Martin Bryant | |
---|---|
![]() Bryant in 1996 | |
Born | Martin John Bryant (1967-05-07)7 May 1967 (age 57) |
Known for | Perpetrator of thePort Arthur massacre |
Criminal status | Incarcerated |
Convictions | Murder (35 counts) Attempted murder (20 counts) Inflicting grievous bodily harm (3 counts) Inflicting wounds (8 counts) Arson (2 counts) |
Criminal penalty | 35life sentences plus 135 years and no opportunity for parole. |
Details | |
Date | 28–29 April 1996 |
Locations | Port Arthur, Tasmania, Australia |
Killed | 35–37 |
Injured | 23 |
Imprisoned at | Risdon Prison |
Martin John Bryant (born 7 May 1967) is an Australianmass murderer[1] who shot and killed thirty-five people and injured twenty-three others in thePort Arthur massacre on 28 and 29 April 1996.[2] He is currently serving thirty-fivelife sentences, and 135 years without the possibility ofparole, atRisdon Prison inHobart,Tasmania.
Martin Bryant was born on 7 May 1967 atQueen Alexandra Hospital inHobart,Tasmania.[2] He was the first child of Maurice and Carleen Bryant. Although his family's home was inLenah Valley, Bryant spent some of his childhood at their beach home in Carnarvon Bay, adjacent to thePort Arthur Historic Site. In a 2011 interview, Bryant's mother recalled that, when he was very young, she would often find his toys broken and that he was an "annoying" and "different" child.[3] A psychiatrist who examined Bryant told the family that he would never be capable of holding down a job because he would aggravate people to such an extent that he would always be in trouble.[3] In 1979, at age 12, Bryant was hospitalised atRoyal Hobart Hospital from an injury caused by a firework accident. While in hospital, he was interviewed by a local television station.[4]
Locals recall abnormal behaviour by Bryant, such as pulling thesnorkel from another boy while diving and cutting down trees on a neighbour's property. At school he was a disruptive and sometimes violent student who suffered severebullying by other children. Bryant was described by teachers as being distant from reality and unemotional. After he was suspended from New Town Primary School in 1977, psychological assessments noted that hetortured animals. Bryant returned to school the following year with improved behaviour but he persisted in teasing younger children. He was transferred to aspecial education unit atNew Town High School in 1980, where he deteriorated both academically and behaviourally throughout his remaining school years.[5]
Descriptions of Bryant's behaviour as anadolescent show that he continued to be disturbed and outlined the possibility of anintellectual disability. When leaving school in 1983, he was assessed for adisability pension by a psychiatrist who wrote: "Cannot read or write. Does a bit of gardening and watches TV ... Only his parents' efforts that prevent further deterioration. Could beschizophrenic and parents face a bleak future with him."[6] Bryant received a disability pension, though he also worked as a handyman and gardener.[6] In an examination after the massacre, forensic psychologist Ian Joblin found Bryant to be borderlinementally disabled with anIQ of 66, equivalent to an 11-year-old.[7][8]
While awaiting trial, Bryant was examined by court-appointed psychiatrist Ian Sale, who was of the opinion that Bryant "could be regarded as having shown a mixture ofconduct disorder,attention deficit hyperactivity and ...Asperger's Syndrome". Psychiatrist Paul Mullen, hired at the request of Bryant's legal counsel, found that he was socially and intellectually impaired. Furthermore, finding that he did not display signs of schizophrenia or amood disorder, Mullen concluded, "though Mr Bryant was clearly a distressed and disturbed young man he was not mentally ill."[5]
In early 1987, when Bryant was aged 19, he met 54-year-old Helen Mary Elizabeth Harvey, heiress to a share in theTattersall's lottery fortune, while looking for new customers for his lawn-mowing service. Helen, who lived with her mother Hilza, befriended Bryant, who became a regular visitor to her neglected mansion inNew Town and assisted with tasks such as feeding the fourteen dogs living inside the mansion and the forty cats living inside her garage.[6] In June 1990, an unidentified person reported Helen to the health authorities, and medics found both Helen and her mother in need of urgent hospital treatment. With Helen suffering from infectedulcers and Hilza with ahip fracture, Hilza was moved into anursing home and died several weeks later at the age of 79.[6]
A mandatory clean-up order was placed on the Harvey mansion, and Bryant's father took long-service leave to assist in cleaning the interior. The localRSPCA unit had to confiscate many animals living in the house. Following the clean-up, Helen Harvey invited Bryant to live with her in the mansion and they began spending extravagant amounts of money, which included the purchase of more than thirty new cars in less than three years. The unconventional pair spent most of their time together extensively shopping, usually after having lunch in a local restaurant. Around this time, Bryant was reassessed for his disability pension and a note was attached to the paperwork: "Father protects him from any occasion which might upset him as he continually threatens violence ... Martin tells me he would like to go around shooting people. It would be unsafe to allow Martin out of his parents' control."[6]
In 1991, as a result of no longer being allowed to have animals at the mansion, Harvey and Bryant moved together onto a 29-hectare (72-acre) farm called Taurusville that Harvey had purchased in the small township ofCopping. Neighbours recalled that Bryant always carried anair gun and often fired it at tourists as they stopped to buy apples at a stall on the highway and that late at night, he would roam through the surrounding properties firing the gun at dogs when they barked at him. Residents in Copping avoided Bryant "at all costs" despite his attempts to befriend them.[6]
