The first attempts at systematic catalogues of galaxies were made in the 1960s, with theCatalogue of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies listing 29,418 galaxies and galaxy clusters, and with theMorphological Catalogue of Galaxies, a putatively completelist of galaxies withphotographic magnitude above 15, listing 30,642. In the 1980s, theLyons Groups of Galaxies listed 485 galaxy groups with 3,933 member galaxies.Galaxy Zoo is a project aiming at a more comprehensive list: launched in July 2007, it has classified over one million galaxy images from The Sloan Digital Sky Survey, The Hubble Space Telescope and the Cosmic Assembly Near-Infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey.[2]
This is a list of galaxies that are well known by something other than an entry in a catalog or list, or a set of coordinates, or a systematic designation.
Andromeda I is a dwarf spheroidal galaxy (dSph) about 2.40 million light-years away in the constellation Andromeda. Andromeda I is part of the local group of galaxies and a satellite galaxy of the Andromeda Galaxy (M31). It is roughly 3.5 degrees south and slightly east of M31. As of 2005, it is the closest known dSph companion to M31 at an estimated projected distance of ~40 kpc or ~150,000 light-years.
Andromeda, which is shortened from "Andromeda Galaxy", gets its name from the area of the sky in which it appears, the constellation of Andromeda.[citation needed]
Andromeda is the closest big galaxy to theMilky Way and is expected to collide with the Milky Way around 4.5 billion years from now. The two will eventually merge into a single new galaxy calledMilkdromeda[3] According to simulations, this object would probably be a giantelliptical galaxy, but with a centre showing less stellar density than current elliptical galaxies.[4]
NGC 3561, also known as Arp 105, is a pair of interacting galaxies NGC 3561A and NGC 3561B within the galaxy cluster Abell 1185 in Ursa Major. It was discovered by British astronomer John Herschel on 30 March 1827.[6] Its common name is "the Guitar" and contains a small tidal dwarf galaxy known as Ambartsumian's Knot that is believed to be the remnant of the extensive tidal tail pulled out of one of the galaxies.
It has a spectacular dark band of absorbing dust in front of the galaxy's bright nucleus, giving rise to its nicknames of the "Black Eye" or "Evil Eye" galaxy.[6]
Named after acondor, a type of vulture that is one of the largest flying birds.[citation needed]
The largest known spiral galaxy, it has a diameter of over 665,300 light-years (204.0 kiloparsecs).[9] It is tidally disturbed by the smaller lenticular galaxyIC 4970.[10]
It is of the subtype Hoag-type galaxy, and may in fact be apolar-ring galaxy with the ring in the plane of rotation of the central object.[citation needed]
This is the fourth-largest galaxy in theLocal Group, and forms a pair with theSMC, and from recent research, may not be part of the Milky Way system of satellites at all.[18]
Also called VV 32 and Arp 148, this is a very peculiar looking object, and is likely to be not one galaxy, but two galaxies undergoing a collision. Event in images is a spindle shape and a ring shape.[citation needed]
Galaxy (akaHIPASS J1131-31) was hidden behind a relatively fast-moving foreground star (TYC 7215-199-1) and became observable when the star moved aside.[citation needed]
Galaxy, relatively nearby, is considered one of the most metal-poor ("extremely metal-poor" (XMP)), least chemically enriched, and seemingly primordial, galaxies known.[24][25]
Named after its location in the Sculptor Constellation. Also called the Silver Dollar or Silver Coin Galaxy, because of its light and circular appearance.[citation needed]
Also known as the Silver Coin, Silver Dollar Galaxy or Caldwell 65[citation needed]
This is a list of galaxies that are visible to the naked eye, for at the very least, keen-eyed observers in a very dark-sky environment that is high in altitude, during clear and stable weather.
