TheLithium Triangle (Spanish:Triángulo del Litio) is a region of theAndes that is rich inlithium reserves, encompassed by the borders ofArgentina,Bolivia, andChile.[1] The lithium in the triangle is concentrated in varioussalt pans that exist along theAtacama Desert andneighboring arid areas. The largest areas three main salt pans that define its vertices are theSalar de Uyuni in Bolivia,Salar de Atacama in Chile, andSalar del Hombre Muerto in Argentina. Of these, the core ofSalar de Atacama inChile has the highest concentration of lithium (0.15% by weight) among all world's brine sources.[2][A]
The shape of the area of interest for lithium resources in salt pans is however not a triangle but more of a crescent starting withSalar de Surire (19° S) in the north and ending withSalar de Maricunga (27° S) in the south.[2] Because of this it has been proposed to rename the areaLithium Crescent.[2]
As of 2017 the area was thought to hold around 54% of the world's lithium reserves,[5] however, these reserves, which are the largest in size and the highest in quality in the world, are not expected to make the surrounding countries wealthy, as oil has done for theGulf countries. For example, the total amount of lithium minerals inChile is worth "less than Saudi Arabia's three years' worth of oil exports."[6]
Annual production in the early 2020's was as follows: 140,000 tons per year in Chile,[7] 33,000 tons per year in Argentina,[8] and 600 tons per year in Bolivia.[9]
Currently, many countries situated in theGlobal North are trying to incorporatetechnocratic solutions in order to achieve sustainability directives.[10] Many of these directives include solutions for whichlithium is an essential resource, e.g., the shift to electric vehicles and battery storage systems. Yet, in most Global North countries, lithium is not nearly as abundant as in the lithium triangle. Therefore, contemporary power relations ingeopolitics have enabled Global North countries to expand theirresource frontier to the lithium triangle, touching upon notions ofgreen extractivism, to accommodate their needs at the expense of theGlobal South.[11][12] This green extractivist practice taking place in the lithium triangle leads to severe impact on the environment and socio-economic/socio-culturallivelihoods of local residents.[13][14][15]
According toThe Economist, Argentina was, by November 2022, the country with most ongoing lithium extraction projects; in total 40.[16] By one estimate Argentina could displace Chile as the second largest lithium producer by 2027.[16] Similarly, there are estimates that posit Argentina producing 16% of the World's lithium by 2030 instead of the 6% it produced in 2021.[16] Lowroyalty payments when compared to Chile are cited byThe Economist as a particular advantage.[16]
In December 2018 Bolivia signed an agreement with the German companyACISA for lithium extraction.[17] The cooperation with ACISA was, by June 2022, deemed to have stalled with Bolivia negotiating larger lithium projects with Canadian, Chinese, and United States companies.[17] Since the early 2020s, the Bolivian government has been advocating that the countries in the region organize themselves so that they can influence international trade oflithium, including the creation of an organization similar toOPEC.[18]
All lithium extracted in Chile as of 2023 comes fromSalar de Atacama.[19] The only two lithium-extracting companies currently operating in Chile,SQM andAlbemarle, have licenses to extract lithium until 2030 and 2043 respectively.[19][20] In April 2023, the Chilean government announced plans for nationalizing its lithium industry.[21] The announcement impacts chiefly the companies SQM and Albemarle.[21] In response, theshares of SQM in theSantiago Stock Exchange dropped by 15% during the day, their largest daily drop since September 20, 2022.[22] The government's decision was thought to have less impact for Albemarle than for SQM given that it had many more years to negotiate before its license expired.[20] The state-owned copper companyCodelco was commissioned by the government to negotiate nationalization with SQM.[20]
The indigenous inhabitants of Salar de Atacama basin –theLikan Antay– have a history of both opposing lithium extraction and negotiating forshared benefits with lithium companies.[23][24] Negotiations occur under the framework of theIndigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention which Chile signed in 2008.[23] It is argued that "[a]greements between Indigenous organizations and lithium companies have brought significant economic resources for community development, but have also expanded the mining industry's capacity for social control in the area.".[23]
This control is rooted in a dominant discourse that has taken root in the global rush to a sustainable future in light of globalclimate change.[14] With lithium being a key strategic resource is facilitating this shift, many countries are rushing to acquire as much as possible.[25] Any form of protest against such mining operations is deemed to be an opposition to climate change, ergo hindering the global agenda in combatting climate change.[15][14] This discourse has resulted in the marginalisation of opposed indigenous voices rendering them nearly powerless.[14]
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
The dictionary definition oflithium triangle at WiktionaryMajor South American geological features | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tectonic plates |  | ||||
| Cratons andshields | |||||
| Structures undergoingsubduction | |||||
| Faults andshear zones | |||||
| Rifts andgrabens | |||||
| Sedimentary basins | |||||
| Orogenies | |||||
| Metallogenetic provinces | |||||
| Volcanism |
| ||||