Maria R. Servedio is a Canadian-American professor at theUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.[1] Her research spans a wide range of topics inevolutionary biology fromsexual selection to evolution of behavior. She largely approaches these topics using mathematical models. Her current research interests includespeciation andreinforcement,mate choice, and learning with a particular focus on evolutionary mechanisms that promote premating (prezygotic) isolation. Through integrative approaches and collaborations, she uses mathematical models along with experimental, genetic, and comparative techniques to draw conclusions on how evolution occurs. She has published extensively on these topics and has more than 50peer-reviewed articles. She served as Vice President in 2018 of theAmerican Society of Naturalists,[2] and has been elected to serve as President in 2023.[3]
Servedio attendedHarvard University from 1989 to 1993. While there she received several awards for academic achievement including the Elizabeth Cary Agassiz Certificate of Merit and the John Harvard Scholarship. After completing her A.B., she went to theUniversity of Texas at Austin to do a PhD under the tutelage ofMark Kirkpatrick. Her dissertation was titled "Preferences, signals and evolution: theoretical studies of mate choice copying, reinforcement, andaposematic coloration." Following that, she did a few postdoctoral positions atCornell University,University of California, Davis, andUniversity of California, San Diego before taking a position at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2002 where she has progressed to full professor in the Department of Biology.[4]
Servedio has focused understanding how mechanisms that prevent different species from interbreeding from mating with one another through a theoretical framework coupled with experimental evidence. Most of her research involved constructing mathematical models to better understand prezygotic isolation. Another topic she has focused on is why males choose mates, and she has found conditions in which females can have traits which are favored by males and that preference for those traits can persist, suggesting that both are adaptive.[5]
She served as Vice President of the American Society of Naturalists in 2018[6] as well as serving as handling editor forEvolution since 2015.[7] Through her career, she has acted in editorial capacity for a number of other journals includingCurrent Zoology,PeerJ,Behavioral Ecology,Quarterly Review of Biology, andThe American Naturalist. Further, she has reviewed articles for over 25 journals and acted as a reviewer for 9 different granting agencies, including theNational Science Foundation andNational Institutes of Health. She currently has one graduate student and has trained 5 others as well as 8 postdoctoral fellows.[8] She has extensive experience teaching courses largely focusing on using mathematical modeling in biology.
Servedio has anextensive history of publishing on topics in evolutionary biology. Below are some select articles on which she has been an author:
Servedio, M.R. and M.A.F. Noor. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data meet. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34:339-364.[9]
Servedio, M.R., G.S. van Doorn, M. Kopp, A.M. Frame and P. Nosil. 2011. Magic traits in speciation: ‘magic’ but not rare? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26: 389-397.[10]
Wiens, J.J. and M.R. Servedio. 2000. Species delimitation in systematics: inferring "fixed" diagnostic differences between species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 267(1444):631-636.[11]
Verzijden, M.N., C. ten Cate, M.R. Servedio, G. Kozak, J.W. Boughman, and E.I. Svensson. 2013. The impact of learned mating traits on speciation is not yet clear. Response to Kawecki. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28:69-70.[12]
Sæther, S.A., G.-P. Sætre, T. Borge, C. Wiley, N. Svedin, G. Andersson, T. Veen, J. Haavie, M.R. Servedio, S. Bureš, M. Král, M.B. Hjernquist, L. Gustafsson, J. Träff and A. Qvarnström. 2007. Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 318:95-97.[13]
Servedio, M.R. and M. Kirkpatrick. 1997. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51:1764-1772.[14]
Servedio, M.R. 2000. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution. 54:21-29.[15]
Lachlan, R.F. and M.R. Servedio. 2004. Song learning accelerates allopatric speciation. Evolution 58:2049-2063.[16]
Servedio, M.R. 2001. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1909-1920.[17]
Servedio, M.R. and R. Lande. 2006. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice. Evolution 60:674-685.[18]
^Servedio, Maria R.; Noor, Mohamed A.F. (2003-11-01). "The Role of Reinforcement in Speciation: Theory and Data".Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.34 (1):339–364.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412.ISSN1543-592X.
