Kingdom of Strathclyde Alt Clud Cumbria | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5th century–c. 1030 | |||||||||
 The core of Strathclyde is thestrath of theRiver Clyde. The major sites associated with the kingdom are shown, as is the markerClach nam Breatann (English:Rock of the Britons), the probable northern extent of the kingdom at an early time. Other areas were added to or subtracted from the kingdom at different times. | |||||||||
| Capital | Dumbarton andGovan | ||||||||
| Common languages | Cumbric | ||||||||
| Government | Monarchy | ||||||||
| Historical era | Middle Ages | ||||||||
• Established | 5th century | ||||||||
• Incorporated into theKingdom of Scotland | c. 1030 | ||||||||
| |||||||||
| Today part of | Scotland ∟Dumfries and Galloway ∟East Ayrshire ∟North Ayrshire ∟South Ayrshire ∟South Lanarkshire ∟North Lanarkshire ∟East Renfrewshire ∟Renfrewshire ∟Glasgow City ∟Inverclyde ∟East Dunbartonshire ∟West Dunbartonshire ∟Argyll and Bute ∟Stirling | ||||||||
Strathclyde (Welsh:Ystrad Clud, "valley of theClyde"), also known asCumbria,[1] was aBrittonic kingdom in northern Britain during theMiddle Ages. It comprised parts of what is now southernScotland andNorth West England, a region the Welsh tribes referred to asYr Hen Ogledd (“the Old North"). At its greatest extent in the 10th century, it stretched fromLoch Lomond to theRiver Eamont atPenrith.[1] Strathclyde seems to have been annexed by theGoidelic-speakingKingdom of Alba in the 11th century, becoming part of the emergingKingdom of Scotland.
In its early days it was called the kingdom ofAlt Clud, the Brittonic name of its capital, and it controlled the region aroundDumbarton Rock.[2] This kingdom emerged during Britain'spost-Roman period and may have been founded by theDamnonii people. After thesack of Dumbarton by a Viking army fromDublin in 870, the capital seems to have moved toGovan and the kingdom became known as Strathclyde. It expanded south to theCumbrian Mountains, into the former lands ofRheged. The neighbouringAnglo-Saxons called this enlarged kingdomCumbraland.[1] We do not know what the inhabitants called theirpolity, though it may have been referred to as “Cumbria.”[3]
The language of Strathclyde is known asCumbric, which was closely related toOld Welsh. Its inhabitants were referred to as Cumbrians. There was some later settlement byVikings orNorse–Gaels(seeScandinavian Scotland), although to a lesser degree than in neighbouringGalloway. A small number ofAnglian place-names show some settlement byAnglo-Saxons fromNorthumbria. Owing to the series of language changes in the area, it is unclear whether anyGaelic settlement took place before the 11th century.
Ptolemy'sGeographia – a sailors' chart, not an ethnographical survey[4] – lists a number of tribes, or groups of tribes, in southern Scotland at around the time of theRoman invasion and the establishment ofRoman Britain in the 1st century AD. As well as the Damnonii, Ptolemy lists theOtalini, whose capital appears to have beenTraprain Law; to their west, theSelgovae in theSouthern Uplands and, further west inGalloway, theNovantae. In addition, a group known as theMaeatae, probably in the area aroundStirling, appear in later Roman records. The capital of the Damnonii is believed to have been at Carman, near Dumbarton, but around five miles inland from theRiver Clyde.
Although the northern frontier of Roman Britain wasHadrian's Wall for most of its history, the extent of Roman influence north of the Wall is obscure. Certainly, Roman forts existed north of the wall, and forts as far north asCramond may have been in long-term occupation. Moreover, the formal frontier was three times moved further north. Twice it was advanced to the line of theAntonine Wall, at about the time when Hadrian's Wall was built and again underSeptimius Severus, and once further north, beyond theriver Tay, duringAgricola's campaigns, although, each time, it was soon withdrawn. In addition to these contacts, Roman armies undertook punitive expeditions north of the frontiers. Northern natives also travelled south of the wall, to trade, to raid and to serve in the Roman army. Roman traders may have travelled north, and Roman subsidies, or bribes, were sent to useful tribes and leaders. The extent to which Roman Britain was romanised is debated, and if there are doubts about the areas under close Roman control, then there must be even more doubts over the degree to which the Damnonii were romanised.[5]
The final period of Roman Britain saw an apparent increase in attacks by land and sea, the raiders including thePicts,Scotti and the mysteriousAttacotti whose origins are not certain.[6] These raids will have also targeted the tribes of southern Scotland. The supposed final withdrawal of Roman forces around 410 is unlikely to have been of military impact on the Damnonii, although the withdrawal of pay from the residual Wall garrison will have had a very considerable economic effect.
No historical source gives any firm information on the boundaries of the Kingdom of Strathclyde, but suggestions have been offered on the basis ofplace-names andtopography. Near the north end ofLoch Lomond, which can be reached by boat from the Clyde, liesClach nam Breatann, the Rock of the Britains, which is thought to have gained its name as a marker at the northern limit of Alt Clut.[7] TheCampsie Fells and the marshes between Loch Lomond andStirling may have represented another boundary. To the south, the kingdom extended some distance up the strath of the Clyde, and along the coast probably extended south towardsAyr.[8]
The written sources available for the period are largely Irish and Welsh, and very few indeed are contemporary with the period between 400 and 600. Irish sources report events in the kingdom of Dumbarton only when they have an Irish link. Excepting the 6th-centuryjeremiad byGildas and the poetry attributed toTaliesin andAneirin—in particulary Gododdin, thought to have been composed in Scotland in the 6th century—Welsh sources generally date from a much later period. Some are informed by the political attitudes prevalent in Wales in the 9th century and after.Bede, whose prejudice is apparent, rarely mentions Britons, and then usually in uncomplimentary terms.
Two kings are known from near contemporary sources in this early period. The first is Coroticus orCeretic Guletic (Welsh:Ceredig), known as the recipient of a letter fromSaint Patrick, and stated by a 7th-century biographer to have been king of the Height of the Clyde, Dumbarton Rock, placing him in the second half of the 5th century. From Patrick's letter it is clear that Ceretic was a Christian, and it is likely that the ruling class of the area were also Christians, at least in name. His descendantRhydderch Hael is named inAdomnán'sLife of SaintColumba. Rhydderch was a contemporary ofÁedán mac Gabráin ofDál Riata andUrien ofRheged, to whom he is linked by various traditions and tales, and also ofÆthelfrith ofBernicia.
The Christianisation of southern Scotland, if Patrick's letter to Coroticus was indeed to a king in Strathclyde, had therefore made considerable progress when the first historical sources appear. Further south, atWhithorn, a Christian inscription is known from the second half of the 5th century, perhaps commemorating a new church. How this came about is unknown. Unlike Columba,Kentigern (Welsh:Cyndeyrn Garthwys), the supposed apostle to the Britons of the Clyde, is a shadowy figure andJocelyn of Furness's 12th centuryLife is late and of doubtful authenticity though Jackson[9] believed that Jocelyn's version might have been based on an earlier Cumbric-language original.
.png)
After 600, information on the Britons of Alt Clut becomes slightly more common in the sources. However, historians have disagreed as to how these should be interpreted. Broadly speaking, they have tended to produce theories which place their subject at the centre of the history of north Britain in the Early Historic period. The result is a series of narratives which cannot be reconciled.[10] More recent historiography may have gone some way to addressing this problem.
At the beginning of the 7th century,Áedán mac Gabráin may have been the most powerful king in northern Britain, andDál Riata was at its height. Áedán's byname in later Welsh poetry, Aeddan Fradawg (Áedán the Treacherous) does not speak to a favourable reputation among the Britons of Alt Clut, and it may be that he seized control of Alt Clut. Áedán's dominance came to an end around 604, when his army, including Irish kings and Bernician exiles, was defeated by Æthelfrith at theBattle of Degsastan.
It is supposed, on rather weak evidence, that Æthelfrith, his successorEdwin and Bernician and Northumbrian kings after them expanded into southern Scotland. Such evidence as there is, such as the conquest ofElmet, the wars in northWales and withMercia, would argue for a more southerly focus of Northumbrian activity in the first half of the 7th century. The report in theAnnals of Ulster for 638, "the battle of Glenn Muiresan and the besieging of Eten" (Eidyn, laterEdinburgh), has been taken to represent the capture of Eidyn by the Northumbrian kingOswald, son of Æthelfrith, but the Annals mention neither capture, nor Northumbrians, so this is rather a tenuous identification.[11]
In 642, the Annals of Ulster report that the Britons of Alt Clut led byEugein son ofBeli defeated the men of Dál Riata and killedDomnall Brecc, grandson of Áedán, at Strathcarron, and this victory is also recorded in an addition toY Gododdin. The site of this battle lies in the area known in later Welsh sources as Bannawg—the nameBannockburn is presumed to be related—which is thought to have meant the very extensive marshes and bogs between Loch Lomond and theriver Forth, and the hills and lochs to the north, which separated the lands of the Britons from those of Dál Riata and the Picts, and this land was not worth fighting over. However, the lands to the south and east of this waste were controlled by smaller, nameless British kingdoms. Powerful neighbouring kings, whether in Alt Clut, Dál Riata, Pictland or Bernicia, would have imposed tribute on these petty kings, and wars for the overlordship of this area seem to have been regular events in the 6th to 8th centuries.
There are few definite reports of Alt Clut in the remainder of the 7th century, although it is possible that theIrish annals contain entries which may be related to Alt Clut. In the last quarter of the 7th century, a number of battles in Ireland, largely in areas along theIrish Sea coast, are reported where Britons take part. It is usually assumed that these Britons are mercenaries, or exiles dispossessed by some Anglo-Saxon conquest in northern Britain. However, it may be that these represent campaigns by kings of Alt Clut, whose kingdom was certainly part of the region linked by the Irish Sea. All of Alt Clut's neighbours, Northumbria, Pictland and Dál Riata, are known to have sent armies to Ireland on occasions.[12]
The Annals of Ulster in the early 8th century report two battles between Alt Clut and Dál Riata, at "Lorg Ecclet" (unknown) in 711, and at "the rock called Minuirc" in 717. Whether their appearance in the record has any significance or whether it is just happenstance is unclear. Later in the 8th century, it appears that the Pictish kingÓengus made at least three campaigns against Alt Clut, none successful. In 744 the Picts acted alone, and in 750 Óengus may have cooperated withEadberht of Northumbria in a campaign in which Talorgan, brother of Óengus, was killed in a heavy Pictish defeat at the hands ofTeudebur of Alt Clut, perhaps at Mugdock, nearMilngavie. Eadberht is said to have taken the plain of Kyle in 750, around modernAyr, presumably from Alt Clut.
Teudebur died around 752, and it was probably his sonDumnagual who faced a joint effort by Óengus and Eadberht in 756. The Picts and Northumbrians laid siege to Dumbarton Rock, and extracted a submission from Dumnagual. It is doubtful whether the agreement, whatever it may have been, was kept, for Eadberht's army was all but wiped out—whether by their supposed allies or by recent enemies is unclear—on its way back to Northumbria.
After this, little is heard of Alt Clut or its kings until the 9th century. The "burning", the usual term for capture, of Alt Clut is reported in 780, although by whom and in what circumstances is not known. ThereafterDunblane was burned by the men of Alt Clut in 849, perhaps in the reign ofArtgal.
An army, led by the Viking chiefs known in Irish asAmlaíb Conung and Ímar, laidsiege in 870 to Alt Clut, a siege which lasted some four months and led to the destruction of the citadel and the taking of a very large number of captives. The siege and capture are reported by Welsh and Irish sources, and the Annals of Ulster say that in 871, after overwintering on the Clyde:
Amlaíb and Ímar returned to Áth Cliath (Dublin) fromAlba with two hundred ships, bringing away with them in captivity to Ireland a great prey of Angles and Britons and Picts.
KingArthgal ap Dyfnwal, called "king of the Britons of Strathclyde", was killed in Dublin in 872 at the instigation ofCausantín mac Cináeda.[13] He was followed by his sonRun of Alt Clut, who was married to Causantín's sister.Eochaid, the result of this marriage, may have been king of Strathclyde, or of thekingdom of Alba.
From this time forward, and perhaps from much earlier, the kingdom of Strathclyde was subject to periodic domination by the kings of Alba. However, the earlier idea, that the heirs to the Scots throne ruled Strathclyde, or Cumbria as anappanage, has relatively little support, and the degree of Scots control should not be overstated. This period probably saw a degree of Norse, or Norse-Gael settlement in Strathclyde. A number of place-names, in particular a cluster on the coast facingthe Cumbraes, and monuments such as thehogback graves at Govan, are some of the remains of these newcomers.
In the late ninth century the Vikings almost conquered England, apart from the southern kingdom ofWessex, but in the 910s the West Saxon kingEdward the Elder and his sisterÆthelflæd, Lady of the Mercians, recovered England south of theHumber. According to theFragmentary Annals of Ireland, Æthelflæd formed an alliance with Strathclyde and Scotland against the Vikings, and in the view of the historian Tim Clarkson Strathclyde seems to have made substantial territorial gains at this time, some at the expense of theNorse Vikings. TheAnglo-Saxon Chronicle states that in 920 the kings of Britain, including the king of Strathclyde (who is not named), submitted to Edward. However, historians are sceptical of the claim as Edward's power was confined to southern Britain, and they think it was probably a peace settlement which did not involve submission. The names of Strathclyde's rulers in this period are uncertain, butDyfnwal is thought to have been king in the early tenth century, and he was probably succeeded by his sonOwain before 920.[14]
In 927 Edward's sonÆthelstan conquered Viking-ruledNorthumbria, and thus became the first king of England. AtEamont Bridge on 27 July several kings accepted his overlordship, includingConstantine of Scotland. Sources differ on whether the meeting was attended by Owain of Strathclyde orOwain ap Hywel of Gwent, but it could have been both. In 934 Æthelstan invaded Scotland and laid waste to the country. Owain was an ally of the Scottish king and it is likely that Strathclyde was also ravaged. Owain attested Æthelstan's charters as sub-king in 931 and 935 (chartersS 413, 434 and 1792), but in 937 he joined Constantine and the Vikings in invading England. The result was an overwhelming victory for the English at theBattle of Brunanburh.[15]
Following the battle of Brunanburh, Owain's sonDyfnwal ab Owain became king of Strathclyde. It is likely that whereas Scotland allied with England, Strathclyde held to its alliance with the Vikings. In 945, Æthelstan's half-brotherEdmund, who had succeeded to the English throne in 939, ravaged Strathclyde. According to the thirteenth-century chroniclerRoger of Wendover, Edmund had two sons of Dyfnwal blinded, perhaps to deprive their father of throneworthy heirs. Edmund then gave the kingdom to KingMalcolm I of Scotland in return for a pledge to defend it on land and on sea, but Dyfnwal soon recovered his kingdom. He died on pilgrimage to Rome in 975.[16]
If the kings of Alba imagined, as John of Fordun did, that they were rulers of Strathclyde, the death ofCuilén mac Iduilb and his brotherEochaid at the hands ofRhydderch ap Dyfnwal in 971, said to be in revenge for the rape or abduction of his daughter, shows otherwise. A major source for confusion comes from the name of Rhydderch's successor,Máel Coluim, now thought to be a son of the Dyfnwal ab Owain who died in Rome, but long confused with the later king of ScotsMáel Coluim mac Cináeda.[17] Máel Coluim appears to have been followed byOwen the Bald who is thought to have died at the battle of Carham in 1018. It seems likely that Owen had a successor, although his name is unknown.
Some time after 1018 and before 1054, the kingdom of Strathclyde appears to have been conquered by the Scots, most probably during the reign of Máel Coluim mac Cináeda who died in 1034.[18] In 1054, the English kingEdward the Confessor dispatched EarlSiward of Northumbria against the Scots, ruled byMac Bethad mac Findláich (Macbeth), along with an otherwise unknown "Malcolm son of the king of the Cumbrians", in Strathclyde. The name Malcolm or Máel Coluim again caused confusion, some historians later supposing that this was the later king of ScotsMáel Coluim mac Donnchada (Máel Coluim Cenn Mór). It is not known if Malcolm/Máel Coluim ever became "king of the Cumbrians", or, if so, for how long.[19]
The Keswick area was conquered by the Anglo-SaxonKingdom of Northumbria in the 7th century, but Northumbria was destroyed by theVikings in the late 9th. In the early 10th century it became part of Strathclyde; it remained part of Strathclyde until about 1050, whenSiward, Earl of Northumbria, conquered that part of Cumbria.[20]
Carlisle was part ofScotland by 1066, and thus was not recorded in the 1086Domesday Book. This changed in 1092, when William the Conqueror's sonWilliam Rufus invaded the region and incorporatedCumberland into England. The construction ofCarlisle Castle began in 1093 on the site of the Roman fort, south of theRiver Eden. The castle was rebuilt in stone in 1112, with a keep and the city walls.
By the 1070s, if not earlier in the reign of Máel Coluim mac Donnchada, it appears that the Scots again controlled Strathclyde. It is certain that Strathclyde did indeed become an appanage, for it was granted byAlexander I to his brotherDavid, Prince of the Cumbrians, laterDavid I, in 1107.
| Eras |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Early Realms | ||
| Topics | ||
| Events | ||
| Places | ||
| Institutions | ||
| Related articles | ||
