 | This articlemay rely excessively on sourcestoo closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from beingverifiable andneutral. Please helpimprove it by replacing them with more appropriatecitations toreliable, independent sources.(May 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Mary, the Mediatrix of All Grace | |
|---|---|
 The original image based on the 1948 Marian apparition, enshrined today in Lipa, Batangas. | |
| Location | Carmelite Monastery,Lipa,Batangas |
| Date | November 12, 1948 |
| Witness | Teresita Castillo |
| Type | Marian apparition |
| Approval | Dismissed — 11 December 2015[1] Approved (Local) — 12 September 2015 Re-investigated — 1991 Suppressed — 11 April 1951 |
| Shrine | Our Lady, Mary Mediatrix of All Grace Parish |
Mary, the Mediatrix of All Grace (Spanish:María, Mediadora de Toda-Gracia;Tagalog:María, Tagapamagitan ng Lahat ng Biyaya), also known as theOur Lady of Lipa,[2] is an allegedMarian apparition that occurred within theCarmelite Monastery of Lipa,Batangas,Philippines. The event occurred to a former Carmelitepostulant,Teresita Castillo.[3] The original statue associated with the apparition is currently enshrined at the monastery.
The apparitions were declared asNon-supernatural after an investigation by six Filipino bishops headed by the formerArchbishop of Manila, CardinalRufino Santos on 11 April 1951.Pope Pius XII declared the apparitions as fraudulent in 1951. The case was reopened again in 1991 by the local bishop.
On 12 September 2015, theArchbishop of Lipa,Ramon Arguelles, against explicit direction from the Holy See and theCatholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines, formally declared approval of the apparitions, citing them as "supernatural and worthy of belief". On 11 December 2015, theVatican re-affirmed the earlier verdict of the apparition asNon-Supernatural.[1][4] A finalized copy of the verdict was received on May 31. Ultimately, Archbishop Arguelles retracted his declaration of supernaturality on 1 June 2016, citing to the original decision by theHoly Office asNon-Supernatural.
TheBlessed Virgin Mary is honored under the titleMediatrix of all graces. It has itsmystical origins inBelgium where devotion under this title began.[5]
Prior to the Marian apparitions, Teresita Castillo claimed to have encountered theDevil on several occasions under demonic torture.[6] On 18 August 1948, Castillo, then a postulant at the monastery, noticed a heavenlyodour, and upon entering her room saw a beautiful lady in white who spoke to her: "Do not fear my daughter, He who loves above all things has sent me. I come with a message…"[6]
According to the account, on 12 September 1948, Castillo was in the convent garden and noticed a vine shaking without any wind blowing. She then heard a woman's voice that instructed her to visit the garden for 15 consecutive days.[5] The next day, September 13, Castillo came to the spot at 5:00 P.M., knelt down and intended to say theHail Mary. In the middle of the prayer, wind came, the garden vine moved, and a beautiful lady appeared. Castillo described the lady as having her hands clasped in prayer and holding a goldenrosary in her right hand. The lady asked her to pray for priests and nuns.
On September 14, rose petals began to shower within the monastery, and some of the nuns noticed rose petals outside their hallways.[6]
Theprioress,Mary Cecilia of Jesus, decided to consult withAlfredo Obviar, Auxiliary Bishop of Lipa and spiritual director of the nuns. The bishop instructed the prioress to demand proof from the lady that she is from heaven.
On November 12, 1948, Castillo claimed that the apparition told her she was "Mary, Mediatrix of All Grace".
In October 17, 1949 the apparition allegedly prophesied an "invasion" byChina of the Philippines and the world, with money as the instrument "leading the people of the world to destruction."[7] The apparition happened roughly three weeks after theCommunist takeover of China. According to CardinalRicardo Vidal, in his 2014 letter to the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines, it was one of the apparition's "secrets" revealed to Castillo.[7] Vidal wrote the letter two years after the start of theScarborough Shoal standoff.
According to Teresita Castillo, the Virgin Mary was slightly stooped and dressed in white, with a narrow cloth belt about her waist. Her face was radiant, and her statues often show her dark hair flowing down her back beneath a white veil. Her hands are clasped on her breast, and a golden rosary hangs from her right hand. She is shown barefoot on clouds about two feet above the ground.[5]
Castillo herself in an interview said she had met theApostolic Nuncio to the PhilippinesCardinalEgidio Vagnozzi in 1951, and told him that she had already left the monastery to seek medical treatment. Vagnozzi strongly disapproved, called Castillo theDevil, and asked her to leave his presence, even trying to shove her out the door. Castillo burst into tears and begged for his blessing, which he withheld.[8][better source needed]
The current archbishop of Lipa, Ramón Argüelles, noted that auxiliary bishop Obviar and Bishop of LipaVerzosa, who were on the commission, were forced to leave the investigation due to their lack of jurisdiction over Lipa.[citation needed] In a televised interview withABS-CBN, Argüelles said no documents were compiled or even reached theHoly See in 1951, causing its immediate rejection.[9][10] In 1991, a petition to approve the apparition began once again.
On March 28, 1951 theSupreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office (later known as the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) declared that the events in Lipa have no signs of supernatural character or origin. This was reportedly confirmed byPope Pius XII. On April 11, 1951, an initial investigation report was signed by six Roman Catholic bishops and declared the Lipa apparitionsNon-supernatural. Bishop Cesar Guerrero reportedly later recanted on his deathbed.[11]
Apostolic Administrator Rufino Santos directed that the statue of Mary as Mediatrix of All Grace be retired from public veneration. According to a later interview with the prioress, Mother Mary of the Sacred Heart and Sister Mary Balthazar were ordered to burn several boxes containing leaflets,novena booklets, rose petals, and other paraphernalia pertaining to the apparition, including Castillo's personaldiary. The sisters were also ordered by the bishop to throw the image of the Virgin into a bonfire, but they instead hid it out of piety.[citation needed]
On 21 May 1990, then-Lipa Archbishop Mariano G. Gaviola, allowed the veneration of the namesake Marian image after forty years of being banned from the public.
On 17 April 2005, Archbishop Argüelles publicly declared that he found no objection to the devotion under this Marian title.[12] In November 2009 he formed a commission to investigate the apparitions anew.
On 12 September 2015, Argüelles formally released the canonical results of the investigation launched by the archdiocese, declaring the Marian apparitions to beSupernatural in character and worthy of pious belief.
On 11 December 2015, theHoly Office decreed through CardinalGerhard Ludwig Müller overruled the Archbishop and rejected his 2012 decree declaring that the alleged Marian apparitions in Batangas in 1948 were supernatural. Arguelles himself disclosed the ruling through an archdiocesan communiqué on May 31. In its decree, the Congregation stated thatPope Pius XII had made a definitive confirmation in 1951 against the supposed apparitions declaring that they "were not of supernatural origin," which the local authority had no authority to overrule.[13]
On March 19, 2024, in acircular, ArchbishopGilbert Garcera of theRoman Catholic Archdiocese of Lipa stated that theDicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, following a request by BishopPablo Virgilio David, revealed the 1951 decree rejecting the apparition adding that Sister Mother Mary Cecilia confessed to having "deceived the faithful about the alleged apparitions in Lipa and consequently asked for forgiveness".[14]
Evidence of the existence of the decree has legal implications in the region. In December 2022Harriet Demetriou, former justice of the anti-graft court Sandiganbayan, filed a perjury complaint against Dominican exorcist priest Father Winston Cabading for claiming under oath that the 1951 decree existed. The case is pending. ‘Give me the document, let me examine it. If it’s valid, if it’s really authentic, then I will submit myself. Who am I to fight the Pope?’ Demetriou toldRappler.[15] However, theCatholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines said it was necessary to review the case, citing lapses in the communication of Rome’s decision.[16]
The Discastery of the Doctrine of the Faith of the Vatican has issuedMater Populi fidelis. In the document, it discourages to refer to Mary the titles "Mediatrix" and "Mediatrix of All Graces" because it diminishes or supersedes the exclusive role of Jesus Christ as the unique redeemer.[17]
Former PhilippineAmbassador to theHoly See,Mercedes Arrastia Tuason, is a devotee of the apparitions, and displayed a large statue of Our Lady Mediatrix of All Grace in her consular office in Rome.[18]
Emma de Guzman, purported visionary,stigmatist and foundress of the church-sanctioned "La Pietà" International Prayer Group,[19] said that Mary had declared herself to be "the Mediatrix standing in front of theMediator".[20]
The Archdiocese of Lipa currently endorses Marian devotion to this title, which is not expressly prohibited as long as it does not counter church doctrine. In 17 January 2015,Pope Francis venerated a replica of the image at the residence of theArchbishop of Palo. InBatangas province, local bishops often tolerate the devotion in public.[citation needed]
Archidioecesis Lipaensis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Territories |  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ordinaries |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cathedral | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basilicas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shrines |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Parishes |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Images | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Suffragan dioceses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apparitions approved by theCatholic Church | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Papal inscription of an associated feast on the General Roman Calendar |
|  | ||||
| Approval of the apparition and its veneration |
| |||||
| Approval of veneration only |
| |||||
| ||||||
