Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Lyddane–Sachs–Teller relation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Incondensed matter physics, theLyddane–Sachs–Teller relation (orLST relation) determines the ratio of the natural frequency of longitudinal optic lattice vibrations (phonons) (ωLO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{LO}}}) of anionic crystal to the natural frequency of the transverse optical lattice vibration (ωTO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{TO}}}) for long wavelengths (zero wavevector).[1][2][3][4][5] The ratio is that of the static permittivityεst{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{\text{st}}} to the permittivity for frequencies in the visible rangeε{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{\infty }}.[6]

ωLO2ωTO2=εstε{\displaystyle {\frac {\omega _{\text{LO}}^{2}}{\omega _{\text{TO}}^{2}}}={\frac {\varepsilon _{\text{st}}}{\varepsilon _{\infty }}}}

The relation holds for systems with a single optical branch, such as cubic systems with two different atoms per unit cell. For systems with many phonon branches, the relation does not necessarily hold, as the permittivity for any pair of longitudinal and transverse modes will be altered by the other modes in the system. The Lyddane–Sachs–Teller relation is named after the physicists R. H. Lyddane,Robert G. Sachs, andEdward Teller.

Phonon band structure inGaAs. The separation between LO and TO phonon frequencies near the Γ-point (small wave vectors) is described by the LST relation. Note this plot shows much higher wavevectors than considered below, and the scale cannot not show the hybridization of the TO branch with light (which would be confined extremely close to Γ).

Origin and limitations

[edit]

The Lyddane–Sachs–Teller relation applies to optical lattice vibrations that have an associated netpolarization density, so that they can produce long rangedelectromagnetic fields (over ranges much longer than the inter-atom distances). The relation assumes an idealized polar ("infrared active") optical lattice vibration that gives a contribution to the frequency-dependentpermittivity described by a lossless Lorentzian oscillator:

ε(ω)=ε()+(ε()εst)ωTO2ω2ωTO2,{\displaystyle \varepsilon (\omega )=\varepsilon (\infty )+(\varepsilon (\infty )-\varepsilon _{st}){\frac {\omega _{\text{TO}}^{2}}{\omega ^{2}-\omega _{\text{TO}}^{2}}},}

whereε(){\displaystyle \varepsilon (\infty )} is the permittivity at high frequencies,εst{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{st}} is the static DC permittivity, andωTO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{TO}}} is the "natural" oscillation frequency of the lattice vibration taking into account only the short-ranged (microscopic) restoring forces.

Dispersion relation of phonon polaritons inGaP. Red curves are the uncoupled phonon and photon dispersion relations, black curves are the result of coupling (from top to bottom: upper polariton, LO phonon, lower polariton). The LST relation relates the frequencies of the horizontal red curve (ωTO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{TO}}}) and the black curve intercept at k=0 (ωLO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{LO}}}).

The above equation can be plugged intoMaxwell's equations to find the complete set of normal modes including all restoring forces (short-ranged and long-ranged), which are sometimes calledphonon polaritons. These modes are plotted in the figure. At everywavevector there are three distinct modes:

  • In this mode, the electric field is parallel to the wavevector and produces no transverse currents, hence it is purely electric (there is no associated magnetic field).
  • The longitudinal wave is basically dispersionless, and appears as a flat line in the plot at frequencyωLO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{LO}}}. This remains 'split off' from the bare oscillation frequency even at high wave vectors, because the importance of electric restoring forces does not diminish at high wavevectors.
  • twotransverse wave modes appear (actually, four modes, in pairs with identical dispersion), with complex dispersion behavior.
  • In these modes, the electric field is perpendicular to the wavevector, producing transverse currents, which in turn generate magnetic fields. As light is also a transverse electromagnetic wave, the behaviour is described as a coupling of the transverse vibration modes with thelight inside the material (in the figure, shown as red dashed lines).
  • At high wavevectors, the lower mode is primarily vibrational. This mode approaches the 'bare' frequencyωTO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{TO}}} because magnetic restoring forces can be neglected: the transverse currents produce a small magnetic field and the magnetically induced electric field is also very small.
  • At zero, or low wavevector theupper mode is primarily vibrational and its frequency instead coincides with the longitudinal mode, with frequencyωLO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{LO}}}. This coincidence is required by symmetry considerations and occurs due toelectrodynamic retardation effects that make the transverse magnetic back-action behave identically to the longitudinal electric back-action.[7]

The longitudinal mode appears at the frequency where thepermittivity passes through zero, i.e.ε(ωLO)=0{\displaystyle \varepsilon (\omega _{\text{LO}})=0}. Solving this for the Lorentzian resonance described above gives the Lyddane–Sachs–Teller relation.[3]

Since the Lyddane–Sachs–Teller relation is derived from the lossless Lorentzian oscillator, it may break down in realistic materials where the permittivity function is more complicated for various reasons:

  • Real phonons have losses (also known as damping or dissipation).
  • Materials may have multiple phonon resonances that add together to produce the permittivity.
  • There may be other electrically active degrees of freedom (notably, mobile electrons) and non-Lorentzian oscillators.

In the case of multiple, lossy Lorentzian oscillators, there are generalized Lyddane–Sachs–Teller relations available.[8]Most generally, the permittivity cannot be described as a combination of Lorentizan oscillators, and the longitudinal mode frequency can only be found as acomplex zero in the permittivity function.[8]

Anharmonic crystals

[edit]

The most general Lyddane–Sachs–Teller relation applicable in crystals where the phonons are affected byanharmonic damping has been derived in Ref.[9] and reads as

|ωLO|2|ωTO|2=εstε{\displaystyle {\frac {|\omega _{\text{LO}}|^{2}}{|\omega _{\text{TO}}|^{2}}}={\frac {\varepsilon _{\text{st}}}{\varepsilon _{\infty }}}}

the absolute value is necessary since the phonon frequencies are now complex, with an imaginary part that is equal to the finite lifetime of the phonon, and proportional to the anharmonic phonon damping (described by Klemens' theory for optical phonons).

Non-polar crystals

[edit]

A corollary of the LST relation is that for non-polar crystals, the LO and TO phonon modes aredegenerate, and thusεst=ε{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{\text{st}}=\varepsilon _{\infty }}. This indeed holds for the purely covalent crystals of thegroup IV elements, such as for diamond (C), silicon, and germanium.[10]

Reststrahlen effect

[edit]
Main article:Reststrahlen effect

In the frequencies betweenωTO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{TO}}} andωLO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{LO}}} there is 100% reflectivity. This range of frequencies (band) is called theReststrahl band. The name derives from the Germanreststrahl which means "residual ray".[11]

Example with NaCl

[edit]

The static and high-frequency dielectric constants ofNaCl areεst=5.9{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{\text{st}}=5.9} andε=2.25{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{\infty }=2.25}, and the TO phonon frequencyνTO{\displaystyle \nu _{\text{TO}}} is4.9{\displaystyle 4.9} THz. Using the LST relation, we are able to calculate that[12]

νLO=εst/ε×νTO=7.9{\displaystyle \nu _{\text{LO}}={\sqrt {\varepsilon _{\text{st}}/\varepsilon _{\infty }}}\times \nu _{\text{TO}}=7.9} THz

Experimental methods

[edit]

Raman spectroscopy

[edit]

One of the ways to experimentally determineωTO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{TO}}} andωLO{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{LO}}} is throughRaman spectroscopy.[13][14] As previously mentioned, the phonon frequencies used in the LST relation are those corresponding to the TO and LO branches evaluated at the gamma-point (k=0{\displaystyle k=0}) of theBrillouin zone. This is also the point where the photon-phonon coupling most often occurs for theStokes shift measured in Raman. Hence two peaks will be present in theRaman spectrum, each corresponding to the TO and LO phonon frequency.

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^Klingshirn 2012, p. 86.
  2. ^Lyddane, Sachs & Teller 1941.
  3. ^abAshcroft & Mermin 1976, p. 548.
  4. ^Fox 2010, p. 209.
  5. ^Kittel 2004, p. 414.
  6. ^Robinson 1973, p. 363.
  7. ^Ashcroft & Mermin 1976, p. 551.
  8. ^abChang et al. 1968.
  9. ^Casella & Zaccone 2021.
  10. ^Fox 2010, p. 277.
  11. ^Fox 2010, p. 277-278.
  12. ^Fox 2010, p. 280.
  13. ^Fox 2010, p. 287-289.
  14. ^Irmer, Wenzel & Monecke 1996, p. 85-95.

References

[edit]

Textbooks

[edit]

Articles

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lyddane–Sachs–Teller_relation&oldid=1282963588"
Category:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp