From 1994 to 2003, the Zapatista territories were structured as regional community centers calledAguascalientes. In 2003, the Aguascalientes were replaced byCenters of Autonomous Resistance and Zapatista Rebellion (CRAREZ),[4] a term coined in 2019, which consisted ofCaracoles as community centers, over local formations (until 2023) as theRebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities (MAREZ) governed byCouncils of Good Government (Spanish:Juntas de Buen Gobierno).[5] In 2023, after increased cartel violence, the EZLN announced the dissolution of the CRAREZ and its sub-formations, replacing them with hyperlocalLocal Autonomous Governments (GAL) within localZapatista Autonomous Government Collectives (CGAZ) and regionalAssemblies of Collectives of Zapatista Autonomous Governments (ACGAZ).[6] Despite attempts at negotiation with theMexican government which resulted in theSan Andrés Accords in 1996, the region's autonomy remains unrecognized by that government.[7]
TheZapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) does not hold formal political power in Zapatista governance. According to its constitution, no commander or member of theClandestine Revolutionar y Indigenous Committee may take positions of authority or government in these spaces.[8]
On 1 January 1994, thousands of EZLN members occupied towns and cities in Chiapas, burning down police stations, occupying government buildings, and skirmishing with the Mexican army. The EZLN demanded "work, land, housing, food, health care, education, independence, freedom, democracy, justice, and peace" in their communities.[9] The Zapatistas seized over a million acres from large landowners during their revolution.[10]
In 2003, the Aguascalientes were replaced byCenters of Autonomous Resistance and Zapatista Rebellion (CRAREZ),[4] a term coined in 2019, which consisted ofCaracoles as community centers, over local formations (until 2023) as theRebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities (MAREZ) governed byCouncils of Good Government (Spanish:Juntas de Buen Gobierno).[5]
In early November 2023, a communique signed by Subcomandante Moises announced the dissolution of the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities,[11][12][13][14] along with their Councils of Good Government.[12][13][14] The announcement declared that, effective immediately, all positions and documents related to the MAREZ would be considered invalid.[13] The statement clarified that the Caracoles (Zapatista community centres) would continue providing their services to locals, but would be "closed to outsiders".[11][12][13][14]
According to the statement, the decision to dissolve the MAREZ had been discussed for months prior to the announcement.[12][13] It has been speculated that the decision had been taken due to the upcoming2024 Mexican general election. According to Mexican anthropologist Gaspar Morquecho, the Zapatistas had also become "increasingly isolated", cutting ties with other organisations. Morquecho claimed this had caused many in the younger generation to leave the Zapatista municipalities, in order to seek work or education.[11] Moises promised that future statements would clarify the reasons for the decision, as well as details on the restructuring of "Zapatista autonomy". The statement also stated the Zapatistas' intention to celebrate the 30th anniversary of their uprising, inviting people to come, while also warning that Chiapas was no longer safe.[11][12]
In the middle of the month, EZLN issued a declaration that announced the new structure for the autonomous region. The new structure is more decentralized and would replace the previously dissolved Municipalities, allowing the base communities to better unite and act.[15][16]
Since 2003, the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities (MAREZ) coordinated in very small groups calledcaracoles (English: "snails" or "seashells"). Before that, the Neo-Zapatistas used the title of Aguascalientes after the site of the EZLN-organized National Democratic Convention on 8 August 1994;[17] this name alluded to theConvention of Aguascalientes during theMexican Revolution whereEmiliano Zapata and other leaders met in 1914 and Zapata made an alliance withFrancisco Villa.
Distribution of Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities (MAREZ) locations[18][19]
The sign reads (top): "You are in Zapatista rebel territory. Here the people rule and the government obeys." Bottom: "North Zone. Council of Good Government.Trafficking in weapons,planting of drugs,drug use,alcoholic beverages, and illegal sales ofwood are strictly prohibited. No to the destruction ofnature." Federal Highway 307,Chiapas.Zapatistas Territory sign in Chiapas, Mexico
Within the MAREZ,popular assemblies each consisted of around 300 families in which anyone over the age of twelve could participate in decision-making. These assemblies strove to reach aconsensus, but were willing to fall back to amajority vote. The communities formed a federation with other communities to create an autonomous municipality, which formed furtherfederations with other municipalities to create a region.[20] Each community had three main administrative structures: (1) thecommissariat, in charge of day-to-day administration; (2) thecouncil for land control, which dealt with forestry and disputes with neighboring communities; and (3) theagencia, a community police agency.[21]
After the dissolution of the MAREZ, Subcomandante Moises said in an official statement that the Caracoles (Zapatista community centres) would continue providing their services to locals, but would be "closed to outsiders".[11][12][13][14]
The Zapatistas run hundreds of schools with thousands of teachers. They are modeled around the principles ofdemocratic education in which students and communities collectively decide on school curriculum and students aren't graded.[22]
The Zapatistas maintain auniversal healthcare service which is provided free of charge. However, patients still have to pay for medications to cover restocking costs.[23] The Zapatistas built two new hospitals and 18 health clinics in the region by the mid-1990s.[22] One 2014 study indicated the following achievements in Zapatista healthcare:
In 2005, 84.2% of Zapatista children were fully vaccinated, while that figure stood at 74.8% in pro-government communities.[24]
In regions where there were previously significantly high rates of death during childbirth, there has now been a period of eight years or more where no maternal deaths have been recorded.
The manufacture and consumption of alcohol has been banned, which is directly linked to the reduction in many illnesses and infections including ulcers, cirrhosis, malnutrition, and surgical wounds.[25] Banning the consumption of alcohol was a collective decision. Nayely, a Zapatista representative, stated that alcohol is “not good for one’s health, and just wastes money”.[26]
In Oventic, there was a small yet seemingly fully-functional medical clinic, which appeared to offer basic healthcare. A sign on the door said general consultations, gynecology, optometry and laboratory services were all available five days a week. Emergency services were available 24 hours, seven days a week. They appeared to have a shiny new ambulance at their disposal. Other services offered a few days a week included dentistry and ultrasounds.[27]
Many Zapatista communities are in rural areas with little access to running water. Projects were undertaken to supply Zapatista communities with fresh water. In one case,Roberto Arenas, a smallTzeltal community, built its own water service with the help of solidarity activists. Such projects were coordinated democratically. An account by Ramor Ryan noted:[28]: 10
The good government committee of the autonomous municipality refer the case to their elected water commission and the options are weighed. The commission consults various parties including the local EZLN commander and clandestine committee members, and so, in the end, after the issue has been bandied around what seems like half the inhabitants of this particular region of the jungle, the community of Roberto Arenas is notified about the eligibility of their request. It’s a process similar to what happens anywhere in the world at a local council level, except for one significant difference: the state authorities have no involvement whatsoever; this is an autonomous process overseen by the communities’ people. There is no separation between who is governed and who is governing—they are one and the same.
Ryan described the process of finishing the water project:[28]: 179
We’re getting lots of little bits and pieces done, fine tuning this and that. Helping people construct their family tap stands, digging here and there, testing the pressure, tightening valves. A group of women come together during the morning to put together a tap stand for the collective clothes washing area. We earmark a bag of cement—the very last one—for the later construction of a large concrete washbasin. The day is punctuated by minor moments of crisis—people coming up and saying that the water isn’t arriving to their house—but it is usually just a blocked pipe or a faulty connection. Really, the system is almost flawless and works perfectly fine; it’s been an exemplary project.
Cerullo, Margaret (2009). "The Zapatistas Other Politics: The Subjects Of Autonomy". In Fasenfest, David (ed.).Engaging Social Justice: Critical Studies of 21st Century Social Transformation. Studies in Critical Social Sciences. Vol. 13.Brill Publishers. pp. 289–299.doi:10.1163/ej.9789004176546.i-350.94.ISBN978-90-04-17654-6.
Chabot, Sean; Vinthagen, Stellan (2020). "One no against violence, many yeses beyond violence: Zapatista dignity, autonomy, counter-conduct". In Jackson, Richard; Llewellyn, Joseph; Manawaroa Leonard, Griffin; Gnoth, Aidan; Karena, Tong (eds.).Revolutionary Nonviolence: Concepts, Cases and Controversies.Zed Books. pp. 107–131.ISBN978-1-78699-825-5.
Eldredge Fitzwater, Dylan (2019).Autonomy Is in Our Hearts: Zapatista Autonomous Government through the Lens of the Tsotsil Language.PM Press.ISBN978-1-62963-580-4.LCCN2018931534.
Stahler-Sholk, Richard (2014). "Mexico: Autonomy, Collective Identity, and the Zapatista Social Movement". In Stahler-Sholk, Richard; Vanden, Harry E.; Becker, Marc (eds.).Rethinking Latin American Social Movements: Radical Action from Below.Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 187–207.ISBN978-1-4422-3567-0.LCCN2014030142.
Guillén, Diana (2017). "Societies in Movement vs. Institutional Continuities? Insights from the Zapatista Experience".Latin American Perspectives.44 (4):114–138.doi:10.1177/0094582X16635292.ISSN0094-582X.S2CID147296630.
Mora, Mariana (2007). "Zapatista Anticapitalist Politics and the "Other Campaign": Learning from the Struggle for Indigenous Rights and Autonomy".Latin American Perspectives.34 (2):64–77.doi:10.1177/0094582X06299086.ISSN0094-582X.S2CID145172536.
Mora, Mariana (2015). "The Politics of Justice: Zapatista Autonomy at the Margins of the Neoliberal Mexican State".Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies.10 (1):87–106.doi:10.1080/17442222.2015.1034439.ISSN1744-2222.S2CID146985966.