This is the galaxy containing theSun and itsSolar System, and therefore Earth. Most things visible to the naked eye in the sky are part of it, including the Milky Way composing theZone of Avoidance.[32]
Being a diffuse object, its visibility is strongly affected by even small amounts of light pollution, ranging from easily visible in direct vision in truly dark skies to a difficult averted vision object in rural/suburban skies.[37]
LordWilliam Parsons, Earl of Rosse discovered the firstspiral nebula from observing M51 (recognition of the spiral shape without the recognition of the object as outside the Milky Way).[42]
Of several items, then calledradio stars, Cygnus A was identified with a distant galaxy, being the first of many radio stars to become aradio galaxy.[44][45]
A proposed dwarf galaxy known as theCanis Major Overdensity may lie closer at 25,000 light-years, however its status as a galaxy is disputed.[51][52][53]
Closest undisputed Seyfert galaxy. It has been proposed that the nearby (2.05 Mly) dwarf galaxyNGC 185 may also be a Seyfert,[60] though this status has been disputed.[61]
This was the most remote object known at the time of discovery. In 2009, gamma ray burstGRB 090423 was discovered at z=8.2, taking the title of most distant object. The next galaxy to hold the title also succeeded GRB 090423, that being UDFy-38135539.[90][91][92]
This was the remotest object known at time of discovery. The galaxy is lensed by galaxy clusterAbell 370. This was the first galaxy, as opposed to quasar, found to exceed redshift 6. It exceeded the redshift of quasarSDSSp J103027.10+052455.0 of z=6.28[94][95][97][98][99][100]
This was the remotest object known at time of discovery. In 2000, the quasarSDSSp J104433.04-012502.2 was discovered at z=5.82, becoming the most remote object in the universe known. This was followed by another quasar,SDSSp J103027.10+052455.0 in 2001, the first object exceeding redshift 6, at z=6.28[101][102]
These were the remotest objects known at the time of discovery. The pair of galaxies were found lensed by galaxy clusterCL1358+62 (z=0.33). This was the first time since 1964 that something other than aquasar held the record for being the most distant object in the universe. It exceeded the mark set by quasarPC 1247-3406 at z=4.897[102][104][105][107][108][109]
From 1964 to 1997, the title of most distant object in the universe were held by a succession of quasars.[109] That list is available atlist of quasars.
This is a radio galaxy. At the time of its discovery, quasarPC 1247-3406 at z=4.73, discovered in 1991 was the most remote object known. This was the last radio galaxy to hold the title of most distant galaxy. This was the first galaxy, as opposed to quasar, that was found beyond redshift 4.[102][110][111][112]
This is a radio galaxy. At the time of its discovery, quasarPC 1158+4635, discovered in 1989, was the most remote object known, at z=4.73 In 1991, quasarPC 1247-3406, became the most remote object known, at z=4.897[102][111][112][113][114]
This is a radio galaxy. At the time of discovery, quasarQ0051-279 at z=4.43, discovered in 1987, was the most remote object known. In 1989, quasarPC 1158+4635 was discovered at z=4.73, making it the most remote object known. This was the first galaxy discovered above redshift 3. It was also the first galaxy found above redshift 2.[102][114][115][116][117]
This is a radio galaxy. At the time, the most remote object was quasarOQ172, at z=3.53, found in 1974. In 1982, quasarPKS 2000-330 at z=3.78 became the most remote object.
This is a radio galaxy. At the time, the most remote object was quasarOQ172, at z=3.53, found in 1974.[102]
From 1964 to 1997, the title of most distant object in the universe were held by a succession of quasars.[109] That list is available atlist of quasars.
This is a radio galaxy. This was the remotest object known at time of discovery of its redshift. This was the last non-quasar to hold the title of most distant object known until 1997. In 1964, quasar3C 147 became the most distant object in the universe known.[102][109][123][124][125]
Using redshift measurements, NGC 7619 was the highest at the time of measurement. At the time of announcement, it was not yet accepted as a general guide to distance; however, later in the year, Edwin Hubble described redshift in relation to distance, leading to a seachange, and having this being accepted as an inferred distance.[139][141][142]
At the time, nebula had yet to be accepted as independent galaxies. However, in 1923, galaxies were generally recognized as external to the Milky Way.[129][139][141][143][144][145][146]
This was the second galaxy whose redshift was determined; the first being Andromeda—which is approaching us and thus cannot have its redshift used to infer distance. Both were measured byVesto Melvin Slipher. At this time, nebula had yet to be accepted as independent galaxies. NGC 4594 was originally measured as 1000 km/s, then refined to 1100, and then to 1180 in 1916.[139][143][146]
This is the lower bound, as it is remotest galaxy observable with the naked eye. It is 12 million light-years away. Redshift cannot be used to infer distance, because it is moving toward us faster than cosmological expansion.
In 1923,Edwin Hubble measured the distance to Andromeda, and settled the question of whether or not there were galaxies, or if everything was in the Milky Way.
MACS0647-JD, discovered in 2012, with z=10.7, does not appear on this list because it has not been confirmed with a spectroscopic redshift.[147]
UDFy-38135539, discovered in 2009, with z=8.6, does not appear on this list because its claimed redshift is disputed.[148] Follow-up observations have failed to replicate the cited redshift measurement.[citation needed]
A1689-zD1, discovered in 2008, with z=7.6, does not appear on this list because it has not been confirmed with a spectroscopic redshift.
Abell 68 c1 andAbell 2219 c1, discovered in 2007, with z=9, do not appear on this list because they have not been confirmed.[149]
IOK4 andIOK5, discovered in 2007, with z=7, do not appear on this list because they have not been confirmed with a spectroscopic redshift.
Abell 1835 IR1916, discovered in 2004, with z=10.0, does not appear on this list because its claimed redshift is disputed. Some follow-up observations have failed to find the object at all.[citation needed]
STIS 123627+621755, discovered in 1999, with z=6.68, does not appear on this list because its redshift was based on an erroneous interpretation of an oxygen emission line as a hydrogen emission line.[150][151][152]
BR1202-0725 LAE, discovered in 1998 at z=5.64 does not appear on the list because it was not definitively pinned.BR1202-0725 (QSO 1202-07) refers to a quasar that the Lyman alpha emitting galaxy is near. The quasar itself lies at z=4.6947[103][106]
BR2237-0607 LA1 andBR2237-0607 LA2 were found at z=4.55 while investigating around the quasarBR2237-0607 in 1996. Neither of these appear on the list because they were not definitively pinned down at the time. The quasar itself lies at z=4.558[153][154]
Two absorption dropouts in the spectrum of quasarBR 1202-07 (QSO 1202-0725,BRI 1202-0725,BRI1202-07) were found, one in early 1996, another later in 1996. Neither of these appear on the list because they were not definitively pinned down at the time. The early one was at z=4.38, the later one at z=4.687, the quasar itself lies at z=4.695[102][155][156][157][158]
In 1986, a gravitationally lensed galaxy forming a blue arc was found lensed by galaxy clusterCL 2224-02 (C12224 in some references). However, its redshift was only determined in 1991, at z=2.237, by which time, it would no longer be the most distant galaxy known.[159][160]
An absorption drop was discovered in 1985 in the light spectrum of quasarPKS 1614+051 at z=3.21 This does not appear on the list because it was not definitively fixed down. At the time, it was claimed to be the first non-QSO galaxy found beyond redshift 3. The quasar itself is at z=3.197[102][161]
In 1975,3C 123 was incorrectly determined to lie at z=0.637 (actually z=0.218).[162][163]
From 1964 to 1997, the title of most distant object in the universe was held by a succession of quasars.[109] That list is available atlist of quasars.
In 1958, clustersCl 0024+1654 andCl 1447+2619 were estimated to have redshifts of z=0.29 and z=0.35, respectively. However, no galaxy was spectroscopically determined.[125]
As of 21 May 2015, WISE-J224607.57-052635.0-20150521 is the most luminous galaxy discovered and releases 10,000 times more energy than theMilky Way galaxy, although smaller. Nearly 100 percent of the light escaping from this dusty galaxy isInfrared radiation.[164][165] (Image)
This is not considered astar cluster, as it is held together by the gravitational effects ofdark matter rather than just the mutual attraction of the constituent stars, gas and black holes.[167][168]
These three galaxies interact with each other and draw out tidal tails, which are dense enough to form star clusters. The bridge of gas between these galaxies is known asArp's Loop.[178]
NGC 6872 is a barred spiral galaxy with agrand design spiral nucleus, and distinct well-formed outer barred-spiral architecture, caused by tidal interaction with satellite galaxy IC 4970.[citation needed]
The Tadpole Galaxy tidally interacted with another galaxy in a close encounter, and remains slightly disrupted, with a long tidal tail.[citation needed]
This was announced as the most distant galaxy merger ever discovered. It is expected that this proto-cluster of galaxies will merge to form abrightest cluster galaxy, and become the core of a larger galaxy cluster.[180][181]
This protocluster is located at 12.4 billion light years from the Earth. Each of these galaxies are forming stars at 1000 times that of the Milky Way, nicknamed the Dusty Red Core.[182]
This is now categorized aglobular cluster of Andromeda. However, it is considered the core of a dwarf galaxy that Andromeda cannibalized.[citation needed]
It is now considered a remnant of a dwarf galaxy that collided with the Milky Way about 8-11 billion years ago. It is the last major merger of the Milky Way in its lifetime.[citation needed]
This galaxy cannot be definitively identified, with the most likely candidate beingNGC 5866, and a good chance of it being a misidentification ofM101. Other candidates have also been suggested.
This is a pair of spiral galaxies, one superimposed on another, at two separate and distinct ranges, and unrelated to each other. It is a rare chance visual alignment.
Lying in the galaxy clusterAbell 3627, this galaxy is being stripped of its gas by the pressure of theintracluster medium (ICM), due to its high speed traversal through the cluster, and is leaving a high density tail with large amounts of star formation. The tail features the largest amount of star formation outside of a galaxy seen so far. The galaxy has the appearance of a comet, with the head being the galaxy, and a tail of gas and stars.[186][187][188][189]
Lying in galaxy clusterAbell 2667, this spiral galaxy is being tidally stripped of stars and gas through its high speed traversal through the cluster, having the appearance of a comet.
Most extreme example in the list of moderate-redshift galaxies with the highest density starbursts yet observed found in theWide-field Infrared Survey Explorer data (Diamond-Stanic et al. 2012).[190]
This galaxy is reported to be the most distant and therefore earliest (700 million years after theBig Bang) massive galaxy where star formation stopped, contrary to expectations based on current models of galaxy formation.[191]
This galaxy is reported to be very metal poor, with the oxygen abundance of 12+log(O/H) < 5.8 (2 sigma), or <0.12% of Solar abundance, measured via JWST spectroscopy. This metallicity measurement is the lowest in the literature, making it the most pristine galaxy to date.[192]
^abz representsredshift, a measure ofrecessional velocity and inferred distance due to cosmological expansion.
^quasars and otherAGN are not included on this list, since they are only galactic cores, unless the host galaxy was observed when it was most distant.
^antiquity – 1913 (based on redshift); antiquity – 1930 (based on Cepheids)
^The quick-look major axis physical diameter given by NED of 273.77 kiloparsecs (893,000 light-years) was based on an earlier distance estimate of 128 megaparsecs (417.5 million light-years). The quoted diameter in this infobox was based on NED's provided scale "Virgo +GA +Shapley" of 973 pc/arcsec multiplied with the given angular diameter of 555.90 arcsec.
^Burbidge, G. (1999). "Baade & Minkowski's Identification of Radio Sources".Astrophysical Journal.525: 569.Bibcode:1999ApJ...525C.569B.
^Baade, W.; Minkowski, R. (1954). "Identification of the Radio Sources in Cassiopeia, Cygnus a, and Puppis a".The Astrophysical Journal.119: 206.Bibcode:1954ApJ...119..206B.doi:10.1086/145812.
^Lopez-Corredoira, M.; Moitinho, A.; Zaggia, S.; Momany, Y.; Carraro, G.; Hammersley, P. L.; Cabrera-Lavers, A.; Vazquez, R. A. (July 2012). "Comments on the "Monoceros" affair".arXiv:1207.2749 [astro-ph.GA].
^Naidu, Rohan P.; et al. (2025). "A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at $z_{\rm{spec}}=14.44$ Confirmed with JWST".arXiv:2505.11263 [astro-ph.GA].
^Seymour, N.; Drouart, G.; Noirot, G.; Broderick, J. W.; Turner, R. J.; Shabala, S. S.; Stern, D. K.; Bellstedt, S.; Driver, S.; Davies, L.; De Breuck, C. A.; Afonso, J. A.; Vernet, J. D. R.; Galvin, T. J. (2022). "HST WFC3/Grism observations of the candidate ultra-high-redshift radio galaxy GLEAM J0917–0012".Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.39 e016.arXiv:2203.01349.Bibcode:2022PASA...39...16S.doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.4.S2CID247222828.
^Ho, Luis C.; Filippenko, Alexei V.; Sargent, Wallace L. W. (October 1997). "A Search for 'Dwarf' Seyfert Nuclei. III. Spectroscopic Parameters and Properties of the Host Galaxies".The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.112 (2):315–390.arXiv:astro-ph/9704107.Bibcode:1997ApJS..112..315H.doi:10.1086/313041.S2CID17086638.
^Bolatto, A. D.; Jackson, J. M.; Wilson, C. D.; Moriarty-Schieven, G. (2000). "Submillimeter Observations of IC 10: The Dust Properties and Neutral Carbon Content of a Low-Metallicity Starburst".Astrophysical Journal.532 (2):909–921.arXiv:astro-ph/9910564.Bibcode:2000ApJ...532..909B.doi:10.1086/308590.S2CID15330330.
^Ilie, Cosmin; Freese, Katherine; Petric, Andreea; Paulin, Jillian (2023). "UHZ1 and the other three most distant quasars observed: Possible evidence for Supermassive Dark Stars".arXiv:2312.13837 [astro-ph.GA].
^Akos Bogdan, Andy Goulding, Priyamvada Natarajan, Orsolya Kovacs, Grant Tremblay, Urmila Chadayammuri, Marta Volonteri, Ralph Kraft, William Forman, Christine Jones, Eugene Churazov, Irina Zhuravleva (24 May 2023). "Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early supermassive black holes from a z ≈ 10 X-ray quasar".Nature Astronomy.8 (1) (published January 2024):126–133.arXiv:2305.15458.Bibcode:2024NatAs...8..126B.doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Finkelstein, S. L.; Papovich, C.; Dickinson, M.; Song, M.; Tilvi, V.; Koekemoer, A. M.; Finkelstein, K. D.; Mobasher, B.; Ferguson, H. C.; Giavalisco, M.; Reddy, N.; Ashby, M. L. N.; Dekel, A.; Fazio, G. G.; Fontana, A.; Grogin, N. A.; Huang, J.-S.; Kocevski, D.;Rafelski, M.; Weiner, B. J.; Willner, S. P. (2013). "A galaxy rapidly forming stars 700 million years after the Big Bang at redshift 7.51".Nature.502 (7472):524–527.arXiv:1310.6031.Bibcode:2013Natur.502..524F.doi:10.1038/nature12657.PMID24153304.S2CID4448085.
^Shibuya, Takatoshi; Kashikawa, Nobunari; Ota, Kazuaki; Iye, Masanori; Ouchi, Masami; Furusawa, Hisanori; Shimasaku, Kazuhiro; Hattori, Takashi (2012). "The First Systematic Survey for Lyalpha Emitters at z = 7.3 with Red-sensitive Subaru/Suprime-Cam".The Astrophysical Journal.752 (2): 114.arXiv:1112.3997.Bibcode:2012ApJ...752..114S.doi:10.1088/0004-637x/752/2/114.S2CID119281732.
^Ono, Yoshiaki; Ouchi, Masami; Mobasher, Bahram; Dickinson, Mark; Penner, Kyle; Shimasaku, Kazuhiro; Weiner, Benjamin J.; Kartaltepe, Jeyhan S.; Nakajima, Kimihiko; Nayyeri, Hooshang; Stern, Daniel; Kashikawa, Nobunari; Spinrad, Hyron (2012). "Spectroscopic Confirmation of Three z-dropout Galaxies at z = 6.844-7.213: Demographics of Lyalpha Emission in z ~ 7 Galaxies".The Astrophysical Journal.744 (2): 83.arXiv:1107.3159.Bibcode:2012ApJ...744...83O.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/83.S2CID119306980.
^Vanzella, E.; Pentericci, L.; Fontana, A.; Grazian, A.; Castellano, M.; Boutsia, K.; Cristiani, S.; Dickinson, M.; Gallozzi, S.; Giallongo, E.; Giavalisco, M.; Maiolino, R.; Moorwood, A.; Paris, D.; Santini, P. (2011). "Spectroscopic Confirmation of Two Lyman Break Galaxies at Redshift Beyond 7".The Astrophysical Journal.730 (2): L35.arXiv:1011.5500.Bibcode:2011ApJ...730L..35V.doi:10.1088/2041-8205/730/2/l35.S2CID53459241.
^Wil van Breugel; Carlos De Breuck; Adam Stanford; Huub Röttgering; George Miley; Daniel Stern; Dante Minniti; Chris Carilli (1999). "Ultra-Steep Spectrum Radio Galaxies at Hy Redshifts". In Andrew J. Bunker; Wil J. M. van Breugel (eds.).The Hy-Redshift Universe: Galaxy Formation and Evolution at High Redshift. ASP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 193. p. 44.arXiv:astro-ph/9910311.Bibcode:1999ASPC..193...44V.ISBN978-1-58381-019-4.
^Le Fevre, O.; Hammer, F.; Nottale, L.; Mazure, A.; Christian, C. (1988). "Peculiar morphology of the high-redshift radio galaxies 3C 13 and 3C 256 in subarcsecond seeing".Astrophysical Journal.324: L1.Bibcode:1988ApJ...324L...1L.doi:10.1086/185078.
^Longair, M. S. (1984). "The Most Distant Galaxies".Journal of the British Astronomical Association.94: 97.Bibcode:1984JBAA...94...97L.
^Spinrad, H.; Djorgovski, S. (1983). "3C324 – Most Distant Galaxy".Sky and Telescope.65: 321.Bibcode:1983S&T....65..321S.
^Smith, H. E.; Junkkarinen, V. T.; Spinrad, H.; Grueff, G.; Vigotti, M. (1979). "Spectrophotometry of three high-redshift radio galaxies - 3C 6.1, 3C 265, and 3C 352".The Astrophysical Journal.231: 307.Bibcode:1979ApJ...231..307S.doi:10.1086/157194.
^abcSandage, Allan (1961). "The Ability of the 200-INCH Telescope to Discriminate Between Selected World Models".Astrophysical Journal.133: 355.Bibcode:1961ApJ...133..355S.doi:10.1086/147041.
^Sandage, Allan (1999). "The First 50 Years at Palomar: 1949–1999 the Early Years of Stellar Evolution, Cosmology, and High-Energy Astrophysics".Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics.37:445–486.Bibcode:1999ARA&A..37..445S.doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.445.
^abChant, C. A. (1932). "Notes and Queries (Doings at Mount Wilson-Ritchey's Photographic Telescope-Infra-red Photographic Plates)".Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada.26: 180.Bibcode:1932JRASC..26..180C.
^Hubble, Edwin; Humason, Milton L. (1931). "The Velocity-Distance Relation among Extra-Galactic Nebulae".Astrophysical Journal.74: 43.Bibcode:1931ApJ....74...43H.doi:10.1086/143323.
^abHumason, M. L. (1931). "The Large Apparent Velocities of Extra-Galactic Nebulae".Astronomical Society of the Pacific Leaflets.1 (37): 149.Bibcode:1931ASPL....1..149H.
^Allan Sandage (December 1989)."EDWIN HUBBLE 1889–1953".The Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada.83 (6). Whole No. 621.Archived from the original on 2 February 1997.
^Wampler, E. J.; et al. (1996). "High resolution observations of the QSO BR 1202-0725: deuterium and ionic abundances at redshifts above z=4".Astronomy & Astrophysics.316: 33.arXiv:astro-ph/9512084.Bibcode:1996A&A...316...33W.
^"Results for ESO 383-G 076".NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology. Retrieved19 November 2025.
^Oei, Martijn S. S. L.; van Weeren, Reinout J.; Hardcastle, Martin J.; Botteon, Andrea; Shimwell, Tim W.; Dabhade, Pratik; Gast, Aivin D. J. G. I. B.; Röttgering, Huub J. A.; Brüggen, Marcus; Tasse, Cyril; Williams, Wendy L.; Shulevski, Aleksandar (14 February 2022). "The discovery of a radio galaxy of at least 5 Mpc".Astronomy & Astrophysics.660: A2.arXiv:2202.05427.Bibcode:2022A&A...660A...2O.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142778.S2CID246823634.