 | This articleprovides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please helpimprove the article byproviding more context for the reader.(November 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | This article'slead sectionmay be too short to adequatelysummarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead toprovide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.(January 2025) |
The legal system ofVenezuela belongs to theContinental Law tradition. Venezuela was the first country in the world toabolish the death penalty for all crimes, doing so in 1863.[1]
The basis for itspublic law is the 1999Constitution. The 1999 Constitution made significant changes to theseparation of powers. Instead of the usual three branches of government, the new Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has five:
The electoral branch is headed by theNational Electoral Council (CNE) and is responsible for the independent oversight of all municipal, state, and federal elections in the country. The citizens' branch is constituted by the(defensor del pueblo) (ombudsman or "defender of the people"), theChief Public Prosecutor(fiscal general), and the comptroller general(contralor general). It is responsible for representing and defending the citizens in their dealings with powers of the Venezuelan state.
The judicial branch is headed by theSupreme Tribunal of Justice, whose 32 justices ("magistrados") are elected by the National Assembly for a single 12-year term.[2]
Until 1998 Venezuelan criminal law was governed by theCódigo de Enjuiciamiento Criminal of 1926. The 1926 procedures "followed many of the traditional rules of inquisitorial tradition",[3] with the pretrial process substantially under the judge's control. At the initialsumario step a judge would direct the police investigation; and after apprehension by police, the judge had 72 hours to decide whether to keep suspects in detention. At the secondplenario step the process became more adversarial and documents of process made available to the defendant, but the judge still had "wide discretion to pursue charges beyond those outlined in the accusation".[3] The 1926 code was established by the dictatorJuan Vicente Gómez, and represented a substantial change from the late nineteenth and early twentieth century procedures, where Venezuela had jury trials and oral procedures in some states.[3] Gómez standardised legal procedures and suppressed juries.[3]
In July 1998 Venezuela's criminal law was radically reformed, with the replacement of the 1926 code with theCódigo Orgánico Procesal Penal.[3] The old secretsumario phase was abolished, and defendants had the immediate right to a lawyer on arrest or indictment.[3] The indictment and police investigation process was now controlled by prosecutors rather than judges, and suspects had to be charged within 24 hours.[3] For more serious crimes, jurors would be involved.[3]Plea bargaining was accepted, and in some cases defendants could avoid punishment by making restitution to their victims.[3] However, the radical package of reforms, partly inspired byGermany's "liberal code, low crime, and notably small incarcerated population"[3] ignored the dominant Venezuelan culture "in which the only conceivable form of punishment is prison or corporal punishment".[3]
Within a year of the new criminal code, commissions had been formed to consider revising it.[3] The first reform, in March 2000,[3] among other changes reinstated the old 72-hour time limit for judicial decision on imprisonment. The reform was presented as "a necessary defense of society from criminality, implying that the new code was ill-adapted to Venezuelan society and overly lenient toward criminals."[3] Further changes in November 2001 made a substantial number of changes which "left very little of the original spirit of the 1998 code".[3] Jury trials were abolished, and among changes prosecutors were given six months to proceed with trial or drop charges.[3] In 1999 - 2001 a high proportion of jury trials had been postponed, as a range of problems with the new jury approach remained to be addressed. However other delays were more significant contributors to postponement.[3] Whilst the number of criminal judges more than doubled from 1998 to 2004, the number of prosecutors did not substantially increase, despite the increased importance of this office in the legal system.[3] The Venezuelan Fiscal General estimated 2900 cases per prosecutor in 2004, rising to 4000 in 2006.[3]
In 2012 Venezuela banned the possession of firearms in public places.[4] In addition, it banned the commercial sale and private import of firearms and ammunition, following a public consultation showing strong support for the measure.[5]