Themaker culture is a contemporarysubculture representing a technology-based extension ofDIY culture[1] that intersects withhardware-oriented parts ofhacker culture and revels in the creation of new devices as well astinkering with existing ones. The maker culture in general supportsopen-source hardware. Typical interests enjoyed by the maker culture include engineering-oriented pursuits such aselectronics,robotics,3-D printing, and the use ofcomputer numeric control tools, as well as more traditional activities such asmetalworking,woodworking, and, mainly, its predecessor, traditionalarts and crafts.
The subculture stresses a cut-and-paste approach to standardized hobbyisttechnologies, and encourages cookbook re-use of designs published on websites and maker-oriented publications.[2][3] There is a strong focus on using and learning practical skills and applying them to reference designs.[4] There is also growing work onequity and the maker culture.
Maker culture emphasizes learning-through-doing (active learning) in a social environment. Maker culture emphasizes informal, networked, peer-led, and shared learning motivated by fun and self-fulfillment.[5] Maker culture encourages novel applications of technologies, and the exploration of intersections between traditionally separate domains and ways of working including metalworking, calligraphy, filmmaking, and computer programming. Community interaction and knowledge sharing are often mediated through networked technologies, with websites and social media tools forming the basis of knowledge repositories and a central channel for information sharing and exchange of ideas, and focused through social meetings in shared spaces such ashackerspaces. Maker culture has attracted the interest of educators concerned about students’ disengagement from STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) in formal educational settings. Maker culture is seen as having the potential to contribute to a more participatory approach and create new pathways into topics that will make them more alive and relevant to learners.
Some say that the maker movement is a reaction to the de-valuing of physical exploration and the growing sense of disconnection with the physical world in modern cities.[6] Many products produced by the maker communities have a focus onhealth (food),sustainable development,environmentalism and localculture, and can from that point of view also be seen as a negative response todisposables,globalisedmass production, the power ofchain stores,multinationals andconsumerism.
In reaction to the rise of maker culture,Barack Obama pledged to open several nationalresearch and development facilities to the public.[6] In addition the U.S. federal government renamed one of their national centers "America Makes".[7]
The methods ofdigital fabrication—previously the exclusive domain of institutions—have made making on a personal scale accessible, following a logical and economic progression similar to the transition from minicomputers to personal computers in themicrocomputer revolution of the 1970s.[8] In 2005, Dale Dougherty launchedMake magazine to serve the growing community, followed by the launch ofMaker Faire in 2006.[9] The term, coined by Dougherty, grew into a full-fledged industry based on the growing number of DIYers who want to build something rather than buy it.
Spurred primarily by the advent ofRepRap3D printing for the fabrication ofprototypes, declining cost and broad adoption have opened up new realms ofinnovation. As it has become cost-effective to make just one item for prototyping (or a small number of household items),[10] this approach can be depicted as personal fabrication for "a market of one person".[8]
The rise of the maker culture is closely associated with the rise ofhackerspaces,fablabs and other "makerspaces", of which there are now many around the world, including over 100 each in Germany and the United States.[11] Hackerspaces allow like-minded individuals to share ideas, tools, and skillsets.[12][13] Some notable hackerspaces which have been linked with the maker culture includeArtisan's Asylum,[14] Dallas Makerspace,[15]Noisebridge,NYC Resistor, Pumping Station: One, andTechShop. In addition, those who identify with the subculture can be found at more traditional universities with a technical orientation, such asMIT andCarnegie Mellon University (specifically around "shop" areas like the MIT Hobby Shop and CMU Robotics Club). As maker culture becomes more popular, hackerspaces and Fab Labs are becoming more common in universities[16] and public libraries. The federal government has started adopting the concept of fully open makerspaces within its agencies, the first of which (SpaceShop Rapid Prototyping Lab) resides atNASA Ames Research Center.[17] In Europe the popularity of the labs is more prominent than in the US: about three times more labs exist there.[18]
Outside Europe and the US, the maker culture is also on the rise, with several hacker or makerspaces being landmarks in their respective cities' entrepreneurial and educational landscape. More precisely:HackerspaceSG in Singapore has been set up by the team now leading the city-state's (and, arguably, South-East Asia's) most prominent accelerator JFDI.Asia.Lamba Labs in Beirut is recognized as a hackerspace where people can collaborate freely, in a city often divided by its different ethnic and religious groups.[19]Xinchejian[20] in Shanghai is China's first hackerspace, which allows for innovation and collaboration in a country known for its strong internet censorship.
With the rise of cities, which will host 60% of the human population by 2030,[21] hackerspaces, fablabs and makerspaces will likely gain traction, as they are places for local entrepreneurs to gather and collaborate, providing local solutions to environmental, social or economical issues.[22][23] TheInstitute for the Future has launched in this regard Maker Cities as "an open and collaborative online game, to generate ideas about how citizens are changing work, production, governance, learning, well-being, and their neighborhoods, and what this means for the future".[24]
Cloud computing describes a family of tools in service of the maker movement, enabling increased collaboration, digital workflow, distributed manufacturing (i.e. the download of files that translate directly into objects via a digitized manufacturing process) andsharing economy. This, combined with theopen source movement, initially focused on software, has been expanding intoopen-source hardware, assisted by easy access to online plans (in the cloud) and licensing agreements.
Some example of cloud-based tools include online project repositories like Appropedia andthingiverse, version-controlled collaborative platforms likeGitHub and wevolver, knowledge sharing platforms likeinstructables, HowToMake,[25]wikipedia and otherWikis, includingWikiHow andwikifab and platforms fordistributed manufacturing likeshapeways and100k garages.
Programmablemicrocontrollers andsingle-board computers like theArduino,Raspberry Pi,BeagleBone Black, and Intel'sGalileo andEdison, many of which are open source, are easy to program and connect to devices such as sensors, displays, and actuators. This lowers the barrier to entry for hardware development. Combined with the cloud, this technology enables theInternet of Things.
Desktop3D printing is now possible in various plastics and metals.[26] In combination with DIY open-source microelectronics, they can create autoreplicant 3d printers, such asRepRap. Digital fabrication also includes various subtractive fabrication tech, eg.laser cutting,CNC milling, andknitting machines.
To create one's own designs for digital fabrication requires digital design tools, likeSolidworks,Autodesk, andRhinoceros 3D. More recently, less expensive or easier to use software has emerged. Free, open-source software such asFreeCAD can be extremely useful in the design process. Autodesk'sFusion 360 is free for start ups and individuals, andOnshape andTinkercad are browser-based digital design software.
Online project repositories make many parts available for digital fabrication—even for people who are unable to do their own design work.Opendesk is one example of a company which has made a business by designing and hosting projects for distributed digital fabrication.
Patreon andKickstarter are two examples of distributed funding platforms key to the maker movement.
Maker culture is not all about new, digital technologies. Traditional and analog tools remain crucial to the movement. Traditional tools are often more familiar and accessible, which is key to maker culture. In many places and projects where digital fabrication tools are just not suitable,Hand tools are.
Maker culture involves many types of making – this section reviews some of the major types.
This involves making scientific instruments forcitizen science oropen source labs.[27] With the advent of low-costdigital manufacturing it is becoming increasingly common for scientists as well as amateurs to fabricate their own scientific apparatuses fromopen source hardware designs.[28][29]Docubricks is a repository ofopen source science hardware.[30]
Examples of maker culture in food production includebaking,homebrewing,winemaking,home roasting coffee,vegoil,pickling,sausage,cheesemaking,yogurt andpastry production.
This can also extend intourban agriculture,composting andsynthetic biology.[31]
Like many other craft objects, also clothing has traditionally been made at home. But within the maker culture, also clothes has seen a resurgence. Clothes can include sew and no-sew DIY hacks, and pattern-sharing magazines and platforms, such asBurda Style.[32][33][34] Especially theopen source element has been picked up by a new generation of makers, creating open patterns and platforms for sharing patterns, sewing methods and construction techniques. Hacking has also been a popular reference to DIY clothing and up cycling.[35]
Clothing can also include knitted or crocheted clothing and accessories. Some knitters may use knitting machines with varying degrees of automatic patterning. Fully electronic knitting machines can be interfaced to computers running computer-aided design software. Arduino boards have been interfaced to electronic knitting machines to further automate the process.[36]
Free People, a popular clothing retailer for young women, often hosts craft nights inside the doors of its Anthropologie locations.[37]
Makercosmetics includeperfumes,creams,lotions,shampoos, andeye shadow.[38]
Tool kits for maker cosmetics can includebeakers,digital scales,laboratory thermometers (if possible, from -20 to 110 °C),pH paper,glass rods, plasticspatulas, andspray to disinfect with alcohol.
Perfumes can be created at home usingethanol (96%, or evenvodka oreverclear),essential oils orfragrance oils,infused oils, evenflavour extracts (such as purevanilla extract),distilled orspring water andglycerine. Tools includeglass bottles,glass jar,measuring cup/measuring spoons, adropper,funnel, andaluminum foil orwrapping paper.[39]
The concept of homemade and experimental instruments in music has its roots prior to the maker movement, from complicated experiments with figures such asReed Ghazala andMichel Waisvisz pioneering earlycircuit bending techniques to simple projects such as theCigar Box Guitar.Bart Hopkin published the magazineExperimental Musical Instruments for 15 years followed by a series of books about instrument building. Organizations such asZvex,WORM,STEIM,Death by Audio, and Casper Electronics cater to the do-it-yourself audience, while musicians likeNicolas Collins andYuri Landman create and perform with custom made and experimental instruments.
While still living at homeHugh Le Caine began a lifelong interest inelectronic music and sound generation. In 1937, he designed an electronic free reed organ, and in the mid-1940s, he built theElectronic Sackbut, now recognised to be one of the firstsynthesizers. In 1953,Robert Moog produced his own theremin design, and the following year he published an article on the theremin inRadio and Television News. In the same year, he founded RA Moog, selling theremins and theremin kits bymail order from his home.[40][41] One of his customers,Raymond Scott, rewired Moog's theremin for control by keyboard, creating theClavivox.[42]John Simonton foundedPAiA Electronics inOklahoma City in 1967 and began offering various small electronics kits throughmail order.[43] Starting in 1972 PAiA began producing analog synthesizer kits, in both modular and all-in-one form.
Makers can also make or fabricate their own tools.[44] This includesknives,hand tools,lathes,3-D printers,wood working tools,[45] etc.
Akit car, also known as a "component car", is an automobile that is available as a set of parts that a manufacturer sells and the buyer himself then assembles into a functioning car.
Car tuning can includeelectric vehicle conversion.
Motorcycle making and conversions are also represented. As examples: Tinker Bike is anopen source motorcycle kit adaptable to recycled components; NightShift Bikes is a small, Makerist project in custom, DIY electric motorcycle conversions.[46]
Bicycles, too, have a DIY, Maker-style community.Zenga Bros'Tall Bikes are one example.[47] Community bike workshops are a specific type ofmakerspaces.[48]
MAKE (a magazine published since 2004 byO'Reilly Media), is considered a "central organ of the Maker Movement,"[49] and its founder,Dale Dougherty, is widely considered the founder of the Movement. Other media outlets associated with the movement includeWamungo,Hackaday,Makery, and the popular weblogBoing Boing. Boing Boing editorCory Doctorow has written a novel,Makers, which he describes as being "a book about people who hack hardware, business-models, and living arrangements to discover ways of staying alive and happy even when the economy is falling down the toilet".[50]
In 2016 Intel sponsored a reality TV show—America's Greatest Makers—where 24 teams of makers compete for $1 million.
Since 2006 the subculture has held regular events around the world,Maker Faire, which in 2012 drew a crowd of 120,000 attendees.[51][52] Smaller, community driven Maker Faires referred to as Mini Maker Fairs are also held in various places where an O'Reilly-organised Maker Faire has not yet been held.[53][54][55][56]Maker Faire provides a Mini Maker Faire starter kit to encourage the spread of local Maker Faire events.[57]
Following the Maker Faire model, similar events which don't use the Maker Faire brand have emerged around the world.
A Maker Film Festival was announced for August 2014Powerhouse Science Center in Durango, Colorado, featuring "Films About Makers, and Makers Making Movies."[58]
The Maker movement galvanized in response to the outbreak of theCOVID-19 pandemic, with participants initially directing their skills toward designing Open Source ventilators. They subsequently targeted production ofPersonal protective equipment (PPE). Disruption of supply chains was a mounting problem, particularly in the early days of the pandemic, and compounded with theShortages related to the COVID-19 pandemic in the medical sectors.[59] The response was largely regional and spread across 86 countries on 6 continents, and coordinated their response, designs and shared insights with each other through intermediary organizations such asTikkun Olam Makers, theFab Fouhdation orOpen Source Medical Supplies which included more than 70,000 people.[60][61][62]
National movements emerged in Germany, Brazil, Romania, France, Spain, India, and the United Kingdom.[63] Said movements useddistributed manufacturing methods; some cooperated with local government entities, local police and the national military to help locate supply shortages and manage distribution.[64][65][66]
Total production figures sides the maker community exceeded 48.3 million units produced, totaling a market value of about $271 million.[67] The most-produced items includedface shields (25 million),medical gowns (8 million) andface masks (6 million).[68] The primary modes of production utilized were familiar tools like3D printing,laser cutting orsewing machines, but multiple maker organizations scaled their production output by pooling funds to afford high-output methods likedie cutting orinjection molding.[68][69]
The maker movement has at times been criticized for not fulfilling its goals of inclusivity and democratization.[1]Evgeny Morozov'sMaking It inThe New Yorker, challenging the movement's potential to actually disrupt or democratize innovation.[70][42] Others criticize the maker movement as not even being a movement, and posit that fundamental hypocrisy extends to limit the scope and impact of every aspect of the "Movement."[42]
We can finally fix that boundary between art and artisans.
