Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Marine primary production

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Marine synthesis of organic compounds

Ocean chlorophyll concentration as aproxy for marineprimary production. Green indicates where there are a lot ofphytoplankton, while blue indicates where there are few phytoplankton. – NASA Earth Observatory 2019.[1]

Marine primary production is the chemical synthesis in the ocean oforganic compounds from atmospheric or dissolvedcarbon dioxide. It principally occurs through the process ofphotosynthesis, which uses light as its source of energy, but it also occurs throughchemosynthesis, which uses the oxidation or reduction of inorganic chemical compounds as its source of energy. Almost alllife on Earth relies directly or indirectly onprimary production. The organisms responsible for primary production are calledprimary producers orautotrophs.

Most marine primary production is generated by a diverse collection ofmarine microorganisms calledalgae andcyanobacteria. Together these form the principal primary producers at the base of theocean food chain and produce half of the world's oxygen. Marine primary producers underpin almost all marine animal life by generating nearly all of the oxygen and food marine animals need to exist. Some marine primary producers are alsoecosystem engineers which change the environment and providehabitats for other marine life.

Primary production in the ocean can be contrasted with primary production on land. Globally the ocean and the land each produce about the same amount of primary production, but in the ocean primary production comes mainly from cyanobacteria and algae, while on land it comes mainly fromvascular plants.

Marine algae includes the largely invisible and oftenunicellularmicroalgae, which together withcyanobacteria form the oceanphytoplankton, as well as the larger, more visible and complexmulticellularmacroalgae commonly calledseaweed. Seaweeds are found along coastal areas, living on the floor ofcontinental shelves and washed up inintertidal zones. Some seaweeds drift with plankton in the sunlit surface waters (epipelagic zone) of the open ocean. Back in theSilurian, some phytoplankton evolved intored,brown andgreen algae. These algae then invaded the land and started evolving into theland plants we know today. Later in theCretaceous some of these land plants returned to the sea asmangroves andseagrasses. These are found along coasts inintertidal regions and in the brackish water ofestuaries. In addition, some seagrasses, like seaweeds, can be found at depths up to 50 metres on both soft and hard bottoms of the continental shelf.

Overview

[edit]
Part of a series of overviews on
Marine life

The rate of marine primary production is controlled primarily bylight availability, nutrient supply, andtemperature.[2] In the sunlit surface layer of the ocean,photosynthesis byphytoplankton is generally limited by nutrient concentrations rather than light,[3] while in deeper waters, low irradiance restricts production.Nitrogen,phosphorus, and in some regions,iron are the key limiting nutrients.[4] Productivity is highest in coastalupwelling zones and high-latitude spring blooms,[5] where nutrient availability is abundant, and lowest in subtropicalgyres, which are characterized by strong stratification and low nutrient availability.[6]

Marine primary production is measured asgross primary production (GPP), the total carbon fixed byphotosynthesis, or asnet primary production (NPP), which subtracts the carbon respired byprimary producers themselves.[7] Estimates are made using in-situ bottle incubations, satellite ocean-color observations, and globalbiogeochemical models. Current analyses suggest that marine NPP averages about 45–55 gigatons of carbon per year,[8] accounting for nearly half of Earth's total primary production.[9] This production fluctuates across regions and time scales, influenced by phenomena such as theEl Niño–Southern Oscillation, monsoons, and long-term shifts in ocean circulation.[10][11][12]

Marine primary producers

[edit]
Seasonal changes in which phytoplankton type dominates – NASA
click to animate
This visualization indicates seasonal changes in which phytoplankton types dominated over the period 1994–1998.
     • Red =diatoms (big phytoplankton, which need silica)
     • Yellow =flagellates (other big phytoplankton)
     • Green =prochlorococcus (small phytoplankton that cannot use nitrate)
     • Cyan =synechococcus (other small phytoplankton)
Opacity indicates concentration of the carbon biomass. In particular, the role of the swirls and filaments (mesoscale features) appear important in maintaining high biodiversity in the ocean.[13][14]
Part of a series on the
Carbon cycle

Primary producers are theautotroph organisms that make their own food instead of eating other organisms. This means primary producers become the starting point in thefood chain forheterotroph organisms that do eat other organisms. Some marine primary producers are specialised bacteria and archaea which arechemotrophs, making their own food by gathering aroundhydrothermal vents andcold seeps and usingchemosynthesis. However, most marineprimary production comes from organisms which usephotosynthesis on the carbon dioxide dissolved in the water. This process uses energy from sunlight to convert water andcarbon dioxide[15]: 186–187  into sugars that can be used both as a source of chemical energy and of organic molecules that are used in the structural components of cells.[15]: 1242  Marine primary producers are important because they underpin almost all marine animal life by generating most of theoxygen and food that provide other organisms with the chemical energy they need to exist.

The principal marine primary producers arecyanobacteria,algae and marine plants. Theoxygen released as a by-product of photosynthesis is needed bynearly all living things to carry outcellular respiration. In addition, primary producers are influential in the globalcarbon andwater cycles. They stabilize coastal areas and can provide habitats for marine animals. The termdivision has been traditionally used instead ofphylum when discussing primary producers, although theInternational Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants now accepts the terms as equivalent.[16]

    Conceptual diagram illustrating the relationships among gross primary production (GPP), net primary production (NPP), and net community production (NCP) in marine systems.

    In a reversal of the pattern on land, in the oceans, almost all photosynthesis is performed by algae andcyanobacteria, with a small fraction contributed byvascular plants and other groups. Algae encompass a diverse range of organisms, ranging from single floating cells to attachedseaweeds. They include photoautotrophs from a variety of groups.Eubacteria are important photosynthetizers in both oceanic and terrestrial ecosystems, and while somearchaea arephototrophic, none are known to utilise oxygen-evolvingphotosynthesis.[17] A number ofeukaryotes are significant contributors to primary production in the ocean, includinggreen algae,brown algae andred algae, and a diverse group of unicellular groups. Vascular plants are also represented in the ocean by groups such as theseagrasses.

    Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, the majority of primary production in the ocean is performed by free-livingmicroscopic organisms calledphytoplankton. It has been estimated that half of the world's oxygen is produced by phytoplankton.[18][19] Larger autotrophs, such as the seagrasses and macroalgae (seaweeds) are generally confined to thelittoral zone and adjacent shallow waters, where they canattach to the underlying substrate but still be within thephotic zone. There are exceptions, such asSargassum, but the vast majority of free-floating production takes place within microscopic organisms.

    The factors limiting primary production in the ocean are also very different from those on land. The availability of water, obviously, is not an issue (though itssalinity can be). Similarly, temperature, while affectingmetabolic rates (seeQ10), ranges less widely in the ocean than on land because theheat capacity of seawater buffers temperature changes, and the formation ofsea iceinsulates it at lower temperatures. However, the availability of light, the source of energy for photosynthesis, and mineralnutrients, the building blocks for new growth, play crucial roles in regulating primary production in the ocean.[20] Available Earth System Models suggest that ongoing ocean bio-geochemical changes could trigger reductions in ocean NPP between 3% and 10% of current values depending on the emissions scenario.[21]

    In 2020 researchers reported that measurements over the last two decades of primary production in theArctic Ocean show an increase of nearly 60% due to higher concentrations ofphytoplankton. They hypothesize new nutrients are flowing in from other oceans and suggest this means the Arctic Ocean may be able to supporthigher trophic level production and additionalcarbon fixation in the future.[22][23]

    Cyanobacteria

    [edit]
    Evolution of photosynthesis from cyanobacteria
    The origin and evolutionary tree of life that is based on small-subunit RNA. The branches that perform oxygenic photosynthesis are labeled with 'O2'. The black arrow indicates the plastid endosymbiotic event that resulted in the origin of eukaryotic photosynthesis from cyanobacteria-like organisms, which ultimately became chloroplasts in algae and later in plants. However, while chloroplasts of the higher plants, glaucophytes, green and red algae are thought to be the result of the plastid (primary) endosymbiosis, all other groups of algae are assumed to have arisen due to the algal (secondary and tertiary) endosymbiosis (not shown), in which one eukaryotic alga was incorporated into another eukaryote.[24][25][26][27][28] Only some branches of bacteria, eukarya, and archaea are displayed.[29]
    Main article:Cyanobacteria

    Cyanobacteria are a phylum (division) of bacteria, ranging from unicellular tofilamentous and includingcolonial species, whichfix inorganic carbon into organic carbon compounds. They are found almost everywhere on earth: in damp soil, in both freshwater and marine environments, and even on Antarctic rocks.[30] In particular, some species occur as drifting cells floating in the ocean, and as such were amongst the first of thephytoplankton. These bacteria function like algae in that they can process nitrogen from the atmosphere when none is in the ocean.

    Cyanobacteria from amicrobial mat. Cyanobacteria were the first organisms to release oxygen via photosynthesis.

    The first primary producers that used photosynthesis were oceaniccyanobacteria about 2.3 billion years ago.[31][32] The release of molecularoxygen bycyanobacteria as a by-product of photosynthesis induced global changes in the Earth's environment. Because oxygen was toxic to most life on Earth at the time, this led to the near-extinction ofoxygen-intolerant organisms, adramatic change which redirected the evolution of the major animal and plant species.[33]

    Prochlorococcus marinus

    The tiny marine cyanobacteriumProchlorococcus, discovered in 1986, forms today part of the base of the oceanfood chain and accounts for more than half the photosynthesis of the open ocean[34] and an estimated 20% of the oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere.[35] It is possibly the most plentiful genus on Earth: a single millilitre of surface seawater may contain 100,000 cells or more.[36]

    Originally, biologists thoughtcyanobacteria was algae, and referred to it as "blue-green algae". The more recent view is that cyanobacteria are bacteria, and hence are not even in the sameKingdom as algae. Most authorities exclude allprokaryotes, and hence cyanobacteria from the definition of algae.[37][38]

    Helical cyanobacteria

    Biological pigments

    [edit]

    Biological pigments are any coloured material in plant or animal cells. All biological pigments selectivelyabsorb certain wavelengths of light whilereflecting others.[39][40] The primary function of pigments in plants isphotosynthesis, which uses the green pigmentchlorophyll and several colourful pigments that absorb as much light energy as possible.Chlorophyll is the primary pigment in plants; it is achlorin that absorbs yellow and blue wavelengths of light while reflectinggreen. It is the presence and relative abundance of chlorophyll that gives plants their green colour.Green algae and plants possess two forms of this pigment: chlorophylla and chlorophyllb.Kelps,diatoms, and other photosyntheticheterokonts contain chlorophyllc instead ofb, while red algae possess only chlorophylla. All chlorophylls serve as the primary means plants use to intercept light in order to fuel photosynthesis.

    Chloroplasts

    [edit]
    Parts of achloroplast
    Diagram above contains clickable links
    Diagram above contains clickable links
    Endosymbiosis
    The first eukaryote may have originated from an ancestral prokaryote that had undergone membrane proliferation, compartmentalization of cellular function (into a nucleus, lysosomes, and an endoplasmic reticulum), and the establishment of endosymbiotic relationships with an aerobic prokaryote and, in some cases, a photosynthetic prokaryote to form mitochondria and chloroplasts, respectively.[41]

    Chloroplasts (from the Greekchloros for green, andplastes for "the one who forms"[42]) areorganelles that conductphotosynthesis, where the photosynthetic pigmentchlorophyll captures theenergy fromsunlight, converts it, and stores it in the energy-storage molecules while freeingoxygen from water inplant andalgal cells. They then use the stored energy to make organic molecules fromcarbon dioxide in a process known as theCalvin cycle.

    A chloroplast is a type of organelle known as aplastid, characterized byits two membranes and a high concentration ofchlorophyll. They are highly dynamic—they circulate and are moved around within plant cells, and occasionallypinch in two to reproduce. Their behavior is strongly influenced by environmental factors like light colour and intensity. Chloroplasts, likemitochondria, contain their ownDNA, which is thought to be inherited from their ancestor—a photosyntheticcyanobacterium that wasengulfed by an earlyeukaryotic cell.[43] Chloroplasts cannot be made by the plant cell and must be inherited by each daughter cell during cell division.

    Most chloroplasts can probably be traced back to a singleendosymbiotic event, when a cyanobacterium was engulfed by the eukaryote. Despite this, chloroplasts can be found in an extremely wide set of organisms, some not even directly related to each other—a consequence of manysecondary and eventertiary endosymbiotic events.

    Thechloroplasts ofglaucophytes have apeptidoglycan layer, evidence suggesting theirendosymbiotic origin fromcyanobacteria.[44]

    Microbial rhodopsin

    [edit]
    Model of the energy generating mechanism in marine bacteria
          (1) When sunlight strikes a rhodopsin molecule
          (2) it changes its configuration so a proton is expelled from the cell
          (3) the chemical potential causes the proton to flow back to the cell
          (4) thus generating energy
          (5) in the form ofadenosine triphosphate.[45]
    Main article:Microbial rhodopsin

    Phototrophic metabolism relies on one of three energy-converting pigments:chlorophyll,bacteriochlorophyll, andretinal. Retinal is thechromophore found inrhodopsins. The significance of chlorophyll in converting light energy has been written about for decades, but phototrophy based on retinal pigments is just beginning to be studied.[46]

    Halobacteria insalt evaporation ponds coloured purple bybacteriorhodopsin[47]
    External videos
    video iconPurple sulphur bacteria

    In 2000 a team of microbiologists led byEdward DeLong made a crucial discovery in the understanding of the marine carbon and energy cycles. They discovered a gene in several species of bacteria[48][49] responsible for production of the proteinrhodopsin, previously unheard of in bacteria. These proteins found in the cell membranes are capable of converting light energy to biochemical energy due to a change in configuration of the rhodopsin molecule as sunlight strikes it, causing the pumping of aproton from inside out and a subsequent inflow that generates the energy.[50] The archaeal-like rhodopsins have subsequently been found among different taxa, protists as well as in bacteria and archaea, though they are rare in complexmulticellular organisms.[48][51][52]

    Research in 2019 shows these "sun-snatching bacteria" are more widespread than previously thought and could change how oceans are affected by global warming. "The findings break from the traditional interpretation of marine ecology found in textbooks, which states that nearly all sunlight in the ocean is captured by chlorophyll in algae. Instead, rhodopsin-equipped bacteria function like hybrid cars, powered by organic matter when available—as most bacteria are—and by sunlight when nutrients are scarce."[53][46]

    There is anastrobiological conjecture called thePurple Earth hypothesis which surmises that original life forms on Earth were retinal-based rather than chlorophyll-based, which would have made the Earth appear purple instead of green.[54][55]

    Marine algae

    [edit]
    Broad classification of algae [56]
    Part of a series on
    Plankton
    Phytoplankton

    Algae is an informal term for a widespread and diverse collection of photosyntheticeukaryotic organisms which are not necessarily closely related and are thuspolyphyletic. Unlike higher plants, algae lack roots, stems, or leaves.

    Algal groups

    [edit]

    Marine algae have traditionally been placed in groups such as:green algae,red algae,brown algae,diatoms,coccolithophores anddinoflagellates.

    Green algae

    [edit]

    Green algae live most of their lives as single cells or are filamentous, while others formcolonies made up from long chains of cells, or are highly differentiated macroscopic seaweeds. They form an informal group containing about 8,000 recognized species.[57]

    Red algae

    [edit]

    Modernred algae are mostlymulticellular with differentiated cells and include many notableseaweeds.[58][59] Ascoralline algae, they play an important role in the ecology of coral reefs. They form a (disputed) phylum containing about 7,000 recognized species.[58]

    Brown algae

    [edit]

    Brown algae are mostlymulticellular and include many seaweeds, includingkelp. They form aclass containing about 2,000 recognized species.[60]

    Diatoms

    [edit]
    Star stick diatom

    Altogether, about 45 percent of theprimary production in the oceans is contributed bydiatoms.[61]

    • Diatoms are one of the most common types of phytoplankton
      Diatoms are one of the most common types of phytoplankton
    • They are a major algae group generating about 20% of world oxygen production.[62]
      They are a major algae group generating about 20% of world oxygen production.[62]
    • Diatoms have glass like cell walls called frustules which are made of silica.[63]
      Diatoms have glass like cell walls calledfrustules which are made ofsilica.[63]
    • Diatoms linked in a colonial chain[64]
      Diatoms linked in acolonial chain[64]

    Coccolithophores

    [edit]

    Coccolithophores are almost exclusively marine and are found in large numbers throughout thesunlight zone of theocean. They havecalcium carbonate plates (or scales) of uncertain function calledcoccoliths, which are importantmicrofossils. Coccolithophores are of interest to those studying globalclimate change because asocean acidity increases, their coccoliths may become even more important as acarbon sink.[65] The most abundant species of coccolithophore,Emiliania huxleyi is an ubiquitous component of the plankton base inmarine food webs.[66] Management strategies are being employed to prevent eutrophication-related coccolithophore blooms, as these blooms lead to a decrease in nutrient flow to lower levels of the ocean.[67]

    Dinoflagellate

    [edit]

    Mixotrophic algae

    [edit]

    Other groups

    [edit]

    Traditionally thephylogeny of microorganisms, such as the algal groups discussed above, was inferred and theirtaxonomy established based on studies ofmorphology. However developments inmolecular phylogenetics have allowed the evolutionary relationship of species to be established by analyzing theirDNA andprotein sequences.[69] Many taxa, including the algal groups discussed above, are in the process of being reclassified or redefined using molecular phylogenetics. Recent developments inmolecular sequencing have allowed for the recovery ofgenomes directly from environmental samples and avoiding the need for culturing. This has led for example, to a rapid expansion in knowledge of the abundance and diversity ofmarine microorganisms. Molecular techniques such as genome-resolvedmetagenomics andsingle cell genomics are being used in combination withhigh throughput techniques.

    Between 2009 and 2013, theTara Oceans expedition traversed the world oceans collecting plankton and analysing them with contemporary molecular techniques. They found a huge range of previously unknown photosynthetic and mixotrophic algae.[70] Among their findings were thediplonemids. These organisms are generally colourless and oblong in shape, typically about 20 μm long and with two flagella.[71] Evidence fromDNA barcoding suggests diplonemids may be among the most abundant and most species-rich of all marine eukaryote groups.[72][73]

    By size

    [edit]

    Algae can be classified by size asmicroalgae ormacroalgae.

    Microalgae

    [edit]

    Microalgae are the microscopic types of algae, not visible to the naked eye. They are mostlyunicellular species which exist as individuals or in chains or groups, though some aremulticellular. Microalgae are important components of themarine protists, as well as themarine phytoplankton. They are verydiverse. It has been estimated there are 200,000–800,000 species of which about 50,000 species have been described.[74] Depending on the species, their sizes range from a few micrometers (μm) to a few hundred micrometers. They are specially adapted to an environment dominated by viscous forces.

    Macroalgae

    [edit]
    Kelp forests are among the most productive ecosystems on Earth.

    Macroalgae are the larger,multicellular and more visible types of algae, commonly calledseaweeds. Seaweeds usually grow in shallow coastal waters where they are anchored to the seafloor by aholdfast. Seaweed that becomes adrift can wash up on beaches.Kelp is a large brown seaweed that forms large underwaterforests covering about 25% of the world coastlines.[75] They are among the most productive and dynamic ecosystems on Earth.[76] SomeSargassum seaweeds are planktonic (free-floating) and form floating drifts.[77]: 246–255  Like microalgae, macroalgae (seaweeds) are technicallymarine protists since they are not true plants.

    A seaweed is a macroscopic form ofred orbrown orgreen algae.
    Global distribution of kelp forests
    • Macroalgae
    • Giant kelp is technically a protist since it is not a true plant, yet it is multicellular and can grow to 50 m (160 ft).
      Giant kelp is technically a protist since it is not a true plant, yet it is multicellular and can grow to 50 m (160 ft).
    • Sargassum seaweed is a brown alga with air bladders that help it float.
      Sargassum seaweed is a brown alga with air bladders that help it float.
    • Sargassum fish are camouflaged to live among drifting Sargassum seaweed.
      Sargassum fish are camouflaged to live among driftingSargassum seaweed.
    • This unicellular bubble algae lives in tidal zones. It can have a 4 cm (1.6 in) diameter.[78]
      This unicellularbubble algae lives intidal zones. It can have a 4 cm (1.6 in) diameter.[78]

    Evolution of land plants

    [edit]
    The earliest land plants
    An evolutionary scenario for the conquest of land bystreptophytes[79]
    Dating is roughly based on Morris et al. 2018.[80]

    The diagram on the right shows an evolutionary scenario for the conquest of land by streptophytes.[79]Streptophyte algae include allgreen algae, and are the only photosyntheticeukaryotes from which the macroscopic land flora evolved(red lines). That said, throughout the course of evolution, algae from various other lineages have colonized land(yellow lines)—but also streptophyte algae have continuously and independently made the wet to dry transition (convergence of red and yellow). Throughout history, numerous lineages have become extinct(X labels). Terrestrial algae of various taxonomic affiliations dwell on rock surfaces and form biologicalsoil crusts. From the diversity of theparaphyletic streptophyte algae, however, did an organism whose descendants eventually conquered land on a global scale emerge: a likely branched filamentous—or evenparenchymatous—organism that formedrhizoidal structures and experienced desiccation from time to time. From this "hypothetical hydro-terrestrial alga", the lineages ofZygnematophyceae andembryophytes (land plants) arose.[79] In its infancy, the trajectory leading to the embryophytes was represented by the—now extinct—earliest land plants.[81]

    The earliest land plants probably interacted with beneficialsubstratemicrobiota that aided them in obtaining nutrients from their substrate. Furthermore, the earliest land plants had to successfully overcome a barrage of terrestrial stressors (including ultraviolet light and photosynthetically activeirradiance, drought, drastic temperature shifts, etc.). They succeeded because they had the right set of traits—a mix of adaptations that were selected for in their hydro-terrestrial algal ancestors, exaptations, and the potential for co-option of a fortuitous set of genes and pathways.[79] During the course of evolution, some members of the populations of the earliest land plants gained traits that are adaptive in terrestrial environments (such as some form of water conductance,stomata-like structures, embryos, etc.); eventually, the "hypotheticallast common ancestor of land plants" emerged. From this ancestor, the extantbryophytes andtracheophytes evolved. While the exact trait repertoire of the hypothetical last common ancestor of land plants is uncertain, it will certainly have entailed properties ofvascular andnon-vascular plants. What is also certain is that the last common ancestor of land plants had traits of algal ancestry.[79]

    Marine plants

    [edit]
    Evolution of mangroves and seagrasses

    Back in theSilurian, some phytoplankton evolved intored,brown andgreen algae. Green algae then invaded the land and started evolving into theland plants we know today. Later, in theCretaceous, some of these land plants returned to the sea asmangroves andseagrasses.[82]

    Plant life can flourish in the brackish waters ofestuaries, wheremangroves orcordgrass orbeach grass might grow.Flowering plants grow in sandy shallows in the form ofseagrass meadows,[83]mangroves line the coast in tropical and subtropical regions[84] andsalt-tolerant plants thrive in regularly inundatedsalt marshes.[85] All of these habitats are able to sequester large quantities of carbon and support abiodiverse range of larger and smaller animal life.[86] Marine plants can be found inintertidal zones and shallow waters, such asseagrasses likeeelgrass andturtle grass,Thalassia. These plants have adapted to the high salinity of the ocean environment.

    Light is only able to penetrate the top 200 metres (660 ft) so this is the only part of the sea where plants can grow.[87] The surface layers are often deficient in biologically active nitrogen compounds. The marinenitrogen cycle consists of complex microbial transformations which include thefixation of nitrogen, its assimilation,nitrification,anammox and denitrification.[88] Some of these processes take place in deep water so that where there is an upwelling of cold waters, and also near estuaries where land-sourced nutrients are present, plant growth is higher. This means that the most productive areas, rich in plankton and therefore also in fish, are mainly coastal.[89]: 160–163 

    Mangroves

    [edit]

    Mangroves provide important nursery habitats for marine life, acting as hiding and foraging places for larval and juvenile forms of larger fish and invertebrates. Based on satellite data, the total world area of mangrove forests was estimated in 2010 as 134,257 square kilometres (51,837 sq mi).[90][91]

    Global mangrove forests in 2000
    The seagrasscommon eelgrass according toIUCN data

    Seagrasses

    [edit]

    Like mangroves, seagrasses provide important nursery habitats for larval and juvenile forms of larger fish and invertebrates. The total world area of seagrass meadows is more difficult to determine than mangrove forests, but was conservatively estimated in 2003 as 177,000 square kilometres (68,000 sq mi).[92]

    External videos
    video iconHow did multicellularity evolve?Journey to the Microcosmos

    Stoichiometry

    [edit]

    Thestoichiometry (measurement of chemicalreactants andproducts) of primary production in the surface ocean plays a crucial role in thecycling of elements in the global ocean. The ratio between the elementscarbon (C),nitrogen (N), andphosphorus (P) in exported organic matter expressed in terms of the C:N:P ratio helps determine how muchatmospheric carbon issequestered in the deep ocean with respect to the availability oflimiting nutrients.[94] On geologic timescales, the N:P ratio reflects the relative availability ofnitrate with respect tophosphate, both of which are externally supplied from the atmosphere vianitrogen fixation and/or continents via river supply and lost bydenitrification and burial.[95][96][97][98] On shorter timescales, the average stoichiometry of exported bulkparticulate organic matter reflects the elemental stoichiometry ofphytoplankton,[99][100][101] with additional influences from biological diversity and secondary processing of organic matter byzooplankton andheterotrophic bacteria. In the face of global change, understanding and quantifying the mechanisms that lead to variability in C:N:P ratios are crucial in order to have an accurate projection of future climate change.[94]

    Likely response of P:C and N:C ratios in marine phytoplankton
    to major environmental drivers
    Illustration of how the five environmental drivers under a typical future climate scenario affect the cellular allocation of volume between P-rich (red), N-rich (blue), and C-rich (orange) pools.[94]

    A key unresolved question is what determines C:N:P of individual phytoplankton. Phytoplankton grows in theupper light-lit layer of the ocean, where the amount of inorganic nutrients, light, and temperature vary spatially and temporally.[94] Laboratory studies show that these fluctuations trigger responses at the cellular level, whereby cells modify resource allocation in order to adapt optimally to their ambient environment.[102] For example, phytoplankton may alter resource allocation between the P-rich biosynthetic apparatus, N-rich light-harvesting apparatus, and C-rich energy storage reserves.[103] Under a typical future warming scenario, the global ocean is expected to undergo changes in nutrient availability, temperature, andirradiance.[104] These changes are likely to have profound effects on the physiology of phytoplankton,[105][106] and observations show that competitive phytoplankton species can acclimate and adapt to changes in temperature, irradiance, and nutrients on decadal timescales.[107] Numerous laboratory and field experiments have been conducted that study the relationship between the C:N:P ratio of phytoplankton and environmental drivers. It is, however, challenging to synthesize those studies and generalize the response of phytoplankton C:N:P to changes in environmental drivers.[94] Individual studies employ different sets ofstatistical analyses to characterize the effects of the environmental driver(s) on elemental ratios, ranging from a simplet test to more complex mixed models, which makes interstudy comparisons challenging. In addition, since environmentally induced trait changes are driven by a combination ofplasticity (acclimation), adaptation, and life history,[108][109] stoichiometric responses of phytoplankton can be variable even amongst closely related species.[94]

    Meta-analysis/systematic review is a powerful statistical framework for synthesizing and integrating research results obtained from independent studies and for uncovering general trends.[110] The seminal synthesis by Geider and La Roche in 2002,[111] as well as the more recent work by Persson et al. in 2010,[112] has shown that C:P and N:P could vary by up to a factor of 20 between nutrient-replete and nutrient-limited cells. These studies have also shown that the C:N ratio can be modestly plastic due to nutrient limitation. A meta-analysis study by Hillebrand et al. in 2013 highlighted the importance of growth rate in determining elemental stoichiometry and showed that both C:P and N:P ratios decrease with the increasing growth rate.[113] In 2015, Yvon-Durocher et al. investigated the role of temperature in modulating C:N:P.[114] Although their dataset was limited to studies conducted prior to 1996, they have shown a statistically significant relationship between C:P and temperature increase. MacIntyre et al. (2002)[115] and Thrane et al. (2016)[116] have shown that irradiance plays an important role in controlling optimal cellular C:N and N:P ratios. Most recently, Moreno and Martiny (2018) provided a comprehensive summary of how environmental conditions regulate cellular stoichiometry from a physiological perspective.[103][94]

    The elemental stoichiometry of marine phytoplankton plays a critical role in global biogeochemical cycles through its impact on nutrient cycling, secondary production, and carbon export. Although extensive laboratory experiments have been carried out over the years to assess the influence of different environmental drivers on the elemental composition of phytoplankton, a comprehensive quantitative assessment of the processes is still lacking. Here, the responses of P:C and N:C ratios of marine phytoplankton have been synthesized to five major drivers (inorganic phosphorus, inorganic nitrogen, inorganic iron, irradiance, and temperature) by a meta-analysis of experimental data across 366 experiments from 104 journal articles. These results show that the response of these ratios to changes in macronutrients is consistent across all the studies, where the increase in nutrient availability is positively related to changes in P:C and N:C ratios. The results show that eukaryotic phytoplankton are more sensitive to the changes in macronutrients compared to prokaryotes, possibly due to their larger cell size and their abilities to regulate their gene expression patterns quickly. The effect of irradiance was significant and constant across all studies, where an increase in irradiance decreased both P:C and N:C. The P:C ratio decreased significantly with warming, but the response to temperature changes was mixed depending on the culture growth mode and the growth phase at the time of harvest. Along with other oceanographic conditions of the subtropical gyres (e.g., low macronutrient availability), the elevated temperature may explain why P:C is consistently low in subtropical oceans. Iron addition did not systematically change either P:C or N:C.[94]

    Evolutionary timeline

    [edit]
    Evolutionary timeline of microbe-plant interactions
    Microbial interactions outlined at the evolutionary scale, showing plant-microbe interactions occurring relatively recently compared to the more ancestral interactions among bacteria or between different microbial kingdoms. Both competitive (red) and cooperative (green) interactions within and between microbial kingdoms are depicted. Mya, million years ago.[117]
    Evolutionary divergence estimated from Lückinget al., 2009 and Heckmanet al., 2001.[118][119]
    Earth's biogeologic clock

    See also

    [edit]

    References

    [edit]
    1. ^Chlorophyll NASA Earth Observatory. Accessed 30 November 2019.
    2. ^Valiela, Ivan (1995). "Factors Affecting Primary Production".Marine Ecological Processes. New York, NY: Springer New York. p. 36–83.doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4125-4_2.ISBN 978-1-4419-2840-5. Retrieved9 October 2025.
    3. ^Diehl, Sebastian (2002)."Phytoplankton, Light, and Nutrients in a Gradient of Mixing Depths: Theory".Ecology.83 (2): 386.doi:10.2307/2680022. Retrieved9 October 2025.
    4. ^Elser, James J.; Bracken, Matthew E.S.; Cleland, Elsa E.; Gruner, Daniel S.; Harpole, W. Stanley; Hillebrand, Helmut; Ngai, Jacqueline T.; Seabloom, Eric W.; Shurin, Jonathan B.; Smith, Jennifer E. (2007)."Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems".Ecology Letters.10 (12):1135–1142.doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x.ISSN 1461-023X. Retrieved9 October 2025.
    5. ^Tian, Ru Cheng; Vézina, Alain F.; Starr, Michel; Saucier, François (2001)."Seasonal dynamics of coastal ecosystems and export production at high latitudes: A modeling study".Limnology and Oceanography.46 (8):1845–1859.doi:10.4319/lo.2001.46.8.1845.ISSN 0024-3590.
    6. ^Mann, K.H.; Lazier, J.R.N. (22 November 2005).Dynamics of Marine Ecosystems. Wiley.doi:10.1002/9781118687901.ch10.ISBN 978-1-4051-1118-8. Retrieved9 October 2025.
    7. ^Vernet, Maria; Smith, Raymond C. (1 August 2007). "Measuring and Modeling Primary Production in Marine Pelagic Ecosystems".Principles and Standards for Measuring Primary Production. Oxford University Press. p. 142–174.doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168662.003.0009.ISBN 978-0-19-516866-2. Retrieved9 October 2025.
    8. ^Chavez, Francisco P.; Messié, Monique; Pennington, J. Timothy (15 January 2011)."Marine Primary Production in Relation to Climate Variability and Change".Annual Review of Marine Science.3 (1):227–260.doi:10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163917.ISSN 1941-1405. Retrieved9 October 2025.
    9. ^Ogilvie Thornton, Daniel Conrad (15 February 2012). "Primary Production in the Ocean".Advances in Photosynthesis - Fundamental Aspects. InTech.doi:10.5772/27848.ISBN 978-953-307-928-8. Retrieved9 October 2025.
    10. ^Gao, Hui; Li, Huazhen; Chen, Ying; Zhao, Hui (2025)."Response of net primary productivity in the South China Sea to ENSO".Marine Environmental Research.212 107520.doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107520. Retrieved9 October 2025.
    11. ^Behrenfeld, Michael J.; Falkowski, Paul G. (1997)."Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite‐based chlorophyll concentration".Limnology and Oceanography.42 (1):1–20.doi:10.4319/lo.1997.42.1.0001.ISSN 0024-3590. Retrieved9 October 2025.
    12. ^Siegel, D.A.; Behrenfeld, M.J.; Maritorena, S.; McClain, C.R.; Antoine, D.; Bailey, S.W.; Bontempi, P.S.; Boss, E.S.; Dierssen, H.M.; Doney, S.C.; Eplee, R.E.; Evans, R.H.; Feldman, G.C.; Fields, E.; Franz, B.A.; Kuring, N.A.; Mengelt, C.; Nelson, N.B.; Patt, F.S.; Robinson, W.D.; Sarmiento, J.L.; Swan, C.M.; Werdell, P.J.; Westberry, T.K.; Wilding, J.G.; Yoder, J.A. (2013)."Regional to global assessments of phytoplankton dynamics from the SeaWiFS mission".Remote Sensing of Environment.135:77–91.doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.025.hdl:1912/7237.
    13. ^Modeled Phytoplankton Communities in the Global OceanNASA Hyperwall, 30 September 2015.Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
    14. ^Darwin ProjectMassachusetts Institute of Technology.
    15. ^abCampbell, Neil A.; Reece, Jane B.; Urry, Lisa Andrea; Cain, Michael L.; Wasserman, Steven Alexander; Minorsky, Peter V.; Jackson, Robert Bradley (2008).Biology (8 ed.). San Francisco: Pearson – Benjamin Cummings.ISBN 978-0-321-54325-7.
    16. ^McNeill, J.; et al., eds. (2012).International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code), Adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011 (electronic ed.). International Association for Plant Taxonomy. Retrieved14 May 2017.
    17. ^Schäfer G, Engelhard M, Müller V (1 September 1999)."Bioenergetics of the Archaea".Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.63 (3):570–620.doi:10.1128/MMBR.63.3.570-620.1999.PMC 103747.PMID 10477309.
    18. ^Roach, John (7 June 2004)."Source of Half Earth's Oxygen Gets Little Credit".National Geographic News. Archived fromthe original on 8 June 2004. Retrieved4 April 2016.
    19. ^Lin, I.; Liu, W. Timothy; Wu, Chun-Chieh; Wong, George T. F.; Hu, Chuanmin; Chen, Zhiqiang; Wen-Der, Liang; Yang, Yih; Liu, Kon-Kee (2003)."New evidence for enhanced ocean primary production triggered by tropical cyclone".Geophysical Research Letters.30 (13): 1718.Bibcode:2003GeoRL..30.1718L.doi:10.1029/2003GL017141.S2CID 10267488.
    20. ^Sigman, D.M.; Hain, M.P. (2012)."The Biological Productivity of the Ocean"(PDF).Nature Education Knowledge.3 (6):1–16. Retrieved1 June 2015.The deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM) occurs at the contact where there is adequate light for photosynthesis and yet significant nutrient supply from below.
    21. ^Mora, C.; et al. (2013)."Biotic and Human Vulnerability to Projected Changes in Ocean Biogeochemistry over the 21st Century".PLOS Biology.11 (10) e1001682.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001682.PMC 3797030.PMID 24143135.
    22. ^"A 'regime shift' is happening in the Arctic Ocean, scientists say".phys.org. Retrieved16 August 2020.
    23. ^Lewis, K. M.; Dijken, G. L. van; Arrigo, K. R. (10 July 2020)."Changes in phytoplankton concentration now drive increased Arctic Ocean primary production".Science.369 (6500):198–202.doi:10.1126/science.aay8380.ISSN 0036-8075.PMID 32647002.S2CID 220433818. Retrieved16 August 2020.
    24. ^Olson, J. M. andBlankenship, R. E. (2005) "Thinking about the evolution of photosynthesis". In:Discoveries in Photosynthesis, pages 1073–1086, Springer.ISBN 9781402033247.doi:10.1007/1-4020-3324-9_95.
    25. ^Blankenship, R. E., Sadekar, S., and Raymond, J. (2007) "The evolutionary transition from anoxygenic to oxygenic photosynthesis". In:Evolution of Aquatic Photoautotrophs, eds P. G. Falkowski and A. N. Knoll, New York: Academic Press, pages 21–35.doi:10.1016/B978-012370518-1/50004-7.
    26. ^Hohmann-Marriott, M.F. and Blankenship, R.E. (2011) "Evolution of photosynthesis".Annual review of plant biology,62: 515–548.doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103811.
    27. ^Kim, E., Harrison, J.W., Sudek, S., Jones, M.D., Wilcox, H.M., Richards, T.A., Worden, A.Z. and Archibald, J.M.(2011) "Newly identified and diverse plastid-bearing branch on the eukaryotic tree of life".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,108(4): 1496–1500.doi:10.1073/pnas.1013337108.
    28. ^Garcia-Mendoza, E. and Ocampo-Alvarez, H. (2011) "Photoprotection in the brown algaMacrocystis pyrifera: evolutionary implications".Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology,104(1-2): 377–385.doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.04.004.
    29. ^Shevela, D. (2011) "Adventures with cyanobacteria: a personal perspective".Frontiers in plant science,2: 28.doi:10.3389/fpls.2011.00028.
    30. ^Walsh PJ, Smith S, Fleming L, Solo-Gabriele H, Gerwick WH, eds. (2 September 2011)."Cyanobacteria and cyanobacterial toxins".Oceans and Human Health: Risks and Remedies from the Seas. Academic Press. pp. 271–296.ISBN 978-0-08-087782-2.
    31. ^"The Rise of Oxygen".Astrobiology Magazine. 30 July 2003. Archived from the original on 3 April 2015. Retrieved6 April 2016.
    32. ^Flannery, D. T.; R.M. Walter (2012). "Archean tufted microbial mats and the Great Oxidation Event: new insights into an ancient problem".Australian Journal of Earth Sciences.59 (1):1–11.Bibcode:2012AuJES..59....1F.doi:10.1080/08120099.2011.607849.S2CID 53618061.
    33. ^Rothschild, Lynn (September 2003)."Understand the evolutionary mechanisms and environmental limits of life". NASA. Archived fromthe original on 29 March 2012. Retrieved13 July 2009.
    34. ^Nadis S (December 2003)."The cells that rule the seas"(PDF).Scientific American.289 (6):52–3.Bibcode:2003SciAm.289f..52N.doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1203-52.PMID 14631732. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 19 April 2014. Retrieved11 July 2019.
    35. ^"The Most Important Microbe You've Never Heard Of".npr.org.
    36. ^Flombaum, P.; Gallegos, J. L.; Gordillo, R. A.; Rincon, J.; Zabala, L. L.; Jiao, N.; Karl, D. M.; Li, W. K. W.; Lomas, M. W.; Veneziano, D.; Vera, C. S.; Vrugt, J. A.; Martiny, A. C. (2013)."Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.110 (24):9824–9829.Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.9824F.doi:10.1073/pnas.1307701110.PMC 3683724.PMID 23703908.
    37. ^Nabors, Murray W. (2004).Introduction to Botany. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education, Inc.ISBN 978-0-8053-4416-5.
    38. ^Allaby, M., ed. (1992). "Algae".The Concise Dictionary of Botany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    39. ^Grotewold, E. (2006). "The Genetics and Biochemistry of Floral Pigments".Annual Review of Plant Biology.57:761–780.doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105248.PMID 16669781.
    40. ^Lee, DW (2007) Nature's palette - the science of plant color. University of Chicago Press
    41. ^Concepts of Biology: Eukaryotic Origins.OpenStax CNX. Retrieved 16 July 2020. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    42. ^"chloroplast".Online Etymology Dictionary.
    43. ^Basic Biology (18 March 2016)."Bacteria".
    44. ^Patrick J. Keeling (2004)."Diversity and evolutionary history of plastids and their hosts".American Journal of Botany.91 (10):1481–1493.doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1481.PMID 21652304.
    45. ^DeLong, E.F.; Beja, O. (2010)."The light-driven proton pump proteorhodopsin enhances bacterial survival during tough times".PLOS Biology.8 (4) e1000359.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000359.PMC 2860490.PMID 20436957. e1000359.
    46. ^abGómez-Consarnau, L.; Raven, J.A.; Levine, N.M.; Cutter, L.S.; Wang, D.; Seegers, B.; Arístegui, J.; Fuhrman, J.A.; Gasol, J.M.; Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S.A. (2019)."Microbial rhodopsins are major contributors to the solar energy captured in the sea".Science Advances.5 (8) eaaw8855.Bibcode:2019SciA....5.8855G.doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw8855.PMC 6685716.PMID 31457093.
    47. ^Oren, Aharon (2002)."Molecular ecology of extremely halophilic Archaea and Bacteria".FEMS Microbiology Ecology.39 (1):1–7.Bibcode:2002FEMME..39....1O.doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00900.x.ISSN 0168-6496.PMID 19709178.
    48. ^abBéja, O.; Aravind, L.; Koonin, E.V.; Suzuki, M.T.; Hadd, A.; Nguyen, L.P.; Jovanovich, S.B.; Gates, C.M.; Feldman, R.A.; Spudich, J.L.; Spudich, E.N. (2000). "Bacterial rhodopsin: evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea".Science.289 (5486):1902–1906.Bibcode:2000Sci...289.1902B.doi:10.1126/science.289.5486.1902.PMID 10988064.S2CID 1461255.
    49. ^"Interviews with Fellows: Ed Delong".American Academy of Microbiology. Archived fromthe original on 7 August 2016. Retrieved2 July 2016.
    50. ^Bacteria with Batteries, Popular Science, January 2001, Page 55.
    51. ^Boeuf, Dominique; Audic, Stéphane; Brillet-Guéguen, Loraine; Caron, Christophe; Jeanthon, Christian (2015)."MicRhoDE: a curated database for the analysis of microbial rhodopsin diversity and evolution".Database.2015 bav080.doi:10.1093/database/bav080.ISSN 1758-0463.PMC 4539915.PMID 26286928.
    52. ^Yawo, Hiromu; Kandori, Hideki; Koizumi, Amane (5 June 2015).Optogenetics: Light-Sensing Proteins and Their Applications. Springer. pp. 3–4.ISBN 978-4-431-55516-2. Retrieved30 September 2015.
    53. ^A tiny marine microbe could play a big role in climate changeUniversity of Southern California, Press Room, 8 August 2019.
    54. ^DasSarma, Shiladitya; Schwieterman, Edward W. (11 October 2018)."Early evolution of purple retinal pigments on Earth and implications for exoplanet biosignatures".International Journal of Astrobiology.20 (3):241–250.arXiv:1810.05150.Bibcode:2018arXiv181005150D.doi:10.1017/S1473550418000423.ISSN 1473-5504.S2CID 119341330.
    55. ^Sparks, William B.; DasSarma, S.; Reid, I. N. (December 2006). "Evolutionary Competition Between Primitive Photosynthetic Systems: Existence of an early purple Earth?".American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts.38: 901.Bibcode:2006AAS...209.0605S.
    56. ^Javed, M.R., Bilal, M.J., Ashraf, M.U.F., Waqar, A., Mehmood, M.A., Saeed, M. and Nashat, N. (2019)"Microalgae as a Feedstock for Biofuel Production: Current Status and Future Prospects" In:Top 5 Contributions in Energy Research and Development, third edition, chapter 2, Avid Science.ISBN 978-93-88170-77-2. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    57. ^Guiry MD (October 2012). "How many species of algae are there?".Journal of Phycology.48 (5):1057–63.Bibcode:2012JPcgy..48.1057G.doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01222.x.PMID 27011267.S2CID 30911529.
    58. ^abGuiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. (2016)."Algaebase".www.algaebase.org. Retrieved20 November 2016.
    59. ^D. Thomas (2002).Seaweeds. Life Series.Natural History Museum, London.ISBN 978-0-565-09175-0.
    60. ^Hoek, Christiaan; den Hoeck, Hoeck Van; Mann, David; Jahns, H.M. (1995).Algae: an introduction to phycology. Cambridge University Press. p. 166.ISBN 978-0-521-31687-3.OCLC 443576944.
    61. ^Yool, A.; Tyrrell, T. (2003). "Role of diatoms in regulating the ocean's silicon cycle".Global Biogeochemical Cycles.17 (4): n/a.Bibcode:2003GBioC..17.1103Y.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.394.3912.doi:10.1029/2002GB002018.S2CID 16849373.
    62. ^The Air You're Breathing? A Diatom Made That
    63. ^"More on Diatoms".University of California Museum of Paleontology. Archived fromthe original on 4 October 2012. Retrieved11 July 2019.
    64. ^This twilight zone is dark, watery, and yes, also full of intrigueNASA Blog, 21 August 2018.
    65. ^Smith, H.E.K.; et al. (2012), "Predominance of heavily calcified coccolithophores at low CaCO3 saturation during winter in the Bay of Biscay",Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,109 (23):8845–8849,Bibcode:2012PNAS..109.8845S,doi:10.1073/pnas.1117508109,PMC 3384182,PMID 22615387
    66. ^"Biogeography and dispersal of micro-organisms: a review emphasizing protists",Acta Protozoologica,45 (2):111–136, 2005
    67. ^Yunev, O.A.; et al. (2007), "Nutrient and phytoplankton trends on the western Black Sea shelf in response to cultural eutrophication and climate changes",Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science,74 (1–2):63–67,Bibcode:2007ECSS...74...63Y,doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.030
    68. ^Brand, Larry E.; Campbell, Lisa; Bresnan, Eileen (2012)."Karenia: The biology and ecology of a toxic genus".Harmful Algae.14:156–178.Bibcode:2012HAlga..14..156B.doi:10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.020.PMC 9891709.PMID 36733478.
    69. ^Olsen GJ, Woese CR, Overbeek R (1994)."The winds of (evolutionary) change: breathing new life into microbiology".Journal of Bacteriology.176 (1):1–6.doi:10.2172/205047.PMC 205007.PMID 8282683.
    70. ^Bork, P., Bowler, C., De Vargas, C., Gorsky, G., Karsenti, E. and Wincker, P. (2015) "Tara Oceans studies plankton at planetary scale".doi:10.1126/science.aac5605.
    71. ^Gawryluk, Ryan M.R.; Del Campo, Javier; Okamoto, Noriko; Strassert, Jürgen F.H.; Lukeš, Julius; Richards, Thomas A.; Worden, Alexandra Z.; Santoro, Alyson E.; Keeling, Patrick J. (2016)."Morphological Identification and Single-Cell Genomics of Marine Diplonemids".Current Biology.26 (22):3053–3059.Bibcode:2016CBio...26.3053G.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.013.PMID 27875688.
    72. ^Faktorová, D., Dobáková, E., Peña-Diaz, P. and Lukeš, J., 2016. From simple to supercomplex: mitochondrial genomes of euglenozoan protists. F1000Research, 5.doi:10.12688/f1000research.8040.1. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    73. ^De Vargas, C., Audic, S., Henry, N., Decelle, J., Mahé, F., Logares, R., Lara, E., Berney, C., Le Bescot, N., Probert, I., Carmichael, M. and 44 others (2015) "Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science",348(6237): 1261605.doi:10.1126/science.1261605.
    74. ^Starckx, Senne (31 October 2012)A place in the sun - Algae is the crop of the future, according to researchers in GeelArchived 4 March 2016 at theWayback Machine Flanders Today, Retrieved 8 December 2012
    75. ^Wernberg, T., Krumhansl, K., Filbee-Dexter, K. and Pedersen, M.F. (2019) "Status and trends for the world's kelp forests". In:World seas: an environmental evaluation, pages 57–78). Academic Press.doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-805052-1.00003-6.
    76. ^Mann, K.H. 1973. Seaweeds: their productivity and strategy for growth. Science 182: 975-981.
    77. ^Kindersley, Dorling (2011).Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Ocean. Dorling Kindersley.ISBN 978-1-4053-3308-5.
    78. ^Tunnell, John Wesley; Chávez, Ernesto A.; Withers, Kim (2007).Coral reefs of the southern Gulf of Mexico. Texas A&M University Press. p. 91.ISBN 978-1-58544-617-9.
    79. ^abcdeDe Vries, Jan; De Vries, Sophie; Fürst-Jansen, Janine M R. (2020)."Evo-physio: On stress responses and the earliest land plants".Journal of Experimental Botany.71 (11):3254–3269.doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa007.PMC 7289718.PMID 31922568. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    80. ^Morris, Jennifer L.; Puttick, Mark N.; Clark, James W.; Edwards, Dianne; Kenrick, Paul; Pressel, Silvia; Wellman, Charles H.; Yang, Ziheng; Schneider, Harald; Donoghue, Philip C. J. (2018)."The timescale of early land plant evolution".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.115 (10):E2274 –E2283.Bibcode:2018PNAS..115E2274M.doi:10.1073/pnas.1719588115.PMC 5877938.PMID 29463716.
    81. ^Delaux, Pierre-Marc; Hetherington, Alexander J.; Coudert, Yoan; Delwiche, Charles; Dunand, Christophe; Gould, Sven; Kenrick, Paul; Li, Fay-Wei; Philippe, Hervé; Rensing, Stefan A.; Rich, Mélanie; Strullu-Derrien, Christine; De Vries, Jan (2019)."Reconstructing trait evolution in plant evo–devo studies".Current Biology.29 (21):R1110 –R1118.Bibcode:2019CBio...29R1110D.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.044.PMID 31689391.S2CID 207844920.
    82. ^Orth, R.J., Carruthers, T.J., Dennison, W.C., Duarte, C.M., Fourqurean, J.W., Heck, K.L., Hughes, A.R., Kendrick, G.A., Kenworthy, W.J., Olyarnik, S. and Short, F.T. (2006)"A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems".Bioscience,56(12): pages 987–996.doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[987:AGCFSE]2.0.CO;2
    83. ^van der Heide, T.; van Nes, E. H.; van Katwijk, M. M.; Olff, H.; Smolders, A. J. P. (2011). Romanuk, Tamara (ed.)."Positive feedbacks in seagrass ecosystems: evidence from large-scale empirical data".PLOS ONE.6 (1) e16504.Bibcode:2011PLoSO...616504V.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016504.PMC 3025983.PMID 21283684.
    84. ^"Mangal (Mangrove)". Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden. Retrieved11 July 2013.
    85. ^"Coastal Salt Marsh". Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden. Retrieved11 July 2013.
    86. ^"Facts and figures on marine biodiversity".Marine biodiversity. UNESCO. 2012. Retrieved11 July 2013.
    87. ^Russell, F. S.; Yonge, C. M. (1928).The Seas. Frederick Warne. pp. 225–227.
    88. ^Voss, Maren; Bange, Hermann W.; Dippner, Joachim W.; Middelburg, Jack J.; Montoya, Joseph P.; Ward, Bess (2013)."The marine nitrogen cycle: recent discoveries, uncertainties and the potential relevance of climate change".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.368 (1621) 20130121.doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0121.PMC 3682741.PMID 23713119.
    89. ^Stow, Dorrik (2004).Encyclopedia of the Oceans. Oxford University Press.ISBN 978-0-19-860687-1.
    90. ^Giri C, Ochieng E, Tieszen LL, Zhu Z, Singh A, Loveland T, et al. (2011) "Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data".Global Ecology and Biogeography,20(1):154–159.doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x
    91. ^Thomas, N., Lucas, R., Bunting, P., Hardy, A., Rosenqvist, A. and Simard, M. (2017) "Distribution and drivers of global mangrove forest change, 1996–2010".PLOS ONE,12(6): e0179302.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179302
    92. ^Short, F.T. and Frederick, T. (2003)World atlas of seagrassesArchived 10 July 2019 at theWayback Machine, University of California Press, page 24.ISBN 9780520240476
    93. ^Froese, Rainer;Pauly, Daniel (eds.)."Phycodurus eques".FishBase. July 2009 version.
    94. ^abcdefghTanioka, Tatsuro; Matsumoto, Katsumi (2020)."A meta-analysis on environmental drivers of marine phytoplankton C: N: P".Biogeosciences.17 (11):2939–2954.Bibcode:2020BGeo...17.2939T.doi:10.5194/bg-17-2939-2020.S2CID 226197209. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    95. ^Broecker, Wallace S. (1982). "Ocean chemistry during glacial time".Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.46 (10):1689–1705.Bibcode:1982GeCoA..46.1689B.doi:10.1016/0016-7037(82)90110-7.
    96. ^Lenton, Timothy M.; Watson, Andrew J. (2000)."Redfield revisited: 1. Regulation of nitrate, phosphate, and oxygen in the ocean".Global Biogeochemical Cycles.14 (1):225–248.Bibcode:2000GBioC..14..225L.doi:10.1029/1999GB900065.S2CID 95940597.
    97. ^Redfield A. C. (1958)"The biological control of chemical factors in the environment",American Scientist,46(3) 230A–221.
    98. ^Tyrrell, Toby (1999). "The relative influences of nitrogen and phosphorus on oceanic primary production".Nature.400 (6744):525–531.Bibcode:1999Natur.400..525T.doi:10.1038/22941.S2CID 4325136.
    99. ^Bonachela, Juan A.; Klausmeier, Christopher A.; Edwards, Kyle F.;Litchman, Elena; Levin, Simon A. (2016)."The role of phytoplankton diversity in the emergent oceanic stoichiometry".Journal of Plankton Research.38 (4):1021–1035.doi:10.1093/plankt/fbv087.
    100. ^Garcia, Catherine A.; Baer, Steven E.; Garcia, Nathan S.; Rauschenberg, Sara; Twining, Benjamin S.; Lomas, Michael W.; Martiny, Adam C. (2018)."Nutrient supply controls particulate elemental concentrations and ratios in the low latitude eastern Indian Ocean".Nature Communications.9 (1): 4868.Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.4868G.doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06892-w.PMC 6242840.PMID 30451846.
    101. ^Martiny, Adam C.; Pham, Chau T. A.; Primeau, Francois W.; Vrugt, Jasper A.; Moore, J. Keith; Levin, Simon A.; Lomas, Michael W. (2013)."Strong latitudinal patterns in the elemental ratios of marine plankton and organic matter".Nature Geoscience.6 (4):279–283.Bibcode:2013NatGe...6..279M.doi:10.1038/ngeo1757.S2CID 5677709.
    102. ^Geider, Richard; La Roche, Julie (2002)."Redfield revisited: Variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis"(PDF).European Journal of Phycology.37 (1):1–17.Bibcode:2002EJPhy..37....1G.doi:10.1017/S0967026201003456.S2CID 13747201.
    103. ^abMoreno, Allison R.; Martiny, Adam C. (2018). "Ecological Stoichiometry of Ocean Plankton".Annual Review of Marine Science.10:43–69.Bibcode:2018ARMS...10...43M.doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-121916-063126.PMID 28853998.
    104. ^Boyd, Philip W.; Strzepek, Robert; Fu, Feixue; Hutchins, David A. (2010). "Environmental control of open-ocean phytoplankton groups: Now and in the future".Limnology and Oceanography.55 (3):1353–1376.Bibcode:2010LimOc..55.1353B.doi:10.4319/lo.2010.55.3.1353.S2CID 15511444.
    105. ^Finkel, Z. V.; Beardall, J.; Flynn, K. J.; Quigg, A.; Rees, T. A. V.; Raven, J. A. (2010). "Phytoplankton in a changing world: Cell size and elemental stoichiometry".Journal of Plankton Research.32:119–137.doi:10.1093/plankt/fbp098.
    106. ^Van De Waal, Dedmer B.; Verschoor, Antonie M.; Verspagen, Jolanda MH; Van Donk, Ellen; Huisman, Jef (2010)."Climate-driven changes in the ecological stoichiometry of aquatic ecosystems".Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.8 (3):145–152.Bibcode:2010FrEE....8..145V.doi:10.1890/080178.hdl:20.500.11755/c74d7e45-762a-4e66-aa31-844e96e69fa2.
    107. ^Irwin, Andrew J.; Finkel, Zoe V.; Müller-Karger, Frank E.; Troccoli Ghinaglia, Luis (2015)."Phytoplankton adapt to changing ocean environments".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.112 (18):5762–5766.Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.5762I.doi:10.1073/pnas.1414752112.PMC 4426419.PMID 25902497.
    108. ^Collins, Sinéad; Boyd, Philip W.; Doblin, Martina A. (2020). "Evolution, Microbes, and Changing Ocean Conditions".Annual Review of Marine Science.12:181–208.Bibcode:2020ARMS...12..181C.doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010318-095311.PMID 31451085.S2CID 201730744.
    109. ^Ward, B. A.; Collins, S.; Dutkiewicz, S.; Gibbs, S.; Bown, P.; Ridgwell, A.; Sauterey, B.; Wilson, J. D.; Oschlies, A. (2019)."Considering the Role of Adaptive Evolution in Models of the Ocean and Climate System".Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.11 (11):3343–3361.Bibcode:2019JAMES..11.3343W.doi:10.1029/2018MS001452.PMC 6988444.PMID 32025278.
    110. ^Gurevitch, Jessica; Koricheva, Julia; Nakagawa, Shinichi; Stewart, Gavin (2018)."Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis".Nature.555 (7695):175–182.Bibcode:2018Natur.555..175G.doi:10.1038/nature25753.hdl:1959.4/unsworks_71830.PMID 29517004.S2CID 3761687.
    111. ^Geider, Richard; La Roche, Julie (2002)."Redfield revisited: Variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis"(PDF).European Journal of Phycology.37 (1):1–17.Bibcode:2002EJPhy..37....1G.doi:10.1017/S0967026201003456.S2CID 13747201.
    112. ^Persson, Jonas; Fink, Patrick; Goto, Akira; Hood, James M.; Jonas, Jayne; Kato, Satoshi (2010). "To be or not to be what you eat: Regulation of stoichiometric homeostasis among autotrophs and heterotrophs".Oikos.119 (5):741–751.Bibcode:2010Oikos.119..741P.doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18545.x.
    113. ^Hillebrand, Helmut; Steinert, Georg; Boersma, Maarten; Malzahn, Arne; Meunier, Cédric Léo; Plum, Christoph; Ptacnik, Robert (2013)."Goldman revisited: Faster-growing phytoplankton has lower N: P and lower stoichiometric flexibility".Limnology and Oceanography.58 (6):2076–2088.Bibcode:2013LimOc..58.2076H.doi:10.4319/lo.2013.58.6.2076.S2CID 55496787.
    114. ^Yvon-Durocher, Gabriel; Dossena, Matteo; Trimmer, Mark; Woodward, Guy; Allen, Andrew P. (2015). "Temperature and the biogeography of algal stoichiometry".Global Ecology and Biogeography.24 (5):562–570.Bibcode:2015GloEB..24..562Y.doi:10.1111/geb.12280.
    115. ^MacIntyre, Hugh L.; Kana, Todd M.; Anning, Tracy; Geider, Richard J. (2002). "Photoacclimation of Photosynthesis Irradiance Response Curves and Photosynthetic Pigments in Microalgae and Cyanobacteria1".Journal of Phycology.38 (1):17–38.Bibcode:2002JPcgy..38...17M.doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.00094.x.S2CID 29301640.
    116. ^Thrane, Jan-Erik; Hessen, Dag O.; Andersen, Tom (2016)."The impact of irradiance on optimal and cellular nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in phytoplankton".Ecology Letters.19 (8):880–888.Bibcode:2016EcolL..19..880T.doi:10.1111/ele.12623.hdl:10852/52926.PMID 27250733.
    117. ^Hassani, M.A., Durán, P. and Hacquard, S. (2018) "Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont".Microbiome,6(1): 58.doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0445-0. Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    118. ^Lucking, R., Huhndorf, S., Pfister, D.H., Plata, E.R. and Lumbsch, H.T. (2009) "Fungi evolved right on track".Mycologia,101(6): 810–822.doi:10.3852/09-016.
    119. ^Heckman, D.S., Geiser, D.M., Eidell, B.R., Stauffer, R.L., Kardos, N.L. and Hedges, S.B. (2001) "Molecular evidence for the early colonization of land by fungi and plants".Science,293(5532): 1129–1133.doi:10.1126/science.1061457.

    Further reading

    [edit]
    General components andfreshwater ecosystems
    General
    Freshwater
    Ecoregions
    General
    Marine life
    Microorganisms
    Vertebrates
    Marine habitats
    Conservation
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marine_primary_production&oldid=1317821034"
    Categories:
    Hidden categories:

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp