 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Mazda Wankel engine" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(January 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Wankel rotary engines | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Overview | |
| Manufacturer | Mazda |
| Also called | "RENESIS" (RX-8 engine) |
| Production | 1967[1]–present |
| Layout | |
| Configuration | Wankel engine |
| Displacement | 0.4L 360 cc (22 cu in) 0.8L 798 cc (48.7 cu in) 1.0L 982 cc (59.9 cu in) 1.1L 1,146 cc (69.9 cu in) 1.3L 1,308 cc (79.8 cu in) 2.0L 1,962 cc (119.7 cu in) 2.6L 2,616 cc (159.6 cu in) |
| Combustion | |
| Turbocharger | 1982 & up |
| Fuel system | Carbureted orfuel injected |
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Oil system | Wet sump |
| Output | |
| Power output | 100–900 hp (75–671 kW)[2][3] |
| Torque output | 20–200 lb⋅ft (27–271 N⋅m)[4][5][6] |
| Dimensions | |
| Dry weight | 347 lb (157 kg) |
TheMazda Wankel engines are a family ofWankelrotary combustion car engines produced byMazda.[7]
Wankel engines were invented in 1950s byFelix Wankel, a German engineer. Over the years,displacement has been increased andturbocharging has been added. Mazda rotary engines have a reputation for being relatively small and powerful at the expense of poorfuel efficiency. The engines became popular withkit car builders,hot rodders and inlight aircraft because of their light weight, compact size, tuning potential and inherently highpower-to-weight ratio—as is true for all Wankel-type engines.
Since the end of production of theMazda RX-8 in 2012, the engine was produced only forsingle seater racing, with the one-makeStar Mazda Championship being contested with a Wankel engine until 2017; the series' transition to using a Mazda-branded piston engine in 2018 temporarily ended the production of the engine. In 2023, Mazda reintroduced the engine as a generator for the 2023MX-30 e-Skyactiv R-EVplug-in hybrid.
Wankel engines can be classified by their geometric size in terms of radius (rotor center to tip distance, also the median stator radius) and depth (rotor thickness), and offset (crank throw, eccentricity, also 1/4 the difference between stator's major and minor axes). These metrics function similarly to thebore and stroke measurements of apiston engine. The displacement of rotor can be calculated as
Note that this only counts a single face of each rotor as the entire rotor's displacement, because with the eccentric shaft – crankshaft – spinning at three times the rate of the rotor,only one power stroke is created per output revolution, thus only one face of the rotor is actually working per "crankshaft" revolution, roughly equivalent to a 2-stroke engine of similar displacement to a single rotor face. Nearly allMazda production Wankel engines share a single rotor radius, 105 mm (4.1 in), with a 15 mm (0.59 in)crankshaft offset. The only engine to diverge from this formula was the rare13A, which used a 120 mm (4.7 in) rotor radius and 17.5 mm (0.69 in) crankshaft offsetoffset, and 8C which is based on 13A but with a larger 76 mm depth.
As Wankel engines became commonplace inmotorsport, the problem of correctly representing their displacement for the purposes of competition arose. Rather than force participants who drove vehicles with piston engines, who were the majority, to halve their quoted displacement, most racing organizations decided to double the quoted displacement of Wankel engines.
The key for comparing the displacement between the 4-cycle engine and the rotary engine is in studying the number of rotations for a thermodynamic cycle to occur. For a 4-cycle engine to complete a thermodynamic cycle, the engine must rotate two complete revolutions of the crankshaft, or 720°. By contrast, in a Wankel engine, the engine rotor rotates at one-third the speed of the crankshaft. Each rotation of the engine (360°) will bring two faces through the combustion cycle (the torque input to the eccentric shaft). This said, it takes three complete revolutions of the crankshaft, or 1080°, to complete the entire thermodynamic cycle. To get a relatable number to compare to a 4-stroke engine, compare the events that occur in two rotations of a two-rotor engine. For every 360° of rotation, two faces of the engine complete a combustion cycle. Thus, for two whole rotations, four faces will complete their cycle. If the displacement per face is 654 cc (39.9 cu in), then four faces can be seen as equivalent to 2.6 L or 160 cu in.
Extrapolating to the case of where three whole rotations is a complete thermodynamic cycle of the engine with a total of six faces completing a cycle, 654 cc (39.9 cu in) per face for six faces yields 3.9 L or 240 cu in.[9]
Mazda's first prototype Wankel was the40A, a single-rotor engine very much like theNSU KKM400. Although never produced in volume, the 40A was a valuable testbed for Mazda engineers, and quickly demonstrated two serious challenges to the feasibility of the design: "chatter marks" in the housing, and heavy oil consumption. The chatter marks, nicknamed "devil's fingernails", were caused by the tip-seal vibrating at its natural frequency. The oil consumption problem was addressed with heat-resistant rubber oil seals at the sides of the rotors. This early engine had a rotor radius of 90 mm (3.5 in), an offset of 14 mm (0.55 in), and a depth of 59 mm (2.3 in).
The very firstMazda Cosmo prototype used a 798 cc (48.7 cu in)L8A two-rotor Wankel. The engine and car were both shown at the 1963Tokyo Motor Show. Hollow cast iron apex seals reduced vibration by changing their resonance frequency and thus eliminated chatter marks. It useddry-sump lubrication. Rotor radius was up from the 40A to 98 mm (3.9 in), but depth dropped to 56 mm (2.2 in).
One-, three-, and four-rotor derivatives of the L8A were also created for experimentation.
The10A series was Mazda's first production Wankel, appearing in 1965. It was a two-rotor design, with each chamber displacing 491 cc (30.0 cu in) so two chambers (one per rotor) would displace 982 cc (59.9 cu in); the series name reflects this value ("10" suggesting 1.0 litres). These engines featured the mainstream rotor dimensions with a 60 mm (2.4 in) depth.
The rotor housing was made of sand-cast aluminium plated with chrome, while the aluminium sides were sprayed with molten carbon steel for strength. Cast iron was used for the rotors themselves, and their eccentric shafts were of expensive chrome-molybdenum steel. The addition of aluminium/carbon apex seals addressed the chatter mark problem.
The first 10A engine was the0810, used in theSeries ICosmo from May 1965 to July 1968. These cars, and their revolutionary engine, were often calledL10A models. Gross output was 110 hp (82 kW) at 7000 rpm and 130 N⋅m (96 lbf⋅ft) at 3500 rpm, but both numbers were probably optimistic (rpm of the crankshaft).
The 10A featured twin side intake ports per rotor, each fed by one of fourcarburetor barrels. Only one port per rotor was used under low loads for added fuel economy. A single peripheral exhaust port routed hot gas through the coolest parts of the housing, and engine coolant flowed axially rather than the radial flow used by NSU. A bit of oil was mixed with the intake charge for lubrication.
The 0810 was modified for the racingCosmos used atNürburgring. These engines had both side- and peripheral-located intake ports switched with a butterfly valve for low- and high-RPM use (respectively)
Applications:
The improved0813 engine appeared in July 1968 in theSeries II/L10BCosmo. Its construction was very similar to the0810.
Japanese-spec gross output was 100 hp (75 kW) at 7000 rpm and 133 N⋅m (98 lbf⋅ft) at 3500 rpm. The use of less-expensive components increased the mass of the engine from 102 to 122 kg (225 to 269 lb).
Applications:
The final member of the 10A family was the 19710866. This variant featured a cast-iron thermal reactor to reduce exhaust emissions and re-tuned exhaust ports. The new approach to reducing emissions was partly a result of Japanese Government emission control legislation in 1968, with implementation starting in 1975. Mazda called their technology REAPS (RotaryEngineAntiPollutionSystem). The die-cast rotor housing was now coated with a new process: The new Transplant Coating Process (TCP) featured sprayed-on steel which is then coated with chrome. Gross output was 105 hp (78 kW) at 7000 rpm and 135 N⋅m (100 lbf⋅ft) at 3500 rpm.
Applications:
Mazda began development on a single rotor engine displacing 360 cc (22 cu in), and was designed forkei car use in the upcomingMazda Chantez but was never placed into production. It was a slimmed down derivative of the 10A engine as fitted to the R100.[10] A prototype engine is on display at the Mazda Museum inHiroshima, Japan.[11]
The13A was designed especially forfront-wheel drive applications. It was a two-rotor design, with each chamber displacing 655 cc (40.0 cu in) so two chambers (one per rotor) would displace 1,310 cc (80 cu in); continuing earlier practice, the series name reflects this value ("13" suggesting 1.3 litres). This was the only production Mazda Wankel with different rotor dimensions: Radius was 120 mm (4.7 in) and offset was 17.5 mm (0.69 in), but depth remained the same as the10A at 60 mm (2.4 in). Another major difference from the previous engines was the integrated water-cooled oil cooler.
The 13A was used only in the 1969–1972R130 Luce, where it produced 126 PS (93 kW) and 172 N⋅m (127 lbf⋅ft). The next Luce wasrear-wheel drive and Mazda would not make a front-wheel drive rotary vehicle until the development of the8C for use in the 2021Mazda MX-30, which is used to power an electric motor spinning the front axle.
Applications:
The12A is an "elongated" version of the 10A: the rotor radius was the same, but the depth was increased by 10 mm (0.39 in) to 70 mm (2.8 in). It continued the two-rotor design; with the depth increase each chamber displaced 573 cc (35.0 cu in) so two chambers (one per rotor) would displace 1,146 cc (69.9 cu in). The 12A series was produced for 15 years, from May 1970 through 1985. In 1974, a 12A became the first engine built outside of western Europe or the U.S. to finish the24 hours of Le Mans (and in 1991 Mazda won the race outright with the 4-rotor R26B engine).
In 1974, a new process was used to harden the rotor housing. The Sheet-metal Insert Process (SIP) used a sheet of steel much like a conventional piston engine cylinder liner with a chrome plated surface. The side housing coating was also changed to eliminate the troublesome sprayed metal. The new "REST" process created such a strong housing, the old carbon seals could be abandoned in favour of conventional cast iron.
Early 12A engines also feature a thermal reactor, similar to the 0866 10A, and some use an exhaust port insert to reduce exhaust noise. Alean-burn version was introduced in 1979 (in Japan) and 1980 (in America) which substituted a more-conventionalcatalytic converter for this "afterburner". A major modification of the 12A architecture was the6PI which featured variable induction ports.
Applications:
The ultimate 12A engine was the electronically fuel-injected engine used in the Japan-spec HB seriesCosmo,Luce,[12] and SA seriesRX-7.[13] In 1982 a 12A turbo powered Cosmo coupe was officially the fastest production car in Japan. It featured "semi-direct injection" into both rotors at once. A passive knock sensor was used to eliminateknocking, and later models featured a specially designed smaller and lighter "Impact Turbo" which was tweaked for the unique exhaust signature of the Wankel engine for a 5-horsepower increase.[13] The engine continued until 1989 in the HB Cosmo series but by that stage it had grown a reputation as a thirsty engine.
Applications:
The12B was an improved version of the12A and was quietly introduced for the 1974 Mazda RX-2 and RX-3. It had increased reliability from the previous series and also used a single distributor for the first time: the earlier 12A and 10A were both twin distributor engines.
Applications:
The13B is the most widely produced rotary engine. It was the basis for all future Mazda Wankel engines, and was produced for over 30 years. The 13B has no relation to the 13A. Instead, it is a lengthened version of the 12A, having 80 mm (3.1 in) thick rotors. It was a two-rotor design, with each chamber displacing 654 cc (39.9 cu in) so two chambers (one per rotor) would displace 1.3 L (1,308 cc); the series name reflects this value ("13" suggesting 1.3 litres), as with the 13A of the same displacement but different proportions.
In the United States, the 13B was available from 1974 to 1978 and was then retired from sedans but continued in 1984–1985 RX-7 GSL-SE. It was then used from 1985 to 1992 in the RX-7 FC, in Naturally Aspirated or Turbocharged options, then once again in the RX-7 FD in a twin turbocharged form from 1992. It disappeared from the US market again in 1995, when the last US-spec RX-7s were sold. The engine was continually used in Japan from 1972'sMazda Luce/RX-4 through 2002's RX-7.
The 13B was designed with both high performance and low emissions in mind. Early vehicles using this engine used theAP name.
Applications:
A tunedintake manifold was used in a Wankel engine for the first time with the13B-RESI. RESI = Rotary Engine Super Injection. The so-called Dynamic Effect Intake featured a two-level intake box which derived asupercharger-like effect from theHelmholtz resonance of the opening and closing intake ports. The RESI engine also featuredBoschL-Jetronicfuel injection. Output was much improved at 135 PS (99 kW) and 180 N⋅m (133 lbf⋅ft).
Applications:
Like the 12A-SIP, the second-generation RX-7 bowed with a variable-intake system. DubbedDEI, the engine features both the 6PI and DEI systems, as well as four-injectorelectronic fuel injection. Total output is up to 146 PS (107 kW) at 6500 rpm and 187 N⋅m (138 lbf⋅ft) at 3500 rpm.
The 13B-T was turbocharged in 1986. It features the newer four-injector fuel injection of the 6PI engine, but lacks that engine's eponymous variable intake system and 6PI. Mazda went back to the 4 port intake design similar to what was used in the '74–'78 13B. In '86–'88 engines thetwin-scroll turbocharger is fed using a two-stage mechanically actuated valve, however, on '89–'91 engines a better turbo design was used with a divided manifold powering the twin-scroll configuration. For engines manufactured between '86-'88 output is rated at 185 PS (136 kW) at 6500 rpm and 248 N⋅m (183 lbf⋅ft) at 3500 rpm.
Applications:
The 13B-RE from the JC Cosmo series was a similar motor to the 13B-REW but had a few key differences, namely it being endowed with the largest side ports of any later model rotary engine.
Injector sizes = 550 cc (34 cu in) PRI + SEC.
Approximately 5000 13B-RE optioned JC Cosmos were sold, making this engine almost as hard to source as its rarer 20B-REW big-brother.
Applications:
Asequentially-turbocharged version of the 13B, the13B-REW, became famous for its high output and low weight. The turbos were operated sequentially, with only the primary providing boost until 4,500 rpm, and the secondary additionally coming online afterwards. Notably, this was the world's first volume-production sequential turbocharger system.[15] Output eventually reached, and may have exceeded, Japan's unofficial maximum of 280 PS (206 kW; 276 hp)DIN for the final revision used in the Series 8 Mazda RX-7.
Applications:
InLe Mans racing, the first three-rotor engine used in the757 was named the13G.
The main difference between the 13G and 20B is that the 13G uses a factory peripheral intake port (used for racing) and the 20B (production vehicle) uses side intake ports.
It was renamed20B after Mazda's naming convention for the767 in November 1987. As a three-rotor design, with each chamber displacing 654 cc (39.9 cu in), three chambers (one per rotor) would displace 1,962 cc (119.7 cu in), and so the new series name reflected this value ("20" suggesting 2.0 litres).
The three-rotor20B-REW was only used in the 1990-1995Eunos Cosmo. It was offered in both13B-RE and 20B-REW form. It displaced 1,962 cc (119.7 cu in) per set of three 654 cc (39.9 cu in) chambers (counting only one chamber per rotor) and used 0.7 bar (10 psi; 70 kPa) of boost pressure from twin sequential turbochargers to produce a claimed 280 PS (206 kW) and 407 N⋅m (300 lbf⋅ft).
A version of the 20B known as the "R20B Renesis 3 Rotor Engine" was built by Racing Beat in the US for theFurai concept car which was released on 27 December 2007.[16] The engine was tuned to run powerfully on 100% ethanol (E100) fuel, produced in partnership with BP.[17] During aTop Gear photo shoot in 2008, a fire in the engine bay combined with a delay to inform the fire crews, the car was engulfed and the entire car destroyed. This information was withheld until made public in 2013.[18][19]
The first Mazda racing four-rotor engine was the13J-M used in the 1988 and 1989 (13J-MM with two step induction pipe)767Le Mans Group C racers.[20] In Group C and GTP this engine was replaced by the R26B, but continued to serve on in various Mazda supported entries in other championships around the world. These championships included, but were not limited to IMSA's GTO and WSC Classes, and the Wesbank Modified Saloon Series.
The most prominent 4-rotor engine from Mazda, the R26B, was used only in various Mazda-builtsports prototype cars including the787B and theRX-792P in replacement of the older13J. In1991 the R26B-powered Mazda 787B became the first Japanese car and the first car with anything other than a reciprocating piston engine to win the24 Hours of Le Mans race outright. The R26B engine displaced 2.6 L (2,616 cc) per set of four chambers (counting only one 654 cc (39.9 cu in) chamber for each of the four rotors) – thus the "26" in the series name suggesting 2.6 litres – and developed 700 hp (522 kW) at 9000 rpm.[21][22] The engine design uses peripheral intake ports, continually variable geometry intakes, and an additional (third) spark plug per rotor.[23][24][25]
The Renesis engine – also 13B-MSP (Multi-Side Port) – which first appeared in production in the 2004 model-yearMazda RX-8, is an evolution of the previous 13B. It was designed to reduce exhaust emission and improvefuel economy, which were two of the most recurrent drawbacks of Wankel rotary engines. It is naturally aspirated, unlike its most recent predecessors from the 13B range, and therefore slightly less powerful thanMazda RX-7's twin-turbocharged 13B-REW which develops 255–280 hp (190–209 kW).
The Renesis design features two major changes from its predecessors. First, the exhaust ports are not peripheral but are located on the side of the housing, which eliminates overlap and allows redesign of the intake port area. This produced noticeably more power thanks to an increased effective compression ratio; however, Mazda engineers discovered that when changing the exhaust port to the side housing, a buildup of carbon in the exhaust port would stop the engine from running. To remedy this, Mazda engineers added a water jacket passage into the side housing. Secondly, the rotors are sealed differently through the use of redesigned side seals, low-height apex seals and the addition of a second cut-off ring. Mazda engineers had originally used apex seals identical to the older design of seal. Mazda changed the apex seal design to reduce friction and push the new engine closer to its limits.
These and other innovative technologies allow the Renesis to achieve 49% higher output and reduced fuel consumption and emissions. Regarding hydrocarbon (HC) emission characteristics of the RENESIS, the use of the side exhaust port allowed for about 35 – 50% HC reduction compared to the 13B-REW with the peripheral exhaust port. With this reduction, the RENESIS vehicle meets USA LEV-II (LEV).[26] The Renesis wonInternational Engine of the Year and Best New Engine awards 2003[27] and also holds the "2.5 to 3 liter" (note that the engine is designated as a 1.3–litre by Mazda) size award[28] for 2003 and 2004, where it is considered a 2.6 L engine, but only for the matter of giving awards.[29][30] This is because although a 2-rotor wankel with 654 cc (39.9 cu in) chambers displaces the same volume in one output shaft rotation as that of a 1.3L four-stroke piston engine, the wankel will complete 2 full combustion cycles in the same amount of time that it takes the four-stroke piston engine to complete 1 combustion cycle. Finally, it was on theWard's 10 Best Engines list for 2004 and 2005.
The Renesis has also been adapted for a dual-fuel use, allowing it to run on petrol or hydrogen in cars like theMazda Premacy Hydrogen RE Hybrid andMazda RX-8 Hydrogen RE.[31][32]
All the Mazda rotary engines have been praised because of their light weight. The unmodified 13B-MSP Renesis Engine has a weight of 112 kg (247 lb), including all standard attachments (except the airbox, alternator, starter motor, cover, etc.), but without engine fluids (such as coolant, oil, etc.), known to make 157–175 kW (211–235 hp).
Also known as the Renesis II, made its first and only appearance in theMazda Taikiconcept car at the 2007 Tokyo Auto Show, but has not been seen since. It features up to 300 hp (224 kW), a lengthened stroke, reduced width rotor housing, direct injection, and aluminium side housings.[33]
The 8C engine is used as a generator for the 2023MX-30 e-Skyactiv R-EV plug-in hybrid.
The 8C is a single rotor with a radius of 120mm, a depth of 76mm, an eccentric offset of 17.5mm, using 2.5mm apex seals, and displacing 830cc making up to 75 hp (55 kW) at 4700rpm and 116 Nm (85 lb-ft) at 4000 rpm.[34] It has a higher compression ratio of 11.9:1 and the first instance ofGasoline direct injection in a production rotary engine, which improves fuel economy by as much as 25%.[35]
Various other technologies have been integrated to increase the efficiency of the engine further, including exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) to reduce the combustion chamber temperatures and plasma spray coatings on the insides of the housings to reduce the friction on the rotor.[34]
Changes have also been made to decrease the weight of the unit such as using aluminium side housings, which saved 15 kg (33 lb).[35]
Mazda was fully committed to the Wankel engine just as theenergy crisis of the 1970s struck. The company had all but eliminated piston engines from its products in 1974, a decision that nearly led to the company's collapse. A switch to a three-prong approach (piston-gasoline, piston-Diesel, and Wankel) for the 1980s relegated the Wankel tosports car use (in theRX-7 andCosmo), severely limiting production volume. But the company had continued production continually since the mid-1960s, and was the only maker of Wankel-powered cars when theRX-8 was discontinued from production in June 2012 with 2000 RX-8 Spirit R models being made for the JDM (RHD) market.
Though not reflected in the graph at right, the RX-8 was a higher-volume car than its predecessors. Sales of the RX-8 peaked in 2004 at 23,690, but continued to decline through 2011, when fewer than 1,000 were produced.[36]
Currently, the engine is produced for SCCAFormula Mazda, and its professionalIndy Racing League LLC dba INDYCAR sanctionedPro Mazda Championship.
Mazda last built a production street car powered by a rotary engine in 2012, the RX-8, but had to abandon it largely to poor fuel efficiency and emissions. It has continued to work on the technology, however, as it is one of the company's signature features. Mazda officials have said that if they could get it to perform as well as a reciprocating engine they would bring it back, to power a conventional sports car.[37]
In November 2011, Mazda CEOTakashi Yamanouchi announced that the company was still committed to producing the rotary engine.[38]
In November 2016, senior managing executive officer of Mazda research and development Kiyoshi Fujiwara told journalists at the Los Angeles motor show that the company would launch its first EV in 2019, and that it was likely to incorporate a rotary engine, but that the details were still "a big secret." He did say, however, that the car is likely to use a new-generation rotary engine as a range extender, similar in concept to aBMW i3. In 2013, Mazda had displayed a Mazda2 RE prototype car, using a similar rotary range extender EV system.[39]
In October 2017, Fujiwara told journalists that they were still working on a rotary engine for a sports car, that would potentially in some markets have hybrid drivetrains, but both would have different powertrains from Mazda's first EV, to be released in 2019/20. "...some cities will ban combustion, therefore we need some additional portion of electrification because the driver can't use this rotary sports car. Some of the regions we don't need this small electrification, therefore we can utilise pure rotary engines."[40]
In 2021, Mazda announced that the upcomingplug-in hybrid variant of theMX-30 would use a new rotary engine acting as a range extender to recharge the batteries, but not to power the wheels.[41]
