 | This article or sectionpossibly contains originalsynthesis. Source material shouldverifiably mention andrelate to the main topic. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page.(August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | This articlepossibly containsoriginal research. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(March 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Part ofa series on | ||||
| Masculism | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
.svg) | ||||
Topics and issues
| ||||
By country | ||||
Lists and categories | ||||
Since the 19th century, men have taken part in significant cultural and political responses tofeminism within each "wave" of the movement. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in a range of social relations, generally done through a "strategic leveraging" ofmale privilege. Feminist men have also argued alongside writers likebell hooks, however, thatmen's liberation from the socio-cultural constraints ofsexism andgender roles is a necessary part of feminist activism and scholarship.
Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the majority ofpro-feminist authors emerged fromFrance, includingFrançois Poullain de La Barre,Denis Diderot,Paul Henri Thiry d'Holbach, andCharles Louis de Montesquieu.[1] Montesquieu introduced female characters, like Roxana inPersian Letters, who subverted patriarchal systems, and represented his arguments against despotism. The 18th century saw male philosophers attracted to issues of human rights, and men such as theMarquis de Condorcet championed women's education. Liberals, such as theutilitarianJeremy Bentham, demanded equal rights for women in every sense, as people increasingly came to believe that women were treated unfairly under the law.[2]
In the 1820s,John Neal wrote feminist essays that filled an intellectual gap between female scholars in the 1790s and those surrounding the 1848Seneca Falls Convention.[3] As a male writer insulated from many common forms of attack against female feminist thinkers, Neal's advocacy was crucial in bringing the field back into the mainstream in England and the US.[4] He delivered America's first women's rights lecture in 1832[5] and reached his peak in the field circa 1843,[6] though he continued writing and organizing on feminist issues into the 1870s.[7] The British legal historian, SirHenry Maine, criticized the inevitability of patriarchy in hisAncient Law (1861).[8] In 1866,John Stuart Mill, author ofThe Subjection of Women, presented a women's petition to the British parliament, and supported an amendment to the1867 Reform Bill. Although his efforts focused on the problems of married women, it was an acknowledgment that marriage for Victorian women was predicated upon a sacrifice of liberty, rights, and property. His involvement in the women's movement stemmed from his long-standing friendship withHarriet Taylor, whom he eventually married.
Parker Pillsbury and otherabolitionist men held feminist views and openly identified as feminist, using their influence to promote the rights of women and slaves respectively.[9][10] Pillsbury helped draft the constitution of the feminist American Equal Rights Association in 1865 serving as vice-president of the New Hampshire Woman Suffrage Association. In 1868 and 1869, Parker editedThe Revolution withElizabeth Cady Stanton.[11]
In 1840, women were refused the right to participate at theWorld Anti-Slavery Convention in London. Supporters of the women attending argued that it was hypocritical to forbid women and men from sitting together at this convention to end slavery; they cited similar segregationist arguments in the United States that were used to separate whites and blacks. When women were still denied to join in the proceedings, abolitionistsWilliam Lloyd Garrison,Charles Lenox Remond,Nathaniel Peabody Rogers, andHenry Stanton, all elected to sit silently with the women.[12]
One argument against female participation, both at the World Anti-Slavery Convention, and commonly in the nineteenth century, was the suggestion that women were ill-constituted to assume male responsibilities. AbolitionistThomas Wentworth Higginson argued against this, stating:
I do not see how any woman can avoid a thrill of indignation when she first opens her eyes to the fact that it is really contempt, not reverence, that has so long kept her sex from an equal share of legal, political, and educational rights ... [a woman needs equal rights] not because she is man's better half, but because she is his other half. She needs them, not as an angel, but as a fraction of humanity.[12]
