Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Lusternik–Schnirelmann theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Existence of antipodal pairs in open covers of spheres
This article is about the theorem on open covers of spheres. For the theorem on simple closed geodesics on spheres, seetheorem of the three geodesics.

Inmathematics, theLusternik–Schnirelmann theorem, akaLusternik–Schnirelmann–Borsuk theorem orLSB theorem, says as follows.

If thesphereSn is covered byn + 1 closed sets, then one of these sets contains a pair (x, −x) of antipodal points.

This implies that theLusternik–Schnirelmann category ofRPn{\displaystyle \mathbb {RP} ^{n}} is at leastn+2{\displaystyle n+2} (and it is not difficult to show thatn+2{\displaystyle n+2} sets suffice, so the category is exactlyn+2{\displaystyle n+2}).

It is named afterLazar Lyusternik andLev Schnirelmann, who published it in 1930.[1][2][3]

Proof

[edit]

The theorem can be proved by leveraging the relationship betweenSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} andRPn{\displaystyle \mathbb {RP} ^{n}}, and the Borsuk-Ulam theorem in higher dimensions.[4]

Real Projective SpaceRPn{\displaystyle \mathbb {RP} ^{n}} is defined as the quotient space ofSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} by the antipodal map, where each pointxSn{\displaystyle x\in S^{n}} is identified with its antipodal pointxSn{\displaystyle -x\in S^{n}}. In other words,RPn=Sn/{\displaystyle \mathbb {RP} ^{n}=S^{n}/\sim }, wherexx{\displaystyle x\sim -x}.

A pair of antipodal points inSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} corresponds to a single point inRPn{\displaystyle \mathbb {RP} ^{n}}. The concept of "containing a pair of antipodal points" in a subset ofSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} is equivalent to that subset having a non-empty intersection with the pre-image of some point inRPn{\displaystyle \mathbb {RP} ^{n}} under the projection mapπ:SnRPn{\displaystyle \pi :S^{n}\to \mathbb {RP} ^{n}}.

TheBorsuk-Ulam theorem states that for any continuous mapf:SnRn{\displaystyle f:S^{n}\to \mathbb {R} ^{n}}, there exists at least one pair of antipodal points{x,x}{\displaystyle \{x,-x\}} inSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} such thatf(x)=f(x){\displaystyle f(x)=f(-x)}.

ConsiderSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} expressed as the union ofn+1{\displaystyle n+1} closed setsA1,A2,,An+1{\displaystyle A_{1},A_{2},\ldots ,A_{n+1}}.

Define distance functionsdi(x)=infyAi|xy|{\displaystyle d_{i}(x)=\inf _{y\in A_{i}}|x-y|} fori=1,,n{\displaystyle i=1,\ldots ,n}. These are continuous functions.

Construct a mapF:SnRn{\displaystyle F:S^{n}\to \mathbb {R} ^{n}} given byF(x)=(d1(x),d2(x),,dn(x)){\displaystyle F(x)=(d_{1}(x),d_{2}(x),\ldots ,d_{n}(x))}.

By the Borsuk-Ulam theorem, there exists a pair of antipodal points{x0,x0}{\displaystyle \{x_{0},-x_{0}\}} such thatF(x0)=F(x0){\displaystyle F(x_{0})=F(-x_{0})}, meaningdi(x0)=di(x0){\displaystyle d_{i}(x_{0})=d_{i}(-x_{0})} for alli=1,,n{\displaystyle i=1,\ldots ,n}.

If anydi(x0)=0{\displaystyle d_{i}(x_{0})=0}, thenx0Ai{\displaystyle x_{0}\in A_{i}}. Sincedi(x0)=di(x0)=0{\displaystyle d_{i}(x_{0})=d_{i}(-x_{0})=0}, thenx0Ai{\displaystyle -x_{0}\in A_{i}} as well (becauseAi{\displaystyle A_{i}} is closed). Thus,Ai{\displaystyle A_{i}} contains a pair of antipodal points.

Ifdi(x0)>0{\displaystyle d_{i}(x_{0})>0} for alli=1,,n{\displaystyle i=1,\ldots ,n}, thenx0Ai{\displaystyle x_{0}\notin A_{i}} fori=1,,n{\displaystyle i=1,\ldots ,n}. SinceSn=j=1n+1Aj{\displaystyle S^{n}=\bigcup _{j=1}^{n+1}A_{j}}, it must be thatx0An+1{\displaystyle x_{0}\in A_{n+1}}. Similarly, sincedi(x0)>0{\displaystyle d_{i}(-x_{0})>0} for alli=1,,n{\displaystyle i=1,\ldots ,n}, thenx0Ai{\displaystyle -x_{0}\notin A_{i}} fori=1,,n{\displaystyle i=1,\ldots ,n}, implyingx0An+1{\displaystyle -x_{0}\in A_{n+1}}. Therefore,An+1{\displaystyle A_{n+1}} contains a pair of antipodal points.

Equivalent results

[edit]

There are several fixed-point theorems which come in three equivalent variants: analgebraic topology variant, a combinatorial variant and a set-covering variant. Each variant can be proved separately using totally different arguments, but each variant can also be reduced to the other variants in its row. Additionally, each result in the top row can be deduced from the one below it in the same column.[5]

Algebraic topologyCombinatoricsSet covering
Brouwer fixed-point theoremSperner's lemmaKnaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz lemma
Borsuk–Ulam theoremTucker's lemmaLusternik–Schnirelmann theorem

References

[edit]
  1. ^Bollobás, Béla (2006),The art of mathematics: Coffee time in Memphis, New York:Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–119,doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816574,ISBN 978-0-521-69395-0,MR 2285090.
  2. ^Lusternik, Lazar;Schnirelmann, Lev (1930),Méthodes topologiques dans les problèmes variationnels, Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Izdat..Bollobás (2006) cites pp. 26–31 of this 68-page pamphlet for the theorem.
  3. ^"Applications of Lusternik–Schnirelmann theorem Category and its Generalizations, John Oprea, Communicated by Vasil V. Tsanov, on Journal of Geometry and Symmetry in Physics ISSN 1312-5192".
  4. ^Hatcher, Allen (2002), "Section 1.1",Algebraic Topology(PDF), Cambridge University Press, p. 33,ISBN 0-521-79540-0,Assuming the higher-dimensional version of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem, the same arguments show thatSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} cannot be covered byn+1{\displaystyle n+1} closed sets without antipodal pairs of points, though it can be covered byn+2{\displaystyle n+2} such sets, as the higher-dimensional analog of a tetrahedron shows.
  5. ^Nyman, Kathryn L.;Su, Francis Edward (2013),"A Borsuk–Ulam equivalent that directly implies Sperner's lemma",The American Mathematical Monthly,120 (4):346–354,doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.04.346,JSTOR 10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.04.346,MR 3035127
Stub icon

Thistopology-related article is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lusternik–Schnirelmann_theorem&oldid=1313931536"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp