The Last Supper (1495-1498). Mural, tempera on gesso, pitch and mastic, 700 x 880 cm (22.9 x 28.8 ft). In theSanta Maria delle Grazie Church,Milan,Italy, it isLeonardo da Vinci's dramatic interpretation of Jesus' last meal before death. Depictions of theLast Supper in Christian art have been undertaken by artistic masters for centuries, Leonardo da Vinci's late-1490s mural painting, being the best-known example.[1](Clickable image—use cursor to identify.)
TheLast Supper is the final meal that, in theGospel accounts,Jesus shared with hisapostles inJerusalem beforehis crucifixion.[2] The Last Supper is commemorated by Christians especially onHoly Thursday.[3] The Last Supper provides the scriptural basis for theEucharist, also known as "Holy Communion" or "The Lord's Supper".[4] Jesus having a final meal with his disciples is almost beyond dispute among scholars, and belongs to the framework of the narrative of Jesus' life.[5][6]
The threeSynoptic Gospels and the First Epistle to the Corinthians include the account of the institution of the Eucharist in which Jesus takesbread, breaks it and gives it to those present, saying "This is my body given to you".[7][8] The Gospel of John tells of Jesuswashing the feet of the apostles,[9] givingthe new commandment "to love one another as I have loved you",[10] and includes the detailedFarewell Discourse by Jesus, calling the apostles who follow his teachings "friends and not servants", as he prepares them for his departure.[11][12][13]
Some scholars have looked to the Last Supper as the source of early Christian Eucharistic traditions.[14][15][16][17][18][19] Others see the account of the Last Supper as derived from 1st-century eucharistic practice as described by Paul in the mid-50s.[15][20][21][22]
The term "Last Supper" does not appear in theNew Testament,[23][24] but traditionally many Christians refer to such an event.[24] The term "Lord's Supper" refers both to the biblical event and the act of "Holy Communion" andEucharistic ("thanksgiving") celebration within theirliturgy.Evangelical Protestants also use the term "Lord's Supper", but most do not use the terms "Eucharist" or the word "Holy" with the name "Communion".[25][additional citation(s) needed]
TheEastern Orthodox use the term "Mystical Supper" which refers both to the biblical event and the act of Eucharistic celebration within liturgy.[26] TheRussian Orthodox also use the term "Secret Supper" (Church Slavonic:"Тайная вечеря",Taynaya vecherya).
Scriptural basis
The last meal that Jesus shared with his apostles is described in all fourcanonical Gospels[27] as having taken place in the week of thePassover. This meal later became known as the Last Supper.[8] The Last Supper was likely a retelling of the events of the last meal of Jesus among theearly Christian community, and became a ritual which recounted that meal.[28]
Paul'sFirst Epistle to the Corinthians,[29] which was likely written before the Gospels, includes a reference to the Last Supper but emphasizes the theological basis rather than giving a detailed description of the event or its background.[7][8]
Background and setting
The overall narrative that is shared in all Gospel accounts that leads to the Last Supper is that after thetriumphal entry into Jerusalem early in the week, and encounters with various people and the Jewish elders, Jesus and his disciples share a meal towards the end of the week. After the meal, Jesus is betrayed, arrested, tried, and thencrucified.[7][8]
Key events in the meal are the preparation of the disciples for the departure of Jesus, the predictions about the impending betrayal of Jesus, and the foretelling of the upcoming denial of Jesus byApostle Peter.[7][8]
In Matthew 26:24–25, Mark 14:18–21, Luke 22:21–23 and John 13:21–30, during the meal, Jesus predicted that one of the apostles present would betray him.[30][31] Jesus is described as reiterating, despite each apostle's assertion that he would not betray Jesus, that the betrayer would be one of those who were present, and saying that there would be "woe to the man who betrays theSon of man! It would be better for him if he had not been born."[32]
In Matthew 26:23–25 and John 13:26–27,Judas is specifically identified as the traitor.[33] In the Gospel of John, when asked about the traitor, Jesus states:
"It is the one to whom I will give this piece of bread when I have dipped it in the dish." Then, dipping the piece of bread, he gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. As soon as Judas took the bread, Satan entered into him.
The three Synoptic Gospel accounts describe the Last Supper as a Passover meal.[34][35] Stéphane Saulnier argues they disagree with John,[35] thoughBrant Pitre argues the Gospels can be reconciled in his "Passover hypothesis", taking theGospel of John's allusions to the Passover lamb as applying to the seven-day festival rather than the meal.[36] Each gives somewhat different versions of the order of the meal. In chapter 26 of the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus prays thanks for the bread, divides it, and hands the pieces of bread to his disciples, saying "Take, eat, this is my body." Later in the meal Jesus takes a cup of wine, offers anotherprayer, and gives it to those present, saying "Drink from it, all of you; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. I tell you, I will never again drink of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom."
In chapter 22 of the Gospel of Luke, however, the wine is blessed and distributed before the bread, followed by the bread, then by a second, larger cup of wine, as well as somewhat different wordings. Additionally, according to Paul and Luke, he tells the disciples "do this in remembrance of me." This event has been regarded by Christians of most denominations as the institution of the Eucharist. There is recorded celebration of the Eucharist by the early Christian communityin Jerusalem.[12]
The institution of the Eucharist is recorded in the three Synoptic Gospels and in Paul'sFirst Epistle to the Corinthians. As noted above, Jesus's words differ slightly in each account. In addition, Luke 22:19b–20 is a disputed text which does not appear in some of the early manuscripts of Luke.[37] Some scholars, therefore, believe that it is aninterpolation, while others have argued that it is original.[38][39]
A comparison of the accounts given in the Gospels and 1 Corinthians is shown in the table below, with text from theASV. The disputed text from Luke 22:19b–20 is initalics.
Mark 14:22–24
And as they were eating, he took bread, and when he had blessed, he brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take ye: this is my body. And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave to them: and they all drank of it. And he said unto them, 'This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many.'[40]
Matthew 26:26–28
And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it; and he gave to the disciples, and said, 'Take, eat; this is my body.' And he took a cup, and gave thanks, and gave to them, saying, 'Drink ye all of it; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many unto remission of sins.'[41]
1 Corinthians 11:23–25
For I received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus in the night in which he was betrayed took bread; and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, 'This is my body, which is for you: this do in remembrance of me.' In like manner also the cup, after supper, saying, 'This cup is the new covenant in my blood: this do, as often as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.'[42]
Luke 22:19–20
And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and gave to them, saying, 'This is my bodywhich is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.'And the cup in like manner after supper, saying, 'This cup is the new covenant in my blood, even that which is poured out for you.'[43]
Jesus' actions in sharing the bread and wine have been linked with Isaiah 53:12[44] which refers to a blood sacrifice that, as recounted in Exodus 24:8,[45]Moses offered in order to seal a covenant with God. Some scholars interpret the description of Jesus' action as asking his disciples to consider themselves part of a sacrifice, where Jesus is the one due to physically undergo it.[46]
Although the Gospel of John does not include a description of the bread and wine ritual during the Last Supper, most scholars agree that John 6:58–59[47] (theBread of Life Discourse) has a Eucharistic nature and resonates with the "words of institution" used in the Synoptic Gospels and the Pauline writings on the Last Supper.[48]
In Matthew 26:33–35, Mark 14:29–31, Luke 22:33–34 and John 13:36–38, Jesus predicts that Peter will deny knowledge of him, stating thatPeter will disown him three times before therooster crows the next morning.[49] The threeSynoptic Gospels mention that after thearrest of Jesus, Peter denied knowing him three times, but after the third denial, heard the rooster crow and recalled the prediction as Jesus turned to look at him. Peter then began to cry bitterly.[50][51]
John 13 includes the account of thewashing the feet of the Apostles by Jesus before the meal.[52] In this episode, Apostle Peter objects and does not want to allow Jesus to wash his feet, but Jesus answers him, "Unless I wash you, you have no part with me",[53] after which Peter agrees.
In the Gospel of John, after the departure ofJudas from the Last Supper, Jesus tells his remaining disciples[54] that he will be with them for only a short time, then gives them aNew Commandment, stating:[55][56] "A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples if you love one another."[57] Two similar statements also appear later in John 15:12: "My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you",[58] and John 15:17: "This is my command: Love each other."[59][56]
At the Last Supper in the Gospel of John, Jesus gives an extendedsermon to his disciples.[60] This discourse resembles farewell speeches called testaments, in which a father or religious leader, often on the deathbed, leaves instructions for his children or followers.[61]
This sermon is referred to as theFarewell Discourse of Jesus, and has historically been considered a source of Christiandoctrine, particularly on the subject ofChristology. John 17:1–26 is generally known as theFarewell Prayer or theHigh Priestly Prayer, given that it is an intercession for the coming Church.[62] The prayer begins with Jesus's petition for his glorification by the Father, given that completion of his work and continues to an intercession for the success of the works of his disciples and the community of his followers.[62]
Historians estimate that the date of the crucifixion fell in the range AD 30–36.[63][64][65]Isaac Newton andColin Humphreys have ruled out the years 31, 32, 35, and 36 on astronomical grounds, leaving 7 April AD 30 and 3 April AD 33 as possible crucifixion dates.[66]Humphreys 2011, pp. 72, 189 proposes narrowing down the date of the Last Supper as having occurred in the evening of Wednesday, 1 April AD 33, by revising Annie Jaubert's double-Passover theory.
Historically, various attempts to reconcile the three synoptic accounts with John have been made, some of which are indicated in the Last Supper by Francis Mershman in the 1912Catholic Encyclopedia.[67] TheMaundy Thursday church tradition assumes that the Last Supper was held on the evening before the crucifixion day (although, strictly speaking, in no Gospel is it unequivocally said that this meal took place on the night before Jesus died).[68]
A new approach to resolve this contrast was undertaken in the wake of the excavations atQumran in the 1950s when Annie Jaubert argued that there were two Passover feast dates: while the official Jewish lunar calendar had Passover begin on a Friday evening in the year that Jesus died, a solar calendar was also used, for instance by theEssene community atQumran, which always had the Passover feast begin on a Tuesday evening. According to Jaubert, Jesus would have celebrated the Passover on Tuesday, and the Jewish authorities three days later, on Friday.[69]Humphreys has disagreed with Jaubert's proposal on the grounds that the Qumran solar Passover would always fallafter the official Jewish lunar Passover. He agrees with the approach of two Passover dates, and argues that the Last Supper took place on the evening of Wednesday 1 April 33, based on his recent discovery of the Essene,Samaritan, andZealotlunar calendar, which is based on Egyptian reckoning.[70][71]
In a review of Humphreys' book, the Bible scholar William R Telford points out that the non-astronomical parts of his argument are based on the assumption that the chronologies described in the New Testament are historical and based on eyewitness testimony. In doing so, Telford says, Humphreys has built an argument upon unsound premises which "does violence to the nature of the biblical texts, whose mixture of fact and fiction, tradition and redaction, history and myth all make the rigid application of the scientific tool of astronomy to their putative data a misconstrued enterprise."[72]
According to later tradition, the Last Supper took place in what is today called TheRoom of the Last Supper onMount Zion, just outside the walls of theOld City ofJerusalem, and is traditionally known as The Upper Room. This is based on the account in theSynoptic Gospels that states that Jesus had instructed two disciples (Luke 22:8 specifies that Jesus sent Peter and John) to go to "the city" to meet "a man carrying a jar of water", who would lead them to a house, where they would find "a large upper room furnished and ready".[73] In this upper room they "prepare the Passover".
No more specific indication of the location is given in the New Testament, and the "city" referred to may be asuburb of Jerusalem, such as Bethany, rather than Jerusalem itself.
A structure onMount Zion in Jerusalem is currently calledthe Cenacle and is purported to be the location of the Last Supper.Bargil Pixner claims the original site is located beneath the current structure of the Cenacle onMount Zion.[74]
The traditional location is in an area that, according toarchaeology, had a largeEssene community, a point made by scholars who suspect a link between Jesus and the group.[75]
Saint Mark's Syrian Orthodox Church in Jerusalem is another possible site for the room in which the Last Supper was held, and contains a Christian stone inscription testifying to early reverence for that spot. Certainly the room they have is older than that of the current cenaculum (crusader – 12th century) and as the room is now underground the relative altitude is correct (the streets of 1st century Jerusalem were at least twelve feet (3.7 metres) lower than those of today, so any true building of that time would have even its upper story currently under the earth). They also have a revered Icon of the Virgin Mary, reputedly painted from life by St Luke.
Peter often displays amazement in feet washing depictions, as in John 13:8.[76] St.Thomas Aquinas viewedThe Father, Christ, and theHoly Spirit as teachers and masters who provide lessons, at times by example. For Aquinas, the Last Supper and the Cross form the summit of the teaching that wisdom flows from intrinsic grace, rather than external power.[77] For Aquinas, at the Last Supper Christ taught by example, showing the value of humility (as reflected in John's foot washing narrative) and self-sacrifice, rather than by exhibiting external, miraculous powers.[77][78]
Aquinas stated that based on John 15:15 (in the Farewell Discourse), in which Jesus said: "No longer do I call you servants; ... but I have called you friends",[79] those who are followers of Christ and partake in thesacrament of the Eucharist become his friends, as those gathered at the table of the Last Supper.[77][78][80] For Aquinas, at the Last Supper Christ made the promise to be present in the sacrament of the Eucharist, and to be with those who partake in it, as he was with his disciples at the Last Supper.[81]
John Calvin believed only in the two sacraments ofBaptism and the "Lord's Supper" (i.e., Eucharist). Thus, his analysis of the Gospel accounts of the Last Supper was an important part of his entire theology.[82][83] Calvin related the Synoptic Gospel accounts of the Last Supper with theBread of Life Discourse in John 6:35 that states: "I am the bread of life. He who comes to me will never go hungry."[84][83]
Calvin also believed that the acts of Jesus at the Last Supper should be followed as an example, stating that just as Jesus gave thanks to the Father before breaking the bread,[85] those who go to theLord's table to receive the sacrament of the Eucharist must give thanks for the "boundless love of God" and celebrate the sacrament with both joy and thanksgiving.[83]
The institution of the Eucharist at the Last Supper is remembered by Roman Catholics as one of theLuminous Mysteries of theRosary, the First Station of a so-calledNew Way of the Cross and by Christians as the "inauguration of theNew Covenant", mentioned by the prophetJeremiah, fulfilled at the last supper when Jesus "took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to them, and said, 'Take; this is my body.' And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, and they all drank of it. And he said to them, 'This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many.'"[86] Other Christian groups consider the Bread and Wine remembrance to be a change to thePassover ceremony, as Jesus Christ has become "our Passover, sacrificed for us",[87] and hold that partaking of the Passover Communion (or fellowship) is now the sign of the New Covenant, when properly understood by the practicing believer.
These meals evolved into more formal worship services and became codified as theMass in the Catholic Church, and as theDivine Liturgy in the Eastern Orthodox Church; at these liturgies, Catholics and Eastern Orthodox celebrate the Sacrament of the Eucharist. The name "Eucharist" is from the Greek wordεὐχαριστία (eucharistia) which means "thanksgiving".
Early Christianity observed a ritual meal known as the "agape feast"[a] These "love feasts" were apparently a full meal, with each participant bringing food, and with the meal eaten in a common room. They were held on Sundays, which became known as theLord's Day, to recall the resurrection, the appearance of Christ to the disciples on theroad to Emmaus, theappearance to Thomas and thePentecost which all took place on Sundays after the Passion.
Passover parallels
Last Supper,Carl Bloch. In some depictionsJohn the Apostle is placed on the right side of Jesus, some to the left.
Since the late 20th century, with growing consciousness of the Jewish character of the early church and the improvement of Jewish-Christian relations, it became common among some evangelical groups to borrow Seder customs, likeHaggadahs, and incorporated them in new rituals meant to mimic the Last Supper.[88] As the earliest elements in the current Passover Seder (a fortiori the full-fledged ritual, which is first recorded in full only in the ninth century) are arabbinic enactment instituted in remembrance of the Temple, which was still standing during the Last Supper,[89] the Seder in Jesus' time would have been celebrated quite differently, however.
In Islam
The fifth chapter in theQuran,Al-Ma'ida (the table) contains a reference to a meal (Sura 5:114) with a table sent down from God toʿĪsá (i.e., Jesus) and the apostles (Hawariyyin). However, there is nothing in Sura 5:114 to indicate that Jesus was celebrating that meal regarding his impending death, especially as the Quran states that Jesus was never crucified to begin with. Thus, although Sura 5:114 refers to "a meal", there is no indication that it is the Last Supper.[90] However, some scholars believe that Jesus' manner of speech during which the table was sent down suggests that it was an affirmation of the apostles' resolves and to strengthen their faiths as the impending trial was about to befall them.[91]
Historicity
According toJohn P. Meier andE. P. Sanders, Jesus having a final meal with his disciples is almost beyond dispute among scholars, and belongs to the framework of the narrative of Jesus' life.[5][6]I. Howard Marshall states that any doubt about the historicity of the Last Supper should be abandoned.[16]
SomeJesus Seminar scholars consider the Last Supper to have derived not from Jesus' last supper with the disciples but rather from thegentile tradition of memorial dinners for the dead.[92] In their view, the Last Supper is a tradition associated mainly with the gentile churches that Paul established, rather than with the earlier, Jewish congregations.[92] Such views echo that of 20th century Protestant theologianRudolf Bultmann, who also believed the Eucharist to have originated inGentile Christianity.[21][22]
On the other hand, an increasing number of scholars have reasserted the historicity of the institution of the Eucharist, reinterpreting it from aJewish eschatological point of view: according to Lutheran theologianJoachim Jeremias, for example, the Last Supper should be seen as a climax of a series of Messianic meals held by Jesus in anticipation of a newExodus.[17] Similar views are echoed in more recent works by Catholic biblical scholars such asJohn P. Meier andBrant Pitre, and by Anglican scholarN.T. Wright.[93][19][94]
The Last Supper has been a popular subject inChristian art.[95] Such depictions date back toearly Christianity and can be seen in theCatacombs of Rome.Byzantine artists frequently focused on the Apostles receiving Communion, rather than the reclining figures having a meal. By theRenaissance, the Last Supper was a favorite topic in Italian art.[96]
There are three major themes in the depictions of the Last Supper: the first is the dramatic and dynamic depiction of Jesus'sannouncement of his betrayal. The second is the moment of the institution of the tradition of the Eucharist. The depictions here are generally solemn and mystical. The third major theme is thefarewell of Jesus to his disciples, in whichJudas Iscariot is no longer present, having left the supper. The depictions here are generally melancholy, as Jesus prepares his disciples for his departure.[95] There are also other, less frequently depicted scenes, such as the washing of the feet of the disciples.[97]
^Agape is one of the four mainGreek words for love (Lewis 1960). It refers to theidealised or high-level unconditional love rather thanlust,friendship, oraffection (as inparental affection). Though Christians interpretAgape as meaning adivine form of love beyond human forms, in modern Greek the term is used in the sense of "I love you" (romantic love).
Bower, Peter (2003).The companion to the Book of common worship. Louisville, Ky: Geneva Press Office of Theology and Worship, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).ISBN0-664-50232-6.OCLC51059177.
Evans, Craig A. (2003).The Bible Knowledge Background Commentary. David C Cook.ISBN0-7814-3868-3.
Fahlbusch, Erwin (2005).The Encyclopedia of Christianity. Vol. 4. Wm. B. Eerdmans.ISBN978-0-8028-2416-5.
Fitzmyer, Joseph, ed. (1981).The Gospel according to Luke: introduction, translation, and notes. Vol. 28A. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday.ISBN0-385-00515-6.OCLC6918343.
Harrington, Daniel (2001).The church according to the New Testament: what the wisdom and witness of early Christianity teach us today. Franklin, Wis: Sheed & Ward.ISBN1-58051-111-2.OCLC47869562.
Harris, Stephen L. (1985). "John".Understanding the Bible. Palo Alto: Mayfield.
Marshall, I. Howard; Millard, A. R.; Packer, J. I.; Wiseman, by Donald J. (1996).New Bible dictionary (3rd ed.). Leicester: InterVarsity Press.ISBN978-0-8308-1439-8.OCLC34943226.
McGuckin, John (2010).The Orthodox Church: an Introduction to its History, Doctrine, and Spiritual Culture. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.ISBN978-1-4443-3731-0.OCLC811493276.
McNamee, Maurice (1998).Vested angels: eucharistic allusions in early Netherlandish paintings. Leuven: Peeters.ISBN978-90-429-0007-3.OCLC39715499.
Telford, William R. (2015). "Review of The Mystery of the Last Supper: Reconstructing the Final Days of Jesus".The Journal of Theological Studies.66 (1):371–76.doi:10.1093/jts/flv005.