Lupus anticoagulant is animmunoglobulin[1] that binds tophospholipids andproteins associated with the cell membrane. Its name is a partialmisnomer, as it is actually aprothrombotic antibodyin vivo. The name derives from their propertiesin vitro, as these antibodies increase coagulation times in laboratory tests such as theactivated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Investigators speculate that the antibodies interfere with phospholipids used to induce in vitro coagulation. In vivo, the antibodies are thought to interact with platelet membrane phospholipids, increasing adhesion and aggregation of platelets, which accounts for the in vivo prothrombotic characteristics.[2]
Both words in the term "lupus anticoagulant" can be misleading:
Most patients with a lupus anticoagulant do not actually havelupus erythematosus, and only a small proportion will proceed to develop this disease (which causes joint pains, skin problems andkidney failure, amongst other complications). People with lupus erythematosus are more likely to develop a lupus anticoagulant than the general population.
The term "anticoagulant" accurately describes its functionin vitro. Howeverin vivo, it functions as aprocoagulant.[5] The "lupus anticoagulant paradox"[6] may be explained by platelet activation as described above, as well as enhancement ofactivated protein C resistance and suppression of the anticoagulant activity ofTFPIα. Another proposed mechanism is the antibody-mediated destruction ofAnnexin A5 on the membranes ofendothelial cells andtrophoblast cells.[7]
In a suspected antiphospholipid syndrome, lupus anticoagulant is generally tested in conjunction withanti-apolipoprotein antibodies andanti-cardiolipin antibodies, and diagnostic criteria require one clinical event (i.e. thrombosis or pregnancy complication) and two positive blood test results spaced at least three months apart that detect at least one of the three types of antibodies.[9]
Testing for lupus anticoagulant can also be indicated by a prolongedaPTT test that is unexplained.[8]
AnaPTT is generally included in adifferential diagnosis in vague symptoms, and is a non-specific test ofcoagulation. In contrast, theprothrombin time (PT), another non-specific coagulation test, is normally unaffected by lupus anticoagulant. Nevertheless,falsely increased PT has been reported, likely by lupus anticoagulant interfering with the phospholipid component of the PT reagent, particularly when using recombinant tissue factor and purified phospholipids.[10]
Amixing test is generally in the initial workup of a prolonged aPTT. In a mixing test, patient plasma is mixed with normal pooled plasma and the clotting is reassessed. If a clotting inhibitor such as a lupus anticoagulant is present, the inhibitor will interact with the normal pooled plasma and the clotting time will generally remain abnormal. However, if the clotting time of the mixed plasma corrects towards normal, the presence of an inhibitor such as the lupus anticoagulant is less likely, instead indicating a deficient quantity of clotting factor (that is replenished by the normal plasma). In case of a corrected mixing test, a lower dose of normal pooled plasma is often used, such as a 4:1 mix (4 times as much patient plasma than normal pooled plasma), as some studies suggest that this method is more sensitive for the detection of a weak lupus anticoagulant that is not enough prevalent or potent to affect a 1:1 mix.[11]
However, only about 60 per cent of patients with lupus anticoagulants have a both a prolonged APTT and APTT mix, making it unsuitable as the only test in case of a high suspicion of the antiphospholipid syndrome.[12] Thus, one or more of the following tests are generally performed to detect lupus anticoagulant if a high suspicion remains, and/or specify lupus anticoagulant as the cause of an abnormal mixing test:
Phospholipid-sensitive functional clotting testing, such as thedilute Russell's viper venom time,Kaolin clotting time, or silica clotting time.[13] As a further confirmation, a second test with the addition of excess phospholipid will correct the prolongation (conceptually known as "phospholipid neutralization"), confirming the diagnosis of a lupus anticoagulant.
Lupus-sensitive aPTT, of which many variants exist, but have the common feature of having a greatersensitivity of becoming prolonged in the presence of lupus anticoagulant compared to a regular aPTT.[14]
Hexagonal (II) phase phospholipid neutralization, wherein such phospholipids specifically neutralize lupus anticoagulant, so a normalization of aPTT after adding it specifically indicates the presence lupus anticoagulants.[15]
Guidelines for lupus anticoagulant testing have been issued by theISTH,[16]CLSI,[17] and the British Committee for Standards in Haematology.[18] The result may be reported as a ratio used to identify the cutoff. A ratio of 1.2 is commonly used, such that a value <1.2 indicates the absence of a lupus anticoagulant, while a value >1.2 indicates the presence of a lupus anticoagulant.[19]Direct oral anticoagulants andvitamin K antagonists used to treatthrombosis can interfere with lupus anticoagulant assays and generate either false-positive or false-negative findings.[20]
Treatment for a lupus anticoagulant is usually undertaken in the context of documentedthrombosis, such as extremity phlebitis or dural sinus vein thrombosis. Patients with a well-documented (i.e., present at least twice) lupus anticoagulant and a history ofthrombosis should be considered candidates for indefinite treatment withanticoagulants. Patients with no history ofthrombosis and a lupus anticoagulant should probably be observed. Current evidence suggests that the risk of recurrentthrombosis in patients with anantiphospholipid antibody is enhanced whether that antibody is measured on serological testing or functional testing. TheSapporo criteria specify that both serological and functional tests must be positive to diagnose theantiphospholipid antibody syndrome.[21]
Miscarriages may be more prevalent in patients with a lupus anticoagulant. Some of these miscarriages maypotentially be prevented with the administration of aspirin and unfractionated heparin. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews provide a deeper understanding on the subject.[22] For refractory cases,hydroxychloroquine may be considered.[23]
^Molhoek JE, de Groot PG, Urbanus RT (July 2018). "The Lupus Anticoagulant Paradox".Semin Thromb Hemost.44 (5):445–452.doi:10.1055/s-0037-1606190.PMID28898901.
^ab"Lupus Anticoagulant Testing".Lab Tests Online. 6 December 2019. Last reviewed on August 22, 2018. This article was last modified on December 6, 2019.
^Htet, S.; Hayes, L.; Leung, T. (2015). "Strong lupus anticoagulant (LA) as a cause for prolonged prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and abnormally low intrinsic factor (IF) levels".Pathology.47: S90.doi:10.1097/01.PAT.0000461585.89264.ae.ISSN0031-3025.S2CID74865864.
^Efthymiou M, Bertolaccini ML, Cohen H (February 2024). "Viewpoint: Lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation in antiphospholipid syndrome".Rheumatology (Oxford).63 (SI):SI54 –SI63.doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kead623.PMID38320587.
^Denis-Magdelaine, A.; Flahault, A.; Verdy, E. (1995). "Sensitivity of Sixteen APTT Reagents for the Presence of Lupus Anticoagulants".Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis.25 (3):98–105.doi:10.1159/000217148.ISSN1424-8832.PMID7607585.
^Triplett DA, Barna LK, Unger GA (1993). "A hexagonal (II) phase phospholipid neutralization assay for lupus anticoagulant identification".Thromb Haemost.70 (5):787–93.doi:10.1055/s-0038-1649671.PMID8128436.S2CID35046350.
^Devreese KM, de Groot PG, de Laat B, Erkan D, Favaloro EJ, Mackie I, Martinuzzo M, Ortel TL, Pengo V, Rand JH, Tripodi A, Wahl D, Cohen H (November 2020). "Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation".J Thromb Haemost.18 (11):2828–39.doi:10.1111/jth.15047.PMID33462974.
^Keeling D, Mackie I, Moore GW, Greer IA, Greaves M (April 2012). "Guidelines on the investigation and management of antiphospholipid syndrome".Br J Haematol.157 (1):47–58.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09037.x.PMID22313321.
^Favaloro EJ (January 2020). "Coagulation mixing studies: Utility, algorithmic strategies and limitations for lupus anticoagulant testing or follow up of abnormal coagulation tests".Am J Hematol.95 (1):117–128.doi:10.1002/ajh.25669.PMID31674066.
^Viard JP, Amoura Z, Bach JF (1991). "[Anti-beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: a marker of thrombosis associated with a circulating anticoagulant]".Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série III (in French).313 (13):607–12.PMID1782567.