Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Kayak Point County Park

Coordinates:48°08′06″N122°22′05″W / 48.135°N 122.368°W /48.135; -122.368
This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
County park in Snohomish County, Washington, United States

Kayak Point County Park
The beach at Kayak Point County Park, pictured in 2017
Map showing the location of Kayak Point County Park
Map showing the location of Kayak Point County Park
Location in Washington
Show map of Washington (state)
Map showing the location of Kayak Point County Park
Map showing the location of Kayak Point County Park
Kayak Point County Park (the United States)
Show map of the United States
LocationSnohomish County,Washington, U.S.
Coordinates48°08′06″N122°22′05″W / 48.135°N 122.368°W /48.135; -122.368[1]
Area670 acres (270 ha)
Elevation3 ft (0.9 m)[1]
Established1972
Governing bodySnohomish County Parks and Recreation
WebsiteKayak Point Regional County Park

Kayak Point County Park is a countypark nearWarm Beach, inSnohomish County, Washington. The 670-acre (270 ha) park is located alongPort Susan and includes a saltwater beach, aboat launch, adisc golf course, and public campgrounds. Kayak Point is the most popular county park in Snohomish County and is mainly visited for recreational fishing,crabbing, andbirdwatching.

Kayak Point was home to a private, locally-runseaside resort from the 1920s to 1950s, named after a pair ofInuitkayaks brought to the resort from Alaska. In the 1960s,Atlantic Richfield proposed construction of anoil refinery at Kayak Point, purchasing 1,200 acres (490 ha) of land, and received approval from the county to re-zone the area for industrial use. During public hearings, local residents opposed the refinery and later filed a lawsuit against the county over its re-zoning decision, which was voided by theWashington Supreme Court in 1979 as an inequitable use of "spot zoning". Atlantic Richfield later attempted to develop some of its land holdings into amaster-planned residential community in the 1970s, but failed to receive county approval due to a lack of good roads and sewers.

The county park was established in 1972, using waterfront property bought by the county government from Atlantic Richfield. It was dedicated in 1976 and underwent major renovations from 2023 to 2024.

History

[edit]

Originally part of the ancestral territory of theSnohomish people, the Kayak Point area was settled by American loggers from the 1850s to 1890s. After the near-shore timber had been logged away,Seattle real estate developerClarence Dayton Hillman bought 12,000 acres (4,900 ha) along Port Susan, from Kayak Point to modern-dayWarm Beach, from 1907 to 1909. Hillmanplatted the area, naming it "Birmingham", and sold five-acre (2.0 ha) parcels for $75 each (equivalent to $2,000 in 2023 dollars),[2] advertising in Seattle-area newspapers during the 1909Alaska–Yukon–Pacific Exposition to prospective buyers.[3][4] The Kilian family settled at the south end of Birmingham and later developed their property into aseaside resort in the 1920s, building roads, cabins, and aboat launch. The resort was named "Kayak Point", after a pair ofInuitkayaks brought fromKing Island, Alaska, and displayed in front of the resort store.[3]

Atlantic Richfield proposals

[edit]

TheAtlantic Richfield Company purchased the resort and surrounding properties in the late 1950s, with the intent of building anoil refinery on the site.[5] In the interim, the resort was leased to aTacoma businessman and would continue operating until the refinery was approved for construction.[6] Atlantic Richfield formally unveiled their proposed 2,200-acre (3.4 sq mi; 8.9 km2) oil refinery in 1967, requesting that the county government issue permits to allow for the refinery's construction and operation as an exception to the area's rural residential zoning.[7][8] Atlantic Richfield selected Kayak Point due to its protected deep water location, road access, available workforce, and proximity toCanada, wherecrude oil would be delivered viapipeline.[9][10] The $100 million (equivalent to $697 million in 2023 dollars)[2] refinery would employ 400 workers and create an additional 800 jobs in supporting industries.[11]

The plans angered local residents, who organized the Save Port Susan Committee and testified against the zoning exception during apublic hearing on November 30, 1967.[12][13] Despite the testimony, the county planning commission and the county board of commissioners approved a change in thecomprehensive plan to rezone Kayak Point for the oil refinery.[14][15] As part of the rezoning plan, Atlantic Richfield agreed to allocate 240 acres (0.97 km2) to public recreation, as well as clean up anyoil spills in the area regardless of fault. Opponents of the refinery, while pleased with the spill provision, sought penalties and damages in the event of a spill and feared that further petrochemical development could follow the refinery's opening.[16]

In response to the rezoning, 19 members of the Save Port Susan Bay Committee filed a lawsuit against the county commissioners and planning commission on June 24, 1968.[17] An additional legal challenge, coming in the form of a complaint fordeclaratory judgment, was filed in September by the committee questioning enforcement of the rezoning agreement's conditions on pollution control and its effects on Port Susan residents.[18] On October 28, 1968, Atlantic Richfield announced that it was dropping plans for the refinery at Kayak Point, instead choosing to build it atCherry Point nearBellingham, due to the delays from litigation and the immediate needs for a new refinery.[19][20] A similar proposal fromUnion Oil for a nearby site on Port Susan was defeated by the county planning commission in 1971, despite support from theTulalip Tribes.[21]

The Save Port Susan Bay Committee nonetheless continued its legal challenge, seeking to revert the rezoning decision and return the area to low-density residential zoning.[22] After denying Atlantic Richfield's motion to dismiss the lawsuit,[23] a visiting judge from theKing County Superior Court ruled that the county's rezone be held void over the denial ofdue process for local residents.[24] The case was taken to theWashington Supreme Court, who ruled that the county's use of "spot zoning" was not in the area's best interest and thus void.[3][8]

Atlantic Richfield, left with 1,200 acres (1.9 sq mi; 4.9 km2) of remaining Kayak Point property, began design work for amaster-planned community in the early 1970s.[25] The planned development, consisting of 4,720 residential units housing nearly 15,000 people, hinged on the improvement on nearby roads.[26] In 1979, the Snohomish County planning commission voted against the first phase of development, consisting of 109 homes, due to the inadequate states of local roads and sewer service.[27] Atlantic Richfield decided to abandon its Kayak Point plans after the rejection and ultimately left its holdings undeveloped.[28][29]

County park

[edit]

The Snohomish County government began purchasing waterfront property near Kayak Point in 1968, intending to establish the county's first saltwater park.[30] After Atlantic Richfield pulled its plans for a Kayak Point oil refinery, the county began negotiating a buyout of the company's waterfront property.[31] The county purchased 670 acres (270 ha) from Atlantic Richfield in 1972 for $1.4 million (equivalent to $8 million in 2023 dollars),[2] using federal and state funds;[32] Atlantic Richfield also donated $250,000 towards development of the $3.3 million (equivalent to $17 million in 2023 dollars)[2] county park and golf course.[33] Kayak Point County Park was dedicated in 1976 by Art Kilian, the former owner of the resort.[3]

In the late 2010s, the county began preparing for future renovations to Kayak Point County Park to support new developed areas and replace aging equipment. Proposals for the beachside area include additional camping areas, a community center, and environmental education exhibits; upland areas could receive newcamping yurts, permanent cabins, and a ranger station.[34][35] The renovation project, estimated to cost $20 million, was approved by the county council in June 2023 and is planned to include a new boat launch, removal of the seawall, and a newberm. The park closed on July 5, 2023, with work originally scheduled to be completed before a fish window that begins October 15.[36] The reopening was later delayed to mid-2024 after work on the fishing pier was unable to be completed before the fish window closed.[37] Kayak Point County Park reopened on June 14, 2024, with a reconstructed boat launch and part of the new berm to replace the former seawall.[38][39]

Facilities and activities

[edit]

Kayak Point is acuspate foreland on Port Susan, with a sandy beach that was derived from erosion of nearby bluffs.[40] The 660-acre (270 ha) park is largely undeveloped, with only 40 acres (16 ha) dedicated solely to recreational uses. Kayak Point County Park features a 3,300-foot-long (1,000 m) sandy beach along Port Susan withpicnic shelters and parking. The beach is interrupted by aboat launch and a 300-foot-long (90 m)pier.[41] An open field is located adjacent to the beach and pier, featuring larger shelters and a playground. The park also offers overnight campsites,yurts, and cabins for rent.[42][43] The park, the most popular in the county system,[34] supports a variety of activities, includingfishing,crabbing,windsurfing,hiking, andbirdwatching.[41][44]

To the east of Kayak Point County Park was an 18-hole publicgolf course that occupied 250 acres (100 ha) of the county park's lands.[45] The golf course was designed by Ronald Fream and opened in 1977.[29][46] It closed in October 2018 due to declining revenues and was replaced with adisc golf course that opened in February 2020.[47][48] The course hosted the Kayak Point Open, an event sanctioned by theProfessional Disc Golf Association, in 2021.[49]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ab"Kayak Point".Geographic Names Information System.United States Geological Survey,United States Department of the Interior. September 12, 1979. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  2. ^abcdJohnston, Louis; Williamson, Samuel H. (2023)."What Was the U.S. GDP Then?".MeasuringWorth. RetrievedNovember 30, 2023. United StatesGross Domestic Product deflator figures follow theMeasuringWorth series.
  3. ^abcdBorell, Karen L. (2015)."Kayak Point". Snohomish County Parks and Recreation. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  4. ^McDonald, Cathy (June 24, 2004)."Walkabout: Kayak Point Regional Park".The Seattle Times. p. G4.Archived from the original on August 4, 2017. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  5. ^"$50,000,000 Refinery In Future for Everett".The Seattle Times. May 7, 1957. p. 4.
  6. ^"Tacoman Leases Resort Site".The Seattle Times. April 5, 1959. p. 70.
  7. ^Lane, Bob (June 23, 1967). "$100 Million Oil Refinery Planned for Kayak Point".The Seattle Times. p. 1.
  8. ^abChrobuck v. Snohomish County, 78 Wn.2d 858 (Washington Supreme Court February 4, 1979), archived from the original on August 7, 2017.
  9. ^Lane, Bob (November 30, 1967). "Kayak Point Only Site for Refinery, Says Richfield Co".The Seattle Times. p. 14.
  10. ^"This week in history".Marysville Globe. August 28, 2008.Archived from the original on August 7, 2017. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  11. ^Lane, Bob (December 1, 1967). "Richfield Refinery Would Create 1,200 New Jobs, Says Consultant".The Seattle Times. p. 56.
  12. ^Woodward, Walt (October 29, 1967). "Beach Residents, Oil Firm Square Off for Battle".The Seattle Times. p. 11.
  13. ^Lane, Bob (December 2, 1967). "Snohomish Planners Sift Oil Testimony".The Seattle Times. p. 8.
  14. ^Loken, Marty (January 9, 1968). "Planners Endorse Kayak Point Refinery".The Seattle Times. p. 1.
  15. ^"Refinery Backers Win Round Over Kayak Point Site".The Seattle Times. February 5, 1968. p. 43.
  16. ^Lane, Bob (May 19, 1968). "Snohomish County Refinery Agreement First of Its Kind".The Seattle Times. p. 20.
  17. ^"Kayak Point Refinery Battle Moved to Court".The Seattle Times. June 25, 1968. p. 25.
  18. ^Lane, Bob (September 23, 1968). "Richfield Refinery Faces New Battle".The Seattle Times. p. 6.
  19. ^"Atlantic Richfield Drops Plan For Refinery at Kayak Point".The Seattle Times. October 28, 1968. p. 1.
  20. ^"Plant to be built near Bellingham".Spokane Daily Chronicle. Associated Press. October 29, 1968. p. 27.
  21. ^Lane, Bob (November 10, 1971). "Plan knocks props from under proposed refinery".The Seattle Times. p. H3.
  22. ^"Rezoning Suit Against Atlantic Richfield Is Continued".The Seattle Times. December 10, 1968. p. 3.
  23. ^Aweeka, Charles (April 22, 1969). "Dismissal Denied In Rezoning Case".The Seattle Times. p. 8.
  24. ^Aweeka, Charles (April 23, 1969). "Judge Voids Snohomish-Tract Rezoning for Oil Refinery".The Seattle Times. p. 35.
  25. ^Lane, Polly (September 1, 1978). "ARCO to begin selling lots for Kayak Point project".The Seattle Times. p. E7.
  26. ^Lane, Polly (January 7, 1979). "Kayak Point proposal to be aired at hearing".The Seattle Times. p. D2.
  27. ^"ARCO rejected on Kayak Point plans".The Seattle Times. January 10, 1979. p. B6.
  28. ^Lane, Polly (April 12, 1979). "Arco tract up in the air after refusal".The Seattle Times. p. B3.
  29. ^abNewnham, Blaine (May 31, 2001)."Kayak Point offers quintessential Northwest golf experience".The Seattle Times. p. D11. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  30. ^"Kayak Point Land Bought For Park".The Seattle Times. July 28, 1968. p. 35.
  31. ^"Outlook brighter for park proposals".The Seattle Times. May 26, 1971. p. E14.
  32. ^"Committee OK's $366,553 for central-waterfront park".The Seattle Times. May 24, 1972. p. A10.
  33. ^"Oil firm's gift: $250,000 for Kayak Pt. park".The Seattle Times. March 2, 1973. p. B1.
  34. ^abBray, Kari (March 8, 2017)."County seeks input on upgrades at popular Kayak Point Park".The Everett Herald.Archived from the original on August 2, 2017. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  35. ^Arney, Sarah (June 14, 2017)."Planning the future of Kayak Park".Stanwood-Camano News. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  36. ^Hansen, Jordan; Dunn, Kayla J. (June 15, 2023)."Kayak Point to close this summer for $20M park renovation".The Everett Herald.Archived from the original on June 15, 2023. RetrievedJune 15, 2023.
  37. ^Van Sistine, Ta'Leah (January 21, 2024)."Snohomish County hopes to reopen popular Kayak Point by summer".The Everett Herald.Archived from the original on January 22, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 22, 2024.
  38. ^Berry, Ryan (June 14, 2024)."Kayak Point reopens ahead of schedule".The Everett Herald. RetrievedJune 15, 2024.
  39. ^Van Sistine, Ta'Leah (June 6, 2024)."Kayak Point, the county's most popular park, to reopen by next weekend".The Everett Herald.Archived from the original on June 15, 2024. RetrievedJune 15, 2024.
  40. ^Johannessen, Jim; MacLennan, Andrewa (April 15, 2008).Kayak Point Restoration Feasibility and Design Phase 2 (with Sea Level Rise Assessment)(PDF) (Report). Snohomish County Parks and Recreation. p. 8.Archived(PDF) from the original on August 2, 2017. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  41. ^abBeers, Carole (April 24, 1991). "Kayak Point Park presents 660 acres for picnicking, overnight camping, hiking".The Seattle Times. p. F3.
  42. ^"Kayak Point County Park". Snohomish County Parks and Recreation.Archived from the original on August 2, 2017. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  43. ^O'Harran, Kristi (November 4, 2004)."Kayak Point cabin makes a cozy retreat".The Everett Herald.Archived from the original on August 2, 2017. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  44. ^"Kayak Point Regional County Park". Snohomish County Parks and Recreation.Archived from the original on August 3, 2017. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  45. ^"Kayak Point Golf Course". Snohomish County Parks and Recreation. RetrievedAugust 2, 2017.
  46. ^Smith, Craig (July 29, 1998). "Golf Notebook: Kayak Point operator eyes deal with Palmer".The Seattle Times. p. C6.
  47. ^Caldwell, Evan (February 25, 2020)."Local group proposes reopening Kayak Point Golf Course as new disc golf operation starts".Stanwood Camano News. RetrievedDecember 9, 2020.
  48. ^Davis-Leonard, Ian (July 8, 2019)."County requesting plans to reimagine Kayak Point Golf Course".The Everett Herald.Archived from the original on March 4, 2021. RetrievedDecember 9, 2020.
  49. ^Patterson, Nick (June 25, 2021)."Kayak Point becomes destination for disc golf".The Everett Herald. RetrievedJune 25, 2021.

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kayak_Point_County_Park&oldid=1284338853"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp