| Masiakasaurus | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Reconstructed skeleton,Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada | |
Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Reptilia |
| Clade: | Dinosauria |
| Clade: | Saurischia |
| Clade: | Theropoda |
| Clade: | †Abelisauria |
| Family: | †Noasauridae |
| Subfamily: | †Noasaurinae |
| Genus: | †Masiakasaurus Sampsonet al., 2001 |
| Species: | †M. knopfleri |
| Binomial name | |
| †Masiakasaurus knopfleri Sampsonet al., 2001 | |
Masiakasaurus is agenus of small predatorytheropoddinosaurs from theLate Cretaceous ofMadagascar. InMalagasy,masiaka means "vicious"; thus, the genus name means "vicious lizard". Thetype species,Masiakasaurus knopfleri, was named after the musicianMark Knopfler, whose music inspired the expedition crew. It was named in 2001 byScott D. Sampson, Matthew Carrano, andCatherine A. Forster. Unlike most theropods, the front teeth ofMasiakasaurus projected forwards instead of straight down. This unique dentition suggests that they had a specialized diet, perhaps including fish and other small prey. Other bones of the skeleton indicate thatMasiakasaurus were bipedal, with much shorter forelimbs than hindlimbs. It was a small theropod, reaching 1.8–2.1 m (5.9–6.9 ft) long and weighing 20 kg (44 lb).[1][2][3]Masiakasaurus lived from 72.1 to 66 million years ago, along with animals such asMajungasaurus,Rapetosaurus, andRahonavis.Masiakasaurus was a member of the groupNoasauridae, small predatoryceratosaurs found primarily inSouth America.
.jpg)
Remains ofMasiakasaurus have been found in the Late CretaceousMaevarano Formation in northwestern Madagascar and were first described in the journalNature in 2001. Fragmentary bones comprising around 40% of the skeleton were collected near the village of Berivotra. Several parts of the skull, including the distinctive teeth, were found. Thehumerus (upper arm bone),pubis, hindlimbs, and several vertebrae were also collected.[1]
In 2011, additional specimens ofMasiakasaurus were described. The braincase,premaxilla, facial bones, ribcage, portions of the hands and pectoral girdle (coracoid), and much of the cervical and dorsal vertebral column were described for the first time. The discovery of this new material clarified many aspects of noasaurid anatomy and made the genus among the best-known dinosaurs.[4] The new finds did, however, not allow for a detailed study of its evolutionary relationships amongceratosaurs. With the new material, around 65% of the skeleton is currently known.[5]
The most distinctive characteristic ofMasiakasaurus is the forward-projecting, or procumbent, front teeth. The teeth areheterodont, meaning that they have different shapes along the jaw.[1] The first fourdentary teeth of the lower jaw project forward, with the first tooth angled only 10° above the horizontal. These teeth are long and spoon-shaped with hooked edges. They have carinae, or sharp edges, that are weakly serrated. Serrations are more evident along the rear edge the posterior teeth in the back of the jaw, which are also recurved and laterally compressed (flattened from the side), resembling the less unusual teeth of other carnivorous dinosaurs. The margin of the dentary curves downward so that thealveoli (tooth sockets) of the front teeth are directed forward. In fact, the alveolus of the first tooth is actually situated lower than the bottom edge of the rest of the lower jaw.[6]
The lower part of the rear edge of the dentary has a long prong known as a ventral process. This differs from the situation in abelisaurids, which have a much shorter ventral process. On the other hand, the upper part of the rear edge of the dentary is very similar to that of abelisaurids such asMajungasaurus andCarnotaurus. This part of the bone possesses an array of four small structures, three of which line a socket which connects to thesurangular bone at the back of the lower jaw. Although the surangular bone is not preserved, several other bones of the lower jaw are, including a triangularangular bone, a gently curving prearticular bone, and a damaged yet notably concavearticular bone. The angular and prearticular formed the lower edge of a large and rounded in the lower jaw (known as a mandibular fenestra) while the articular bone formed the lower part of the jaw joint. A long and taperinghyoid (tongue bone) has also been preserved.[5] The front teeth of the upper jaw are also procumbent, and the margin of the premaxilla curves slightly upward to direct them outward. Unlike the skulls of abelisaurids, which are very deep, the skull ofMasiakasaurus is long and low. Thelacrimal andpostorbital bones around the eye are textured with bumpy projections. Not including the highly modified jaws and teeth, the skull ofMasiakasaurus possesses many general ceratosaurian characteristics. Overall, its morphology is intermediate between abelisaurids and more basal ceratosaurs.[5]
The neck is relatively narrow in comparison to abelisaurids and bear stout neck ribs. While many theropods have s-shaped necks, the ribs would make the neck rather stiff inMasiakasaurus, and the back of the neck is positioned almost horizontally, giving it only a slighter curve. Like those of other abelisauroids, the vertebrae are heavily pneumaticized, or hollowed, and have relatively short neural spines. Pneumaticity is limited to the neck and foremost back vertebrae, however. Pneumatic cavities are also present in the braincase.[5]
As in other ceratosaurs, the shoulder blade (scapula) and shoulder girdle fuse into a single bone, thescapulocoracoid. This bone is very large and broad, even compared to the condition in other ceratosaurs. The scapula portion (above the glenoid, or arm socket) tapers towards the back while the coracoid portion (below the glenoid) is expanded into a curved blade-like structure. While abelisaurids have arms that are extremely reduced in size,Masiakasaurus and other noasaurids had longer forelimbs. The humerus is slender, and known bones of the hand are relatively short. The related genusNoasaurus has a large and curved raptorialungual (claw), which was originally interpreted as a sickle-like foot claw as indromaeosaurids such asVelociraptor. More recently, this has been re-evaluated as a claw of the hand. The penultimatephalanx, the finger bone that immediately precedes the raptorial ungual inNoasaurus, is also known inMasiakasaurus and has a similar appearance. The enlarged ungual, however, is unknown inMasiakasaurus.[5] It is assumed that members of this genus had four fingers, with the middle two fingers being the longest as in other ceratosaurians.
In its initial 2001 description,Masiakasaurus was classified as abasalabelisauroid related toLaevisuchus andNoasaurus, two poorly known genera named in 1933 and 1980, respectively.[1] In the following year, Carranoet al. (2002) placedMasiakasaurus along withLaevisuchus andNoasaurus in the family Noasauridae. They conducted a phylogenetic analysis of abelisauroids using characteristics fromMasiakasaurus. Below is acladogram from an updated version of their analysis showing the phylogenetic placement ofMasiakasaurus.[7]
Carranoet al. (2002) distinguished two forms ofMasiakasaurus, a robust form and a gracile form. The robust morph includes specimens with thicker bones and more pronounced projections for the attachment of ligaments and muscles. The gracile form includes specimens that are more slender and have less pronounced muscle attachments. It also has unfusedtibiae, unlike the fused tibiae of the robust form. These two varieties may be an indication ofsexual dimorphism inMasiakasaurus, but they may also represent two distinct populations.[6]
One specimen ofMasiakasaurus, a right scapulocoracoid, bears holes that may be puncture marks from predation or scavenging.Majungasaurus, a large abelisaurid from the Maevarano Formation, may have preyed uponMasiakasaurus.[8] The holes may also have been the result of an infection.[5]
Adults ofMasiakasaurus knopfleri may have been prey for adults of the snakeMadtsoia madagascariensis, though such large prey would have been injurious for the snake.[9]
The procument front teeth ofMasiakasaurus were likely an adaptation for grasping small prey. They would have been unsuitable for tearing larger food apart. In the front of the jaws, carinae are restricted to the base of the teeth and would not have been used to tear prey. The back teeth, however, share the same general characteristics as those of most other theropods, suggesting that they served a similar function inMasiakasaurus, such as cutting and slicing.[6]
Several feeding behaviors have been proposed forMasiakasaurus on the basis of its unusual dentition. Because the front teeth would have been well suited for grasping,Masiakasaurus may have consumed small vertebrates, invertebrates, and possibly even fruits.[6]
In 2013, Lee and O'Connor observed thatMasiakasaurus would be a good subject for an analysis of theropod growth, considering that there is an abundance of fossil material to examine from a broad range ofontogenetic stages. The study showed thatMasiakasaurus grew determinately and reached full maturity at a small body size. Competing theories thatMasiakasaurus specimens represent the juvenile form of a larger-bodied theropod were not supported by the data.Masiakasaurus took 8 to 10 years to grow the size of a large dog. This indicates a rate of growth that is 40% slower than that of comparably sized non-avian theropods, a finding that is supported by the unusual prominence of parallel-fibered bone, which is known to be associated with relatively slow growth. However, individuals in this genus grew 40% faster than crocodylians. Lee and O'Connor noted that the evolution of slow growth gave this dinosaur the advantage of minimizing the nutritional investment allocated toward structural growth while living in a semiarid and seasonally stressful environment.[10]
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