AmericansociologistMichael Kimmel categorized American male responses to feminism at the turn of the twentieth century into three categories: pro-feminist,masculinist, andantifeminist.[13][14] Pro-feminist men, believing that changes would also benefit men, generally welcomed women's increased participation in the public sphere, and changes in the division of labour in the home;[14] in contrast, anti-feminists opposedwomen's suffrage and participation in public life, supporting a traditional patriarchal family model.[14] Finally, themasculinist movement was characterized by men's groups, and developed as an indirect reaction to the perceived femininization of manhood.[14]
The men's liberation movement (MLM) is a social movement which started in the late 1960-70s.[15][circular reference] The MLM stresses the negative portions of traditional masculinity. [reference needed] The MLM and the men's rights movement (MRM) are different. MRM addresses the unequal or unfair treatment of men. MLM promotes liberation for men from stereotypes, such as the idea that men cannot express their feelings and emotions because they are men. Feminist and gender scholars believe that the MLM was created among heterosexual middle-class men to respond to the cultural changes occurring at the time.[16][circular reference]
The MLM began in the early 1970s as consciousness-raising groups to help men free themselves from the limits of sex roles. Proponents of men's liberation argued that male bonding is a mechanism to conform men's identities to a single sense of masculinity, which reinforces patriarchy.[citation needed] In lieu of such bonding, MLM called for the open acknowledgment of the costs of masculinity: men's entrapment in their fixed role as the breadwinner of the nuclear family and the taboo against men expressing emotions.[citation needed]
The link between the biological male sex and the social construction of masculinity was seen by some scholars[17] as a limitation on men's collaboration with the feminist movement. This sharply contrasted with sex role theory, which viewed gender as something determined by biological differences between the sexes.[citation needed] Other key elements of the men's liberation movement were the ideas that genders are relational and each cannot exist without the other, and that gender as a whole is asocial construction and not a biological imperative. Thus, second-wave pro-feminist writers[18] were able to explore the interactions between social practices and institutions, and ideas of gender.
Themen's rights movement was formed in the 1980s as a splinter breaking away from the men's liberation movement, as part of abacklash to feminism.[19][20][21] This group claimed that men's rights were being reduced by feminism, that feminist advances had not been balanced by the elimination of traditional feminine privileges, and that the men should empower themselves by revitalizing their masculinity.[20] This argument was also echoed in religious circles with theMuscular Christianity movement.
The feminist movement is divided on whether or not men can be considered feminists. Male-exclusionary feminists believe that men can not be true feminists because they do not have the experience of living as a woman, such as facing the discrimination and stereotyping that women do.[22] They may also believe that male feminists might have ulterior motives or be insincere ("performative") in their feminism.
As feminist writerShira Tarrant has argued, a number of men have engaged with and contributed to feminist movements throughout the history.[23] Today, academics likeMichael Flood,Michael Messner, andMichael Kimmel are involved withmen's studies andpro-feminism.[12][24][25]
Some feminists, like Simone de Beauvoir in her seminal textThe Second Sex, argue that men cannot be feminists because of the intrinsic differences between the sexes.[26]Separatist feminists also hold this view, arguing that only by rejecting the masculine perspective entirely can feminism allow women to define themselves on their own terms, and that the involvement of men in the feminist movement will inculcate the values ofpatriarchy into any social change. Some writers[27] hold that men do not suffer the same oppression as women, and as such cannot comprehend women's experience, and as such cannot constructively contribute to feminist movements or concepts.[28][29]
.jpg)
Others argue that men's identification with the feminist movement is necessary for furthering the feminist causes. A number of feminist writers maintain that identifying as a feminist is the strongest stand men can take in the struggle against sexism against women. They have argued that men should be allowed, or even encouraged, to participate in the feminist movement.[30][31] For some, the participation of men in the feminist movement is seen as part of a process of the universalization of the feminist movement, necessary for its continued relevance.[32] One challenge of motivating men to participate, or promoting their inclusion, in feminism has been linked to the disconnect between gender and intersecting components of identity. One example of this is that some African American men have been unable to carry over the fundamental principles and lessons of the struggle for civil rights into a meaningful contribution to the struggle to end sexist oppression. However, at a more primary level, the bonds formed in the civil rights movement established valuable solidarity among African American women and men.[33] This is an approach that may be transferable and equally useful to the feminist movement. Making these important connections understood by women and men might greatly benefit feminism. As described in the theory of strategic intersectionality,[34] utilizing the experiences of one part of our identity that intersects with another provides insightful tools to further improve the available tactics of the feminist movement. Other female feminists argue that men cannot be feminists simply because they are not women, cannot understand women's issues, and are collectively members of the class of oppressors against women. They assert that men are granted inherent privileges that prevent them from fundamentally identifying with feminist struggles and thus make it impossible for them to identify with feminists.[35]
One idea supporting men's inclusion as "feminists" is that excluding men from the feminist movement labels it as solely a female task, which could be argued to be sexist in itself. This idea asserts that until men share equal responsibility for struggling to end sexism against women, the feminist movement will reflect the very sexist contradiction it wishes to eradicate.[31] The term "profeminist" occupies the middle ground in this semantic debate, because it offers a degree of closeness to feminism without using the term itself. Also, the prefix "pro" characterizes the term as more proactive and positive. There has been some debate regarding the use of the hyphen (identifying as a "pro-feminist" as opposed to a profeminist), claiming that it distances the term too much from feminism proper.[30]
In 2014, severalhigh-profile events led to the continued presence of feminist issues in the media. These includedBring Back Our Girls,HeForShe campaign, theGamergate controversy,Malala Yousafzai winning the Nobel Peace Prize, and sexual assault allegations being made againstJian Ghomeshi andBill Cosby.
In 2015 Canadian Prime MinisterJustin Trudeau made international headlines for establishing the first gender-balanced cabinet in Canada.[36] In response to a media question asking his reason for doing so, Trudeau said, "Because it's 2015."[37] At theWorld Economic Forum in 2016, Trudeau again made headlines when he spoke about raising his sons to be feminists and urged men not to be afraid of using the word "feminist".[38] A few months later at a United Nations conference, Trudeau said "I'm going to keep saying, loud and clearly, that I am a feminist. Until it is met with a shrug."[39] He explained further what that meant for him:
It shouldn't be something that creates a reaction. It's simply saying that I believe in the equality of men and women and that we still have an awful lot of work to do to get there. That's like saying the sky is blue and the grass is green.
— Justin Trudeau, United Nations conference, March 16th 2016
In October 2014ElleUk created a shirt with the slogan "This Is What a Feminist Looks Like" withThe Fawcett Society. A photo series featuring many A-list stars wearing the shirts was released.[41] Theproduction of the shirts was criticized for being anti-feminist due to sweat-shop labour.[42] In spite of this criticism, the phrase became popular. It was quoted by President Barack Obama in a speech at theUnited State of Women Summit in 2016.[43] In 2017 two photographers, Carey Lynne Fruth and Sophie Spinelle, launched a photo series with subjects holding signs bearing the slogan.[44][45]
Five original stars fromThe Big Bang Theory including four men (Jim Parsons,Johnny Galecki,Kunal Nayyar andSimon Helberg) decided to take a pay cut so that their two female co-stars who joined later could earn a higher wage for seasons 11 and 12. The current wage gap sits at $900,000, with the original cast making one million dollars per episode, whileMayim Bialik andMelissa Rauch earn $100,000 per episode.[46]
Emmy Rossum fromShameless put production of season 8 on hold when she was renegotiating her contract for equal pay as her co-starWilliam H. Macy. She also requested a little more money to make up for the years of work where she was making less.[47] When confronted by TMZ with this reality, William H. Macy responded, "It's about f--king time, don't you think?" and "She works as hard as I do, she deserves everything."[48]
Bradley Cooper responded to his frequent co-starJennifer Lawrence's "Why Do These Dudes Make More Than Me?" essay by vowing to share his salary information with his female co-stars during the preproduction negotiation stage in an effort to reduce the gender gap.[49]
John Legend attended theWomen's March on Main Street Park City in Utah on January 21, 2017.[50] In an interview he revealed that he joined the march to show solidarity with everyone marching all around the world, and to raise awareness on equality to ensure that all the progress that women and people of colour have made over the past century is not diminished under PresidentDonald Trump's administration.[51]
Manymale liberal leaders and politicians took part in the march as well. Among them,Bernie Sanders took the stage at the Vermont Women's March on January 21, 2017. He spoke in support of equal work for equal pay, health care,Planned Parenthood and unifying the country.[52] FormerSecretary of StateJohn Kerry also joined the Women's March inWashington, D.C.[53]
There is also the United Nations' women's solidarity movement forgender equality, which encourages boys and men to become equal partners with women.[54] TheHeForShe campaign aims to enlist everyone to do their part to reimagine a society through gender equality. Since the launch of HeForShe campaign in 2014, UN Women ambassadors alongsideEmma Watson and thousands of men across the globe are committed to the goal of gender equality.[55] Overall,bell hooks concludes that gender issues are not just for women as some men may believe, but it is for everyone. Therefore, the more we work together, the better our society will be. Emma Watson's moving speech at the United Nations about gender equality for the UN's HeForShe campaign demonstrates the first look at the notion "HeForShe".[56]
Masculinity scholars seek to broaden the academic discourse of gender throughmen's studies. While some feminists argue that most academic disciplines, except women's studies, can be considered "men's studies" because they claim that the content of the curriculum consists of primarily male subjects, masculinity scholars[57] assert that men's studies specifically analyzes men's gendered experiences. Central to men's studies is the understanding that "gender" does not mean "female", the same way "race" does not mean "black". Men's studies are typically interdisciplinary, and incorporate the feminist conception that "the personal is political." Masculinity scholars strive to contribute to the existing dialogue about gender created through women's studies.[58]
There are various arguments and movements that support the cause for gender equality as it relates to feminism.Jackson Katz suggests that we have a responsibility to help youths to create a society that will prevent future generations from experiencing the current issues regarding gender equality.[59] Gender studies is often referred to as women's issues. Women's issues are sometimes viewed as issues that men contribute to. Katz argues that women's issues should be men's issues as well. Katz believes that when both genders work together, there is a change that the next generation can use to avoid suffering similar tragedies.[60]
We owe it to young men. These boys didn't make the choice to be a man in a culture that tells them that manhood is a certain way. We, that have a choice, have an opportunity and a responsibility to them.
— Jackson Katz, TEDxFiDiWomen conference, November 2012
 | This article needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2022) |
In 2001, aGallup poll found that 20% of American men considered themselves feminists, with 75% saying they were not.[61] A 2005CBS poll found that 24% of men in the United States claim the term "feminist" is an insult. Four in five men refused to identify themselves as feminist, but when a specific definition is given the number fell to two in five. An increasing number of men said that feminism had improved their lives, in comparison to polls taken in 1983 and 1999, with an unprecedented, but marginal plurality of 47% agreeing. 60% believed that a strong women's movement is no longer needed.[62] However, aYouGov Poll of Britain in 2010 found that only 16% of men described themselves as feminist with 54% stating they were not and 8% specifically claiming to be antifeminist.[63]
In 2001, a qualitative study of men's perception of feminism showed pervasive patterns of binary reasoning. Researchers found that the participants identified two genres of feminism and two strains of feminists, and dubbed it the 'Jekyll and Hyde' binary. The participants would classify feminism and feminists as either "good" or "monstrous".[64] In 2016 the study was repeated by a new team of researchers to find that the binary persisted, as "unreasonable feminism" and "fair feminism".[65]
.svg)
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)If Trudeau had appointed women proportionately based on the pool of MPs, there would be eight female cabinet members, not 15.
| History |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Movements and ideologies |
| ||||||
| Concepts |
| ||||||
| Theory |
| ||||||
| By country |
| ||||||
| Lists |
| ||||||
| Concepts |
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Movements |
| ||||||||||
| People | |||||||||||
| Remembrance days | |||||||||||
| Issues |
| ||||||||||
