Ameteor shower is a celestial event in which a number ofmeteors are observed to radiate, or originate, from one point in thenight sky. These meteors are caused by streams of cosmic debris calledmeteoroids enteringEarth's atmosphere at extremely high speeds on parallel trajectories. Most meteors are smaller than a grain of sand, so almost all of them disintegrate and never hit the Earth's surface. Very intense or unusual meteor showers are known asmeteor outbursts andmeteor storms, which produce at least 1,000 meteors an hour, most notably from theLeonids.[1] The Meteor Data Centre lists over 900 suspected meteor showers of which about 100 are well established.[2] Several organizations point to viewing opportunities on the Internet.[3] NASA maintains a daily map of active meteor showers.[4]
Historical records suggest that Spartan observations of meteor showers occurred as early as 1200 BCE. There are detailed records from ancient archives showing they were observed from China, Japan, and Korea.[5][6] There are multiple chronicles where Medieval Arabs recorded meteor showers, as they regarded them as good omens.[7] A meteor shower in August 1583 was recorded in theTimbuktu manuscripts.[8][9][10] TheLyrids meteor shower is the oldest such event to be continuously recorded, with records in China dating back to 687 BCE.[11]
Diagram from 1872
In 1789,Antoine Lavoisier published the first modern chemistry textbook titled,Traité Élémentaire de Chimie. In it, he speculated that dust rising into the upper atmosphere could be consolidated into lumps of matter by lightning, forming fiery meteors as they plummeted to the ground. At the start of the 19th century, this became one of the most favored hypothesis for the formation on meteors. However, in 1794, German scientistErnst Chladni proposed that meteorites originated in outer space, and as evidence he published a book linking fireballs to iron meteorites. This proposal was initially met with disbelief from some scientists, initially includingAlexander von Humboldt, as it contradictedIsaac Newton's statement that space must be empty for planets to continue along their orbits.[12][5]
In the modern era, the first great meteor storm was theLeonids of November 1833. One estimate is a peak rate of over one hundred thousand meteors an hour,[13] but another, done as the storm abated, estimated more than two hundred thousand meteors during the 9 hours of the storm,[14] over the entire region ofNorth America east of theRocky Mountains. AmericanDenison Olmsted (1791–1859) explained the event most accurately. After spending the last weeks of 1833 collecting information, he presented his findings in January 1834 to theAmerican Journal of Science and Arts, published in January–April 1834,[15] and January 1836.[16] He noted the shower was of short duration and was not seen inEurope, and that the meteors radiated from a point in theconstellation of Leo. He speculated the meteors had originated from a cloud of particles in space.[17] Work continued, yet coming to understand the annual nature of showers though the occurrences of storms perplexed researchers.[18]
The Italian astronomerGiovanni Schiaparelli ascertained the relation between meteors and comets in a series of letters toAngelo Secchi late in 1866. He was able to demonstrate that theLeonid meteor shower shared the same orbit as theComet Tempel.[19][5]Biela's Comet, discovered in 1772 and identified as periodic in 1826, was observed to have two components in 1846. During the 1852 return, both components were fainter and had a greater separation. In 1868,Edmund Weiss determined that the Earth would intersect the orbit of this comet in 1872, and a strong meteor shower was observed at that time. This meteor stream, now referred to as theAndromedids, further established the connection between comets and meteor showers.[20]
In the 1890s, Irish astronomerGeorge Johnstone Stoney (1826–1911) and British astronomerArthur Matthew Weld Downing (1850–1917) were the first to attempt to calculate the position of the dust at Earth's orbit, taking into account thegravitational perturbations of Jupiter. They studied the dust ejected in 1866 by comet55P/Tempel-Tuttle before the anticipated Leonid shower return of 1898 and 1899. Meteor storms were expected, but the final calculations showed that most of the dust would be far inside Earth's orbit. The same results were independently arrived at byAdolf Berberich of theKönigliches Astronomisches Rechen Institut (Royal Astronomical Computation Institute) in Berlin, Germany.[21] Although the absence of meteor storms that season confirmed the calculations, the advance of much better computing tools was needed to arrive at reliable predictions.
In 1981, Donald K. Yeomans of theJet Propulsion Laboratory reviewed the history of meteor showers for the Leonids and the history of the dynamic orbit of Comet Tempel-Tuttle.[22] A graph[23] from it was adapted and re-published inSky and Telescope.[24] It showed relative positions of the Earth and Tempel-Tuttle and marks where Earth encountered dense dust. This showed that the meteoroids are mostly behind and outside the path of the comet, but paths of the Earth through the cloud of particles resulting in powerful storms were very near paths of nearly no activity.
In 1985, E. D. Kondrat'eva and E. A. Reznikov of Kazan State University first correctly identified the years when dust was released which was responsible for several past Leonid meteor storms. In 1995,Peter Jenniskens predicted the 1995Alpha Monocerotids outburst from dust trails.[25] In anticipation of the 1999 Leonid storm,Robert H. McNaught,[26]David Asher,[27] and Finland's Esko Lyytinen were the first to apply this method in the West.[28][29] In 2006 Jenniskens published predictions for future dust trail encounters covering the next 50 years.[30] Jérémie Vaubaillon continues to update predictions based on observations each year for theInstitut de Mécanique Céleste et de Calcul des Éphémérides [fr] (IMCCE).[31]
Because meteor shower particles are all traveling in parallel paths and at the same velocity, they will appear to an observer below to radiate away from a single point in the sky. Thisradiant point is caused by the effect ofperspective, similar to parallel railroad tracks converging at a single vanishing point on the horizon. Meteor showers are normally named after the constellation from which the meteors appear to originate. This "fixed point" slowly moves across the sky during the night due to the Earth turning on its axis, the same reason the stars appear to slowly march across the sky.[32] The radiant also moves slightly from night to night against the background stars (radiant drift) due to the Earth moving in its orbit around the Sun.[33] SeeIMO Meteor Shower Calendar 2017 (International Meteor Organization) for maps of drifting "fixed points".
The geocentric velocity of the meteors can vary considerably between showers. For example, the velocity is around 27 km/s for theTaurids and 71 km/s for the Leonids. (Compare to the Earth's average orbital velocity of29.8 km/s.[34]) Incoming meteors produce a measureablelight curve along their trajectory, which varies in brightness by the rate ofablation.[35] The observed heights for meteor ionization is from70 to 110 km, where the atmosphere is sufficiently dense to heat the projectiles.[36] A typical meteor in a shower has a diameter of5 μm with a density of 2 g cm−3. It starts to melt at a temperature of around1800 K.[37]
As the Earth rotates, the shower rate will be low when the radiant point is near the horizon, then it will rise to at least 50% of maximum when the radiant point reaches analtitude of 30° above the horizon. Optimum viewing is when the radiant point is at an angle of 45°, or half way up the sky, as the meteors are still passing through a thicker column of air. The longer, more prominent trails will then be observed 30–60° away from the radiant point.[38] Most meteor showers improve their visibility after midnight, as the observer's position becomes more oriented toward the direction of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. For this reason, the best viewing time for a meteor shower is generally slightly before dawn — a compromise between the maximum number of meteors available for viewing and the brightening sky, which makes them harder to see.[39]
Meteor showers are named after the nearest constellation, or bright star with a Greek or Roman letter assigned that is close to the radiant position at the peak of the shower, whereby the grammaticaldeclension of the Latinpossessive form is replaced by "id" or "ids."[40] Hence, meteors radiating from near the starDelta Aquarii (declension "-i") are called theDelta Aquariids. TheInternational Astronomical Union's Working Group on Meteor Shower Nomenclature and the IAU's Meteor Data Center keep track of meteor shower nomenclature and which showers are established.[41][42]
Comet Encke's meteoroid trail is the diagonal red glow.Meteoroid trail between fragments ofComet 73P
A meteor shower results from an interaction between a planet, such as Earth, and streams of debris from acomet (or occasionally anasteroid). Comets can produce debris by water vapor drag, as demonstrated byFred Whipple in 1951,[43] and by breakup. Whipple envisioned comets as "dirty snowballs", made up of rock embedded in ice, orbiting theSun. The "ice" may bewater,methane,ammonia, or othervolatiles, alone or in combination. The "rock" may vary in size from a dust mote to a small boulder. Dust mote sized solids areorders of magnitude more common than those the size of sand grains, which, in turn, are similarly more common than those the size of pebbles, and so on. When the ice warms and sublimates, the vapor can drag along dust, sand, and pebbles.
Each time a comet swings by the Sun in itsorbit, some of its ice vaporizes, and a certain number of meteoroids will be shed.[44] The meteoroids spread out along the entire trajectory of the comet to form a meteoroid stream, also known as a "dust trail"[45] (as opposed to a comet's "gas tail" caused by the tiny particles that are quickly blown away by solar radiation pressure).
Recently,Peter Jenniskens has argued that most of our short-period meteor showers are not from the normal water vapor drag of active comets, but the product of infrequent disintegrations, when large chunks break off a mostly dormant comet. Examples are theQuadrantids andGeminids, which originated from a breakup of asteroid-looking objects,(196256) 2003 EH1 and3200 Phaethon, respectively, about 500 and 1000 years ago. The fragments tend to fall apart quickly into dust, sand, and pebbles and spread out along the comet's orbit to form a dense meteoroid stream, which subsequently evolves into Earth's path.[30]
Shortly after Whipple predicted that dust particles traveled at low speeds relative to the comet, Milos Plavec was the first to offer the idea of adust trail, when he calculated how meteoroids, once freed from the comet, would drift mostly in front of or behind the comet after completing one orbit. The effect is simplecelestial mechanics – the material drifts only a little laterally away from the comet while drifting ahead or behind the comet because some particles make a wider orbit than others.[30] These dust trails are sometimes observed in comet images taken at mid infrared wavelengths (heat radiation), where dust particles from the previous return to the Sun are spread along the orbit of the comet.[46]
The gravitational pull of the planets determines where the dust trail would pass by Earth orbit, much like a gardener directing a hose to water a distant plant. Most years, those trails would miss the Earth altogether, but in some years, the Earth is showered by meteors. This effect was first demonstrated from observations of the 1995alpha Monocerotids,[47][48] and from earlier not widely known identifications of past Earth storms.
Over more extended periods, the dust trails can evolve in complicated ways. For example, the orbits of some repeating comets, and meteoroids leaving them, are inresonant orbits withJupiter or one of the other large planets – so many revolutions of one will equal another number of the other. This creates a shower component called a filament.[49]
A second effect is a close encounter with a planet. When the meteoroids pass by Earth, some are accelerated (making wider orbits around the Sun), others are decelerated (making shorter orbits), resulting in gaps in the dust trail in the next return (like opening a curtain, with grains piling up at the beginning and end of the gap). Also, Jupiter's perturbation can dramatically change sections of the dust trail, especially for a short period comets, when the grains approach the giant planet at their furthest point along the orbit around the Sun, moving most slowly. As a result, the trail has aclumping, abraiding or atangling ofcrescents, of each release of material.[citation needed]
The third effect is that ofradiation pressure which will push less massive particles into orbits further from the Sun – while more massive objects (responsible forbolides orfireballs) will tend to be affected less by radiation pressure. This makes some dust trail encounters rich in bright meteors, others rich in faint meteors.[citation needed] Over time, these effects disperse the meteoroids and create a broader stream. The meteors we see from these streams are part ofannual showers, because Earth encounters those streams every year at much the same rate.
When the meteoroids collide with other meteoroids in thezodiacal cloud, they lose their stream association and become part of the "sporadic meteors" background.[citation needed] Long since dispersed from any stream or trail, they form isolated meteors, not a part of any shower. These random meteors will not appear to come from the radiant of the leading shower.
Meteor shower calendar for 2021 shows the peak dates, radiant point, ZHR, and origins of the meteors
The peak rate of a meteor shower is measured by thezenith hourly rate (ZHR), which is the expected number of meteors visible to the naked eye when the radiant point is at thezenith; that is, at the highest point in the night sky. For younger streams that are more clumpy, the rate can vary year to year with peak meteor "storms" occurring with the orbital period of the stream. Some storms have measured hundreds and even thousands of meteors per hour. The showers typically showing the highest ZHR are thePerseids (75/hr),Geminids (75/hr), andQuadrantids (60/hr).[50]
In most years, the most reliable meteor shower is thePerseids, which peak on 12 August of each year at over one meteor per minute.[51] NASA has anestimator tool to calculate how many meteors per hour are visible from one's observing location.
TheLeonid meteor shower peaks around 17 November of each year. In multiples of 33 years, the Leonid shower produces a meteor storm peaking at rates of thousands of meteors per hour.[50]Leonid storms gave birth to the termmeteor shower when it was first realised that, during the November 1833 storm, the meteors radiated from near the star Gamma Leonis.[citation needed] The last Leonid storms were in 1999, 2001 (two), and 2002 (two). Before that, there were storms in 1767, 1799, 1833, 1866, 1867, and 1966.[52] When the Leonid shower is notstorming, it is less active than the Perseids.[50]
Any otherSolar System body with a reasonably transparent atmosphere can also have meteor showers. As the Moon is in the neighborhood of Earth it can experience the same showers, but will have its own phenomena due to its lack of an atmosphereper se, such as vastly increasing itssodium tail.[70] NASA now maintains an ongoing database of observed impacts on the moon[71] maintained by theMarshall Space Flight Center whether from a shower or not.
Many planets and moons have impact craters dating back large spans of time. But new craters, perhaps even related to meteor showers are possible. Mars, and thus its moons, is known to have meteor showers.[72] These have not been observed on other planets as yet but may be presumed to exist. For Mars in particular, although these are different from the ones seen on Earth because of the different orbits of Mars and Earth relative to the orbits of comets. The Martian atmosphere has less than one percent of the density of Earth's at ground level; at their upper edges, where meteoroids strike, the two are more similar. Because of the similar air pressure at altitudes for meteors, the effects are much the same. Only the relatively slower motion of the meteoroids due to increased distance from the sun should marginally decrease meteor brightness. This is somewhat balanced because the slower descent means that Martian meteors have more time to ablate.[73]
On March 7, 2004, the panoramic camera onMars Exploration RoverSpirit recorded a streak which is now believed to have been caused by a meteor from a Martian meteor shower associated with comet114P/Wiseman-Skiff. A strong display from this shower was expected on December 20, 2007. Other showers speculated about are a "Lambda Geminid" shower associated with theEta Aquariids of Earth (i.e., both associated withComet 1P/Halley), a "Beta Canis Major" shower associated withComet 13P/Olbers, and "Draconids" from5335 Damocles.[74]
Isolated massive impacts have been observed at Jupiter: The 1994Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 which formed a brief trail as well, and successive events since then (seeList of Jupiter events.) Meteors or meteor showers have been discussed for most of the objects in the Solar System with an atmosphere: Mercury,[75] Venus,[76] Saturn's moonTitan,[77] Neptune's moonTriton,[78] andPluto.[79]
^abcWilliams, Iwan P.; Murad, Edmond (2002)."Introduction". In Murad, Edmond; Williams, Iwan P. (eds.).Meteors in the Earth's Atmosphere: Meteoroids and Cosmic Dust and Their Interactions with the Earth's Upper Atmosphere. Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-521-80431-8.
^Rada, W. S.; Stephenson, F. R. (March 1992). "A Catalogue of Meteor Showers in Mediaeval Arab Chronicles".Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society.33 (1): 5.Bibcode:1992QJRAS..33....5R.
^Hammer, Joshua (2016).The Bad-Ass Librarians of Timbuktu And Their Race to Save the World's Most Precious Manuscripts. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 26–27.ISBN978-1-4767-7743-6.
^Williams, I. P. (1992). Ferraz-Mello, Sylvio (ed.).The Dynamics of Meteoroid Streams (lecture). Chaos, Resonance, and Collective Dynamical Phenomena in the Solar System: Proceedings of the 152nd Symposium of the International Astronomical Union held in Angra dos Reis, Brazil, 15-19 July, 1991. International Astronomical Union. Symposium. Vol. 152. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 299.Bibcode:1992IAUS..152..299W.
^Lukianova, Renata; et al. (August 2018). "Recognition of Meteor Showers From the Heights of Ionization Trails".Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.123 (8):7067–7076.Bibcode:2018JGRA..123.7067L.doi:10.1029/2018JA025706.
^Jenniskens, P. (1997). "Meteor stream activity IV. Meteor outbursts and the reflex motion of the Sun".Astronomy & Astrophysics.317:953–961.Bibcode:1997A&A...317..953J.
^Jenniskens, P.; et al. (1997). "The detection of a dust trail in the orbit of an Earth-threatening long-period comet".Astrophysical Journal.479 (1):441–447.Bibcode:1997ApJ...479..441J.doi:10.1086/303853.
^Vaubaillon, J. (2004). Triglav-Čekada, M.; Trayner, C. (eds.).What happened with pi-Puppids in April 2003?. Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, Bollmannsruh, Germany, September 19-21, 2003. International Meteor Organization. pp. 140–143.Bibcode:2004pimo.conf..140V.
^Jenniskens, P.; Lyytinen, E. (2005). "Meteor Showers from the Debris of Broken Comets: D/1819 W1 (Blanpain), 2003 WY25, and the Phoenicids".Astronomical Journal.130 (3):1286–1290.Bibcode:2005AJ....130.1286J.doi:10.1086/432469.
^Christou, Apostolos A. (2007). "The P/Halley Stream: Meteor Showers on Earth, Venus and Mars".Earth, Moon, and Planets.102 (1–4):125–131.doi:10.1007/s11038-007-9201-3.S2CID54709255.
^Pesnell, W. Dean; et al. (March 27, 2014)."Watching meteors on Triton"(PDF).Icarus (169):482–491. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2014-03-27. Retrieved2014-03-27.
_(potw2227b).jpg)
.png)
