Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Mathematics of paper folding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Map folding for a 2×2 grid of squares: there are eight different ways to fold such a map along its creases

The discipline oforigami or paper folding has received a considerable amount ofmathematical study. Fields of interest include a given paper model's flat-foldability (whether the model can be flattened without damaging it), and the use of paper folds to solvemathematical equations up to the third order.[1]

Computational origami is a recent branch ofcomputer science that is concerned with studying algorithms that solve paper-folding problems. The field of computational origami has also grown significantly since its inception in the 1990s withRobert Lang's TreeMaker algorithm to assist in the precise folding of bases.[2] Computational origami results either address origami design or origami foldability.[3] In origami design problems, the goal is to design an object that can be folded out of paper given a specific target configuration. In origami foldability problems, the goal is to fold something using the creases of an initial configuration. Results in origami design problems have been more accessible than in origami foldability problems.[3]

History

[edit]
See also:History of origami

In 1893, Indiancivil servant T. Sundara Row publishedGeometric Exercises in Paper Folding which used paper folding to demonstrate proofs of geometrical constructions. This work was inspired by the use of origami in thekindergarten system. Row demonstrated an approximate trisection of angles and implied that the construction of a cube root was impossible.[4]

In 1922,Harry Houdini published "Houdini's Paper Magic," which described origami techniques that drew informally from mathematical approaches that were later formalized.[5]

The Beloch fold

In 1936Margharita P. Beloch showed that use of the 'Beloch fold', later used in the sixth of theHuzita–Hatori axioms, allowed the generalcubic equation to be solved using origami.[1]

In 1949, R C Yeates' book "Geometric Methods" described three allowed constructions corresponding to the first, second, and fifth of the Huzita–Hatori axioms.[6][7]

TheYoshizawa–Randlett system of instruction by diagram was introduced in 1961.[8]

Crease pattern for a Miura fold. The parallelograms of this example have 84° and 96° angles.

In 1980 a construction was reported which enabled an angle to be trisected. Trisections are impossible under Euclidean rules.[9]

Also in 1980,Kōryō Miura and Masamori Sakamaki demonstrated a novel map-folding technique whereby the folds are made in a prescribed parallelogram pattern, which allows the map to be expandable without any right-angle folds in the conventional manner. Their pattern allows the fold lines to be interdependent, and hence the map can be unpacked in one motion by pulling on its opposite ends, and likewise folded by pushing the two ends together. No unduly complicated series of movements are required, and foldedMiura-ori can be packed into a very compact shape.[10] In 1985 Miura reported a method of packaging and deployment of large membranes in outer space,[11] and as early as 2012 this technique had been applied tosolar panels on spacecraft.[12][13]

A diagram showing the first and last step of how origami can double the cube

In 1986, Messer reported a construction by which one coulddouble the cube, which is impossible with Euclidean constructions.[14]

The first complete statement of the seven axioms of origami by French folder and mathematicianJacques Justin was written in 1986, but were overlooked until the first six were rediscovered byHumiaki Huzita in 1989.[15] The first International Meeting of Origami Science and Technology (now known as the International Conference on Origami in Science, Math, and Education) was held in 1989 in Ferrara, Italy. At this meeting, a construction was given by Scimemi for theregular heptagon.[16]

Around 1990,Robert J. Lang and others first attempted to write computer code that would solve origami problems.[17]

Mountain-valley counting

In 1996,Marshall Bern andBarry Hayes showed that the problem of assigning a crease pattern of mountain and valley folds in order to produce a flat origami structure starting from a flat sheet of paper isNP-complete.[18]

In 1999, a theorem due to Haga provided constructions used to divide the side of a square into rational fractions.[19][20]

In 2002,sarah-marie belcastro andTom Hull brought to the theoretical origami the language ofaffine transformations, with an extension fromR{\displaystyle R}2 toR{\displaystyle R}3 in only the case of single-vertex construction.[21]

In 2002, Alperin solvedAlhazen's problem of spherical optics.[22] In the same paper, Alperin showed a construction for a regular heptagon.[22] In 2004, was proven algorithmically the fold pattern for a regular heptagon.[23] Bisections and trisections were used by Alperin in 2005 for the same construction.[24]

In 2005, principles and concepts from mathematical and computational origami were applied to solveCountdown, a game popularized in British television in which competitors used a list of source numbers to build an arithmetic expression as close to the target number as possible.[25]

In 2009, Alperin and Lang extended the theoretical origami to rational equations of arbitrary degree, with the concept of manifold creases.[26][27] This work was a formal extension of Lang's unpublished 2004 demonstration of angle quintisection.[27][28]

Pure origami

[edit]

Flat folding

[edit]
Two-colorability
Angles around a vertex

The construction of origami models is sometimes shown as crease patterns. The major question about such crease patterns is whether a given crease pattern can be folded to a flat model, and if so, how to fold them; this is anNP-complete problem.[29] Related problems when the creases are orthogonal are calledmap folding problems. There are three mathematical rules for producing flat-foldable origamicrease patterns:[30]

  1. Maekawa's theorem: at any vertex the number of valley and mountain folds always differ by two.
    It follows from this that every vertex has an even number of creases, and therefore also the regions between the creases can be colored with two colors.
  2. Kawasaki's theorem or Kawasaki-Justin theorem: at any vertex, the sum of all the odd angles (see image) adds up to 180 degrees, as do the even.
  3. A sheet can never penetrate a fold.

Paper exhibits zeroGaussian curvature at all points on its surface, and only folds naturally along lines of zero curvature. Curved surfaces that can't be flattened can be produced using a non-folded crease in the paper, as is easily done with wet paper or a fingernail.

Assigning a crease pattern mountain and valley folds in order to produce a flat model has been proven byMarshall Bern andBarry Hayes to beNP-complete.[18] Further references and technical results are discussed in Part II ofGeometric Folding Algorithms.[31]

Huzita–Justin axioms

[edit]
Main article:Huzita–Hatori axioms

Someclassical construction problems of geometry — namelytrisecting an arbitrary angle ordoubling the cube — are proven to be unsolvable usingcompass and straightedge, but can be solved using only a few paper folds.[32] Paper fold strips can be constructed to solve equations up to degree 4. The Huzita–Justin axioms or Huzita–Hatori axioms are an important contribution to this field of study. These describe what can be constructed using a sequence of creases with at most two point or line alignments at once. Complete methods for solving all equations up to degree 4 by applying methods satisfying these axioms are discussed in detail inGeometric Origami.[33]

Constructions

[edit]

As a result of origami study through the application of geometric principles, methods such as Haga's theorem have allowed paperfolders to accurately fold the side of a square into thirds, fifths, sevenths, and ninths. Other theorems and methods have allowed paperfolders to get other shapes from a square, such as equilateraltriangles,pentagons,hexagons, and special rectangles such as thegolden rectangle and thesilver rectangle. Methods for folding most regular polygons up to and including the regular19-gon [de] have been developed.[33] A regularn-gon can be constructed by paper foldingif and only ifn is a product of distinctPierpont primes,powers of two, andpowers of three.

Haga's theorems

[edit]
BQ is always rational if AP is.

The side of a square can be divided at an arbitrary rational fraction in a variety of ways. Haga's theorems say that a particular set of constructions can be used for such divisions.[19][20] Surprisingly few folds are necessary to generate large odd fractions. For instance15 can be generated with three folds; first halve a side, then use Haga's theorem twice to produce first23 and then15.

The accompanying diagram shows Haga's first theorem:

BQ=2AP1+AP.{\displaystyle BQ={\frac {2AP}{1+AP}}.}

The function changing the lengthAP toQC isself inverse. Letx beAP then a number of other lengths are also rational functions ofx. For example:

Haga's first theorem
APBQQCARPQ
x{\displaystyle x}2x1+x{\displaystyle {\frac {2x}{1+x}}}1x1+x{\displaystyle {\frac {1-x}{1+x}}}1x22{\displaystyle {\frac {1-x^{2}}{2}}}1+x21+x{\displaystyle {\frac {1+x^{2}}{1+x}}}
1223133856
1312124956
2345155181315
15132312251315

A generalization of Haga's theorems

[edit]

Haga's theorems are generalized as follows:

BQCQ=2APBP.{\displaystyle {\frac {BQ}{CQ}}={\frac {2AP}{BP}}.}

Therefore, BQ:CQ=k:1 implies AP:BP=k:2 for a positive real number k.Also,

Each side is 1PB=1AP{\displaystyle PB=1-AP}AP=1/2{\displaystyle AP=1/2}By triangle congruence, AR~PBBQ=(AP/AR)(PB){\displaystyle BQ=(AP/AR)*(PB)}=(2AP/(1AP2))(1AP){\displaystyle =(2*AP/(1-AP^{2}))*(1-AP)}[34]

Doubling the cube

[edit]
Doubling the cube: PB/PA = cube root of 2

The classical problem ofdoubling the cube can be solved using origami. This construction is due to Peter Messer:[35] A square of paper is first creased into three equal strips as shown in the diagram. Then the bottom edge is positioned so the corner point P is on the top edge and the crease mark on the edge meets the other crease mark Q. The length PB will then be the cube root of 2 times the length of AP.[14]

The edge with the crease mark is considered a marked straightedge, something which is not allowed incompass and straightedge constructions. Using a marked straightedge in this way is called aneusis construction in geometry.

Trisecting an angle

[edit]
Trisecting the angle CAB

Angle trisection is another of the classical problems that cannot be solved using a compass and unmarked ruler but can be solved using origami.[36] This construction, which was reported in 1980, is due to Hisashi Abe.[35][9] The angle CAB is trisected by making two folds: PP', parallel to the base, and QQ', halfway in between. Then point P is folded over to lie on line AC and at the same time point A is made to lie on line QQ' at A'. The angle A'AB is one third of the original angle CAB. This is because PAQ, A'AQ and A'AR are threecongruent triangles. Aligning the two points on the two lines is another neusis construction as in the solution to doubling the cube.[37][9]

Related problems

[edit]

The problem ofrigid origami, treating the folds as hinges joining two flat, rigid surfaces, such assheet metal, has great practical importance. For example, theMiura map fold is a rigid fold that has been used to deploy large solar panel arrays for space satellites.

Thenapkin folding problem is the problem of whether a square or rectangle of paper can be folded so the perimeter of the flat figure is greater than that of the original square.

The placement of a point on a curved fold in the pattern may require the solution of elliptic integrals. Curved origami allows the paper to formdevelopable surfaces that are not flat.[38]Wet-folding origami is a technique evolved by Yoshizawa that allows curved folds to create an even greater range of shapes of higher order complexity.

The maximum number of times an incompressible material can be folded has been derived. With each fold a certain amount of paper is lost to potential folding. Theloss function for folding paper in half in a single direction was given to beL=πt6(2n+4)(2n1){\displaystyle L={\tfrac {\pi t}{6}}(2^{n}+4)(2^{n}-1)}, whereL is the minimum length of the paper (or other material),t is the material's thickness, andn is the number of folds possible.[39] The distancesL andt must be expressed in the same units, such as inches. This result was derived by Britney Gallivan, a high schooler fromCalifornia, in December 2001. In January 2002, she folded a 4,000-foot-long (1,200 m) piece of toilet paper twelve times in the same direction, debunking a long-standing myth that paper cannot be folded in half more than eight times.[40][41]

Thefold-and-cut problem asks what shapes can be obtained by folding a piece of paper flat, and making a single straight complete cut. The solution, known as the fold-and-cut theorem, states that any shape with straight sides can be obtained.

A practical problem is how to fold a map so that it may be manipulated with minimal effort or movements. TheMiura fold is a solution to the problem, and several others have been proposed.[42]

Computational origami

[edit]

Computational origami is a branch of computer science that is concerned with studying algorithms for solving paper-folding problems. In the early 1990s, origamists participated in a series of origami contests called theBug Wars in which artists attempted to out-compete their peers by adding complexity to their origami bugs. Most competitors in the contest belonged to the Origami Detectives, a group of acclaimed Japanese artists.[43]Robert Lang, a research-scientist fromStanford University and theCalifornia Institute of Technology, also participated in the contest. The contest helped initialize a collective interest in developing universal models and tools to aid in origami design and foldability.[43]

Research

[edit]

Paper-folding problems are classified as either origami design or origami foldability problems. There are predominantly three current categories of computational origami research: universality results,efficient decision algorithms, andcomputational intractability results.[44] A universality result defines the bounds of possibility given a particular model of folding. For example, a large enough piece of paper can be folded into any tree-shaped origami base, polygonal silhouette, and polyhedral surface.[45] When universality results are not attainable, efficient decision algorithms can be used to test whether an object is foldable in polynomial time.[44] Certain paper-folding problems do not have efficient algorithms. Computational intractability results show that there are no such polynomial-time algorithms that currently exist to solve certain folding problems. For example, it is NP-hard to evaluate whether a given crease pattern folds into any flat origami.[46]

In 2017, Erik Demaine of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Tomohiro Tachi of the University of Tokyo published a new universal algorithm that generates practical paper-folding patterns to produce any 3-D structure. The new algorithm built upon work that they presented in their paper in 1999 that first introduced a universal algorithm for folding origami shapes that guarantees a minimum number of seams. The algorithm will be included in Origamizer, a free software for generating origami crease patterns that was first released by Tachi in 2008.[47]

Software & tools

[edit]
Animation of folds to make a Samurai helmet, also called a kabuto. (On a laptop computer, Julia and GLMakie generated[48] the 66 second .mp4 video in 10 seconds.)

There are several software design tools that are used for origami design. Users specify the desired shape or functionality and the software tool constructs the fold pattern and/or 2D or 3D model of the result. Researchers at theMassachusetts Institute of Technology,Georgia Tech,University of California Irvine,University of Tsukuba, andUniversity of Tokyo have developed and posted publicly available tools in computational origami. TreeMaker, ReferenceFinder, OrigamiDraw, and Origamizer are among the tools that have been used in origami design.[49]

There are other software solutions associated with building computational origami models using non-paper materials such as Cadnano inDNA origami.[50]

Applications

[edit]

Computational origami has contributed to applications in robotics, engineering, biotechnology & medicine, industrial design.[51] Applications for origami have also been developed in the study of programming languages and programming paradigms, particular in the setting of functional programming.[52]

Robert Lang participated in a project with researchers at EASi Engineering in Germany to develop automotive airbag folding designs.[53] In the mid-2000s, Lang worked with researchers at theLawrence Livermore National Laboratory to develop a solution for theJames Webb Space Telescope, particularly its large mirrors, to fit into a rocket using principles and algorithms from computational origami.[54]

In 2014, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, and the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering published a method for building self-folding machines and credited advances in computational origami for the project's success. Their origami-inspired robot was reported to fold itself in 4 minutes and walk away without human intervention, which demonstrated the potential for autonomous self-controlled assembly in robotics.[55]

Other applications includeDNA origami andRNA origami, folding of manufacturing instruments, and surgery by tiny origami robots.[56]

Applications of computational origami have been featured by various production companies and commercials. Lang famously worked with Toyota Avalon to feature an animated origami sequence, Mitsubishi Endeavor to create a world entirely out of origami figures, and McDonald's to form numerous origami figures from cheeseburger wrappers.[57]

See also

[edit]

Notes and references

[edit]
  1. ^abHull, Thomas C. (2011)."Solving cubics with creases: the work of Beloch and Lill"(PDF).American Mathematical Monthly.118 (4):307–315.doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.118.04.307.MR 2800341.S2CID 2540978.
  2. ^"origami - History of origami | Britannica".Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved2022-05-08.
  3. ^ab"Lecture: Recent Results in Computational Origami".Origami USA: We are the American national society devoted to origami, the art of paperfolding. Retrieved 2022-05-08.
  4. ^T. Sundara Row (1917). Beman, Wooster; Smith, David (eds.).Geometric Exercises in Paper Folding.The Open Court Publishing Company.
  5. ^Houdini, Harry.Houdini's Paper Magic.
  6. ^George Edward Martin (1997).Geometric constructions. Springer. p. 145.ISBN 978-0-387-98276-2.
  7. ^Robert Carl Yeates (1949).Geometric Tools. Louisiana State University.
  8. ^Nick Robinson (2004).The Origami Bible. Chrysalis Books. p. 18.ISBN 978-1-84340-105-6.
  9. ^abcHull, Tom (1997)."a comparison between straight edge and compass constructions and origami".origametry.net.
  10. ^Bain, Ian (1980)."The Miura-Ori map".New Scientist.. Reproduced inBritish Origami, 1981, and online at the British Origami Society web site.
  11. ^Miura, K. (1985). Method of packaging and deployment of large membranes in space (Report). Tech. Report 618. The Institute of Space and Astronautical Science.
  12. ^"2D Array". Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. Archived fromthe original on 25 November 2005.
  13. ^Nishiyama, Yutaka (2012)."Miura folding: Applying origami to space exploration"(PDF).International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics.79 (2):269–279.
  14. ^abPeter Messer (1986)."Problem 1054"(PDF).Crux Mathematicorum.12 (10):284–285 – via Canadian Mathematical Society.
  15. ^Justin, Jacques, "Resolution par le pliage de l'equation du troisieme degre et applications geometriques", reprinted inProceedings of the First International Meeting of Origami Science and Technology, H. Huzita ed. (1989), pp. 251–261.
  16. ^Benedetto Scimemi, Regular Heptagon by Folding, Proceedings of Origami, Science and Technology, ed. H. Huzita., Ferrara, Italy, 1990
  17. ^Newton, Liz (1 December 2009)."The power of origami". University of Cambridge. + plus magazine.
  18. ^abBern, Marshall; Hayes, Barry (1996)."The complexity of flat origami".Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (Atlanta, GA, 1996). ACM, New York. pp. 175–183.MR 1381938.
  19. ^abHatori, Koshiro."How to Divide the Side of Square Paper". Japan Origami Academic Society.
  20. ^abK. Haga, Origamics, Part 1, Nippon Hyoron Sha, 1999 (in Japanese)
  21. ^belcastro, sarah-marie;Hull, Thomas C. (2002)."Modelling the folding of paper into three dimensions using affine transformations".Linear Algebra and Its Applications.348 (1–3):273–282.doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(01)00608-5.
  22. ^abAlperin, Roger C. (2002). "Ch.12". In Hull, Thomas (ed.).Mathematical Origami: Another View of Alhazen's Optical Problem. pp. 83–93.doi:10.1201/b15735.ISBN 9780429064906.
  23. ^Robu, Judit; Ida, Tetsuo; Ţepeneu, Dorin; Takahashi, Hidekazu;Buchberger, Bruno (2006). "Computational Origami Construction of a Regular Heptagon with Automated Proof of Its Correctness".Automated Deduction in Geometry. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 3763. pp. 19–33.doi:10.1007/11615798_2.ISBN 978-3-540-31332-8.
  24. ^Alperin, Roger C. (2005). "Trisections and Totally Real Origami".The American Mathematical Monthly.112 (3):200–211.arXiv:math/0408159.doi:10.2307/30037438.JSTOR 30037438.
  25. ^Bird, Richard; Mu, Shin-Cheng (September 2005)."Countdown: A case study in origami programming".Journal of Functional Programming.15 (5):679–702.doi:10.1017/S0956796805005642.ISSN 1469-7653.S2CID 46359986.
  26. ^Lang, Robert J.;Alperin, Roger C. (2009)."One-, Two-, and Multi-Fold Origami Axioms"(PDF).Origami 4.Origami4: Fourth International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education. pp. 383–406.doi:10.1201/b10653-38.ISBN 9780429106613.
  27. ^abBertschinger, Thomas H.; Slote, Joseph; Spencer, Olivia Claire; Vinitsky, Samuel.The Mathematics of Origami(PDF). Carleton College.
  28. ^Lang, Robert J. (2004)."Angle Quintisection"(PDF).langorigami.com. Retrieved16 January 2021.
  29. ^Thomas C. Hull (2002). "The Combinatorics of Flat Folds: a Survey".The Proceedings of the Third International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education. AK Peters.arXiv:1307.1065.ISBN 978-1-56881-181-9.
  30. ^"Robert Lang folds way-new origami".
  31. ^Demaine, Erik D.;O'Rourke, Joseph (2007).Geometric folding algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511735172.ISBN 978-0-521-85757-4.MR 2354878.
  32. ^Tom Hull."Origami and Geometric Constructions". Archived fromthe original on 2019-06-18. Retrieved2013-12-29.
  33. ^abGeretschläger, Robert (2008).Geometric Origami. UK: Arbelos.ISBN 978-0-9555477-1-3.
  34. ^Hiroshi Okumura (2014)."A Note on Haga's theorems in paper folding"(PDF).Forum Geometricorum.14:241–242.
  35. ^abLang, Robert J (2008)."From Flapping Birds to Space Telescopes: The Modern Science of Origami"(PDF). Usenix Conference, Boston, MA.
  36. ^Archived atGhostarchive and theWayback Machine:Dancso, Zsuzsanna (December 12, 2014)."Numberphile: How to Trisect an Angle with Origami".YouTube. RetrievedOctober 2, 2021.
  37. ^Michael J Winckler; Kathrin D Wold; Hans Georg Bock (2011). "Hands-on Geometry with Origami".Origami 5. CRC Press. p. 225.ISBN 978-1-56881-714-9.
  38. ^"Siggraph: "Curved Origami"". Archived fromthe original on 2017-05-08. Retrieved2008-10-08.
  39. ^Korpal, Gaurish (25 November 2015)."Folding Paper in Half".At Right Angles.4 (3). Teachers of India:20–23. Archived fromthe original on 14 November 2016. Retrieved28 November 2015.
  40. ^Weisstein, Eric W."Folding".MathWorld.
  41. ^D'Agostino, Susan (2020).How to Free Your Inner Mathematician.Oxford University Press. p. 22.ISBN 9780198843597.
  42. ^Hull, Thomas (2002). "In search of a practical map fold".Math Horizons.9 (3):22–24.doi:10.1080/10724117.2002.11975147.JSTOR 25678354.S2CID 126397750.
  43. ^ab"The Origami Lab".The New Yorker. 2007-02-12. Retrieved2022-05-09.
  44. ^abDemaine, Erik (2001). "Recent Results in Computational Origami" (PDF).
  45. ^Lang, Robert."A Computational Algorithm for Origami Design"(PDF).
  46. ^Schneider, Jonathan (December 10, 2004). "Flat-Foldability of Origami Crease Patterns" (PDF).
  47. ^"Origami anything".MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 22 June 2017. Retrieved2022-05-08.
  48. ^"Julia and Projective Geometric Algebra". Julia code animating kabuto is in example 3.4. 31 March 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  49. ^TASON."Computational Origami". Retrieved2022-05-08.
  50. ^"Cadnano".cadnano. Retrieved2022-05-08.
  51. ^Magazine, Smithsonian; Morrison, Jim."How Origami Is Revolutionizing Industrial Design".Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved2022-05-08.
  52. ^Gibbons, Jeremy (2003)."Origami Programming"(PDF).
  53. ^TASON."Airbag Folding". Retrieved2022-05-08.
  54. ^"Webb and Origami - Webb Telescope/NASA".webb.nasa.gov. Retrieved2022-05-08.
  55. ^Felton, S.; Tolley, M.; Demaine, E.; Rus, D.; Wood, R. (2014-08-08)."A method for building self-folding machines".Science.345 (6197):644–646.Bibcode:2014Sci...345..644F.doi:10.1126/science.1252610.ISSN 0036-8075.PMID 25104380.S2CID 18415193.
  56. ^Brewin, Bob (2004-05-10)."Computational Origami".Computerworld. Retrieved2022-05-08.
  57. ^"The Origami Resolution".Damn Interesting. Retrieved2022-05-08.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toOrigami mathematics.
Portal:
Flat folding
Strip folding
3d structures
Polyhedra
Miscellaneous
Publications
People
Concepts
Fibonacci word: detail of artwork by Samuel Monnier, 2009
Forms
Artworks
Buildings
Artists
Renaissance
19th–20th
Century
Contemporary
Theorists
Ancient
Renaissance
Romantic
Modern
Publications
Organizations
Related
"Mathematics of" articles
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mathematics_of_paper_folding&oldid=1335433134"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp