In theKingdom of England, theMagnum Concilium (Latin for"Great Council") was anassembly historically convened at certain times of the year when the Englishnobles and church leaders outside theCuria regis were summoned to discuss the affairs of the country withthe king. In the 13th century, the Great Council was superseded by theParliament of England, which had developed out of the Council. The Great Council was last summoned byCharles I in 1640.
TheMagnum Concilium (Latin for "Great Council") originated in the 10th century, when several small Anglo-Saxon kingdoms formed a unifiedKingdom of England. InAnglo-Saxon England, the king helddeliberative assemblies ofnobles andprelates, calledwitans. These assemblies comprised between twenty-five and hundreds of participants, includingbishops,abbots,ealdormen, andthegns. Witans met regularly during the three feasts ofChristmas,Easter andWhitsun and at other times. Previously, kings interacted with their nobility throughroyal itineration, but the new kingdom's size made that impractical. Having nobles come to the king for witans was an important alternative to maintain control of the realm.[1]
Witans served several functions. They appear to have had a role inelecting kings, especially in times when the succession was disputed. They were theatrical displays of kingship in that they coincided with crown-wearings. They were also forums for receiving petitions and building consensus among themagnates. King's dispensedpatronage, such as grantingbookland, and these were recorded incharters witnessed and consented to by those in attendance.
Appointments to offices, such as to bishoprics or ealdormanries, were made during witans. Important political decisions were made in consultation with witans, such as going to war and making treaties. Witans helped the king to produceAnglo-Saxon law codes and acted as a court for important cases, such as those involving the king or important magnates.[2]
After theNorman Conquest of 1066,William the Conqueror (r. 1066–1087) continued the tradition of summoning assemblies of magnates to consider national affairs, conductstate trials, and make laws; although legislation now took the form ofwrits rather than law codes. These assemblies were calledmagnum concilium.[3] While kings had access tofamiliar counsel, this private advice could not replace the need for consensus building, and overreliance on familiar counsel could lead to political instability. Great councils were valued because they "carried fewer political risks, allowed responsibility to be more broadly shared, and drew a larger body of prelates and magnates into the making of decisions".[4]
The council's members were the king'stenants-in-chief. The greater tenants, such as archbishops, bishops, abbots,earls, andbarons were summoned by individual writ, but sometimes lesser tenants[note 1] were also summoned bysheriffs.[6] Politics in the period following the Conquest (1066–1154) was dominated by about 200 wealthylaymen, in addition to the king and leading clergy. High-ranking churchmen, such as bishops and abbots, were important magnates in their own right. According toDomesday Book, theEnglish church owned between 25% and 33% of all land in 1066.[7]
Traditionally, the great council was not involved in levying taxes. Royal finances derived from land revenues,feudal aids andincidents, and the profits of royal justice. This changed near the end ofHenry II's reign (1154–1189) due to the need to finance theThird Crusade, theransom of Richard I, and pay for the series ofAnglo-French wars fought between thePlantagenet and Capetian dynasties. In 1188, Henry II gained the council's consent to levy theSaladin tithe. The precedent of gaining the magnates' consent in council for taxation was followed thereafter. In the process, the council assumed a more representative role, since they were in effect consenting on behalf of the kingdom's taxpayers. At the same time, these financial pressures created new political tensions between the baronage and the Crown.[8]
King John (r. 1199–1216) alienated the barons by showing partiality when dispensing justice, heavy financial demands and abusing his right to feudal incidents and aids. In 1215, the barons forced John to abide by a charter of liberties similar to charters issued by earlier kings (seeCharter of Liberties).[9] Known asMagna Carta (Latin for "Great Charter"), the document was based on three assumptions important to the later development of Parliament:[10]
While the clause stipulating no taxation "without the common counsel" was deleted from later reissues, it was nevertheless followed. Magna Carta transformed the feudal obligation to advise the king into a right to consent. The liberties guaranteed in the charter were granted to "all the free men of our realm", but it was the barons in council who would represent them.[11]
During the reign of John's son,Henry III (r. 1216–1272), meetings of the great council began to be calledparliament, from theFrenchparlement, first used in the late 11th century, with the meaning ofparley or conversation.[12] TheParliament of England continued to develop in the reign of Henry's sonEdward I (r. 1272–1307).
This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(September 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
According toThe Oxford History of England,Henry VII summoned the Magnum Concilium half a dozen times in the last years of the fifteenth century,[13] but thereafter it fell into disuse.
In the autumn of 1640,Charles I summoned the first Magnum Concilium in generations, having dissolved theShort Parliament and suffered defeats in theBishops' Wars againstScotland. The Concilium offered Charles a guaranteed loan of £200,000 sterling to pay the army and attempted unsuccessfully to negotiate with the Scots. It declined to resume its ancient governing role, and urged Charles instead to summon anew Parliament, which then became a protagonist in theEnglish Civil War. Following theStuart Restoration, the revived monarchy did not recreate the Magnum Concilium. Since then, the Concilium has not met.
In 2008, Christopher Russell Bailey, 5thBaron Glanusk, suggested that the time had come for a recall of the Magnum Concilium, sincehereditary peers had lost their right to sit in theHouse of Lords under theHouse of Lords Act 1999.[14]
| Preceded by | Magnum Concilium 1066–c.1215 | Succeeded by |