The Lynx X-ray Observatory | |
| Names | Lynx X-ray Surveyor (previous name) |
|---|---|
| Mission type | Space telescope |
| Operator | NASA |
| Website | www |
| Start of mission | |
| Launch date | 2036 (proposed) |
| Orbital parameters | |
| Reference system | Sun–Earth L2 orbit |
| Main | |
| Type | Wolter telescope |
| Diameter | 3 m (9.8 ft) |
| Focal length | 10 m (33 ft) |
| Collecting area | 2 m2 (22 sq ft) at 1keV |
| Wavelengths | X-ray |
| Resolution | 0.5arcsec across the entire field of view |
| Instruments | |
| Lynx X-ray Mirror Assembly (LMA) High Definition X-ray Imager (HDXI) Lynx X-ray Microcalorimeter (LXM) X-ray Grating Spectrometer (XGS) | |
The Lynx X-ray Observatory Wordmark | |
TheLynx X-ray Observatory (Lynx) is aNASA-fundedLarge Mission Concept Study commissioned as part of theNational Academy of Sciences 2020Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey. The concept study phase is complete as of August 2019, and theLynx final report[1] has been submitted to the Decadal Survey for prioritization. If launched,Lynx would be the most powerfulX-ray astronomy observatory constructed to date, enabling order-of-magnitude advances in capability[2] over the currentChandra X-ray Observatory andXMM-Newton space telescopes.

In 2016, following recommendations laid out in the so-calledAstrophysics Roadmap of 2013,NASA established fourspace telescope concept studies for futureLarge strategic science missions. In addition toLynx (originally called X-ray Surveyor in theRoadmap document), they are theHabitable Exoplanet Imaging Mission (HabEx), theLarge Ultraviolet Optical Infrared Surveyor (LUVOIR), and theOrigins Space Telescope (OST, originally called the Far-Infrared Surveyor). The four teamscompleted their final reports in August 2019, and turned them over to both NASA and theNational Academy of Sciences, whose independentDecadal Survey committee advises NASA on which mission should take top priority. If it receives top prioritization and therefore funding,Lynx would launch in approximately 2036. It would be placed into a halo orbit around thesecond Sun–Earth Lagrange point (L2), and would carry enoughpropellant for more than twenty years of operation without servicing.[1][2]
TheLynx concept study involved more than 200 scientists and engineers acrossmultiple international academic institutions,aerospace, andengineering companies.[3] TheLynx Science and Technology Definition Team (STDT) was co-chaired byAlexey Vikhlinin andFeryal Özel.Jessica Gaskin was the NASA Study Scientist, and theMarshall Space Flight Center managed theLynx Study Office jointly with theSmithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, which is part of theCenter for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian.
According to the concept study'sFinal Report, theLynx Design Reference Mission was intentionally optimized to enable major advances in the following three astrophysical discovery areas:
Collectively, these serve as three "science pillars" that set the baseline requirements for the observatory. Those requirements include greatly enhancedsensitivity, asub-arcsecondpoint spread function stable across the telescope'sfield of view, and very highspectral resolution for bothimaging and gratingsspectroscopy. These requirements, in turn, enable a broad science case with major contributions across theastrophysical landscape (as summarized in Chapter 4 of theLynx Report), includingmulti-messenger astronomy,black holeaccretion physics,large-scale structure,Solar System science, and evenexoplanets. TheLynx team markets the mission's science capabilities as "transformationally powerful, flexible, and long-lived", inspired by the spirit ofNASA'sGreat Observatories program.

As described in Chapters 6-10 of the concept study'sFinal Report,Lynx is designed as anX-ray observatory with agrazing incidenceX-ray telescope and detectors that record the position, energy, and arrival time of individual X-rayphotons. Post-facto aspect reconstruction leads to modest requirements on pointing precision and stability, while enabling accurate sky locations for detected photons. The design of theLynxspacecraft draws heavily on heritage from theChandra X-ray Observatory, with few moving parts and hightechnology readiness level elements.Lynx will operate in ahalo orbit aroundSun-Earth L2, enabling high observing efficiency in a stable environment. Its maneuvers and operational procedures on-orbit are nearly identical toChandra's, and similar design approaches promote longevity. Without in-space servicing,Lynx will carry enoughconsumables to enable continuous operation for at least twenty years. The spacecraft and payload elements are, however, designed to be serviceable, potentially enabling an even longer lifetime.

The major advances in sensitivity, spatial, and spectral resolution in theLynx Design Reference Mission are enabled by the spacecraft's payload, namely the mirror assembly and suite of three science instruments. TheLynx Report notes that each of the payload elements featuresstate-of-the-art technologies while also representing a natural evolution of existing instrumentation technology development over the last two decades. The key technologies are currently atTechnology Readiness Levels (TRL) 3 or 4. TheLynx Report notes that, with three years of targeted pre-phase A development in early 2020s, three of four key technologies will be matured to TRL 5 and one will reach TRL 4 by start of Phase A, achieving TRL 5 shortly thereafter. TheLynx payload consists of the following four major elements:

The Chandra X-ray Observatory experience provides the blueprint for developing the systems required to operate Lynx, leading to a significant cost reduction relative to starting from scratch. This starts with a singleprime contractor for the science and operations center, staffed by a seamless, integrated team of scientists, engineers, and programmers. Many of the system designs, procedures, processes, and algorithms developed for Chandra will be directly applicable for Lynx, although all will be recast in a software/hardware environment appropriate for the 2030s and beyond.
The science impact of Lynx will be maximized by subjecting all of its proposed observations to peer review, including those related to the three science pillars. Time pre-allocation can be considered only for a small number of multi-purpose key programs, such as surveys in pre-selected regions of the sky. Such an open General Observer (GO) program approach has been successfully employed by large missions such asHubble Space Telescope,Chandra X-ray Observatory, andSpitzer Space Telescope, and is planned forJames Webb Space Telescope andNancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. The Lynx GO program will have ample exposure time to achieve the objectives of its science pillars, make impacts across the astrophysical landscape, open new directions of inquiry, and produce as yet unimagined discoveries.
The cost of theLynx X-ray Observatory is estimated to be between US$4.8 billion to US$6.2 billion (inFY20dollars at 40% and 70%confidence levels, respectively). This estimated cost range includes thelaunch vehicle, cost reserves, and funding for five years of mission operations, while excluding potential foreign contributions (such as participation by theEuropean Space Agency (ESA)). As described in Section 8.5 of the concept study'sFinal Report, theLynx team commissioned five independentcost estimates, all of which arrived at similar estimates for the total mission lifecycle cost.