Kings–Tulare Regional Station | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 The station under construction in October 2024 | |||||||||||
| General information | |||||||||||
| Location | Central Valley Highway outsideHanford, California | ||||||||||
| Coordinates | 36°20′07″N119°35′32″W / 36.335141°N 119.592321°W /36.335141; -119.592321 | ||||||||||
| Owned by | California High-Speed Rail Authority | ||||||||||
| Construction | |||||||||||
| Structure type | elevated | ||||||||||
| History | |||||||||||
| Opening | 2030(High-Speed Rail service) | ||||||||||
| Services | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Kings–Tulare Regional Station is a plannedCalifornia High-Speed Rail station servingKings County andTulare County, California. It will be located atop the Hanford Viaduct near the intersection ofHanford Expressway andCentral Valley Highway,[1] just east of the city limits ofHanford and less than 20 miles (32 km) west of the larger city ofVisalia.
The construction of the station has been controversial, with Tulare County supporting the station while Kings County, where the station would be located, has strongly opposed the entire California High-Speed Rail project.[2][3]
The currentAmtrakGold Runner service in theCentral Valley uses theBNSF Railway tracks through the center of Hanford, stopping atan existing station there. However, a high-speed rail route along this alignment was strongly opposed by Hanford city officials, who said that it would disrupt the city's historic downtown. This meant that only routes that bypassed Hanford city limits were considered. An alignment alongRoute 99 was ruled out due to the extra expense and uncertain cooperation fromUnion Pacific Railroad, which has its own track in the vicinity. This left routes through rural areas, which ran into opposition from farmers whose land would be taken.[4]
In October 2011 the Kings CountyBoard of Supervisors voted to oppose all possible alignments through that county.[5] In December 2011 the Kings County Association of Governments turned down a station planning grant that it had already been approved for due to opposition within the county. Tulare County and the City of Visalia continued to pursue a similar grant, leading to complaints from Kings County officials that Tulare County was sidelining Kings County's jurisdiction.[2] Hanford officials also complained that the opening of the high-speed rail station would lead to a loss of service to the existing downtown Amtrak station, negatively affecting the city's tourism industry due to the new station being 1.5 miles (2.4 km) from the city center.[6]
The initial plans called for the high-speed rail line to diverge from the BNSF line and run east of Hanford city limits, with a west bypass not considered due to increased impacts on wetlands and farmland, negative effects on potential development between Hanford andLemoore, and increased distance from Visalia. However, in October 2011 the California High-Speed Rail Authority recalled its draft environmental impact report to produce a new one that would consider both routes.[7] An initial report in April 2013 indicated that the western alternative with below-grade tracks was preferred.[8][9] However, in November 2013 the Authority approved the original eastern alignment for largely the same reasons that it was initially preferred,[10] along with the discovery that the groundwater in the western area was only 10 feet (3.0 m) to 15 feet (4.6 m) below ground level due to an impermeable clay formation, making a below-grade track unfeasible there.[9]
In August 2015, the Hanford City Council rejected contributing $100,000 to a planning grant that included a potentiallight rail line connecting the high-speed rail station to the centers of Hanford and Visalia, theCross Valley Corridor. Tulare County had already approved its $100,000 contribution, and the California High-Speed Rail Authority had promised $600,000, but Hanford's rejection killed the entire grant. Tulare County and Visalia officials indicated that they would seek funding to plan for a connectivity study potentially including light rail even without the assistance of Kings County or Hanford.[11][12]
In November 2019, it was announced that construction of the station's underlying viaduct would begin the following month. The design at this point had changed from an at-grade to an elevated station on a mile-long viaduct, with the benefits of having a smaller footprint, avoiding modifications to theUnion Pacific Railroad line and anelectrical transmission line at the location, and allowing potential Cross Valley Corridor service to be accessed at-grade beneath the high-speed rail tracks.[13]
