Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Lighter aboard ship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Loading barges on a bigger ship for transport
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Lighter aboard ship" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(October 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
MVRhine Forest in thePort of Rotterdam

Thelighter aboard ship (LASH) system refers to the practice of loadingbarges (lighters) aboard a biggervessel fortransport. It was developed in response to a need to transport lighters, a type of (usually but not always) unpowered barge, betweeninland waterways separated by openseas. Lighters are typically towed or pushed aroundharbors,canals orrivers and cannot be relocated under their own power. The carrier ships are known variously asLASH carriers,barge carriers,kangaroo ships orlighter transport ships.[1]

History

[edit]

Development

[edit]
70th Naval Construction Battalion Seabees operating a 6 x 20 barge

During World War II the United StatesSeabees developed a pontoon assembly for moving cargo from transports to assault beachheads that met the needs at the time that was the forerunner to theLASH system. By the 1950s, the needs ofcargo transport customers were no longer being met by thebreak bulk system of loading individual cargo pieces into a ship's hold. The dimensions and shapes of cargo pieces varied widely, and the ISO standardcargo container had only slowly begun to be adopted during the 1960s. Largecontainer terminals with extensive conveyor systems and storage areas were still only in planning or in the development stages.

The LASH system was developed as an alternative and supplement to the developing container system. The lighters, which may be characterized as floating cargo containers, served dual purposes:transportation over water, and the establishment of a modular, standardized shape for loading and unloading cargo. The lighters are loaded onto a LASH carrier at the port of embarkation and unloaded from the ship at the port of destination. Each lighter was approximately 60 ft × 30 ft × 15 ft (18.3 m × 9.1 m × 4.6 m) (L×W×H), with a capacity of 385 t (379 long tons; 424 short tons) and 550 m3 (19,000 cu ft); the dry (unladen) weight of each steel lighter was 3.9 t (4.3 short tons).[2]

Stern ofAcadia Forest, photographed in Rotterdam, showing one of the lighters on thegantry crane, positioned fully aft.

The system was developed during the 1960s by the American shipbuilding engineerJerome Goldman.Acadia Forest, commissioned in September 1969,[2] was the first LASH carrier - the ship could take up 75 standardized lighters, with about 376 metric tons of total loading capacity. At the time, it was a novel kind of ship, the first vessel designed primarily to transport other, smaller ships.

In the late 1980s, the Soviet Union builtSevmorput, a nuclear-powered LASH carrier.Sevmorput is one of only four nuclear powered cargo vessels ever built, and is the largest and the only one in an active commercial service, as it mainly operates in the Russian domestic waters along theNorthern Sea Route, where it's unencumbered bythe ports' unwillingness to accommodate nuclear ships, a problem that made other nuclear cargo vessels impractical.

Economic impact

[edit]

At the time of its invention, the system was considered by experts to be a considerable advancement in shipping technology. LASH carriers were able to transport five times more cargo than a comparable conventional transport ship, the loading and unloading process was much more efficient, and a lack of harbor equipment or quay moorings provided no obstacle, as the lighters could be loaded directly onto the ship. The system also relieved the pressure to unload as quickly as possible, since the lighters already in the water could be moved while others were being unloaded. All told, these ships spent more than 80% of their annual application time at sea, whereas the conventional ships often lay at harbor for as much as half the year.

Problems and shortcomings

[edit]

New problems which were as yet unknown to shipping companies arose with the advent of the LASH system and similar barge carriers. Aboard the carrier ship, the lighter is simply a large cargo container, but in the seaport and on the inland waterways it becomes a vessel. As a vessel, they are subject to requirements for equipment regulations likeanchors. Also, serving waterways which freeze over in winter required a high capital expenditure.

Studies showed that the costs of addressing these issues, along with the costs of operating the carrier ships and their lighters, were much higher than for the customaryfreighter ships or the ISO-compliant container ships that were beginning to conquer the transportation market. While barge carriers and lighters are a technologically interesting sea transport system, they are economic only under certain specific conditions of traffic and economy.[3][4]

In the United States, LASH operators were subject toJones Act tariffs on the value of repairs made to ships engaged incoastwise trade. LASH operators were thus required to pay a tariff on repairs to their cargo-carrying equipment (barges), unlike container ship operators, who could send theirintermodal containers aboard for low-cost repairs. To mitigate this competitive disadvantage, Congress exempted LASH vessels from the tariff.[5]

Preservation

[edit]

On 15 December 2007,Rhine Forest,[6] ex-Bilderdijk of theHolland-Amerika Line, entered thePort of Rotterdam for the last time, prior to being withdrawn from service because of low utilization on theNew Orleans/Rotterdam route. It is a sister ship ofMS München. The LASH lighter with registration p. CG 6013 was donated toDe Binnenvaart, an inland-shipping museum inDordrecht, where it is now part of an exhibit.

Designs

[edit]

LASH

[edit]
Lash Turkiye 1971 in Piraeus
Yulius Fuchik, a Soviet and later Ukrainian barge carrier based on the Sea Bee system.

LASH barges are loaded at inland river and shallow ports. Then, the barges are towed to ocean port's fleeting areas to meet the LASH mother vessel. On arrival, the mother vessel crane lifts the LASH barges onto the ships. LASH cargo does not requiretransshipment, as the movement from the origin to destination takes place with a single bill of lading.

An important technical problem raised by the invention of the new transport system was the shape of the lighters. Several other designs, differentiated mainly by the shape of the lighters and the loading mechanism, were proposed, but the LASH system found the largest range of applications. In this approach, the lighters were individually lifted onto the carrier ship by a largegantry crane located at the stern of the ship. The crane could move the entire length of the ship and stack the lighters atop each other in the ship's body and on the deck. The cranes had a load-carrying capacity of more than 500 Mp.[clarification needed] Loading or unloading a lighter took on average fifteen minutes. LASH ships were constructed in Europe,Japan and the US with almost uniform parameters.

The host vessel is sometimes purpose-built or modified with a door at the waterline, to allow the payloads to be loaded and unloaded without special lifting equipment. An example would beSS Cape Florida (AK-5071) (originallyLASH Turkiye), built atAvondale Shipyard for the American shipping line Prudential Grace, and later transferred to the Ready Reserve Fleet.[7]

Technical data

[edit]
LASH Carrier
ParameterLASH 1LASH 2
Overall length262 m
860 ft
250 m
820 ft
Beam32.50 m
106.6 ft
30.50 m
100.1 ft
Draught11.30 m
37.1 ft
10.70 m
35.1 ft
Tonnage43,000 t
47,000 short tons
29,600 t
32,600 short tons
Speed19 kn
35 km/h; 22 mph
22 kn
41 km/h; 25 mph
Power26,000 hp
19,000 kW
32,000 hp
24,000 kW
LASH Lighter
Parameter
Length18.70 m
61.4 ft
Beam9.50 m
31.2 ft
Headway4.00 m
13.12 ft
Weight80.00 t
88.18 short tons
Capacity380.00 t
418.88 short tons
Draught2.60 m
8 ft 6 in

Sea Bee system

[edit]
Main article:Type C8-class ship
SSCape Mohican (T-AKR-5065) built as the SSTillie Lykes a type C8-S-82a
SSCape May (T-AKR-5063) at C8-S-82a type ship
SSCape Mendocino a type C8-S-82a
150926-N-KK081-196 (22851642026) The improved Navy lighterage system (INLS)

Another related system was theSea Bee, which had a lifting system located at the stern of the carrier ship, known asType C8-class ship. The lift, known as a "Syncrolift" was a platform that could be lowered below the water surface. Two lighters weighing up to 1,000 metric tons are maneuvered onto the submerged platform and raised to the height of the deck, where special rails engage and transport the lighters down the length of the ship to their berthings. The lighters used in the Sea Bee system are considerably larger than the LASH lighter, and the loading hardware is also stronger, with a lifting force of more than 2,000 Mp.

The first ship of a series of three Sea Bee ships wasSSDoctor Lykes, followed bySSAlmeria Lykes andSSTillie Lykes all of which were operated byLykes Brothers Steamship Company. The "Sea Bee" vessels had three decks and could transport 38 lighters (12 on the lower decks and 14 on the upper deck). The dual function of the ship is noteworthy, as it had storage tanks with a capacity of nearly 36000 m³ volume built into its sides and the unusually large double hull, allowing it to be used also as a product tanker. The ships were later purchased byMilitary Sealift Command.

Finnish state-owned shipbuilding companyValmet built two barge carriers largely based on the Sea Bee system for theSoviet Union inVuosaari Shipyard in the late 1970s,Yulius Fuchik andTibor Szamueli. Of these,Yulius Fuchik was featured in a prominent role in the novelRed Storm Rising byTom Clancy, where it was modified to masquerade asDoctor Lykes.

Technical data

[edit]
Seabee-Carrier
Parameters
Overall length266.70 m
875.0 ft
Beam32.26 m
105.8 ft
Height to the first deck9.70 m
31.8 ft
Height to the main deck16.10 m
52.8 ft
Height to the upper deck22.80 m
74.8 ft
Draught10.00 m
32.81 ft
Capacity27,500 t
30,300 short tons
Displacement45,400 t
50,000 short tons
Speed20 kn
37 km/h; 23 mph
Power36,000 hp
27,000 kW
Seabee-Lighter
Parameters
Length29.75 m
97.6 ft
Beam10.67 m
35.0 ft
Headway3.80 m
12.5 ft
Weight150 t
170 short tons
Capacity850 t
940 short tons
Draught3.25 m
10.7 ft

BACAT system

[edit]

A Danish project with the name BACAT (Barge-Catamaran) was introduced at the end of 1973. It was used for the transport of several hundred thousand metric tons of load between northern Europe and Great Britain. The system was similar to the Sea Bee, but the lighters were smaller and had an individual load-carrying capacity of only 140 tons.

Technical data

[edit]
BACAT-Carrier
Parameters
Overall length103.50 m
339.6 ft
Beam20.70 m
67.9 ft
Headway10.50 m
34.4 ft
Draught5.40 m
17.7 ft
Capacity2,700 t
3,000 short tons
Speed13 kn
24 km/h; 15 mph
Power2,250 hp
1,680 kW
BACAT-Lighters
ParametersLighter type 1Lighter type 2
Length16.80 m
55.1 ft
18.75 m
61.5 ft
Beam4.70 m
15.4 ft
9.50 m
31.2 ft
Draught2.47 m
8 ft 1 in
2.50 m
8 ft 2 in
Capacity140 t
150 short tons
370 t
410 short tons

BACO System

[edit]
Baco Liner 2 1982 during float-in of barges

1979 saw the introduction of the BaCo system, newly developed by Captain H. Mönke and ThyssenNordseewerke, in which the carrier could transport barges in addition to standardshipping containers, therefore the nameBaCo. In addition, the barges were floated into the flooded hold through bow doors, akin to how ships enter afloating dry dock. The hold could be made watertight by closing two vertically foldable inner doors and two large outer doors; water in the hold could be pumped out during sea passage. The deck was suited for the stowage ofcontainers, for which a movablegantry crane was provided.

The BaCo barges were relatively large compared to the LASH barges, having adeadweight of 800 t, whereby the max. draught was very large with 4.15 m. The BaCo beam of 9.5 m corresponded to the standard beam of Europeaninland waterway transport barges, so that also four Europa barges of Type I could be stored instead of the 12 Baco barges. The container capacity was 652TEU

In total threeBaco Liners were built between 1979 and 1984, namedBaco Liner 1, Baco-Liner 2 andBaco Liner 3. Owner was the Baco-Liner GmbH Emden, founded by the shipyard, the Rhein-, Maas- und See-Schiffahrtskontor GmbH (RMS) as well asRhenus-WTAG, Dortmund. Operator was RMS. The BaCo barges were among others built by Cassens-Werft in Emden.

The Baco-Liners were employed in the liner's service between Northern Europe and West Africa and sailed without major incidents. After the sea transport shifted more and more to containers, the ships were scrapped between 2012 and 2013.

Technical data

[edit]
BaCo-Liner
Parameters
Length over all204.10 m
669.6 ft
Beam28.50 m
93.5 ft
Depth14.50 m
47.6 ft
Draught6.65 m
21.8 ft
Deadweight21,100 t
23,300 short tons
Speed15 kn
28 km/h; 17 mph
Power10,570 hp
7,880 kW
BaCo shipping units
ParametersBaCoLASH
Length24.00 m
78.74 ft
18.75 m
61.5 ft
Beam9.50 m
31.2 ft
9.50 m
31.2 ft
Draught4.15 m
13.6 ft
2.50 m
8 ft 2 in
deadweight800 t
880 short tons
370 t
410 short tons

References

[edit]
  1. ^shipslist
  2. ^abZehner, Joe; Scoggin, David (January 25, 2020)."Remembering LASH".Maritime Executive. Retrieved15 June 2021.
  3. ^article in The Hindu Business Line
  4. ^article in JOC
  5. ^Hadley, Lawrence M."The Fifty Percent Ad Valoren Duty on Foreign Ship Repairs: Scope of Application and Proposals for Elimination."George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, vol. 24, no. 2, 1990, pp. 415-454.HeinOnline
  6. ^MV Rhine Forest
  7. ^vesselhistory.marad.dot.gov, SS Cape Mendocino

Additional reading

[edit]
  • Jahrbuch der Schiffahrt 1974Schiffe im Schiff (Float on / Floot of) TRANSPRESS Berlin 1973(in German)
  • Hans Jürgen Witthöft:Huckepack über See, Koeher Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Herford, 1982,ISBN 3-7822-0275-9
  • E. de Jong:BACO - BArgen und COntainer in einem Schiff, Schiffahrt International 3/80, S. 123-124

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toLash vessels.
  • LASH (explanation)[1]
  • Shipspotting[2]
  • SS Cape Farewell[3]
C8-S-81b
C8-S-82a
World War II Maritime Commission ship designs
Cargo designs
Emergency cargo
Tanker
Special-purpose
Miscellaneous-cargo
Tugs
Overviews
A reefer
Dry cargo
Tankers
Passenger
Support
Other types
Related
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lighter_aboard_ship&oldid=1305843708"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp