 Mariner 2 engineering model | |
| Mission type | Venus flyby |
|---|---|
| Operator | NASA /JPL |
| Harvard designation | 1962 Alpha Rho 1[1] |
| COSPAR ID | 1962-041A |
| SATCATno. | 374 |
| Mission duration | 4 months and 7 days |
| Spacecraft properties | |
| Spacecraft | Mariner R-2 |
| Spacecraft type | Ranger Block I |
| Manufacturer | JPL |
| Launch mass | 203.6 kg (449 lb)[2] |
| Power | 220 watts (at Venus encounter) |
| Start of mission | |
| Launch date | August 27, 1962, 06:53:14 (1962-08-27UTC06:53:14Z) UTC[1] |
| Rocket | Atlas LV-3 Agena-B |
| Launch site | Cape CanaveralLC-12 |
| End of mission | |
| Disposal | Decommissioned |
| Last contact | January 3, 1963 (1963-01-04) 7:00 UTC[3] |
| Orbital parameters | |
| Reference system | Heliocentric[4] |
| Eccentricity | 0.16278 |
| Perihelion altitude | 0.720 AU (107.7 million km) |
| Aphelion altitude | 1.000 AU (149.6 million km) |
| Period | 292 days |
| Epoch | 14 December 1962 |
| Flyby ofVenus | |
| Closest approach | 14 December 1962 |
| Distance | 34,773 km (21,607 mi) |
Mariner 2 (Mariner-Venus 1962), an American space probe toVenus, was the first roboticspace probe to report successfully from a planetary encounter. The first successfulspacecraft in theNASAMariner program, it was a simplified version of the Block I spacecraft of theRanger program and an exact copy ofMariner 1. The missions of the Mariner 1 and 2 spacecraft are sometimes known as the Mariner R missions. Original plans called for the probes to be launched on theAtlas-Centaur, but serious developmental problems with that vehicle forced a switch to the much smallerAgena B second stage. As such, the design of the Mariner R vehicles was greatly simplified. Far less instrumentation was carried than on the SovietVenera probes of this period—for example, forgoing a TV camera—as the Atlas-Agena B had only half as much lift capacity as the Soviet8K78 booster. The Mariner 2 spacecraft was launched from Cape Canaveral on August 27, 1962, and passed as close as 34,773 km (21,607 mi) to Venus on December 14, 1962.[4]
The Mariner probe consisted of a 100 cm (39 in) diameter hexagonal bus, to whichsolar panels, instrument booms, andantennas were attached. The scientific instruments on board the Mariner spacecraft were: tworadiometers (one each for themicrowave andinfrared portions of thespectrum), amicrometeorite sensor, a solarplasma sensor, acharged particle sensor, and amagnetometer. These instruments were designed to measure the temperature distribution on the surface of Venus and to make basic measurements of Venus'satmosphere.
The primary mission was to receive communications from the spacecraft in the vicinity of Venus and to performradiometric temperature measurements of the planet. A second objective was to measure theinterplanetary magnetic field and charged particle environment.[5][6]
En route to Venus, Mariner 2 measured thesolar wind, a constant stream of charged particles flowing outwards from theSun, confirming the measurements byLuna 1 in 1959. It also measuredinterplanetary dust, which turned out to be scarcer than predicted. In addition, Mariner 2 detected high-energy charged particles coming from the Sun, including several briefsolar flares, as well ascosmic rays from outside theSolar System. As it flew by Venus on December 14, 1962, Mariner 2 scanned the planet with its pair of radiometers, revealing that Venus has cool clouds and an extremely hot surface.
With the advent of theCold War, the two then-superpowers, the United States and theSoviet Union, both initiated ambitious space programs with the intent of demonstrating military, technological, and political dominance.[7] The Soviets launched theSputnik 1, the first Earth orbiting satellite, on October 4, 1957. The Americans followed suit withExplorer 1 on February 1, 1958, by which point the Soviets had already launched the first orbiting animal,Laika inSputnik 2. Earth's orbit having been reached, focus turned to being the first to the Moon. ThePioneer program of satellites consisted of three unsuccessful lunar attempts in 1958. In early 1959, the SovietLuna 1 was the first probe to fly by the Moon, followed byLuna 2, the first artificial object to impact the Moon.[8]
With the Moon achieved, the superpowers turned their eyes to the planets. As the closest planet to Earth,Venus presented an appealinginterplanetary spaceflight target.[9]: 172 Every 19 months, Venus and the Earth reach relative positions in their orbits around the Sun such that a minimum of fuel is required to travel from one planet to the other via aHohmann Transfer Orbit. These opportunities mark the best time to launch exploratory spacecraft, requiring the least fuel to make the trip.[10]
The first such opportunity of the Space Race occurred in late 1957, before either superpower had the technology to take advantage of it. The second opportunity, around June 1959, lay just within the edge of technological feasibility, andU.S. Air Force contractorSpace Technology Laboratory (STL) intended to take advantage of it. A plan drafted January 1959 involved two spacecraft evolved from the first Pioneer probes, one to be launched viaThor-Able rocket, the other via the yet-untestedAtlas-Able.[11] STL was unable to complete the probes before June,[12] and thelaunch window was missed. The Thor-Able probe was repurposed as the deep space explorerPioneer 5, which was launched March 11, 1960, and designed to maintain communications with Earth up to a distance of 20 million km (12 million mi) as it traveled toward the orbit of Venus.[13] (The Atlas Able probe concept was repurposed as the unsuccessfulPioneer Atlas Moon probes.)[14] No American missions were sent during the early 1961 opportunity. The Soviet Union launchedVenera 1 on February 12, 1961, and on May 19–20 became the first probe to fly by Venus; however, it had stoppedtransmitting on February 26.[15]
For the summer 1962 launch opportunity, NASA contractedJet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in July 1960[9]: 172 to develop "Mariner A", a 1,250 lb (570 kg) spacecraft to be launched using the yet undevelopedAtlas-Centaur. By August 1961, it had become clear that theCentaur would not be ready in time. JPL proposed to NASA that the mission might be accomplished with a lighter spacecraft using the less powerful but operationalAtlas-Agena. A hybrid of Mariner A and JPL's Block 1Ranger lunar explorer, already under development, was suggested. NASA accepted the proposal, and JPL began an 11-month crash program to develop "Mariner R" (so named because it was a Ranger derivative). Mariner 1 would be the first Mariner R to be launched followed by Mariner 2.[16]
Three Mariner R spacecraft were built: two for launching and one to run tests, which was also to be used as a spare.[9]: 174 Aside from its scientific capabilities, Mariner also had to transmit data back to Earth from a distance of more than 26 million km (16 million mi), and to survive solar radiation twice as intense as that encountered in Earth orbit.[9]: 176
All three of the Mariner R spacecraft, including Mariner 2, weighed within 3 lb (1.4 kg) of the design weight of 447 lb (203 kg), 406 lb (184 kg) of which was devoted to non-experimental systems: maneuvering systems, fuel, and communications equipment for receiving commands and transmitting data. Once fully deployed in space, with its two solar panel "wings" extended, Mariner R was 12 ft (3.7 m) in height and 16.5 ft (5.0 m) across. The main body of the craft was hexagonal with six separate cases of electronic and electromechanical equipment:
At the rear of the spacecraft, amonopropellant (anhydroushydrazine) 225N[17] rocket motor was mounted for course corrections. A nitrogen gas fueled stabilizing system of ten jet nozzles controlled by the onboard gyroscopes, Sun sensors, and Earth sensors, kept Mariner properly oriented to receive and transmit data to Earth.[9]: 175
The primaryhigh-gain parabolic antenna was also mounted on the underside of Mariner and kept pointed toward the Earth. Anomnidirectional antenna atop the spacecraft would broadcast at times that the spacecraft was rolling or tumbling out of its proper orientation, to maintain contact with Earth; as an unfocused antenna, its signal would be much weaker than the primary. Mariner also mounted small antennas on each of the wings to receive commands from ground stations.[9]: 175–176
Temperature control was both passive, involving insulated, and highly reflective components; and active, incorporatinglouvers to protect the case carrying the onboard computer. At the time the first Mariners were built, notest chamber existed to simulate the near-Venus solar environment, so the efficacy of these cooling techniques could not be tested until the live mission.[9]: 176
At the time of the Mariner project's inception, few of Venus's characteristics were definitely known. Its opaqueatmosphere precludedtelescopic study of the ground. It was unknown whether there was water beneath the clouds, though a small amount ofwater vapor above them had been detected. The planet'srotation rate was uncertain, though JPL scientists had concluded throughradar observation that Venus rotated very slowly compared to the Earth, advancing the long-standing[18] (but later disproven)[19] hypothesis that the planet wastidally locked with respect to the Sun (as the Moon is with respect to the Earth).[20] No oxygen had been detected in Venus's atmosphere, suggesting that life as existed on Earth was not present. It had been determined that Venus's atmosphere contained at least 500 times as muchcarbon dioxide as the Earth's. These comparatively high levels suggested that the planet might be subject to arunaway greenhouse effect with surface temperatures as high as 600 K (327 °C; 620 °F), but this had not yet been conclusively determined.[16]: 7–8
The Mariner spacecraft would be able to verify this hypothesis by measuring the temperature of Venus close-up;[21] at the same time, the spacecraft could determine if there was a significant disparity between night and daytime temperatures.[16]: 331 An on-boardmagnetometer and suite of charged particle detectors could determine if Venus possessed an appreciable magnetic field and an analog to Earth'sVan Allen Belts.[21]
As the Mariner spacecraft would spend most of its journey to Venus in interplanetary space, the mission also offered an opportunity for long-term measurement of thesolar wind of charged particles and to map the variations in the Sun'smagnetosphere. The concentration ofcosmic dust beyond the vicinity of Earth could be explored as well.[9]: 176
Due to the limited capacity of the Atlas-Agena, only 18 kilograms (40 lb) of the spacecraft could be allocated to scientific experiments.[16]: 195
The magnetometer was attached to the top of the mast below theomnidirectional antenna. Particle detectors were mounted halfway up the mast, along with the cosmic ray detector. The cosmic dust detector and solar plasma spectrometer were attached to the top edges of the spacecraft base. The microwave radiometer, the infrared radiometer and the radiometer reference horns were rigidly mounted to a 48 cm (19 in) diameter parabolic radiometer antenna mounted near the bottom of the mast. All instruments were operated throughout the cruise and encounter modes except the radiometers, which were only used in the immediate vicinity of Venus.
In addition to these scientific instruments, Mariner 2 had a data conditioning system (DCS) and a scientific power switching (SPS) unit. The DCS was a solid-state electronic system designed to gather information from the scientific instruments on board the spacecraft. It had four basic functions: analog-to-digital conversion, digital-to-digital conversion, sampling and instrument-calibration timing, and planetary acquisition. The SPS unit was designed to perform the following three functions: control of the application ofAC power to appropriate portions of the science subsystem, application of power to the radiometers and removal of power from the cruise experiments during radiometer calibration periods, and control of the speed and direction of the radiometer scans. The DCS sent signals to the SPS unit to perform the latter two functions.[16]
Not included on any of the Mariner R spacecraft was a camera for visual photos. With payload space at a premium, project scientists considered a camera an unneeded luxury, unable to return useful scientific results.Carl Sagan, one of the Mariner R scientists, unsuccessfully fought for their inclusion, noting that not only might there be breaks in Venus's cloud layer, but "that cameras could also answer questions that we were way too dumb to even pose".[30]
.jpg)
The launch window for Mariner, constrained both by the orbital relationship of Earth and Venus and the limitations of the Atlas Agena, was determined to fall in the 51-day period from July 22 through September 10.[9]: 174 The Mariner flight plan was such that the two operational spacecraft would be launched toward Venus in a 30-day period within this window, taking slightly differing paths such that they both arrived at the target planet within nine days of each other, between the December 8 and 16.[31] Only Cape Canaveral Launch Complex 12 was available for the launching of Atlas-Agena rockets, and it took 24 days to ready an Atlas-Agena for launch. This meant that there was only a 27-day margin for error for a two-launch schedule.[9]: 174
Each Mariner would be launched into aparking orbit, whereupon the restartable Agena would fire a second time, sending Mariner on its way to Venus (errors intrajectory would be corrected by a mid-course burn of Mariner's onboard engines).[16]: 66–67 Real-time radar tracking of the Mariner spacecraft while it was inparking orbit and upon its departure theAtlantic Missile Range would provide real-time radar tracking with stations atAscension andPretoria, whilePalomar Observatory provided optical tracking. Deep space support was provided by three tracking and communications stations atGoldstone, California,Woomera, Australia, andJohannesburg, South Africa, each separated on the globe by around 120° for continuous coverage.[16]: 231–233
On July 22, 1962, the two-stageAtlas-Agena rocket carrying Mariner 1 veered off-course during its launch due to a defective signal from the Atlas anda bug in the program equations of the ground-based guidance computer; the spacecraft was destroyed by theRange Safety Officer.
Two days after that launch, Mariner 2 and its booster (Atlas vehicle 179D) were rolled out to LC-12. The Atlas proved troublesome to prepare for launch, and multiple serious problems with the autopilot occurred, including a complete replacement of the servoamplifier after it had suffered component damage due to shorted transistors.[32]
At 1:53 AM EST on August 27, Mariner 2 was launched fromCape Canaveral Air Force Station Launch Complex 12 at 06:53:14 UTC.[16]: 97 [32] The bug in the rocket’s software that resulted in the loss of Mariner 1 had not been identified at the time of the launch.[33] In the event the bug caused no issues with the launch since it was in a section of code that was only used when the data-feed from the ground was interrupted and there were no such interruptions during the launch of Mariner 2.[33]
The flight proceeded normally up to the point of the Agena booster engine cutoff, at which point the V-2 vernier engine lost pitch and yaw control. The vernier started oscillating and banging against its stops, resulting in a rapid roll of the launch vehicle that came close to threatening the integrity of the stack. At T+189 seconds, the rolling stopped and the launch continued without incident. The rolling motion of the Atlas resulted in ground guidance losing its lock on the booster and preventing any backup commands from being sent to counteract the roll. The incident was traced to a loose electrical connection in the vernier feedback transducer, which was pushed back into place by the centrifugal force of the roll, which also by fortunate coincidence left the Atlas only a few degrees off from where it started and within the range of the Agena's horizontal sensor. As a consequence of this episode, GD/A implemented improved fabrication of wiring harnesses and checkout procedures.
Five minutes after liftoff, the Atlas and Agena-Mariner separated, followed by the first Agena burn and second Agena burn. The Agena-Mariner separation injected the Mariner 2 spacecraft into a geocentric escape hyperbola at 26 minutes 3 seconds after liftoff. The NASA NDIF tracking station at Johannesburg, South Africa, acquired the spacecraft about 31 minutes after launch. Solar panel extension was completed approximately 44 minutes after launch. The Sun lock acquired the Sun about 18 minutes later. The high-gain antenna was extended to its acquisition angle of 72°. The output of the solar panels was slightly above the predicted value.
As all subsystems were performing normally, with the battery fully charged and the solar panels providing adequate power, the decision was made on August 29 to turn on cruise science experiments. On September 3, the Earth acquisition sequence was initiated, and Earth lock was established 29 minutes later.[16]: 97–109
Due to the Atlas-Agena putting Mariner slightly off course, the spacecraft required a mid-course correction, consisting of a roll-turn sequence, followed by a pitch-turn sequence and finally a motor-burn sequence. Preparation commands were sent to the spacecraft at 21:30 UTC on September 4. Initiation of the mid-course maneuver sequence was sent at 22:49:42 UTC and the roll-turn sequence started one hour later. The entire maneuver took approximately 34 minutes. As a result of the mid-course maneuver, the sensors lost their lock with the Sun and Earth. At 00:27:00 UTC the Sun re-acquisition began and at 00:34 UTC the Sun was reacquired. Earth re-acquisition started at 02:07:29 UTC and Earth was reacquired at 02:34 UTC.[16]: 111–113
On September 8 at 12:50 UTC, the spacecraft experienced a problem withattitude control. It automatically turned on the gyros, and the cruise science experiments were automatically turned off. The exact cause is unknown as attitude sensors went back to normal before telemetry measurements could be sampled, but it may have been an Earth-sensor malfunction or a collision with a small unidentified object which temporarily caused the spacecraft to lose Sun lock. A similar experience happened on September 29 at 14:34 UTC. Again, all sensors went back to normal before it could be determined which axis had lost lock. By this date, the Earth sensor brightness indication had essentially gone to zero. This time, however, telemetry data indicated that the Earth-brightness measurement had increased to the nominal value for that point in the trajectory.[16]: 113–114
On October 31, the output from one solar panel (withsolar sail attached) deteriorated abruptly. It was diagnosed as a partial short circuit in the panel. As a precaution, the cruise science instruments were turned off. A week later, the panel resumed normal function, and cruise science instruments were turned back on. The panel permanently failed on November 15, but Mariner 2 was close enough to the Sun that one panel could supply adequate power; thus, the cruise science experiments were left active.[16]: 114
Mariner 2 was the first spacecraft to successfully encounter another planet,[3] passing as close as 34,773 km (21,607 mi) to Venus after 110 days of flight on December 14, 1962.[4]
After encounter, cruise mode resumed. Spacecraft perihelion occurred on December 27 at a distance of 105,464,560 kilometers (65,532,640 mi). The last transmission from Mariner 2 was received on January 3, 1963, at 07:00 UTC, making the total time from launch to termination of the Mariner 2 mission 129 days.[34] After passing Venus, Mariner 2 enteredheliocentric orbit.[2]
The data produced during the flight consisted of two categories—viz., tracking data and telemetry data.[34] One particularly noteworthy piece of data gathered during the pioneering fly-by was the high temperature of the atmosphere,[35] measured to be 500 °C (773 K; 932 °F).[35] Various properties of thesolar wind were also measured for the first time.[35]
The microwave radiometer made three scans of Venus in 35 minutes on December 14, 1962, starting at 18:59 UTC.[24] The first scan was made on the dark side, the second was near the terminator, and the third was located on the light side.[24][36] The scans with the 19 mm band revealed peak temperatures of 490 ± 11 K (216.9 ± 11.0 °C; 422.3 ± 19.8 °F) on the dark side, 595 ± 12 K near the terminator, and 511 ± 14 K on the light side.[37] It was concluded that there is no significant difference in temperature across Venus.[24][36] However, the results suggest alimb darkening, an effect which presents cooler temperatures near the edge of the planetary disk and higher temperatures near the center.[22][23][24][36][37][38] This was evidence for the theory that the Venusian surface was extremely hot and the atmosphere optically thick.[24][36][37]
The infrared radiometer showed that the 8.4 μm and 10.4 μm radiation temperatures were in agreement with radiation temperatures obtained from Earth-based measurements.[26] There was no systematic difference between the temperatures measured on the light side and dark side of the planet, which was also in agreement with Earth-based measurements.[26] The limb darkening effect that the microwave radiometer detected was also present in the measurements by both channels of the infrared radiometer.[26][36][38] The effect was only slightly present in the 10.4 μm channel but was more pronounced in the 8.4 μm channel.[36] The 8.4 μm channel also showed a slight phase effect. The phase effect indicated that if a greenhouse effect existed, heat was transported in an efficient manner from the light side to the dark side of the planet.[36] The 8.4 μm and 10.4 μm showed equal radiation temperatures, indicating that the limb darkening effect would appear to come from a cloud structure rather than the atmosphere.[26] Thus, if the measured temperatures were actually cloud temperatures instead of surface temperatures, then these clouds would have to be quite thick.[25][36][38]
The magnetometer detected a persistent interplanetary magnetic field varying between 2 γ and 10 γ (nanotesla), which agrees with priorPioneer 5 observations from 1960. This also means that interplanetary space is rarely empty or field-free.[27] The magnetometer could detect changes of about 4 γ on any of the axes, but no trends above 10 γ were detected near Venus, nor were fluctuations seen like those that appear at Earth'smagnetospheric termination. This means that Mariner 2 found no detectable magnetic field near Venus, although that did not necessarily mean that Venus had none.[36][39] However, if Venus had a magnetic field, then it would have to be at least smaller than 1/10 the magnetic field of the Earth.[39][40] In 1980,Pioneer 12 indeed showed that Venus has a small weak magnetic field.[41]
The Anton type 213 Geiger-Müller tube performed as expected.[42] The average rate was 0.6 counts per second. Increases in its counting rate were larger and more frequent than for the two larger tubes, since it was more sensitive to particles of lower energy.[16] It detected seven small solar bursts of radiation during September and October and 2 during November and December.[43] The absence of a detectable magnetosphere was also confirmed by the tube; it detected no radiation belt at Venus similar to that of Earth. The count rate would have increased by 104, but no change was measured.[16][44]
It was also shown that in interplanetary space, thesolar wind streams continuously,[32][45] confirming a prediction byEugene Parker,[46] and the cosmic dust density is much lower than the near-Earth region.[47]Improved estimates of Venus's mass and the value of the Astronomical Unit were made. Also, research, which was later confirmed by Earth-based radar and other explorations, suggested that Venus rotates very slowly and in a direction opposite that of the Earth.[48]
| Active missions |
|    | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past missions |
| ||||||||||||
| Planned missions |
| ||||||||||||
| Proposed missions |
| ||||||||||||
| Cancelled or not developed | |||||||||||||
| Program overviews | |||||||||||||
| Related | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
