Area swept out per unit timeby an object in anelliptical orbit, andby an imaginary object in acircular orbit (with the same orbital period). Both sweep out equal areas in equal times, but the angular rate of sweep varies for the elliptical orbit and is constant for the circular orbit. Shown aremean anomaly andtrue anomaly for two units of time. (Note that for visual simplicity, a non-overlapping circular orbit is diagrammed, thus this circular orbit with same orbital period is not shown in true scale with this elliptical orbit: for scale to be true for the two orbits of equal period, these orbits must intersect.)
Incelestial mechanics, themean anomaly is the fraction of anelliptical orbit's period that has elapsed since the orbiting body passedperiapsis, expressed as anangle which can be used in calculating the position of that body in the classicaltwo-body problem. It is the angular distance from thepericenter which a fictitious body would have if it moved in acircular orbit, with constantspeed, in the sameorbital period as the actual body in its elliptical orbit.[1][2]
DefineT as the time required for a particular body to complete one orbit. In timeT, theradius vector sweeps out 2π radians, or 360°. The average rate of sweep,n, is then
which is called themean angular motion of the body, with dimensions of radians per unit time or degrees per unit time.
Defineτ as the time at which the body is at the pericenter. From the above definitions, a new quantity,M, themean anomaly can be defined
which gives an angular distance from the pericenter at arbitrary timet[3] with dimensions of radians or degrees.
Because the rate of increase,n, is a constant average, the mean anomaly increases uniformly (linearly) from 0 to 2π radians or 0° to 360° during each orbit. It is equal to 0 when the body is at the pericenter,π radians (180°) at theapocenter, and 2π radians (360°) after one complete revolution.[4] If the mean anomaly is known at any given instant, it can be calculated at any later (or prior) instant by simply adding (or subtracting)n⋅δt whereδt represents the small time difference.
Mean anomaly does not measure an angle between any physical objects (except at pericenter or apocenter, or for a circular orbit). It is simply a convenient uniform measure of how far around its orbit a body has progressed since pericenter. The mean anomaly is one of three angular parameters (known historically as "anomalies") that define a position along an orbit, the other two being theeccentric anomaly and thetrue anomaly.
Themean anomaly at epoch,M0, is defined as the instantaneous mean anomaly at a givenepoch,t0. This value is sometimes provided with other orbital elements to enable calculations of the object's past and future positions along the orbit. The epoch for whichM0 is defined is often determined by convention in a given field or discipline. For example, planetary ephemerides often defineM0 for the epochJ2000, while for earth orbiting objects described by atwo-line element set the epoch is specified as a date in the first line.[5]
whereM0 is the mean anomaly at the epocht0, which may or may not coincide withτ, the time of pericenter passage. The classical method of finding the position of an object in an elliptical orbit from a set of orbital elements is to calculate the mean anomaly by this equation, and then to solve Kepler's equation for the eccentric anomaly.
Defineϖ as thelongitude of the pericenter, the angular distance of the pericenter from a reference direction. Defineℓ as themean longitude, the angular distance of the body from the same reference direction, assuming it moves with uniform angular motion as with the mean anomaly. Thus mean anomaly is also[6]
whereμ is thegravitational parameter, which varies with the masses of the objects, anda is thesemi-major axis of the orbit. Mean anomaly can then be expanded,
and here mean anomaly represents uniform angular motion on a circle of radiusa.[7]
Mean anomaly can be calculated from the eccentricity and thetrue anomalyv by finding the eccentric anomaly and then using Kepler's equation. This gives, in radians:whereatan2(y, x) is the angle from the x-axis of the ray from (0, 0) to (x, y), having the same sign as y.
For parabolic and hyperbolic trajectories the mean anomaly is not defined, because they don't have a period. But in those cases, as with elliptical orbits, the area swept out by a chord between the attractor and the object following the trajectory increases linearly with time. For the hyperbolic case, there is a formula similar to the above giving the elapsed time as a function of the angle (the true anomaly in the elliptic case), as explained in the articleKepler orbit. For the parabolic case there is a different formula, the limiting case for either the elliptic or the hyperbolic case as the distance between the foci goes to infinity – seeParabolic trajectory#Barker's equation.
^Vallado, David A. (2001).Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications (2nd ed.). El Segundo, California: Microcosm Press. pp. 53–54.ISBN1-881883-12-4.
^Smart, W. M. (1953).Celestial Mechanics. London, UK: Longmans, Green, and Co. p. 38.
^Roy, A. E. (1988).Orbital Motion (1st ed.). Bristol, UK; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: A. Hilger.ISBN0852743602.
^Brouwer, Dirk (1961).Methods of celestial mechanics. Elsevier. pp. e.g. 77.