.jpg) The Leeds Tiger, 2021 | |
| Species | Bengal tiger |
|---|---|
| Sex | Probably male |
| Died | 1860 Deyrah Dhoon valley, nearDehradun,India |
| Cause of death | Shot byCharles Reid |
| Resting place | Mounted and displayed atLeeds City Museum,Leeds,West Yorkshire, England |
| Known for | Past mythical dangerous reputation; Present visitor attraction |
| Owner | Leeds City Council |
| Leeds City Museum | |
TheLeeds Tiger is ataxidermy-mounted 19th-centuryBengal tiger, displayed atLeeds City Museum inWest Yorkshire, England. It has been a local visitor attraction for over 150 years.
The tiger was shot and killed byCharles Reid in theDehrah Dhoon valley nearDehradun, India, in 1860. It was displayed as a tiger skin at the1862 International Exhibition, and sold toWilliam Gott, who had it mounted by Edwin Henry Ward, and presented it in 1863 to the museum of theLeeds Philosophical and Literary Society in theWest Riding of Yorkshire, England.
The Leeds Tiger's novelty and size drew public attention, as did the myths of a "dangerous reputation" which accumulated over the years. In 1979, Leeds City Museum curator Adrian Norris said, "The tiger has always been very popular with the public, and school parties in general".
.jpg)
.JPG)
TheBengal tiger which ultimately became the mounted Leeds Tiger inLeeds City Museum originally inhabited theDeyrah Dhoon, nearDehradun; a valley nearMussoorie hill station inUttarakhand, northern India. The animal was shot in March 1860 by ColonelCharles Reid (later General Sir Charles Reid,GCB) of theSirmoor Battalion (2ndGurkhas).[1] Reid was a sportsman who, on one 1872 afternoon inElginshire,bagged 25.5 brace ofgrouse.[2] He wrote to a friend about the tiger kill:
I had a tiger ... which is now in the museum at Leeds, which was the largest tiger I ever killed or ever saw. As he lay on the ground he measured 12 feet 2 inches – his height I did not measure – from the tip of one ear to the tip of the other 191⁄2 inches. I never took skull measurements, nor did I ever weigh the tiger ... The three tigers mentioned are the largest I ever killed – all Dhoon tigers.[3][4]
M.B. Bose (1926) defends the published measurements of tiger kills by hunters such as Reid, and gives an explanation of the body lengths achieved by some Bengal tigers: "Length alone does not necessarily constitute fitness ... The elongated tiger is a result of the disease known to animalpathologists andzoologists asvertebromegaly in which the centra of the respectivevertebrae become very much elongated and gothic in structure".[5] However theMadras Weekly Mail (1890) says that hunters such as Reid would measure tigers along the curves "from the nose over the head, down the neck and along the backbone" including the tail. "A naturalist measures tigers in a straight line" without the tail.[6]
In the 19th century the male pronoun was preferred for individuals in general, but in this case the masculinity of the tiger might have been obvious. Tiger testicles are visible, and male Bengal tigers can be almost twice as large as females.[7] Charles Reid's original measurements remain unverified; if verified the Leeds Tiger might originally have been one of the largest tigers on record.[8] Such kills were normally skinned and cured in India before being shipped back to London. This one was displayed in the1862 International Exhibition,[3] while the specimen was still an unmounted tiger skin.[nb 1] As withcowhide and cowskin rugs, the cured and trimmed tiger pelt can be synonymous with the tiger rug, the only difference being whether it is displayed on the wall or floor.[nb 2] Since the specimen was cured as ahunting trophy skin or rug which would typically include the mounted head, it is possible that the head of the mounted Leeds Tiger still contains the skull and teeth of the original Bengal tiger shot in India.[10]: 33
After the exhibition, the skin was purchased byWilliam Gott (1797–1863), the son ofBenjamin Gott.[11][12] Gott commissioned Edwin Henry Ward (father ofRowland Ward) to mount it for the museum of theLeeds Philosophical and Literary Society.[13]
The mount wasallocated an accession number in Leeds,[nb 3] and displayed in thePhilosophical Hall onPark Row. Its label read, "Shot in Deyrah Dhoon in March 1860 by Colonel Charles Reid, C.B., H.M. 2nd Goorkahs (Sirmoor Rifles) by whom this tiger is exhibited".[14] The Leeds Tiger drew public attention. At the annualconversazione of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society in 1863, the ReverendThomas Hincks stated that, "he was afraid that the tiger ... had been too much the great lion ... and that they had neglected many other noble beasts surrounding it".[15] In a long article extolling the philanthropy of William Gott, theLeeds Mercury reported, "The setting up of this tiger is so natural and so perfect in posture and anatomical detail, that it is certainly to be looked upon as a work of art quite as much as an object for scientific observation ... "[16] and in the same vein, "Professor Owen has more than once stated that it is the finest and largest animal of its species not only in England but in Europe".[12][13]
Additional material has been used to increase the area of the skin for mounting purposes.[17] Ebony Andrews (2009) suggests that the taxidermist Ward would have mounted the tiger skin to be viewed from above and laterally so that patching or the strange shape of the head might have remained unnoticed.[9] In 2016 the Leeds Tiger, together with several other natural history exhibits, was temporarily placed in frozen storage atLeeds Discovery Centre to destroy any infestation by thewebbing clothes moth which had been detected in the gallery. The mount was returned to the museum after treatment.[18]
The museum in Leeds has been through many incarnations, but the Leeds Tiger has been on display through all of them, almost continuously for over 150 years.[19][20]
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
In a 1906 museum guidebook, the curatorHenry Crowther wrote that the original Bengal tiger "destroyed forty bullocks in six weeks and was considered so formidable that no native dare venture into the jungle where this noble beast reigned supreme".[19][21] There does not seem to be any contemporary evidence for this but the myth was perpetuated by its 1950s label: "This magnificent man-eater was presented to the City Museum by William Gott. It had long terrorised the villagers and farmstock of a limited area, and besides accounting for several natives, no fewer than forty bullocks were killed during a period of six weeks".[14] In 2016, the story was revisited by theYorkshire Evening Post which reported, "We'll never know for certain whether the Leeds Tiger really lived up to its dangerous reputation, but today it sends a shiver down the spines of visitors to Leeds City Museum".[21] In 2021Leeds Museums & Galleries curator Clare Brown stated that there was no evidence "that it was anything other than a large tiger minding its own business in a quiet Himalayan valley on the day Charles Reid turned up and shot it".[22]
Paul Chrystal (2016) suggests that the Leeds Tiger was "saved from the curators' skip byThe Yorkshire Post, when it mounted a successful campaign to retain it as a popular centrepiece of the museum's collection".[23] However the museum's curator Adrian Norris said in 1979,[10]
The tiger has always been very popular with the public, and school parties in general, and is one of the few items in the Museum we dare not remove, or cover, for fear of being swamped with complaints from members of the public, who in some cases have travelled many hundreds of miles just to see it.[10]
.JPG)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
