Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Linear Tape-Open

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Magnetic tape data storage technology

LTO
A 400 GB LTO-3 cartridge by Sony
Media typeMagnetic tape cartridge
CapacityUp to 40 TB
Developed byLTO Consortium (Hewlett Packard Enterprise,IBM,Quantum)
Manufactured byFujifilm,Sony (tapes)
IBM (drives)
Dimensions102.0 × 105.4 × 21.5 mm
(4.0 in. x 4.1 in. x 0.8 in.)
UsageArchival storage
Released2000; 26 years ago (2000)

Linear Tape-Open (LTO), also known as theLTO Ultrium format,[1] is amagnetic tape data storage technology used forbackup, data archiving, and data transfer. It was originally developed in the late 1990s as anopen-standard alternative to the proprietary magnetic tape formats available at the time. Upon introduction, LTO rapidly defined thesuper tape market segment and has consistently been the best-selling super-tape format.[2][3] The latest generation as of 2026, LTO-10, defines two unique cartridge types which can hold30 TB or40 TB each.[4]

Cartridges (a.k.a.tapes) contain hundreds of meters of half-inch (12.65 mm) wide tape media wound onto a single reel. The first generation LTO cartridge was released in 2000 and stored0.1 TB of data. With each new generation, the capacity has increased, while maintaining the same physical size cartridge.

Mechanisms (a.k.a.drives, streamers, transports) extract the tape from the cartridge and spool it up on a second reel in the mechanism, reading or writing data as the tape moves between reels. Roboticlibraries exist that can hold hundreds or thousands of LTO cartridges and dozens of mechanisms.

In contrast to other non-tape data storage formats, LTO offers high-capacity removable cartridges with a lower cost per TB and better long term stability. As an overall system, LTO requires significantly less electrical power per TB and includes built-in technologies useful for data interchange and safe-keeping, likeLTFS,WORM, encryption and data compression.

Historical context

[edit]
Computer memory anddata storage types
General
Volatile
Historical
Non-volatile

Half-inch (12.65 mm) wide magnetic tape has been used for data storage since the 1950s, starting with the open reel formatsIBM 7-track and laterIBM 9-track.

In the mid-1980s, smaller, enclosed, single-reel cartridge formats were developed byIBM andDEC. Although the physical tape was nominally the same width in these new formats and the preceding open-reel formats, the technologies and intended markets were significantly different and there was no compatibility between them. TheIBM 3480 tape format was designed to meet the demanding requirements of its mainframe products. DEC's CompacTape was targeted at a broader market, including minicomputers and smaller systems.Later on, it was renamedDigital Linear Tape (DLT) and eventually sold toQuantum Corporation.

In the late 1980s, Exabyte'sData8 format, derived from Sony's dual-reel cartridge 8 mm video format, saw some popularity, especially with UNIX systems. Sony followed this success with their own now-discontinued 8 mm data format,Advanced Intelligent Tape (AIT).

By the late 1990s, Quantum's DLT and Sony's AIT were the leading options for high-capacity tape storage for PC servers and UNIX systems. These technologies were tightly controlled by their owners and consequently, there was little to no competition between vendors and the prices were relatively high.

Birth of LTO

[edit]

Seeing an opportunity, IBM, HP andSeagate formed the LTO Consortium,[5] which introduced a more open format focusing on the same mid-range market segment.[6] Much of the technology is an extension of the work done by IBM at its Tucson lab during the previous 20 years.[7]

In 2000, and around the time of the release of LTO-1, Seagate's magnetic tape division was spun off as Seagate Removable Storage Solutions,[8] renamedCertance in 2003, and subsequently acquired by Quantum in 2004.[9]

Unrealized variations

[edit]

Initial plans called for two distinct LTO formats: 1) Ultrium - with half-inch tape on a single reel, optimized for high capacity, and 2) Accelis[10] - with 8 mm tape on dual reels, optimized for fast access. Only Ultrium was ever produced, so in common usage, LTO refers to just the Ultrium form factor.

Additionally, the first generation of Ultrium was proposed to be available with 4 different lengths of tape, holding 10 GB, 30 GB, 50 GB, and 100 GB per cartridge.[11] Only full length cartridges were ever produced.

Generations

[edit]
Capacities of each LTO generation compared with other tape technologies

As of 2025, ten generations of LTO Ultrium technology have been made available[12] and four more are planned.[13] Between generations, there are strict compatibility rules that describe how and which drives and cartridges can be used together.

The LTO Consortium publishes a roadmap of future generations, which states that LTO-14 will have a capacity of "up to" 576 TB.[14][15][16]

Key specifications

[edit]
FormatLTO-1LTO-2LTO-3LTO-4LTO-5LTO-6LTO-7Type M[Note 1]LTO-8LTO-9LTO-10
Release date2000[17]2003200520072010[18]Dec. 2012[19]Dec. 2015[20][21][22]Dec. 2017Sep. 2021[23]May 2025Jan. 2026[24]
Native capacity(uncompressed)[Note 2]100 GB200 GB400 GB800 GB1.5 TB[25]2.5 TB[26]6.0 TB[22][27]9 TB12 TB[28]18 TB[29][25][15]30 TB40 TB
Advertised capacity(compressed)[Note 3]200 GB400 GB800 GB1.6 TB3.0 TB6.25 TB15 TB22.5 TB30 TB45 TB75 TB100 TB
Max speed MB/s(uncompressed)[Note 4]204080120140160300[30]360400
Compression capable?Yes (2:1)Yes (2.5:1)
WORM capable?NoYesNo[31]Yes
Encryption capable?NoYes
LTFS capable?NoYes
Max. number of partitions1 (no partitioning)24
  1. ^Type M (label id: M8) is an alternate format of an LTO-7 cartridge, not an independent generation. See:Compatibility
  2. ^The units for data capacity and data transfer rates generally follow the "decimal"SI prefix convention (e.g. mega = 106), not thebinary interpretation of a decimal prefix (e.g. mega = 220).
  3. ^On packaging and in marketing materials, capacities are often stated assuming that data will becompressed at a fixed ratio, commonly 2:1 or 2.5:1.
  4. ^This is the maximum data transfer rate between the drive and the tape. See:Data transfer rates

Compatibility

[edit]

In contrast to other tape technologies, an Ultrium cartridge is rigidly defined by a particular generation of LTO technology and cannot be used in any other way (with the exception of LTO-7 Type M, see below). Ultrium drives prior to LTO-10[32] have some level of compatibility with older generations of cartridges.

CompatibilityDrives
LTO-1LTO-2LTO-3LTO-4LTO-5LTO-6LTO-7LTO-8LTO-9LTO-10
CartridgesLTO-10.1 TBL1--RWRWR
LTO-20.2 TBL2--RWRWR
LTO-30.4 TBL3LTRWRWR
LTO-40.8 TBL4LURWRWR
LTO-51.5 TBL5LVRWRWR
LTO-62.5 TBL6LWRWRW
LTO-76 TBL7LXRWRW
LTO-7 Type M9 TBM8--RW
LTO-812 TBL8LYRWRW
LTO-918 TBL9LZRW
LTO-1030 TBLALHRW
40 TBPARW
GenerationCapacityRegular
ID
WORM
ID
  RW   Read & Write compatible
  R   Read Only compatible

Therules for compatibility between generations of drives and cartridges are as follows:

  • Drives of every generation can read and write cartridges of the same generation.
  • Drives from generations 2 through 9 can also read and write cartridges of the prior generation.
  • Drives from generations 3 through 7 can also read (but not write) cartridges of 2 generations prior.
  • Drives from generation 8 can reformat unused cartridges from generation 7 with a special, higher-capacity format (Type M (M8)). Once reformatted as Type M, the cartridge is only compatible with drives from generation 8.

Within the compatibility rules stated above, drives and cartridges from different vendors are expected to be interchangeable. For example, a tape written on any one vendor's drive should be fully readable on any other vendor's drive that is compatible with that generation of LTO.

Core technology

[edit]

Tape specifications

[edit]
GenerationsLTO-1LTO-2LTO-3LTO-4LTO-5[33]LTO-6[34]LTO-7LTO-7 Type M (M8)[35]LTO-8[36]LTO-9LTO-10
Native capacity100 GB200 GB400 GB800 GB1.5 TB2.5 TB6.0 TB9.0 TB12 TB18 TB30 TB40 TB
Tape length609 m680 m820 m846 m[37]960 m1035 m[38]1337 m[39]
Tape width12.650 mm ± 0.006 mm
Tape thickness8.9 μm8 μm6.6 μm6.4 μm6.4 μm[34] or 6.1 μm (BaFe)[40]5.6 μm5.2 μm[41][42]4.0 μm[39]
Magnetic pigment material[43]Metal particulate (MP)MP orBaFe[44]BaFe[45][41]SrFe & BaFe hybrid[42]
Base materialPolyethylene naphthalate (PEN)Aramid[46][39]
Data bands per tape4
Wraps per band1216111420[25]3428425270118
Tracks per wrap, read/write elements816[25][47]32[22][41]
Total tracks3845127048961,2802,176[47]3,5845,3766,6568,960[41]15,104[48]
Linear density (bits/mm)4,8807,3989,63813,25015,142[49]15,143[50]19,094[51]19,10420,668???
Time to write a full tape at max speed (hh:mm)1:231:513:104:205:338:209:1612:3020:50?
EncodingRLL 1,7RLL 0,13/11;PRMLRLL 32/33;PRMLRLL 32/33;NPML[50]???
End-to-end passes required to fill tape4864445680136112168208280472?
Expected tape durability, end-to-end passes9,600[52]16,000[52]16,000[52]11,200[52]16,000[52]20,000???

Band layout

[edit]
Four data bands and five servo bands, to scale.

LTO Ultrium tape is laid out with four wide data bands sandwiched between five narrow servo bands.[53] A thin edge guard band runs along each edge. The tape head assembly, which reads from and writes to the tape, straddles a single data band and the two adjacent servo bands.

Servo bands

[edit]

The servo bands contain a pattern of angled magnetic stripes permanently written to the tape at the factory. The primary use of the servo signal is to maintain the transverse position of the tape head in relation to the tape. This allows the tape head to precisely follow each track as the tape moves past at high speed. The servo signal can also encode a low bitrate data stream. This data is used to encode the longitudinal position (LPOS) of that point on the tape.[54] In addition to LPOS, manufacturers can encode additional data in the signal.[53] With LPOS and a precise time source, a tape drive can precisely measure the velocity of the tape.

Data bands

[edit]

The actual data stored on the tape is recorded in individual tracks located within the data bands. Depending on the generation, there could be tens, hundreds, or thousands of data tracks per band.

The tape head has 8, 16, or 32 data read/write head elements and additional servo read elements. The set of 8, 16, or 32 tracks written in a single, one-way, end-to-end pass is called a "wrap". The tape head shifts laterally to access the different wraps within each band and also to access the other bands.

Writing to a blank tape starts at band 0, wrap 0, a forward wrap that runs from the beginning of the tape (BOT) to the end of the tape (EOT) and includes a track that runs along one side of the data band. The next wrap written, band 0, wrap 1, is a reverse wrap (EOT to BOT) and includes a track along the other side of the band. Wraps continue in forward and reverse passes, with slight shifts toward the middle of the band on each pass.

The tracks written on each passpartially overlap the tracks written on the previous wrap of the same direction, likeroof shingles. The back and forth pattern, working from the edges into the middle, conceptually resembles a coiledserpent and is known aslinear serpentine recording.

Logical structure

[edit]

The block structure of the tape is logical so interblock gaps, file marks, tape marks and so forth take only a few bytes each. In LTO-1 and LTO-2, this logical structure has CRC codes and compression added to create blocks of 403,884 bytes. Another chunk of 468 bytes of information (including statistics and information about the drive that wrote the data and when it was written) is then added to create a "dataset". Finally error correction bytes are added to bring the total size of the dataset to 491,520 bytes (480 KiB) before it is written in a specific format across the eight heads. LTO-3 and LTO-4 use a similar format with 1,616,940-byte blocks.[55]

The tape drives use a strong error correction algorithm that makes data recovery possible when lost data is within one track. Also, when data is written to the tape it is verified by reading it back using the read heads that are positioned just "behind" the write heads. This allows the drive to write a second copy of any data that fails the verify without the help of the host system.

Positioning times

[edit]

While specifications vary between different drives, a typical LTO-7 drive will take about 15 seconds to load the tape and 20 seconds to unload the tape. These drives have an average rewind time of 60 seconds and an average access time (from beginning of tape) of about 56 seconds.[56] Because of serpentine writing methods, rewinding often takes less time than the maximum. If a tape is written to full capacity, there is no rewind time, since the last pass is a reverse pass leaving the head at the beginning of the tape (number of tracks ÷ tracks written per pass is always an even number).

Durability

[edit]

LTO tape is designed for 15 to 30 years of archival storage.[57][58] If tapes are archived for longer than 6 months they have to be stored at a temperature between 16 and 25 °C (61 and 77 °F) and between 20 – 50% RH.[59][60]Both drives and media should be kept free from airborne dust or other contaminants from packing and storage materials, paper dust, cardboard particles, printer toner dust etc.[59]

Depending on the generation of LTO technology, a single LTO tape should be able to sustain approximately 200-364 full file passes.[52] There is a large amount of lifespan variability in actual use. One full file pass is equal to writing enough data to fill an entire tape and takes between 44 and 208 end-to-end passes. Regularly writing only 50% capacity of the tape results in half as many end-to-end tape passes for each scheduled backup, and thereby doubles the tape lifespan. LTO uses an automatic verify-after-write technology to immediately check the data as it is being written,[61][62] but some backup systems explicitly perform a completely separate tape reading operation to verify the tape was written correctly. This separate verify operation doubles the number of end-to-end passes for each scheduled backup, and reduces the tape life by half.

Optional technology

[edit]

The original release of LTO technology defined an optional data compression feature. Subsequent generations of LTO have introduced new technologies, includingWORM, encryption, and partitioning features. These features are built into the drives and/or tapes and can be ignored or enabled. Compression and encryption can also be performed in software prior to the data being sent to the tape drive. However, the partitioning function can only be done in hardware, and the WORM feature requires special WORM tapes.

Compression

[edit]

The original LTO specification describes adata compression methodLTO-DC, also called Streaming Lossless Data Compression (SLDC).[63][64] It is very similar to the algorithm ALDC[65] which is a variation ofLZS. LTO-1 through LTO-5 are advertised as achieving a "2:1" compression ratio, while LTO-6 and later generations,[22] which apply a modified SLDC algorithm using a larger history buffer, are advertised as having a "2.5:1" ratio. This is inferior to slower algorithms such asgzip, but similar tolzop and the high speed algorithms built into other tape drives. The actually achievable ratio generally depends on the compressibility of the data, e.g. for precompressed data such as ZIP files,JPEG images, andMPEG video or audio the ratio will be close to or equal to 1:1.

WORM

[edit]

New for LTO-3 waswrite once read many (WORM) capability. This is useful for legal record keeping, and for protection from accidental or intentional erasure, for example fromransomware, or simply human error. Standard LTO cartridges do include a write-protect switch in the bottom-left corner, although it is easily overridden by the user and does not provide any protection from accidental deletion by, for example, misidentification of a cartridge. An LTO-3 or later drive will not erase or overwrite data on a WORM cartridge, but will read it. A WORM cartridge is identical to a normal tape cartridge of the same generation with the following exceptions: the cartridge memory identifies it to the drive as WORM, the servo tracks are slightly different to allow verification that data has not been modified, the bottom half of the cartridge shell is gray,[66] and it may come with tamper-proof screws.[67] WORM-capable drives immediately recognize WORM cartridges and include a unique WORM ID with every dataset written to the tape. There is nothing different about the tape medium in a WORM cartridge.

Encryption

[edit]

The LTO-4 specification added a feature to allow LTO-4 drives to encrypt data before it is written to tape.[68] All LTO-4 drives must be aware of encrypted tapes, but are not required to support the encryption process. All current LTO manufacturers support encryption natively enabled in the tape drives using Application Managed Encryption (AME). The algorithm used by LTO-4 isAES-GCM, which is an authenticated, symmetric block cipher. The same key is used to encrypt and decrypt data, and the algorithm can detect tampering with the data. Tape drives, tape libraries, and backup software can request and exchange encryption keys using either proprietary protocols, or an open standard likeOASIS'sKey Management Interoperability Protocol.

Partitioning

[edit]

The LTO-5 specification introduced the partitioning feature that allows a tape to be divided into two separately writable areas, known as partitions. LTO-6 extends the specification to allow 4 separate partitions. TheLinear Tape File System (LTFS) is a self-describing tape format and file system made possible by the partition feature. File data and filesystemmetadata are stored in separate partitions on the tape. The metadata, which uses a standardXML schema, is readable by any LTFS-aware system and can be modified separately from the data it describes. The Linear Tape File System Technical Work Group of theStorage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) works on the development of the format for LTFS.[69] Without LTFS, data is generally written to tape as a sequence of nameless "files", or data blocks, separated by "filemarks". Each file is typically an archive of data organized using some variation oftar format or proprietary container formats developed for and used by backup programs. In contrast, LTFS utilizes an XML-based index file to present the copied files as if organized into directories. This means LTFS-formatted tape media can be used similarly to other removable media (USB flash drive,external hard disk drive, and so on). While LTFS can make a tape appear to behave like a disk, it does not change the fundamentally sequential nature of tape. Files are always appended to the end of the tape. If a file is modified and overwritten or removed from the volume, the associated tape blocks used are not freed up: they are simply marked as unavailable, and the used volume capacity is not recovered. Data is deleted and capacity recovered only if the whole tape is reformatted.[citation needed] In spite of these disadvantages, there are several use cases where LTFS-formatted tape is superior to disk and other data storage technologies. While LTO seek times can range from 10 to 100 seconds, the streaming data transfer rate can match or exceed disk data transfer rates. Additionally, LTO cartridges are easily transportable and the latest generation can hold more data than other removable data storage formats. The ability to copy a large file or a large selection of files (up to 1.5 TB for LTO-5 or 2.5 TB for LTO-6) to an LTFS-formatted tape, allows easy exchange of data to a collaborator or saving of an archival copy.

Cartridges

[edit]

As of 2025[update], 10 generations of data cartridges and 1 type of universal cleaning cartridge have been produced by 6 manufacturers. All LTO Ultrium cartridges are the same size and shape. Humans and robotic libraries can identify the cartridges by barcode labels. Tape drives can identify cartridges by the internal cartridge memory.

  • LTO-2 cartridge with the top shell removed, showing the internal components. Top right corner: tape access gate. Bottom left corner: write-protect-tab. Bottom right corner: cartridge memory chip
    LTO-2 cartridge with the top shell removed, showing the internal components. Top right corner: tape access gate. Bottom left corner: write-protect-tab. Bottom right corner: cartridge memory chip
  • LTO-3 cartridge with the top shell removed, showing the internal components. Top right corner: write-protect-tab. Bottom left corner: cartridge memory chip. Bottom: tape access gate.
    LTO-3 cartridge with the top shell removed, showing the internal components. Top right corner: write-protect-tab. Bottom left corner: cartridge memory chip. Bottom: tape access gate.

Manufacturers

[edit]

Throughout the history of the format, there have been six compliance-verified, licensed manufacturers of LTO technology media:EMTEC,Imation,Fujifilm,Maxell,TDK, andSony.[70] All other brands of media are (or were) manufactured by these companies under contract.Verbatim[71] andQuantegy[72] both licensed LTO technology, but never manufactured their own compliance-verified media. Since its bankruptcy in 2003, EMTEC no longer manufactures LTO media products. Imation ended all magnetic tape production in 2011,[73] but continued making cartridges using TDK tape for a while. Maxell produced cartridges up to and including generation 6 in 2012, but has since withdrawn from the market. TDK withdrew from the data tape business in 2014.[74]

As of 2019[update], only Fujifilm and Sony continue to manufacture LTO cartridges.[75]

Cartridge specifications

[edit]

Cartridges of all generations have the same dimensions, 102.0 mm × 105.4 mm × 21.5 mm (4.02 in × 4.15 in × 0.85 in).[76]

LTO Cartridge Specifications
UCCLTO-1LTO-2LTO-3LTO-4LTO-5LTO-6LTO-7Type MLTO-8LTO-9LTO-10
ColorsTypical Regular
  
Black[77]
  
Black[78]
  
Purple[78]
  
Blue-gray[78]
  
Green (dark)[78]
  
Dark red[78]
  
Black[78]
  
Purple[78][79]
  
Dark red[78][77]
  
Green (dark)[78]
  
Black
HP Regular
  
Orange[80]
  
Blue[81]
  
Dark red[81]
  
Yellow[81]
  
Green[81]
  
Light blue[81][82]
  
Purple[81][82]
  
Slate blue[82]
  
Green[82]
  
Light blue[82]
  
Purple
Typical WORM--
  
  
  
  
  
--
  
  
  
HP WORM--
  
  
  
  
  
--
  
  
  
LabelsRegular ID[83]*L1L2L3L4L5L6L7M8L8L9LA
PA
WORM ID[83]------LTLULVLWLX--LYLZLH
Notes
  • Cleaning Cartridges are identified by having "C L N" as thefirst 3 characters of the barcode.[84] Some also use the ID "CU".
  • Diagnostic Cartridges are identified by having "D Gspace" as thefirst 3 characters of the barcode.[85]
MemoryCM Blocks128[86]2555111023[48]
CM Capacity4 KiB8 KiB16 KiB32 KiB[39]
CM Block sizeEach Cartridge Memory (CM) block is 32 Bytes

Colors

[edit]

The colors of LTO Ultrium cartridge shells are mostly consistent. HP is the notable exception. Sometimes similar, rather than identical, color names are used by different manufacturers (slate-blue and blue-gray; green, teal, and blue-green; dark red and burgundy).

WORM (write once, read many) cartridges are two-tone: the top half of the shell is the normal color of that generation for that manufacturer, and the bottom half of the shell is a light gray.[87]

Memory

[edit]
LTO cartridge memory
Main article:Media Auxiliary Memory

Every LTO cartridge has a cartridge memory (CM) chip inside it, which is used to identify tapes, to discriminate between different LTO generations, and to store tape-use information. This memory can be read or written, one 32-byte block at a time, via a non-contacting passive 13.56 MHz RF interface. The non-contact interface has a range of 20 mm.[88]

Every LTO drive has a cartridge memory reader in it. External readers are available, both built into tape libraries and PC based. One such reader, Veritape, connects by USB to a PC and integrates with analytical software to evaluate the quality of tapes.[89] This device is also rebranded as the Spectra MLM Reader[90] and the Maxell LTO Cartridge Memory Analyzer.[91]Proxmark3 and other generic RFID readers are also able to read data.[92]

Labels

[edit]
An example of an LTO-6 label

The LTO cartridge label intape library applications commonly uses the bar code symbology ofUSS-39.[93][94] A description and definition is available from the Automatic Identification Manufacturers (AIM) specification Uniform Symbol Specification (USS-39) and the ANSI MH10.8M-1993 ANSI Barcode specification. For LTO labels, there are 6 characters plus an ID code. This identifier is called a VOLSER, for Volume Serial.[83]

Leader pin

[edit]
Leader pin on the end of a length of LTO tape

The tape inside an LTO cartridge is wound around a single reel. The end of the tape is attached to a perpendicular leader pin that is used by an LTO drive to reliably grasp the end of the tape and mount it in a take-up reel inside the drive. Older single-reel tape technologies, such as9-track tape andDLT, used different means to load tape onto a take-up reel. When a cartridge is not in a drive, the pin is held in place at the opening of the cartridge with a small spring. A common reason for a cartridge failing to load into a drive is the misplacement of the leader pin as a result of the cartridge having been dropped. The plastic slot where the pin is normally held is deformed by the drop and the leader pin is no longer in the position that the drive expects it to be.

Erasing

[edit]

The magnetic servo tracks on the tape are factory encoded. Using a bulk eraser, degaussing, or otherwise exposing the cartridge to a strong magnetic field, will erase the servo tracks along with the data tracks, rendering the cartridge unusable. Erasing the data tracks without destroying the servo tracks can be done with an LTO drive or with special equipment. The erasing head used in these erasers has four magnetic poles that match the width and the location of the data bands. The gaps between the poles correspond to the servo tracks, which are not erased. Tapes erased by this equipment can be recorded again.[95]

Cleaning

[edit]

A Universal Cleaning Cartridge can be used to remove debris from the tape read and write heads in a tape drive. Although keeping a tape drive clean is important, normal cleaning cartridges are abrasive and frequent use will shorten the drive's lifespan. Cleaning cartridge lifespan is usually from 15 to 50 cleanings.[96]

In addition to keeping the tape drive clean, it is also important to keep the media clean. Debris on the media can be deposited onto drive components that are in contact with the tape. This debris can result in increased media wear which generates more debris. Removing excessive debris from tape can reduce the number of data errors. Cleaning of the media requires special equipment. These cleaners are also used by Spectra Logic to clean new media that is marketed as "CarbideClean" media.[97]

Mechanisms

[edit]
Inside a LTO-2 tape drive

As of 2019[update], compliance-verified licensed manufacturers of current LTO technology mechanisms areIBM,Hewlett-Packard, andQuantum,[98] although both Hewlett Packard and Quantum have stopped new development of drive mechanisms.[99] The mechanisms, also known astape drives or streamers, are available inFull-height and Half-height form factors.

HP Half-Height LTO-2 drive in an enclosure for desktop use
An LTO-2 mechanism, from IBM. ThisSCSI drive fits in a 5.25 inch, Full-Heightdrive bay.

Data transfer rates

[edit]
Max I/O speeds of LTO and other technologies

Minimum and maximum data transfer rates vary by generation and by drive. Half height drives may not attain the same speeds as full-height drives of the same generation.

If data compression (or decompression) is being performed, the average speed between the drive and the computer would be higher than the speed between tape and the drive.

Drives usually support variable-speed operation to dynamically match the data rate flow. This nearly eliminates tape backhitching or "shoe-shining", maximizing overall throughput and device/tape life.[100]

Cleaning

[edit]
Internal head cleaning brush from an IBM LTO-2 FH drive. Swipes once for every insert and eject

LTO drives have an internal tape head cleaning brush that is activated when a cartridge is inserted. When a more thorough cleaning is required, the drive signals this on its display and/or via Tape Alert flags.[101]

Libraries

[edit]
IBM 3584 tape library with LTO-1 (Ultrium) tapes visible
ADIC Scalar 100tape library interior

These drives are frequently packaged into external desktop enclosures or carriers that fit into a robotic tape library.

As of 2025, large automated tape libraries are available from IBM,[102]Spectra Logic,[103] OracleStorageTek,[104] and Quantum (formerlyADIC).[105] Smaller libraries and autochangers are available from other vendors too, including many rebranded units originally manufactured by BDT.[106] Currently available libraries can hold up to two thousand LTO cartridges in the volume of a typicaldata center rack.[107] Total storage per unit can exceed tens of Petabytes with I/O rates exceeding hundreds of Terabytes per day.

Sales and market

[edit]
Tape technology releases
since 2010,
with native storage capacity
2010LTO-5 - 1.5 TB
2011TS1140 - 4 TB
T10000C - 5 TB
2012LTO-6 - 2.5 TB
2013T10000D - 8.5 TB
2014TS1150 - 10 TB
2015LTO-7 - 6 TB
2016
2017LTO-8 - 12 TB
2018TS1160 - 20 TB
2019
2020
2021LTO-9 - 18 TB
2022
2023TS1170 - 50 TB
2024
2025LTO-10 - 30 TB
2026LTO-10 - 40 TB

In the course of its existence, LTO has succeeded in completely displacing all other low-end/mid-range tape technologies such asAIT,DLT,DAT/DDS, andVXA. And after the exit ofOracle StorageTek T10000 of the high-end market,[108] only theIBM 3592 series and LTO are still under active development. LTO also competes againsthard disk drives (HDDs) in some use cases, and its continuous improvement has prevented the predicted "death of tape".[109]

LTO Sales

[edit]
LTO media shipments, 2000–2023

Since its inception, over 5 Million LTO drives and 500EB of media capacity have been sold.[110]

The presence of five certified media manufacturers and four certified mechanism manufacturers for a while produced a competitive market for LTO products. However, as of 2019,[update] there are only two manufacturers developing media, Sony and Fuji, and only IBM is developing mechanisms.