On 20 October 1992, Harvey, aged 59, was killed along with two of her dogs when her car veered onto the wrong side of the road and hit an oncoming car directly.[6] Bryant was inside the vehicle at the time of the accident and was hospitalised for seven months with severe neck and back injuries. He returned to his family's home to convalesce after leaving hospital. Bryant was briefly investigated by police for the role he played in the accident, as he had a known habit of lunging for the steering wheel and Harvey had already had three accidents as a result. Harvey often told people that this was the reason she never drove faster than 60 kilometres an hour (37 mph). Harvey even allegedly said to a neighbour that "one of these days the little bastard [Bryant] is going to kill me." Bryant was named the solebeneficiary of Harvey's will and came into possession of assets totalling more thanAU$550,000. As Bryant had only the "vaguest notions" of financial matters, his mother subsequently applied for and was granted aguardianship order, placing his assets under the management of publictrustees. The order was based on evidence of Bryant's diminished intellectual capacity.[6]
After Harvey's death, Bryant's father Maurice, aged 60, looked after the Copping farm. Maurice had been prescribedantidepressants and had discreetly transferred his joint bank account and utilities into his wife's name.[6] Two months later, on 14 August 1993, a visitor looking for Maurice at the Copping property found a note saying "call the police" pinned to the door and found several thousand dollars in his car. The rates officer at the time found no reason to suspect criminal intent and sent council members and police to quell the stresses put forward by letters sent to the local council chambers. Police searched the property for Maurice without success. Divers were called to search the four dams on the property, and on 16 August Maurice's body was found in the dam closest to the farmhouse, with a diving weight belt around his neck. Police described the death as "unnatural" and it was ruled asuicide. Bryant inherited the proceeds of his father'ssuperannuation fund, valued at AU$250,000.[9]
Bryant later sold the Copping farm for AU$143,000 and kept the former Harvey mansion.[5] While living at Copping, the whiteoveralls he habitually wore were replaced with clothing more in line with Harvey's financial status. Now that he was alone, Bryant's fashion sense became more eccentric; he often wore a grey linen suit,cravat, lizard-skin shoes and aPanama hat while carrying a briefcase during the day, telling anyone who would listen that he had a high paying career as a businessman. Bryant often wore anelectric-blue suit with flared trousers and a ruffled shirt to the restaurant he frequented. The restaurant owner recalled: "It was horrible. Everyone was laughing at him, even the customers. I really felt suddenly quite sorry for him. I realised this guy didn't really have any friends."[6]
With both Harvey and his father dead, Bryant became increasingly lonely. From 1993 to late 1995, he travelled overseas fourteen times and a summary of his domestic airline travel filled three pages. However, Bryant had felt as lonely travelling as he did at home in Tasmania. He enjoyed the flights, as he could speak to the people sitting adjacent to him who had no choice but to be polite. He later took great joy in describing some of the conversations he had with fellow passengers.[5] Bryant ultimately became suicidal after deciding he had "had enough", stating, "I just felt more people were against me. When I tried to be friendly toward them, they just walked away." Although he had previously been little more than a social drinker, Bryant's alcohol consumption increased and, although he had not consumed any alcohol on the day of the massacre, had especially escalated in the six months prior to that day. His average daily consumption was estimated at half a bottle ofSambuca and a bottle ofBaileys Irish Cream, supplemented withport wine and other sweet alcoholic drinks.[5] According to Bryant, he thought the plan for the massacre might have first occurred to him four to twelve weeks before the event.[5][10]
Bryant has provided conflicting and confused accounts of what led him to kill thirty-five people at the Port Arthur site on 28 April 1996. It could have been his desire for attention, as he allegedly told a next-door neighbour, "I'll do something that will make everyone remember me."[11] Hisdefence psychiatrist, Paul Mullen, former chief of forensic psychiatry atMonash University, said Bryant became fascinated with theDunblane massacre in Scotland: "He followed Dunblane. His planning started with Dunblane. Before that he was thinking about suicide, but Dunblane and the early portrayal of the killer,Thomas Hamilton, changed everything".[7]
Bryant's first victims, David and Noelene Martin,[12] owned thebed and breakfast guest house called "Seascape". The Martins had beaten Bryant's father in purchasing the bed and breakfast, and his father had complained to Bryant on numerous occasions of the damage done to their family because of that purchase.[13] Bryant apparently believed the Martins bought the property out of spite towards his family and blamed them for causing thedepression that led to his father's suicide.[5] He fatally shot the Martins in the guest house and stole their weapons and the property keys before travelling to the Port Arthur site.
At Port Arthur, Bryant entered the Broad Arrow Café on the grounds of the historic site, carrying a large blue sports bag. While he was eating, Bryant attempted to start conversations with random people about the lack of wasps in the area and the lack of usual Japanese tourists. Once he finished eating, Bryant moved toward the back of the café and set a video camera on a vacant table. He took out aColt AR-15 SP1 Carbine (semi-automatic rifle) and, firing from the hip, began shooting patrons and staff. Within fifteen seconds, he had fired seventeen shots, killing twelve people and wounding ten. Bryant then walked to the other side of the shop and fired twelve more times, killing another eight people while wounding two. He then changedmagazines before fleeing, shooting at people in the car park and from his yellowVolvo 244 car as he drove away; an additional four were killed and six were injured.
Bryant drove 300 metres down the road, to where a woman and her two children were walking. He stopped and fired two shots, killing the woman and the child she was carrying. The older child fled, but Bryant followed her and killed her with a single shot. He then stole a 1980 goldBMW 7 series by killing all four of its occupants. A short distance down the road, he stopped beside a couple in a whiteToyota and, drawing his weapon, ordered the male occupant into the boot of the BMW. After shutting the boot, he fired two shots into the windscreen of the Toyota, killing the female driver.
Bryant returned to the guest house, set the stolen car alight and took his hostage inside, where he had left the Martins' corpses. The police tried to negotiate with Bryant for many hours before the battery in the phone he was using ran out, ending communication. Bryant's only demand was to be transported in anAustralian Army helicopter to an airport. During the negotiations, Bryant killed his hostage. The following morning, eighteen hours later, Bryant set fire to the guest house and attempted to escape in the confusion.[14] Suffering burns to his back and buttocks, Bryant was captured and taken to Royal Hobart Hospital, where he was treated and kept under heavy guard.
Bryant was judgedfit to stand trial, which was scheduled to begin on 7 November 1996. He initially pleaded not guilty but was persuaded by his court-appointed lawyer,John Avery, to plead guilty to all charges.[7] Two weeks later, on 22 November 1996, Hobart Supreme Court JudgeWilliam Cox gave Bryant thirty-fivelife sentences, plus 1,652 years in prison, without the possibility ofparole, all of which is to be served concurrently; this life sentence being applied is "for the term of [his] natural life".[15][16]
For the first eight months of his imprisonment, Bryant was held in a purpose-built suicide-prevention cell in almost completesolitary confinement. He remained in protective custody for his own safety until 13 November 2006, when he was moved into Hobart's Wilfred Lopes Centre,[17] a secure mental health unit run by theTasmanian Department of Health and Human Services. The thirty-five bed unit for inmates with serious mental illness is staffed with doctors, nurses and other support workers. Inmates are not locked down and can come and go from their cells. Exterior security at the facility is provided by a three-wall perimeter patrolled by private contract guards.
On 5 July 2003, an incident occurred that led an inmate to spray a cleaning solution into Bryant's eyes. He was transferred to Royal Hobart Hospital.[18] On 25 March 2007, Bryant attempted to end his life by slashing his wrist with a razor blade. On 27 March he cut his throat with another razor blade and was hospitalised briefly.[19] Bryant is currently housed in the maximum-securityRisdon Prison nearHobart.[20]
Newspaper coverage immediately after the massacre raised serious questions about journalistic practices, and criticism was directed toward Australian media. Photographs of Bryant published inThe Australian had his eyes digitally manipulated with the effect of making him appear deranged and "glaring".[21][22] Despite the criticism, the manipulated photographs continued to be used in media reporting a decade later. There were also questions as to how the photos had been obtained.
The Tasmaniandirector of public prosecutions warned media that the coverage compromised Bryant's right to a fair trial andwrits were issued againstThe Australian, the HobartMercury (which used Bryant's picture under the headline "This is the Man"),The Age and theABC. The chairman of theAustralian Press Council at the time,David Flint, argued that because newspapers regularly ignoredcontempt-of-court provisions, this showed that the law, not the newspapers, needed change. Flint suggested that such a change in the law would not necessarily lead totrial by media.[23] Australian newspapers also came under critical scrutiny of their accounts of Bryant and how the kind of identity responsible for his and other similar kinds of killing might be understood.[24]
As a response to the massacre, Australian state and territory governments introduced extensive restrictions on allfirearms, including semi-automaticcentre-fire rifles, repeatingshotguns (holding more than five shots) and high-capacity rifle magazines. In addition, limitations were imposed on low-capacityrepeating shotguns andrim-fire semi-automatic rifles. Though the measures caused controversy, opposition to the new laws was lessened by media reporting of the massacre and mounting public opinion.[25]
In March 2012, Sydney artistRodney Pople controversially won the AU$35,000Glover Prize for his landscape painting depicting Port Arthur with Bryant in the foreground holding a firearm.[26] In 2019, the massacre was referenced in the lyrics ofPond's song, "The Boys Are Killing Me", featured on their albumTasmania.[27] The 2021 filmNitram, directed byJustin Kurzel, is based on Bryant's life,[28] withCaleb Landry Jones in the role of Bryant. Jones won theCannes Film Festival Award for Best Actor for his portrayal.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link){{cite AV media}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link){{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)