 | This articlepossibly containsoriginal research. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(July 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Korean reunification | |
 | |
| Korean name | |
|---|---|
| Hangul | 남북통일 |
| Hanja | 南北統一 |
| RR | Nambuk tongil |
| MR | Nambuk t'ongil |
| Part ofa series on |
| Korean nationalism |
|---|
|
Ideologies |
| This article is part ofa series on |
 |
|---|
Korean reunification is the hypothetical unification ofNorth Korea andSouth Korea into a singularKoreansovereign state. The process towards reunification of the peninsula while still maintaining two opposing regimes was started by theJune 15th North–South Joint Declaration in June 2000, was reaffirmed by the October 4th Declaration in October 2007 and thePanmunjom Declaration in April 2018. In the Panmunjom Declaration, the two countries agreed to work to officially end theKorean conflict in the future.
Prior to theFirst World War andKorea under Japanese rule (1910–1945), all of Korea had been unified as a single state for over a millennium, notably under theGoryeo andJoseon dynasties (the latter of which was declared theKorean Empire in 1897). After the end of World War II in 1945 and during the beginning of theCold War, Korea had a unified government, thePeople's Republic of Korea. However, this would be brief and serve as the last government, as Korea was divided into two countries along the38th parallel (now theKorean Demilitarized Zone) in 1948. After World War II, North Korea was occupied by theSoviet Union, and later administered by the Workers' Party of Korea underKim Il Sung. South Korea was occupied by the United States, later becoming independent under dictatorSyngman Rhee. Both governments of the two new Korean states claimed to be the sole legitimate government of all of Korea. TheKorean War, which began in June 1950, ended in a stalemate in July 1953.
Even after the end of the Korean War, reunification proved a challenge as the two countries increasingly diverged at a steady pace. Therelations between North and South Korea warmed somewhat in early 2000s and again in late 2010s when South Korea pursued theSunshine Policy of greater engagement with the North, though relations have subsequently deteriorated.[1][2][3] Further deterioration has also been seen in 2024, withKim Jong Un officially "ruling out unification" with South Korea, and subsequently demolishing theArch of Reunification inPyongyang.[4][5] In the recent decades, public support for reunification in South Korea has dropped, especially among the younger generation.
The current division of the Korean Peninsula is the result of decisions taken at the end ofWorld War II. In 1910, theEmpire of Japanannexed Korea and ruled over it until itsdefeat in World War II. The Korean independence agreement officially occurred on 1 December 1943, when the United States, China, and the United Kingdom signed theCairo Declaration, which stated: "The aforesaid three powers, mindful of the enslavement of the people of Korea, are determined that in due course Korea shall become free and independent". In 1945, theUnited Nations developed plans for trusteeship administration of Korea.[6][7]
The division of the peninsula into two military occupation zones was agreed: theSoviet Civil Administration in the North and theUnited States Army Military Government in Korea in the South. At midnight on 10 August 1945, two army lieutenant colonels selected the38th parallel as a dividing line.Japanese troops north of the line were to surrender to the Soviet Union, and the troops south of the line would surrender to the United States.[6]
The partition was not originally intended to last long, butCold War politics resulted in the establishment of two separate governments in the two zones in 1948, and rising tensions prevented co-operation. The desire of many Koreans for a peaceful unification was dashed when theKorean War broke out in 1950.[8] On 25 June 1950, troops from North Korea invaded South Korea.Mao Zedong encouraged the confrontation with the United States[9] andJoseph Stalin reluctantly supported the invasion.[10] After three years of fighting, which involved both Koreas, China andUnited Nations forces led by the US, the war ended with anarmistice agreement at approximately the same boundary.
After thedétente between theUnited States andChina, the North and South Korean governments made in 1972 theJuly 4 South–North Joint Statement to improve the relations between the two countries on July 4, 1972. It had a representative of each government secretly visit the other's capital city, and both sides agreed to a North-South Joint Communiqué, outlining the steps to be taken towards achieving a peacefulreunification of the country:
The agreement outlined the steps to be taken towards achieving a peaceful reunification of the country. However, the North-South Coordination Committee was disbanded the following year after no progress had been made towards implementing the agreement. In January 1989, the founder ofHyundai,Jung Ju-young, toured North Korea and promoted tourism inMount Kumgang. After a twelve-year hiatus, the prime ministers of the two Koreas met inSeoul in September 1990 to engage in theInter-Korean summits or High-Level Talks. In December, the two countries reached an agreement on issues of reconciliation,nonaggression, cooperation, and exchange between North and South in "The Agreement on Reconciliation, Nonaggression, Cooperation, and Exchange Between North and South",[12] but these talks collapsed overinspection of nuclear facilities. In 1994, after former U.S. PresidentJimmy Carter's visit toPyongyang, the leaders of the two Koreas agreed to meet with each other, but the meeting was prevented by thedeath of Kim Il Sung that July.[13]
In June 2000, North and South Korea signed theJune 15th North–South Joint Declaration, in which both sides made promises to seek out a peaceful reunification with the co-existence of two systems:[14]
During the 2007 high-level inter-Korean talks held in Pyongyang between Kim Jong Il and Roh Moo Hyun, both sides agreed to the October 4th Declaration, improving on inter-Korean relations on the basis of the June 15 Joint Declaration. The eight points of the declaration signed on the 4th of October 2007 are as follows:
In April 2018, at the north-south summit talks at the "House of Peace" in Panmunjom, Kim Jong Un and Moon Jae-in signed thePanmunjom Declaration, declaring that there would be no longer war and a new era of peace has opened on the Korean peninsula. They declared as follows reflecting the firm will to put an end to division and confrontation, to open up a new era of national reconciliation, peace and prosperity and more actively improve and develop the north-south ties. A brief outline of the three main points of the agreement are as follows:
Aunified Korean team marched in the opening ceremonies of the2000,2004, and2006 Olympics, but the North and South Korean national teams competed separately. There were plans for a truly unified team at the2008 Summer Olympics, but the two countries were unable to agree on the details of its implementation. In the1991 World Table Tennis Championships inChiba,Japan, the two countries formed a unified team. AUnified Korea women's ice hockey team competed under a separate IOC country code designation (COR) in the2018 Winter Olympics; in all other sports, there were a separateNorth Korea team and a separateSouth Korea team.[17]
The nature of unification, i.e. through North Korean collapse, South Korean collapse, or the formation of two systems under a united federation, is still a topic of intense political debate and even conflict among interested parties, which include both Koreas, China, Japan, Russia, and the United States.[18][19]
Relations between the two Koreas have been strained, with conflict between the two coming to a head such as in the enforcement of the colonial era National Security Law in South Korea which led to the arrest of South Korean pro-reunification activistRoh Su-hui,suspected torpedoing of the ROKSCheonan[20] and thebombardment of Yeonpyeong Island,[21] both in 2010, the rocket launchesin April andDecember of 2012 andNorth Korea's third nuclear test in 2013. Kim Jong Un's sudden accession and limited experience governing have also stoked fears about power struggles among different factions leading to future instability on the Korean Peninsula.[22]
Reunification has remained a long-term goal for the governments of both North and South Korea. North Korean leaderKim Jong Un made calls in his 2012 New Year's Day speech to "remove confrontation" between the two countries and implementprevious joint agreements for increased economic and political cooperation.[23] The South KoreanMinistry of Unification redoubled their efforts in 2011 and 2012 to raise awareness of the issue, launching a variety show (Miracle Audition) and an Internet sitcom with pro-unification themes.[24][25] The Ministry already promotes curriculum in elementary schooling, such as a government-issued textbook about North Korea titled "We Are One" and reunification-themed arts and crafts projects.[24]
In Kim's 2018 New Year's address, a Korean-led reunification was repeatedly mentioned and an unexpected proposal was made for the North's participation in the 2018 Winter Olympics that were held inPyeongchang County of South Korea, a significant shift after several years of increasing hostilities, the2018–19 Korean peace process.[26] Subsequent meetings between North and South led to the announcement that the two Koreas would march together with a unified flag in the Olympics' Opening Ceremony and form a unified ice hockey team, with a total of 22 North Korean athletes participating in various other competitions including figure skating, short track speed skating, cross-country skiing and alpine skiing.[27][28]
In April 2018, at a summit inPanmunjom, Kim Jong Un and South Korean PresidentMoon Jae-in signed a deal committing to finally seal peace between both Koreas by the end of the year. Both leaders also symbolically crossed each other's borders, marking the first time a South Korean president crossed the North border and vice versa. Kim stated that the North will start a process ofdenuclearization, which was supported by the U.S. PresidentDonald Trump.[29] In 2019, Moon Jae-in proposed reunification of the Korean peninsula by 2045.[30] The peace talks led to nothing,[31] as North Korea continued forward with their nuclear program, despite former U.S. President Donald Trump showcasing it as a considerable win.[32]
Under PresidentYoon Suk Yeol, South Korea adopted a harder policy towards North Korea, with the South Korean government officially declaring their goals of “unification by absorption” under a “liberal democracy” system.[33]
In response, in December 2023, during a speech at the 9th plenum of the8th Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, Kim called for a "fundamental turnabout" in North Korea's stance towards South Korea, calling the South the "enemy".[34] He stated "the party's comprehensive conclusion after reviewing inter-Korean relations is that reunification can never be achieved with those ROK riffraffs that defined the 'unification by absorption' and 'unification underliberal democracy' as their state policy", which he said is in "sharp contradiction with what our line of national reunification was: one nation, one state with two systems".[33]
Kim citedSouth Korean constitution's claims over the entire Korean Peninsula and President Yoon's policy towards the north as evidence that South Korea is an unsuitable partner for reunification.[34] He said the relations between the two Koreas currently were "states hostile to each other and the relations between two belligerent states" and no longer ones that are "consanguineous or homogeneous",[35] continuing by saying it is "unsuitable" to discuss the issue of reunification "with this strange clan [South Korea], who is no more than a colonial stooge of the U.S. despite the rhetorical word [we used to use] — 'the fellow countrymen." Kim also instructed the WPK on reforming organizations related to inter-Korean relations, including the WPK'sUnited Front Department.[33]
Kim further confirmed a shift in policy in January 2024, when he gave a speech to theSupreme People's Assembly (SPA) calling for theconstitution to be amended to remove references to cooperation and reunification, as well as specify DPRK's territorial borders and add an article specifying the ROK as the most hostile country.[36] He also rejected the maritimeNorthern Limit Line, saying that "If the Republic of Korea invades our ground territory, territorial air space, or territorial waters by even 0.001 mm, it will be considered a provocation of war". He called for the removal of physical symbols such as theArch of Reunification, which he called an "eyesore". The SPA also voted on the abolition of three inter-Korean cooperation organizations; theCommittee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland, the Korean People's Cooperation Administration, and the Kumgangsan International Tourism Administration.[36]
On March 1, 2024, the government of PresidentYoon Suk Yeol plans to develop a new vision of unification with North Korea to include the principle of liberal democracy. South Korea intended to update its vision of unification for the first time in 30 years. This was the first revision of theUnification Formula of the national community, South Korea's unification policy unveiled in August 1994 under the administration of late PresidentKim Young-sam.[37] On 15 August 2024, Yoon outlined his policy on reunification, calling for a "unified Republic of Korea"; this was the first time this term was used by a South Korean administration. It was seen as South Korea's most explicit policy statement to date in support of unification by absorption, referring to unifying the Korean Peninsula under the Republic of Korea. He called on efforts to increase support among North Koreans for a "freedom-based unification", which he said would be done by expanding efforts to increase North Korean people's access to information.[38]
Following the inauguration of PresidentLee Jae-myung in June 2025, South Korea’s approach toward North Korea shifted to a more pragmatic and engagement-oriented stance, contrasting with the hardline policies of his predecessor.
On 11 June 2025, Lee banned anti-North Korean activists from sending leaflets into the North by balloon. He also ordered themilitary to haltloudspeakerpropaganda broadcasts across the border with North Korea, South Korea even switched off shortwave radio broadcasts that had carried similar propaganda for over half a century in an attempt to improverelations.[39] North Korea responded by haltingtheir own propaganda loudspeakers towards the South just a few hours later.[40][41][42] Lee expressed gratitude for the North's reciprocation, remarking that the speed of their response had exceeded his expectations, and also expressed hope for an improvement in relations.[43]
But these efforts by Lee were “not the work worthy of appreciation,” saidKim Yo Jong, who spoke for her brother,Kim Jong Un, in a statement. She went on to say that no matter what policy was adopted in Seoul or proposal was sent that they had zero interest in discussion with South Korea. These had been the first official remarks on the new administration by the North. South Korea sought to downplay the significance of the statement by Kim Yo Jong, saying that the government would continue its efforts to promote reconciliation and cooperation. A South Korean government spokesman, Koo Byoung-sam, said that the remarks from the North “showed how high the wall of distrust has become inSouth-North Korean relations.”[44]
Support for reunification in South Korea has been falling, especially among the younger generations. In the 1990s, the percent of people in government polls who regarded reunification as essential was over 80%. By 2011 that number had dropped to 56%.[24][45] According to a December 2017 survey released by theKorea Institute for National Unification (KINU), 72.1% of South Koreans in their 20s believe reunification is unnecessary,[46] with younger South Koreans saying they are more concerned about issues related totheir economy, employment, andliving costs.[46] In 2025, a poll by the KINU showed that 51% thought reunification was unnecessary, while 49% thought it was necessary; it marked the first time a majority of South Koreans thought of reunification as unnecessary. A further 63.2% agreed that "unification is not necessary if peaceful coexistence can be maintained", 47% said it was "acceptable" for the two Koreas to be permanently divided, and 68.1% said they were "indifferent" to North Korea.[47]
Polls show a majority of South Koreans, even those in age groups traditionally seen as being more eager to reunify the peninsula, are not willing to see their living conditions decline in order to accommodate a reunification with the North.[46] Moreover, about 50% of men in their 20s see North Korea as an outright enemy that they want nothing to do with.[48]
Some scholars, likePaul Roderick Gregory, have suggested that a complete abandonment of Korean reunification may be necessary, in exchange for the North to dismantle itsnuclear weapons program and permanently ending the Korean War with apeace treaty.[49]
Introduced by theMillennium Democratic Party of South Korea under PresidentKim Dae-jung, as part of a campaign pledge to "actively pursue reconciliation and cooperation" with North Korea, the Sunshine Policy was intended to create conditions of economic assistance and cooperation for reunification, rather thansanctions andmilitary threats. The plan was divided into three parts: increased cooperation through inter-Korean organizations (while maintaining separate systems in the North and South), national unification with two autonomous regional governments, and finally the creation of a central national government. In 1998, Kim approved large shipments of food aid to the North Korean government, lifted limits on business deals between North Korean and South Korean firms, and even called for a stop to the American economicembargo against the North. In June 2000, the leaders of North and South Korea met in Pyongyang and shook hands for the first time since the division of Korea.
Despite the continuation of the Sunshine Policy under the Roh administration, it was eventually declared a failure by the South KoreanMinistry of Unification in November 2010 over issues of North Korea's nuclear weapons program, stymied further negotiations, and again strained relations between the two Koreas.
Opponents of the Sunshine Policy argue that dialogue and trade with North Korea did nothing to improve prospects for peaceful reunification, despite the transfer of large funds to the North Korean government by PresidentKim Dae-jung, but allowed the North Korean government to retain its hold on power. Others believe that South Korea should remain prepared for the event of a North Korean attack. Hardliners also argue that the continued and maximized isolation of the North will lead to the country's collapse after which the territory could be absorbed by force into South Korea.
In November 2000, outgoing US PresidentBill Clinton wanted to visit Pyongyang. However, the intended visit never happened because of the controversy surrounding the results of the2000 US presidential election. Around April or May 2001, Kim Dae-jung was expecting to welcome Kim Jong Il to Seoul. Returning from his meeting in Washington D.C., with newly elected President Bush, Kim Dae-jung described his meeting as embarrassing while privately cursing President Bush and his hardliner approach. This meeting negated any chance of a North Korean visit to South Korea. After the Bush administration labeled North Korea as part of the "axis of evil", North Korea renounced thenonproliferation treaty, kicked outUN inspectors, and restarted its nuclear program.[50] In early 2005, the North Korean government confirmed that the country had successfully become anuclear armed state, with its first nuclear test conducted in October 2006.[50]: 504–505 [51]
In North Korea, the Three Charters for National Reunification have served as the sole guidelines for reunification. They contain theThree Principles for National Reunification,Ten Point Programme for Reunification of the Country and the plan of founding theDemocratic Confederal Republic of Koryo.[52] They were formulated by North Korean leader Kim Jong Il into the Three Charters for National Reunification in his public work "Let Us Carry Out the Great Comrade's Instructions for National Reunification", in 1997.
North Korean PresidentKim Il Sung proposed theThree Principles of National Reunification in 1972 as the central force that should drive reunification. They are as follows:
TheTen Point Programme for Reunification of the Country was written byKim Il Sung in 1993 and contains the idea of reunification with South Korea under a pan-national unified state. It emphasises once again the need for an independent reunification, and more specifically, the removal of US forces from the peninsula. It is laid out as follows:
In accordance with the three principles and the ten point programme,Kim Il Sung elaborated on theproposed state, called Democratic Confederal Republic of Koryo (DFRK),[55] on October 10, 1980, in theReport to the Sixth Congress of the Workers' Party of Korea on the Work of the Central Committee. Kim proposed aconfederation between North and South Korea, in which their respective political systems would initially remain. It is described by North Korea as a "...peaceful reunification proposal to found a federal state on the condition that the north and the south recognize and tolerate each other's existing ideologies."[52] It was stated that the DFRK should be a neutral country which does not participate in any political, military alliance or bloc, embracing the whole of the territory and people of the country.[56]
On January 1, 2011, a group of twelve lawmakers from the ruling and opposition parties introduced a bill into theSouth Korean National Assembly to allow for the establishment of a "unification tax". The bill called for businesses to pay 0.05% of corporate tax, individuals to pay 5% of inheritance or gift taxes, and both individuals and companies to pay 2% of theirincome tax towards the cost of unification. The bill initiated legislative debate on practical measures to prepare for unification, as proposed by PresidentLee Myung-bak in hisLiberation Day speech the previous year. The proposal for a unification tax was not warmly welcomed at the time. Lee has since reiterated concerns regarding the imminence of unification, which, combined with North Korean behavior, led to the tax proposal gaining wider acceptance. Practical measures to prepare for unification are becoming an increasingly frequent aspect of political debate, as concern regarding imminent and abrupt unification increases.[57]
It has been suggested that the formation of a KoreanEconomic Community could be a way to ease in unification of the peninsula.[58] Lee Myung-bak, departing from the Saenuri Party's traditional hardline stance, outlined a comprehensive diplomatic package on North Korea that includes setting up a consultative body to discuss economic projects between the two Koreas. He proposed seeking a Korean economic community agreement to provide the legal and systemic basis for any projects agreed to in the body.[59]
In 2017, formerInha University professor Shepherd Iverson proposed creating a $175 billion reunification investment fund aiming to bribe the elite officials on top of DPRK's hierarchy to ensure a diplomatic way to resolve the Korean conflict by conducting an internalregime change. In the proposal a sum of up to $23.3 billion would be paid in total to the families of those elite officials who wield power inPyongyang, while he noted that the top ten families would receive $30 million each, and the top thousand families would get $5 million. Another sum of $121.8 billion would go to the country's general population to start their life again post-reunification, and it's envisioned that the proceeds for the fund is to be raised from private groups and business moguls.[60][61][62]
In 1984, theBeijing Review provided China's view on Korean unification: "With regard to the situation on the Korean peninsula, China's position is clear: it is squarely behind the proposal of North Korea for tripartite (between the two Koreas and the United States) talks to seek a peaceful and independent reunification of Korea in the form of a confederation, free from outside interference. China believes this is the surest way to reduce tension on the peninsula."[63]
China's currentrelationship with North Korea and position on a unified Korea is seen as dependent on a number of issues. A unified Korea could preventNorth Korea's nuclear weapons program from destabilizing East Asia as well as the Chinese government. The 2010United States diplomatic cables leak mentioned two unnamed PRC officials telling the Deputy Foreign Minister of South Korea that theyounger generation of Chinese leaders increasingly believed that Korea should be reunified under South Korean rule, provided it were not hostile to China.[64] The report also claimed that senior officials and the general public in the PRC were becoming increasingly frustrated with the North acting like a "spoiled child," following its repeated missile and nuclear tests, which were seen as a gesture of defiance not only to the West, but also to China.[65] The business magazineCaixin reported that North Korea accounted for 40% of China's foreign aid budget and required 50,000 tonnes of oil per month as abuffer state against Japan, South Korea, and the United States, with whom trade and investment is now worth billions. North Korea is seen in China as expensive and internationally embarrassing to support.[66]
However, the collapse of the North Korean regime and unification by Seoul would also present a number of problems for China. A sudden and violent collapse might cause amass exodus of North Koreans fleeing or fighting poverty into China, causing ahumanitarian crisis that could destabilizenortheast China. The movement of South Korean and American soldiers into the North could result in their being temporarily or even permanently stationed on China's border, seen as a potential threat to China sovereignty and an imposition of aChina containment policy.[67] A unified Korea could also more strongly pursue itsterritorial disputes with China[68] and might inflame nationalism amongKoreans in China.[69] Some have claimed the existence ofcontingency plans for the PRC intervening in situations of great turmoil in North Korea[70][71] (with theChinese Academy of Social Sciences' Northeast Project on theChinese identity of the Goguryeo kingdom potentially used to justifyintervention or evenannexation).[25]
Similarly, reunification of Korea poses complications for future Korea-Japan relations, especially with regards to the disputed territorial status of theLiancourt Rocks and historical issues such as theComfort women. A reunified Korea will likely position itself as an economic competitor to Japan.[72][73]
 | This section needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(May 2014) |
As relations between North Korea and the Soviet Union warmed, the latter returned to warm public support for Kim Il Sung's peaceful reunification proposals. Soviet attention in Northeast Asia gradually began to focus on a new plan for "collective security in Asia" first proposed in anIzvestia editorial in May 1969 and mentioned specifically bySoviet general secretaryLeonid Brezhnev in his address to theInternational Conference of Communist and Workers' Parties in Moscow the following month:[74]
For us, the burning problems of the present international situation do not push into the background more long-range tasks, especially the creation of a system of collective security in those parts of the world where the threat of the unleashing of a new World War and the unleashing of armed conflicts is centered... We think that the course of events also places on the agenda the task of creating a system of collective security in Asia.
.jpg)
The United States officially supports Korean reunification under a democratic government, but questions still remain as to the continued relevance of US military presence on the peninsula.[75][76]Mike Mansfield proposed that Korea be neutralized under a great-power agreement, accompanied by the withdrawal of all foreign troops and the discontinuation of security treaties with the great power guarantors of the North and South.
In the 1990s, despite issues surrounding the controversial US-South Korean jointTeam Spirit military exercises, the Clinton administration still managed to help turn around the situation regarding peace with North Korea throughJimmy Carter's support. It promisedlight water reactors in exchange for the availability of North Korea for inspection of its facilities and other concessions. North Korea reacted positively, despite blaming the United States as the original aggressor in the Korean War. There were attempts tonormalize relations with Japan as well as the United States with South Korean President Kim Dae-jung in open support. North Korea actually favored the United States military's position on the front lines because it helped prevent an outbreak of war. Eventually, aid and oil were supplied, and even cooperation with South Korean business firms. However, one of the remaining fears was North Korea, with their necessary uranium deposits, having the potential to achieve a high level of nuclear technology.
Former US Secretary of StateHenry Kissinger, another supporter of Korean unification, proposed asix-party conference to find a way out of theKorean dilemma, composed of the two Koreas and four connected powers (the United States, the Soviet Union, China, and Japan). North Korea denounced the "four plus two" scenario, as it was also known, by claiming Korea would be at the mercy of thegreat powers and insinuated the reestablishment of Japanese power in Korea. However, North Korea ultimately lacked confidence in getting simultaneous help from China and the Soviet Union.[50]: 508
Following a summit meeting held between leaders of the two countries in Pyongyang from June 13 to 15 in 2000, the chairmen of theMillennium Summit issued a statement welcoming their Joint Declaration as a breakthrough in bringing peace, stability, and reunification to the Korean peninsula.[77] Seven weeks later, a resolution to the same effect was passed by theUnited Nations General Assembly after being co-sponsored by 150 other nations.[78]
A scheduled General Assembly debate on the topic in 2002 was deferred for a year at the request of both nations,[79] and when the subject returned in 2003, it was immediately dropped off the agenda.[80]
The issue did not return to the General Assembly until 2007,[81] following a second Inter-Korean summit held in Pyongyang on October 2–4, 2007. These talks were held during one round of theSix-Party Talks in Beijing which committed to the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.[82]
A unified Korea could have great implications for the balance of power in the region, with South Korea already considered by many a regional power.[83]
In September 2009,Goldman Sachs published its 188th Global Economics Paper about the subject of "reassessing North Korea Risks and A United Korea"[84] which highlighted in detail the potential economic power of a unified Korea, which would surpass many G7 countries, including Canada, Germany, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, and possibly Japan within 30–40 years of reunification, with a potentialGDP of more than $6 trillion by 2075.[85] The young,skilled labor and large amount of natural resources from the North combined with the advanced technology, infrastructure and large amount of capital in the South, as well as Korea's strategic location connecting three major economic powers, were cited as potential factors that could drive this growth. According to some opinions, a unified Korea could occur before 2075.[85] If it occurred, Korean reunification would immediately raise the country's population to over 80 million.[86] According to research by Jin-Wook Kim atCiti, reunification would require an investment of US$63.1 billion in the long term to rebuild transportation such as railroads, roads, airports, sea ports and other infrastructure like power plants, mines, oil refineries, and gas pipelines.
 United Korea |  South Korea |  North Korea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDP inUSD | $6.056 trillion | $4.073 trillion | $1.982 trillion |
| GDP per capita | $78,000 | $81,000 | $71,000 |
| GDP growth (2015–2075) | 4.8% | 3.9% | 11.4% |
| Total population | 78 million | 50 million | 28 million |
However, there is a downside to this. The role of neighboring powers in a unified Korea will change. For example, there will continue to be competition between Russia and China to increase their influence on the Korean Peninsula.[87]
The team [Unified Korea women's ice hockey team] will use the acronym COR and will be the first joint Korean sports team at an Olympic Games.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
Media related toKorean reunification at Wikimedia Commons
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