The LTO organization publishes annual media shipments measured in both units and compressed capacity. Media unit shipments peaked in 2008, at about 28 million.[111] However, the 152.9 Exabytes of total compressed storage capacity shipped in 2023 is the highest ever reported.[112]

Public information on tape drive sales is not readily available. Units shipped annually peaked at about 800,000 in 2008, but have declined since then to about 400,000 units in 2010,[113] and to less than 250,000 by the end of 2018[114]

Comparison to disk storage

[edit]
Main article:Magnetic-tape data storage § Comparison to disk storage

For decades, tape storage has primarily been used only in a few special situations, such as with mainframes or for backup and archiving, so the declining cost of disk made it seem possible that disk would completely take over the remaining uses of tape. In spite of this, the continuing evolution of tape technology, and particularly LTO, has kept tape storage relevant.[115][116]

Comparison to flash storage

[edit]

SSDs based onflash memory have also been declining in cost and seeing increased usage. A key benefit of SSDs is the fast seek times and data transfer rates, easily besting LTO and disk options. However, LTO never competed in the primary storage space where SSDs excel. In the offline archival storage market, SSDs do not yet compete with LTO in terms of long term stability or low cost per unit of data storage.[117]

See also

[edit]
  • Optical Disc Archive, an optical-based archival format by Sony
  • RDX, similar removable disk format for archive purposes

References

[edit]
  1. ^"What is LTO tape technology?".Ultrium LTO. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, International Business Machines Corporation and Quantum Corporation.Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. RetrievedDecember 13, 2023.
  2. ^"Super tape drive shipments double in"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on March 6, 2005. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  3. ^"New Freeman Study Projects Major Shifts In Compact Tape — Industry Growth In Units, Revenue Seen"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on March 6, 2005. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  4. ^"IBM LTO Tape Drive".
  5. ^"LTO Ultrium: Reliable and Scalable Open Tape Storage Format".Ultrium LTO. RetrievedOctober 29, 2022.
  6. ^"HP, IBM, And Seagate Agree to Establish Open Format Specifications for Enterprise and Network Storage" (Press release). LTO. November 4, 1997. Archived fromthe original on November 13, 2006. RetrievedOctober 15, 2007.
  7. ^"IBM storage history". IBM. January 23, 2003. Archived fromthe original on January 24, 2005. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  8. ^"Seagate Removable Storage Solutions Holdings: No Action, Interpretive and/or Exemptive Letter of March 7, 2003".www.sec.gov. RetrievedOctober 29, 2022.
  9. ^Mearian, Lucas (October 22, 2004)."Quantum buys Certance for $60M".Computerworld. RetrievedOctober 29, 2022.
  10. ^"Advanced Research, Exabyte, Matsushita, Mitsumi Electric and Otari License Linear Tape-Open Technology". Archived fromthe original on January 8, 2016. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  11. ^"Cartouches Ultrium" (EMTEC site offering LTO-1 tape cartridges in multiple sizes) (in French). RPS data. May 9, 2005. Archived from the original on May 9, 2005. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  12. ^IBM LTO Tape Drive
  13. ^"LTO-9 · New LTO Generation 9 Specifications | LTO Ultrium".Ultrium LTO. RetrievedOctober 29, 2022.
  14. ^"Roadmap".Ultrium LTO.
  15. ^abMellor, Chris (September 11, 2014),"No TKO for LTO: Tape format spawns another 2 generations, sports 120 TB bigness",The Register
  16. ^Mellor, Chris (April 15, 2010)."Two new LTO tape gens announced".The Register.
  17. ^"Linear Tape-Open Program Ships One Million Ultrium Tapes in First 12 Months of Availability for market"(PDF) (Press release). LTO. November 5, 2001. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on March 6, 2004.
  18. ^"LTO-5 expected in H1 2010 with 1.6 TB–3.2 TB storage". Geekzone.co.nz:80. Archived fromthe original on September 28, 2011. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  19. ^from Quantum and Tandberg, Bechtle Direct catalog 09/2012, p. 450
  20. ^"Quantum LTO-7 HH SAS internes Laufwerk (TC-L72AN-BR)". Archived fromthe original on January 8, 2016. RetrievedDecember 27, 2015.
  21. ^Signoretti, Enrico (September 21, 2015)."LTO-7 has it taped, but when will 'bigger/faster' thinking hit the buffers?".The Register. RetrievedSeptember 24, 2015.
  22. ^abcd"The LTO Program Announces Upcoming Generation 7 Specifications for Licensing". September 14, 2015. RetrievedSeptember 15, 2015.
  23. ^Woodie, Alex (September 8, 2021)."LTO-9 Drives and Cartridges Finally Get Out the Door". RetrievedSeptember 9, 2002.
  24. ^"Fujifilm to begin shipping LTO Ultrium 10 40TB tape cartridges in January 2026".Tom's Hardware. December 29, 2025. RetrievedDecember 30, 2025.
  25. ^abcd"WHAT IS LTO TECHNOLOGY?". 2017.
  26. ^"Licensing Specs for LTO-6 Available in August, 2012". Micro-Journal / The LTO Program. June 11, 2012.
  27. ^"Ultrium Generations LTO". Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Quantum. Archived fromthe original on June 26, 2011.
  28. ^"IBM Ts2280 LTO-8". RetrievedOctober 13, 2017.
  29. ^"THE LTO PROGRAM RELEASES SPECIFICATIONS FOR UPCOMING GENERATION 9".lto.org. September 9, 2020. RetrievedSeptember 10, 2020.
  30. ^Mellor, Chris (September 16, 2015)."LTO issues mighty seventh-generation 15 TB tape format".The Register. RetrievedSeptember 22, 2015.
  31. ^LTO Type M cartridge (M8)
  32. ^LTO-10 Breaks the Mold: New Tape Format Sacrifices Compatibility
  33. ^"HP LTO Ultrium tape drives technical reference manual; Volume 4: specifications; LTO 5 drives"(PDF).
  34. ^ab"HP LTO Ultrium 6 Tape Drives Technical Reference Manual; Volume 4: Specifications"(PDF).
  35. ^"HPE LTO-7 cartridge initialized as Type M media; A technical overview of the main characteristics of LTO-7 Type M media"(PDF).
  36. ^"HPE StoreEver LTO-8 Ultrium Tape Drives; Technical Reference Manual Volume 4; Specifications Guide". February 2018.
  37. ^Rivera, Rogelio; Vargas, Gustavo; Vázquez, Marco (September 2012)."IBM System Storage LTO Ultrium 6 Tape Drive - Tape Drive Performance White Paper"(PDF). IBM Guadalajara. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on August 11, 2013.This new capacity is achieved in the same tape length (846 m) as the gen5 media due to a higher density format (gen6 format). Note that another IBM announcement disagrees: "This is achieved by increasing the linear density, track density, and the media length." (IBM TS1060 LTO-6 tape drive announcement, p. 3.) Note: the difference on the length from LTO5 and LTO6 media is only 1 m.
  38. ^"LTO Media".
  39. ^abcdhttps://www.fujifilm.com/us/en/news/fujifilm-launches-lto-ultrium-10-data-cartridge
  40. ^"Fujifilm LTO-6 specifications"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on May 11, 2013. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  41. ^abcd"Fujifilm Launches LTO Ultrium9 Data Cartridge | Fujifilm [Latvia]".
  42. ^abhttps://www.fujifilm.com/es/en/news/hq/12477
  43. ^"Document Display | HPE Support Center".
  44. ^"Imation whitepaper: LTO-6 MP or BaFe?"(PDF).
  45. ^"HP Ultrium Storage Supplies"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on January 31, 2016.
  46. ^Tape keeps kicking, 'breakthrough' 40TB native spec announced — LTO-10 tapes claim up to 100TB compressed data capacity, hold 2.2X more data than previous spec
  47. ^abIBM System Storage TS1060 Tape Drive offers an Ultrium 6 Tape Drive for the TS3500 Tape Library,IBM, October 3, 2012, IBM Hardware Announcement, retrievedNovember 5, 2012,There are 2,176 data tracks in Ultrium 6 versus 1,280 data tracks in Ultrium 5.
  48. ^abLTO-10 Press Release
  49. ^"LTO-5 Tape Drive User's Guide"(PDF). Quantum. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on January 8, 2016.
  50. ^ab"LTO-6/LTO-5 Tape Drive Datasheet". Quantum. Archived fromthe original on April 8, 2014. RetrievedDecember 14, 2012.
  51. ^485 kbit/in"LTO Ultrium 7"(PDF). Sony. April 4, 2016. RetrievedApril 17, 2016.
  52. ^abcdef"Expected Usage Life of Imation Media"(PDF). Imation. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on January 8, 2016. RetrievedJuly 16, 2013.
  53. ^abECMA-319: Ultrium 1 Format
  54. ^Frame Synchronization for PPM-Encoded Longitudinal Position Words in Magnetic Tape Storage
  55. ^"Patent application number 20090208018: Data Transfer Device". Faqs.org. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  56. ^IBM Performance Specifications for LTO Tape Drives. Retrieved 2023-11-08
  57. ^HP Ultrium Media QuickSpecs(PDF),UK: CCI distribution.
  58. ^"Storage tek tape storage media LTO specs".Oracle and Sun. Sun. October 4, 2011. Archived fromthe original on April 30, 2009. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  59. ^ab"Fujifilm Tape Care & Handling Recommendations"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on November 30, 2021.
  60. ^"IBM media environmental specifications".IBM.
  61. ^"Primer 3".Ultrium – LTO Technology. LTO. April 4, 2010. Archived fromthe original on March 6, 2012. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  62. ^News bytes(PDF), LTO, June 2011, archived fromthe original(PDF) on July 27, 2011.
  63. ^Standard, ECMA, 321, archived fromthe original on September 24, 2006, retrievedSeptember 23, 2006
  64. ^Specification of SLDC(PDF), ECMA, 321, archived fromthe original(PDF) on October 8, 2006, retrievedSeptember 23, 2006.
  65. ^ALDC documentation, IBM, archived fromthe original on March 13, 2006.
  66. ^"Image of Dell LTO-3 WORM cartridge with gray bottom". Support.dell.com. June 6, 2012. Archived fromthe original on March 13, 2012. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  67. ^"HP Forum: LTO 3 WORM info". H30499.www3.hp.com. Archived fromthe original on August 12, 2014. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  68. ^LTO-4 encryption whitepaper(PDF), HP, p. 11, archived fromthe original(PDF) on November 12, 2013, retrievedMarch 29, 2013
  69. ^"Linear Tape File System (LTFS)".SNIA. RetrievedNovember 20, 2013.
  70. ^"LTO Compliance-Verified Licencees". Ultrium. Archived fromthe original on November 13, 2006. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  71. ^"Emtec, Imation, and Verbatim License Linear Tape-Open Technology"(PDF) (Press release). LTO. August 3, 1998. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on May 4, 2025. RetrievedAugust 31, 2007.
  72. ^"Linear Tape-Open (LTO) Technology Continues Licensee Momentum with Signing of Fujitsu and Quantegy"(PDF) (Press release). LTO. October 21, 1998. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on May 2, 2025. RetrievedAugust 31, 2007.
  73. ^"Imation To Close Tape Plant | Network Computing".www.networkcomputing.com.
  74. ^"Notice Concerning Dissolution of Consolidated Subsidiary Due to Business Withdrawal" (Press release). LTO. August 29, 2013.
  75. ^"SONY AND FUJIFILM PASS LTO ULTRIUM GENERATION 7 INTERCHANGE TESTING".www.lto.org. November 18, 2015. RetrievedJune 2, 2019.
  76. ^"LTO cartridge specifications". USA: Fujifilm. Archived fromthe original on May 11, 2013. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  77. ^ab"Quantum LTO Ultrium Media Datasheet"(PDF).cdn.allbound.com.
  78. ^abcdefghi"IBM TS4500 tape library - LTO data cartridge".IBM.
  79. ^"Quatum LTO Ultrium Media Datasheet"(PDF).cdn.allbound.com.
  80. ^"C7978-60010".partsurfer.hpe.com.
  81. ^abcdef"HP StoreEver LTO Ultrium Tape Drives"(PDF).cdn.cnetcontent.com.
  82. ^abcde"HPE LTO Ultrium Cartridges Data sheet".
  83. ^abcIBM: LTO bar code labels
  84. ^IBM LTO Cleaning Cartridge
  85. ^LTO diagnostic cartridge
  86. ^"LTO Ultrium Data Cartridge". Fujifilm. RetrievedDecember 27, 2015.
  87. ^""HPE LTO-6 ULTRIUM 6.25TB WORM DATA CARTRIDGE".
  88. ^"Fujitsu Cartridge Memory documentation"(PDF). US: Fuji film. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on May 11, 2013. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  89. ^"VeriTape the trusted Cartridge Quality Analyzer". MP tapes. June 15, 2010. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  90. ^"Spectra MLM Reader". Spectra logic. November 15, 2007. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  91. ^"Maxell LTO Cartridge Memory Analyzer". US: Maxell. Archived fromthe original on March 5, 2013. RetrievedMarch 29, 2013.
  92. ^"Proxmark3 developers community". US: Proxmark. RetrievedDecember 21, 2019.
  93. ^"IBM LTO Ultrium Cartridge LabelSpecification (Revision 6)". IBM. February 2009.
  94. ^"Barcode Requirements". Quantum Corporation. Archived fromthe original on December 31, 2019. RetrievedDecember 31, 2019.
  95. ^"Erasing LTO Tapes"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on August 20, 2008.
  96. ^"Document Display | HPE Support Center".
  97. ^"Certified Tape Media".Spectra Logic. RetrievedApril 14, 2016.
  98. ^"Participants".LTO.org. LTO Consortium. RetrievedJune 2, 2019.
  99. ^"Digital Data Storage Outlook 2019". Spectra Logic. May 22, 2019. Archived fromthe original on January 26, 2021. RetrievedJune 2, 2019.It was Spectra's opinion that IBM would be the sole manufacturer of enterprise-class tape drives and media in the years to come. In 2017, this projection became true as Oracle announced their intentions to no longer pursue future tape drive development. There remain two tape media suppliers.
  100. ^"Chapter 2: Introduction Speed Matching",Quantum LTO-7 HH SAS User's Guide(PDF), December 2015, archived fromthe original(PDF) on October 14, 2017, retrievedApril 9, 2017
  101. ^Tape alert, archived fromthe original on March 30, 2014, retrievedMarch 29, 2014
  102. ^(IBM) Tape storage solutions
  103. ^(SpectraLogic) Automated tape libraries
  104. ^(Oracle) StorageTek tape libraries
  105. ^(Quantum) Scalar Tape Libraries
  106. ^BDT Storage Automation
  107. ^FUJIFILM: Tape Technology Update March 24, 2025, Presented at Designing Storage Architecture Conference at The Library of Congress. Slide 7
  108. ^"T10000C/D New Firmware for Drive Cleaning (Doc ID 2784043.1)".Oracle.
  109. ^"Data Tape: Dying a Slow Death or Already Dead?".Data Center Knowledge. July 18, 2013.
  110. ^"What is LTO tape technology?".LTO SIG.
  111. ^"Media Shipment Report"(PDF). LTO Organization. March 2018. p. 6. RetrievedJune 6, 2019.
  112. ^LTO Annual Tape report, covering CY'23
  113. ^"Tape Market Strength"(PDF). HP. July 2011. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on February 14, 2019. RetrievedJune 6, 2019.
  114. ^"Evaluating Different Tape Technologies for Today's Data Storage Needs". Spectra Logic. January 17, 2019. Archived fromthe original on June 7, 2019. RetrievedJune 2, 2019.
  115. ^"Quantum: Building a 100 year Archive"(PDF).DigitalPreservation.gov. Slide 3: "Majority of archival storage is on LTO Tape".
  116. ^Tape vs. disk storage: Why isn't tape dead yet?, Curtis Preston, Networkworld
  117. ^Tech Radar: There's one crucial way tape still trounces SSDs and hard drives when it comes to storage...

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toLinear Tape-Open.
Linear
Wide (19–25.4 mm)
Half inch (12.7 mm)
Eight millimeter (8 mm)
Quarter inch (6.35 mm)
"Eighth" (0.15) inch (3.81 mm)
Stringy (1.58–1.9 mm)
Helical
Three quarter inch (19 mm)
Half inch (12.7 mm)
Eight millimeter (8 mm)
Four millimeter (3.81 mm)
Standards ofEcma International
Application interfaces
File systems (tape)
File systems (disk)
Graphics
Programming languages
Radio link interfaces
Other
List of Ecma standards (1961 – present)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linear_Tape-Open&oldid=1337477690"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp