Diffusivity,mass diffusivity ordiffusion coefficient is usually written as the proportionality constant between themolar flux due to moleculardiffusion and the negative value of the gradient in the concentration of the species. More accurately, the diffusion coefficient times the local concentration is the proportionality constant between the negative value of the mole fraction gradient and the molar flux. This distinction is especially significant in gaseous systems with strong temperature gradients. Diffusivity derives its definition fromFick's law and plays a role in numerous other equations ofphysical chemistry.
The diffusivity is generally prescribed for a given pair of species andpairwise for a multi-species system. The higher the diffusivity (of one substance with respect to another), the faster they diffuse into each other. Typically, a compound's diffusion coefficient is ~10,000× as great in air as in water. Carbon dioxide in air has a diffusion coefficient of 16 mm2/s, and in water its diffusion coefficient is 0.0016 mm2/s.[1][2]
Diffusivity has dimensions of length2 / time, or m2/s inSI units and cm2/s inCGS units.
The diffusion coefficient in solids at different temperatures is generally found to be well predicted by theArrhenius equation:
where
Diffusion in crystalline solids, termedlattice diffusion, is commonly regarded to occur by two distinct mechanisms,[3]interstitial andsubstitutional orvacancy diffusion. The former mechanism describes diffusion as the motion of the diffusing atoms betweeninterstitial sites in the lattice of the solid it is diffusing into, the latter describes diffusion through a mechanism more analogue to that in liquids or gases: Any crystal at nonzero temperature will have a certain number ofvacancy defects (i.e. empty sites on the lattice) due to the random vibrations of atoms on the lattice, an atom neighbouring a vacancy can spontaneously "jump" into the vacancy, such that the vacancy appears to move. By this process the atoms in the solid can move, and diffuse into each other. Of the two mechanisms, interstitial diffusion is typically more rapid.[3]
An approximate dependence of the diffusion coefficient on temperature in liquids can often be found usingStokes–Einstein equation, which predicts that
where
The dependence of the diffusion coefficient on temperature for gases can be expressed usingChapman–Enskog theory (predictions accurate on average to about 8%):[4]
where
The relation
is obtained when inserting the ideal gas law into the expression obtained directly fromChapman-Enskog theory,[8] which may be written as
where is the molar density (mol / m3) of the gas, and
with the universal gas constant. At moderate densities (i.e. densities at which the gas has a non-negligibleco-volume, but is still sufficiently dilute to be considered as gas-like rather than liquid-like) this simple relation no longer holds, and one must resort toRevised Enskog Theory.[9] Revised Enskog Theory predicts a diffusion coefficient that decreases somewhat more rapidly with density, and which to a first approximation may be written as
where is theradial distribution function evaluated at thecontact diameter of the particles. For molecules behaving likehard, elastic spheres, this value can be computed from theCarnahan-Starling Equation, while for more realistic intermolecular potentials such as theMie potential orLennard-Jones potential, its computation is more complex, and may involve invoking athermodynamic perturbation theory, such asSAFT.
For self-diffusion in gases at two different pressures (but the same temperature), the following empirical equation has been suggested:[4]where
In population dynamics,kinesis is the change of the diffusion coefficient in response to the change of conditions. In models of purposeful kinesis, diffusion coefficient depends on fitness (or reproduction coefficient)r:
where is constant andr depends on population densities and abiotic characteristics of the living conditions. This dependence is a formalisation of the simple rule: Animals stay longer in good conditions and leave quicker bad conditions (the "Let well enough alone" model).
The effective diffusion coefficient describes diffusion through the pore space ofporous media.[10] It ismacroscopic in nature, because it is not individual pores but the entire pore space that needs to be considered. The effective diffusion coefficient for transport through the pores,De, is estimated as follows:where
The transport-availableporosity equals the total porosity less the pores which, due to their size, are not accessible to the diffusing particles, and less dead-end and blind pores (i.e., pores without being connected to the rest of the pore system). The constrictivity describes the slowing down of diffusion by increasing theviscosity in narrow pores as a result of greater proximity to the average pore wall. It is a function of pore diameter and the size of the diffusing particles.
Gases at 1 atm., solutes in liquid at infinite dilution. Legend: (s) – solid; (l) – liquid; (g) – gas; (dis) – dissolved.
Species pair | Temperature (°C) | D (cm2/s) | |
---|---|---|---|
Solute | Solvent | ||
Water (g) | Air (g) | 25 | 0.260 |
Oxygen (g) | Air (g) | 25 | 0.176 |
Species pair | Temperature (°C) | D (10−5 cm2/s) | |
---|---|---|---|
Solute | Solvent | ||
Acetone (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.16 |
Air (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.00 |
Ammonia (dis) | Water (l) | 12[citation needed] | 1.64 |
Argon (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.00 |
Benzene (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.02 |
Bromine (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.18 |
Carbon monoxide (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.03 |
Carbon dioxide (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.92 |
Chlorine (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.25 |
Ethane (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.20 |
Ethanol (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 0.84 |
Ethylene (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.87 |
Helium (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 6.28 |
Hydrogen (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 4.50 |
Hydrogen sulfide (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.41 |
Methane (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.49 |
Methanol (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 0.84 |
Nitrogen (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.88 |
Nitric oxide (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.60 |
Oxygen (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.10 |
Propane (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 0.97 |
Water (l) | Acetone (l) | 25 | 4.56 |
Water (l) | Ethyl alcohol (l) | 25 | 1.24 |
Water (l) | Ethyl acetate (l) | 25 | 3.20 |
Species pair | Temperature (°C) | D (cm2/s) | |
---|---|---|---|
Solute | Solvent | ||
Hydrogen | Iron (s) | 10 | 1.66×10−9 |
Hydrogen | Iron (s) | 100 | 124×10−9 |
Aluminium | Copper (s) | 20 | 1.3×10−30 |