Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

List of United States Navy amphibious warfare ships

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Three US amphibious warfare ships in 2011 - the Landing Helicopter DockUSS Makin Island (LHD 8) leading the Landing Platform DockUSS New Orleans (LPD 18), rear, and the Landing Ship DockUSS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52), fore
Ships of the United States Navy
Ships in current service
Ships grouped alphabetically
Ships grouped by type

This is alist of United States Navy amphibious warfare ships. Thistype of ship has been in use with theUS Navy sinceWorld War I.

Ship status is indicated as either currently active [A] (including ready reserve), inactive [I], or precommissioning [P]. Ships in the inactive category include only ships in the inactive reserve, ships which have been disposed from US service have no listed status. Ships in the precommissioning category include ships under construction or on order.

Historical overview

[edit]

There have been four generations ofamphibious warfare ships, with each generation having more capability than the previous:

  • The first generation simply landed troops and equipment ashore with standard (i.e., non-specialized) boats and barges. These ships are not listed in this article since they were indistinguishable from thetroopships and othersurface combatants of their day, and as such were not assigned specializedhull classification symbols.
  • The second generation was designed duringWorld War II to land personnel and vehicles ashore, either directly or via carried specializedlanding craft.
  • The third generation was designed beginning in the 1950s to usehelicopters for amphibious operations, with the result that such operations were no longer limited to beaches.
  • The fourth generation was designed beginning in the 1980s to usehovercraft (Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) specifically), with the result that the numbers and types of beaches which could be accessed dramatically increased.

World War II

[edit]
See also:List of auxiliaries of the United States Navy § World War II

During the naval build-up for World War II, almost 200Maritime Commission (MARCOM) standard designs were converted to US Navy amphibious warfare ships. In theCold War these and newer standard designs were built under MARCOM's successor agency, the United States Maritime Administration (MARAD):

In the following lists MARCOM types are abbreviated as 'MC type' and MARAD as 'MA type'; 'MC types' became 'MA types' in 1950.

Postwar

[edit]

The first amphibious warfare ships had a top speed of 12 to 17 knots. With the appearance ofhigher speed submarines at the end of World War II, the US Navy decided that all new amphibious warfare ships would have to have a minimum speed of 20knots (37 km/h; 23 mph) to increase their chances of survival. The High Speed Transport destroyer conversions (APD/LPR), the Landing Platform Docks (LPD), and all new ships with a full flight deck (LPH, LHA, LHD) would meet this criterion. The other major types would see relatively small numbers of new ships constructed with this 20 knot requirement, with the last appearing in 1969.[1]

Classifications

[edit]

Amphibious warfare ships were considered by the US Navy to beauxiliaries and were classed with hull classification symbols beginning with 'A' until 1942. Many ships were reclassed at that time as landing ships and received new hull symbols beginning with 'L'; others would retain 'A' hull symbols until 1969 and then receive 'L' symbols. This article pairs the two lists of what are the same ships, with each 'L' list preceding the respective 'A' list.Littoral Combat Ships also use 'L' hull symbols but are not solely intended for amphibious warfare.

In 2015 the US Navy created new hull classification symbols that began with an 'E' to designate 'expeditionary' vessels. Expeditionary vessels are designed to support low-intensity missions, allowing more expensive, high-value amphibious warfare ships to be re-tasked for more demanding missions. Most of these ships are not commissioned warships, but rather are operated by theMilitary Sealift Command.[2]

Amphibious assault ship (General Purpose) (LHA)

[edit]
USSTarawa (LHA 1)
USSAmerica (LHA-6)
Further information:Landing helicopter assault

Tarawa class

TheTarawa-class LHA was the first to combine the features of thewell deck of the Landing Ship Dock (LSD) or Landing Platform Dock (LPD) and the fullflight deck of the Landing Platform Helicopter (LPH) into one ship. Though not designed to carryLanding Craft Air Cushion (LCAC)s, they could accommodate one in their well decks.[3]


America class

TheAmerica-class LHA would be a follow-on to theWasp-class LHD. The first two ships,America andTripoli, would not have a well deck, so as to dedicate more space to the support of air operations. This was criticized as a repeat of the mistakes of theLPH concept, and so it was decided thatBougainville and all future ships of this class would have a well deck.[4]

Amphibious assault ship (multi-purpose) (LHD)

[edit]
USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD-6)
Further information:Landing helicopter dock

Wasp class

The well deck of theTarawa-class LHA was not designed to accommodate the LCAC, which came into service just six years after the last of that class was completed. TheWasp-class LHD and the later units of theAmerica-class LHA were designed to be LCAC compatible; theWasp-class could carry 3 LCACs.[9]

Landing Platform Helicopter (LPH)

[edit]
USSIwo Jima (LPH-2)
USSPrinceton (LPH-5)
Thetis Bay (LPH-6)
Further information:Landing platform helicopter

The Landing Platform Helicopter (LPH) would be the first ships to operate helicopters for large scaleair assault behind beaches. One major defect of the LPH concept was that these ships did not carry landing craft to disembark Marines when weather or hostileanti-aircraft systems grounded helicopters; onlyInchon would be modified to carrytwo landing craft. In such situations the LPH would be reliant on landing craft supplied by other ships, which proved awkward in practice. This defect would drive the design of theTarawa-class LHA, in effect a LPH with a well deck.[12]

Commencement Bay class: MC type T3


Iwo Jima class

As the 'definitive' LPH design under project SCB 157, theIwo Jima class would be the only class to be built as such, with sufficient 'hotel' accommodations for the embarked Marines. All other LPH ships would be conversions of aircraft carriers, and so had accommodation deficiencies (for example, some Marine units could not bunk together, andwater evaporation was insufficient to allow all personnel showers within a 24 hour period).[14]
After their retirement as amphibious warfare ships, one (Inchon) would be converted to carryminesweeping helicopters as amine countermeasures support ship (MCS). All of these ships would be scrapped or sunk as targets by 2018.


Essex class

The following LPH ships were convertedEssex class aircraft carriers, due to budget constraints with the construction of theIwo Jima class ships.[16]


Casablanca class: MC type S4-S2-BB3

Thetis Bay was a convertedCasablanca class escort carrier. Under the hull designation CVHA-1, she was the prototype for the LPH concept.[17]

Landing Platform Dock (LPD)

[edit]
USSRaleigh (LPD-1)
USSAustin (LPD-4)
USSDubuque (LPD-8), note temporary telescoping helicopter hangar
USSTrenton (LPD-14)
USSSan Antonio (LPD-17)
Further information:Amphibious transport dock andCommand ship

The Landing Platform Dock (LPD) concept began as a compromise design, an attempt to build a ship with much more capability than a Landing Ship Dock (LSD) - the LPD superficially resembles an LSD with an enlarged flight deck - but without the expense of a LPH. The well deck is smaller than that of an LSD. TheRaleigh andAustin classes could be fitted with a temporary telescoping helicopter hangar.[18]

Several of these ships were built with space dedicated for command capabilities. Two of these,La Salle andCoronado, would be redesignated asauxiliary command ships (AGF).

TheRaleigh class would be designed under project SBC 187 (La Salle under SBC 187A) and theAustin class under SBC 187B.

Raleigh class


Austin class

Austin class (Cleveland subclass)

Austin class (Trenton subclass)


San Antonio class

Further information:LX(R)-class amphibious warfare ship
TheSan Antonio-class were the first LPDs designed to accommodate Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC); two could be carried. They were also the first LPDs to be built with a permanent helicopter hangar.[19]

Landing Ship Dock (LSD)

[edit]
USSAshland (LSD-1)
USSCasa Grande (LSD-13)
USSThomaston (LSD-28)
USSAnchorage (LSD-36)
USSWhidbey Island (LSD-41)
USSHarper's Ferry (LSD-49)
Further information:Dock landing ship

The LSD came as a result of a British requirement during World War II for a vessel that could carry large landing craft across the seas at speed. The design was developed and built in the US for the Royal Navy and the US Navy, with the US Navy originally classifying these ships asMechanized artillery transports (APM), then changing them to LSDs. The first LSDs could carry 36Landing Craft Mechanized (LCM) at 16knots (30 km/h) in a flooding well deck, the first ships with this capability. Late in the war they were modified with the addition of a temporary superdeck over the well deck; this could carry vehicles, support helicopter operations, or be removed for outsized cargo.[23]

In December 2020 the U.S. Navy's Report to Congress on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels stated that it was planned that all LSDs would be placed Out of Commission in Reserve by 2027.[24]

Ashland class


Casa Grande class


Thomaston class

TheThomaston class, designed under project SCB 75, would be the first class of LSDs capable of 20 knots.[30]


Anchorage class

TheAnchorage class, designed under project SCB 404, was basically theThomaston class with the well deck enlarged (49 feet longer and 2 feet wider) to accommodate the new larger LCU-1610 class. They would later be modified to carry up to 3 Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC).[33]


Whidbey Island class

TheWhidbey Island-class were the first LSDs designed to accommodate LCACs - up to 5 could be carried - and the first in which the helicopter deck would not be removable.[34]


Harpers Ferry class

TheHarpers Ferry-class is basically theWhidbey Island-class with more cargo capacity at the expense of a shorter well deck which could carry 2 LCACs.[36]

Mechanized artillery transports (APM)

[edit]

The APM hull classification was short-lived; it was changed toLanding Ship Dock (LSD).[37]

  • USSAshland (APM-1)
  • USSBelle Grove (APM-2)
  • USSCarter Hall (APM-3)
  • USSEpping Forest (APM-4)
  • USSGunston Hall (APM-5)
  • USSLindenwald (APM-6)
  • USSOak Hill (APM-7)
  • USSWhite Marsh (APM-8)
  • USSLakehurst (APM-9)

Amphibious command ship (LCC)

[edit]
USSMount McKinley (LCC-7)
USSTaconic (LCC-17)
USSBlue Ridge (LCC-19)
Further information:Amphibious command ship andCommand ship

AllAmphibious force flagships (AGC) in service in 1969 were reclassed as Amphibious Command Ships (LCC), which should not be confused with the World War II eraLanding craft, control (LCC).

Mount McKinley class: MC type C2-S-AJ1


Adirondack class


Blue Ridge class

TheBlue Ridge-class would be the only amphibious command ships purposely built as such by the US Navy, and the first and only class capable of exceeding 20 knots. Their hulls were based on theIwo Jima-class Landing Platform Helicopter (LPH) design due to the need for flat deck space for multiple antennas. After the retirement of the fleet flagships [cruisers] (see alsoList of cruisers of the United States Navy § Command cruisers (CLC, CC)) these ships would be pressed into that role despite their lack of speed relative tocarrier strike groups.[38]

Amphibious force flagship (AGC)

[edit]
USSAncon (AGC-4)
USSCatoctin (AGC-5)
USSBiscayne (AGC-18)
Further information:Amphibious command ship § World War II, andCommand ship

All Amphibious Force Flagships (AGC) in service in 1969 were reclassed asAmphibious command ships (LCC).

Appalachian class: MC type C2-S-B1


Troop transport conversion


Coast Guard cutter conversions


Mount McKinley class: MC type C2-S-AJ1


Adirondack class


Barnegat class


Presidential yacht (never used as a true AGC)

Amphibious cargo ship (LKA)

[edit]
USSLibra (LKA-12)
USSThuban (LKA-19)
USSRankin (LKA-103)
USSTulare (LKA-112)
USSCharleston (LKA-113)
Further information:Amphibious cargo ship

AllAttack cargo ships (AKA) in service in 1969 were reclassed as Amphibious Cargo Ships (LKA).

Arcturus class


Andromeda class: MA type C2


Tolland class: MA type C2-S-AJ3


Tulare class: MA type C4-S-1A

TheTulare would be the first AKA/LKA capable of 20 knots[39]


Charleston class: MA type C4-S-1A

Attack cargo ship (AKA)

[edit]
Further information:Amphibious cargo ship

The Attack Cargo Ship (AKA) hull symbol was introduced on 1 February 1943; all AKA ships remaining in service in 1969 were reclassed asAmphibious cargo ships (LKA).


Arcturus class: MC type C2


Andromeda class: MC type C2


Artemis class: MC type S4-SE2-BD1

The Artemis class was deliberately smaller than other classes of attack cargo ships, to reduce the risks of having too many troops and large quantities of cargo in a single hull. After WW2 most were quickly disposed of as uneconomical.


Andromeda class: MC type C2


Tolland class: MC Type C2-S-AJ3


Andromeda class: MC type C2


Tolland class: MC type C2-S-AJ3


Andromeda class: MC type C2


TheTulare and theCharleston class would be the only AKA/LKAs capable of 20 knots.[39]


Charleston class

Amphibious transport (LPA)

[edit]
USSChilton (LPA-38)
USSClinton (LPA-144)
USSFrancis Marion (LPA-249)
Further information:Attack transport

AllAttack transports (APA) in service in 1969 were reclassed as Amphibious Transports (LPA), hull numbers were unchanged.

Bayfield class: MA type C3-S-A2


Haskell class: MA type VC2-S-AP5


Paul Revere class: MA type C4-S-1A

ThePaul Revere class would be the first and only class of APA/LPA capable of 20 knots.[40]

Attack transport (APA)

[edit]
Further information:Attack transport

Two transports with the hull symbol AP,USS George F. Elliott (AP-13) andUSS Leedstown (AP-73), had been configured as attack transports but were sunk in 1942 before the introduction of the APA hull symbol on 1 February 1943.

All attack transports (APA) in service in 1969 were reclassified asamphibious transports (LPA).


Doyen class: MC type P1-S2-L2


Harris class


McCawley class


Heywood class


Harry Lee class


Doyen class: MC type P1-S2-L2


Harris class


President Jackson class: MC type C3-A, C3-P or C3-P&C


Crescent City class: MC type C3-P or C3-Delta


Joseph Hewes class


John Penn class


Edward Rutledge class


Arthur Middleton class: MC type C3-P&C


Crescent City class: MC type C3-P or C3-Delta


President Jackson class: MC type C3-A, C3-P or C3-P&C


Crescent City class: MC type C3-P or C3-Delta


Bayfield class: MC type C3-S-A2


Ormsby class: MC type C2-S-B1


Sumter class: MC type C2-S-E1


Windsor class: MC type C3-S-A1, C3-S-A3, or C3-S-A2


Gilliam class: MC type S4-SE2-BD1

The Gilliams were deliberately smaller than other classes of attack transports, to reduce the risks of having too many troops and large quantities of cargo in a single hull. After WW2 they were quickly disposed of as uneconomical.


Frederick Funston class: MC type C3-S-A1


Windsor class: MC type C3-S-A1, C3-S-A3, or C3-S-A2


Bayfield class: MC type C3-S-A2


Windsor class: MC type C3-S-A1, C3-S-A3, or C3-S-A2


Bayfield class: MC type C3-S-A2


Sumter class: MC type C2-S-E1


Windsor class: MC type C3-S-A1, C3-S-A3, or C3-S-A2


Bayfield class: MC type C3-S-A2


Windsor class: MC type C3-S-A1, C3-S-A3, or C3-S-A2


Bayfield class: MC type C3-S-A2


Windsor class: MC type C3-S-A1, C3-S-A3, or C3-S-A2


Bayfield class: MC type C3-S-A2


Windsor class: MC type C3-S-A1, C3-S-A3, or C3-S-A2


Bayfield class: MC type C3-S-A2


Haskell class: MC type VC2-S-AP5

APA-181 to APA-186, all unnamed, canceled, 1944
(* cancelled in 1945)


Paul Revere class: MA type C4-S-1A

ThePaul Revere class would be the first and only class of APA/LPA capable of 20 knots.[40]

Amphibious transport, small (LPR)

[edit]
USSBarber (LPR-57)
USSKirwin (LPR-90)
Further information:High-speed transport

In 1969 the remainingdestroyer escorts which had been converted intoHigh-speed transports (APD)s were reclassified as Amphibious transports, small (LPR)s with no change of hull number.

Charles Lawrence class


Crosley class

High-speed transport (APD)

[edit]
Further information:High-speed transport

High-speed Transports (APD) were converteddestroyers anddestroyer escorts; they received the US hull classification symbol APD: "AP" for transport and "D" for destroyer. In 1969, the remaining ships were reclassified asAmphibious transport, small (LPR) with no change of hull numbers. This classification is not to be confused with hull code "HST", also for "High Speed Transport", previously assigned only to experimental high-speed catamaran designs, and high-speed catamarans chartered from private ferry companies.


Caldwell class


Wickes class


Clemson class


Wickes-class


Clemson-class


Wickes-class


Clemson-class


Wickes-class


Clemson-class


Charles Lawrence class


Crosley class

Transport submarine (LPSS)

[edit]
USSGrayback (LPSS-574)
Main article:List of submarines of the United States Navy

Transport submarine (APS, ASSP, APSS)

[edit]
USSPerch (ASSP-313)
Main article:List of submarines of the United States Navy
  • USSArgonaut (APS-1), ex-SM-1, sunk by Japanese destroyers offRabaul on 10 January 1943, 102 killed
  • USSTunny (APSS-282), ex-SS-282, SSG-282, later LPSS-282
  • USSPerch (APSS-313), ex-SS-313, SSP-313, ASSP-313, later LPSS-313
  • USSSealion (APSS-315), ex-SS-315, SSP-315, ASSP-315, later LPSS-315
  • USSGrayback (APSS-574), ex-SS-574, SSG-574, later LPSS-574

Inshore fire support ship (LFR)

[edit]
USSCarronade LFR-1

Landing craft air cushion (LCAC)

[edit]
Main article:Landing Craft Air Cushion
Further information:Hovercraft § United States military
See also:List of patrol vessels of the United States Navy § Patrol air cushion vehicle (PACV)

Landing craft, control (LCC)

[edit]

Not to be confused with the laterAmphibious command ship (LCC).

During World War II a number of small boats were built to direct the movements of landing craft as they approached beaches. These were 56 feet in length, displaced 30 tons, and ran 13-16 knots in speed. They were equipped with multiple radios and SO radar (the same radar as on PT boats). During theinvasion of southern France they were used to control drone minesweepers.[43]

Landing craft infantry (LCI)

[edit]

The United States Navy built 932Landing Craft Infantry ships inWorld War II.

Main article:List of United States Navy Landing Craft Infantry (LCI)

Landing Craft Mechanized (LCM)

[edit]

The United States Navy built 11,144 landing craft Motorized, designatedLanding Craft Mechanized (LCM) in World War II.[44]

Further information:Landing Craft Mechanized

Landing craft support (large) (Mark 3), a.k.a. LCS(L)(3)

[edit]
Further information:Landing Craft Support

Landing craft tank (LCT)

[edit]

The United States Navy built 1,394 landing craft tank, designatedLanding Craft Tank (LCT) in World War II. Those that were still in use in 1949 were redesignated as Landing Craft, Utility (LCU).

Further information:Landing Craft Tank

Landing craft utility (LCU)

[edit]

The United States Navy built the LCU 1466, 1610 and 1627 classes after World War II.[45] Seventy old LCUs (likely ex-LCTs) were retired from amphibious duties and reclassified asHarbor utility craft (YFU).

Further information:Landing Craft Utility § LCU 1466, 1610 and 1627 classes

Landing ship medium (LSM)

[edit]

Towards the end of World War II the United States Navy built 558Landing Ship Medium (LSM) type vessels across three classes. They were originally designed under the classificationLanding Craft Tank - Mark 7 but were reclassified after exceeding 200 feet in length.

Main article:List of United States Navy Landing Ship Medium (LSM)

As of February 2023 the US Marine Corps has proposed the purchase of 18 to 35 modern LSMs; this LSM concept was previously known as the Light Amphibious Warship (LAW).[46][47]

Landing ship, tank (LST)

[edit]
USSDe Soto County (LST-1171)
USSNewport (LST-1179)

The United States Navy built nearly 1,200tank landing ships, classified as "Landing Ship, Tank" or "LST", from the World War II-era up through the early 1970s.[48] TheNewport class, which entered service in 1969, would be the last class built and the only class capable of exceeding 20 knots. The 1987 introduction of Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) — which allowed for over-the-horizon amphibious landings onto a far larger number of beaches — made LSTs obsolete, but they remained with the fleet for another decade because they were the only means by which the hundreds of thousands of gallons of motor vehicle fuel needed by aMarine Expeditionary Force could be landed. Only the development oftankers with the Offshore Petroleum Discharge System (OPDS) and the later development of special fuel bladders which gave the LCACs a tanker capability allowed for their retirement.[49]

Main article:List of United States Navy LSTs § By class

Landing ship, tank, hospital (LSTH)

[edit]
Further information:Landing Ship, Tank (Hospital)

Atlantic tank landing ship (ATL)

[edit]

The ATL hull classification was short-lived; it was changed to Landing Ship Tank (LST).[50]

  • USSATL-1, later USSLST-1

Vehicle landing ship (LSV)

[edit]
USSMontauk (LSV-6)
USNSComet (T-AK-269)

The World War II LSVs were converted fromsurplusminelayers (CM) andnetlayers (AN) into ships which could carry and launch amphibious vehicles.[51] After the war most were slated to becomemine countermeasures support ships (MCS), but only two were actually converted.

Further information:Minelayer andNetlayer

The post-WW2 LSVs were among the firstroll-on/roll-off cargo ships.[52]

Patrol craft, control (PCC)

[edit]
USSPCC-598

Thirty-fivePC-461-classsubmarine chasers were converted into amphibious landing control vessel during World War II and reclassified as Patrol Craft, Control after the war. Extra personnel (eight radiomen, two signalmen, one quartermaster and two communications officers), accommodations and improved radar and communications equipment were added. PCs proved exceptionally adept as Control Vessels, guiding waves of landing craft during numerous amphibious landings in the European and Pacific Theaters.[53]

  • PCC-549, ex-PC-549
  • PCC-555, ex-PC-555
  • PCC-563, ex-PC-563
  • PCC-578, ex-PC-578
  • USSLenoir (PCC-582), ex-PC-582
  • USSHoughton (PCC-588), ex-PC-588
  • USSMetropolis (PCC-589), ex-PC-589
  • PCC-598, ex-PC-598
  • PCC-802, ex-PC-802, later to Republic of Korea asSam Gak San (PC-703)
  • PCC-803, ex-PC-803
  • PCC-1136, ex-PC-1136
  • PCC-1137, ex-PC-1137
  • USSEscandido (PCC-1169), ex-PC-1169
  • USSGuymon (PCC-1177), ex-PC-1177
  • USSKewaunee (PCC-1178), ex-PC-1178
  • USSMartinez (PCC-1244), ex-PC-1244
  • USSUkiah (PCC-1251), ex-PC-1251

Patrol craft sweeper, control (PCSC)

[edit]

Thirteen Patrol Craft Sweepers (which were built on 134-footYMS-1-class minesweeper hulls) were converted into amphibious landing control vessel during World War II and reclassified as Patrol Craft Sweeper, Control.[54]

Expeditionary medical ship (EMS)

[edit]
Main article:List of United States Navy hospital ships § Expeditionary Medical Ship

Expeditionary fast transport (EPF)

[edit]
USNSSpearhead (T-EPF-1)
Further information:Expeditionary fast transport

Spearhead class

In January 2023, the Navy announced that three Expeditionary Medical Ships (EMS) had been approved in the2023 military budget.[57] By May 2023 the three ships had been officially reclassified from EPF to EMS.[58]

Expeditionary mobile base (ESB)

[edit]
USSLewis B. Puller ESB-3
Further information:Expeditionary Transfer Dock § Expeditionary Mobile Base (ESB) variants

Lewis B. Puller class

Note there is no ESB-1 or ESB-2, the ESB and ESD hulls have one sequence.

Afloat forward staging base (AFSB)

[edit]

The Afloat forward staging base (AFSB) was reclassified as the Expeditionary mobile base (ESB) on 4 September 2015.

Expeditionary transfer dock (ESD)

[edit]
USNSMontford Point (T-ESD-1)
Further information:Expeditionary Transfer Dock

Montford Point class

Mobile landing platform (MLP)

[edit]

The Mobile landing platform (MLP) was reclassified as the Expeditionary transfer dock (ESD) on 4 September 2015.

  • USNSMontford Point (T-MLP-1), later T-ESD-1
  • USNSJohn Glenn (T-MLP-2), later T-ESD-2
  • USNSLewis B. Puller (T-MLP-3) later AFSB-1, ESB-3

Littoral combat ship (LCS)

[edit]
Main article:Littoral combat ship § List of littoral combat ships
Further information:Littoral combat ship § Irregular warfare and amphibious modules

Barracks ships

[edit]

Barracks ships are auxiliaries that are used in a variety of roles, not only for amphibious warfare.

Self-propelled barracks ship (APB)

[edit]
Main article:List of auxiliaries of the United States Navy § Self-propelled barracks ships (APB)

Non self-propelled barracks ship (APL)

[edit]
Main article:List of auxiliaries of the United States Navy § Barracks craft (APL)

Offshore petroleum distribution system (OPDS) ships

[edit]
USNSVice Adm. K. R. Wheeler (T-AG-5001)
SS Chesapeake (AOT-5084), note the green barge-like Single Anchor Leg Mooring (SALM) on the deck aft of center for use in deploying the OPDS hoses, hose reels are forward

OPDS ships support amphibious operations by pumping needed fuel ashore without the need for port facilities. They do not have unique hull classification symbols.[62]

Pump vessels

[edit]

Tankers

[edit]

All OPDS tankers have been scrapped.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^USSOak Hill participated inOperation Ivy andOperation Dominic
  2. ^USSFort Marion participated inOperation Wigwam andOperation Dominic[29]
  3. ^USSMount McKinley participated inOperation Sandstone andOperation Wigwam[28][29]
  4. ^USSEstes participated inOperation Ivy andOperation Castle[25]
  5. ^USSLeo participated inOperation Ivy andOperation Castle[25]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^Friedman 2002, p. 311-345.
  2. ^"U.S. Navy Program Guide 2013"(PDF).United States Navy. 6 November 2013. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on May 12, 2013. Retrieved5 December 2013.See pages 101–102
  3. ^Friedman 2002, p. 370-372.
  4. ^Jean 2008.
  5. ^Shelbourne 2022b.
  6. ^Mongilio 2022b.
  7. ^LaGrone 2024a.
  8. ^abcdLaGrone 2024b.
  9. ^Friedman 2002, p. 448-449.
  10. ^Dyer 2020.
  11. ^LaGrone 2020.
  12. ^Friedman 2002, p. 357-358,370-372.
  13. ^Friedman 2002, p. 355-356.
  14. ^Friedman 2002, p. 357-358.
  15. ^abcdefgOperation Dominic I(PDF) (DNA6040F), Washington, DC: Defense Nuclear Agency, 1983, archived fromthe original(PDF) on 23 August 2012, retrieved12 January 2014
  16. ^Friedman 2002, p. 359-363.
  17. ^Friedman 2002, p. 350.
  18. ^Friedman 2002, p. 364-365.
  19. ^Friedman 2002, p. 458-463.
  20. ^LaGrone 2022a.
  21. ^Barnhart 2024.
  22. ^abLaGrone 2022b.
  23. ^Friedman 2002, p. 127-131.
  24. ^"Report to Congress on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels"(PDF). Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. 9 December 2020. p. 16. Retrieved2 February 2021.
  25. ^abcMartin & Rowland 1982.
  26. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacadaeafagahaiajOperation Crossroads 1946(PDF) (Report). Defense Nuclear Agency.
  27. ^abc"Analysis of Radiation Exposure for Navy Personnel at Operation Ivy"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2007-09-27.
  28. ^abcdeBerkhouse et al. 1983, p. 40.
  29. ^abSylvester 1955.
  30. ^Friedman 2002, p. 329-331.
  31. ^ab"Archived copy - National Defense Reserve Fleet Inventory For the month ending September 30, 2011"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2013-02-24. Retrieved2012-01-04.
  32. ^abc"Ships Associated with SHAD Tests". Archived fromthe original on July 26, 2013. Retrieved21 September 2012.
  33. ^Friedman 2002, p. 331-334.
  34. ^Friedman 2002, p. 440-442.
  35. ^Mongilio 2022a.
  36. ^Friedman 2002, p. 448.
  37. ^Friedman 2002, p. 129-130.
  38. ^Friedman 2002, p. 428-431.
  39. ^abFriedman 2002, p. 313-325.
  40. ^abFriedman 2002, p. 325.
  41. ^"USS Gregory DD-82 / APD-3 Roll of Honor".Maritime Quest. Retrieved21 August 2023.
  42. ^"USS Little DD-79 / APD-4 Roll of Honor".Maritime Quest. Retrieved21 August 2023.
  43. ^Friedman 2002, p. 278-283.
  44. ^Colton.
  45. ^Friedman 2002, p. 390.
  46. ^Shelbourne 2023a.
  47. ^Grady 2023.
  48. ^Priolo 2005.
  49. ^Friedman 2002, p. 339–344.
  50. ^Friedman 2002, p. 117.
  51. ^Friedman 2002, p. 178-182.
  52. ^Friedman 2002, p. 468-470.
  53. ^"PC World War II Service".Patrol Craft Sailor Association.
  54. ^Friedman 1987, p. 91-93.
  55. ^abcdBurchett 2025a.
  56. ^LaGrone 2023a.
  57. ^Seck 2023.
  58. ^Mongilio 2023.
  59. ^Pagan 2025a.
  60. ^Fuentes 2024a.
  61. ^Shelbourne 2022a.
  62. ^"Offshore Petroleum Discharge System (OPDS)". GlobalSecurity.com. Retrieved24 March 2023.

Sources

[edit]

External links

[edit]

Museum ships

  • USS LCI(L)-713 - Amphibious Forces Memorial Museum, Portland, OR
  • USS LCI(L)-1091 - Humboldt Bay Naval Sea/Air Museum, Eureka, CA
  • USS LCS(L)(3)-102 - Landing Craft Support Museum, Mare Island, CA
  • USS LST-325 - The USS LST Ship Memorial, Evansville, IN
  • USS LST-393 - USS LST 393 Veterans Museum, Muskegon, MI
  • USS Stark County (LST-1134) - Surat Thani, Thailand
Leadership
Structure
Operating
forces
Shore
Fleets
Ships
Personnel
and
training
People
Officers
Enlisted
Personnel
Training
Equipment
History and
traditions
World War II Maritime Commission ship designs
Cargo designs
Emergency cargo
Tanker
Special-purpose
Miscellaneous-cargo
Tugs
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_United_States_Navy_amphibious_warfare_ships&oldid=1338271142"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp