Thejugular venous pressure (JVP, sometimes referred to asjugular venous pulse) is the indirectly observed pressure over thevenous system via visualization of theinternal jugular vein. It can be useful in the differentiation of different forms ofheart andlung disease.Classically three upward deflections and two downward deflections have been described.

The patient is positioned at a 45° incline. The head is gently turned to the left, and the rightexternal jugular vein should be identified which may be pulsatile and the filling level noted.[1] If the external jugular vein is pulsatile it is a reliable indicator of jugular venous pressure, however if it is not pulsatile it may contain a valve or be kinked, in which case it will not provide an accurate measure of jugular venous pressure. The JVP represents right atrial pressure, which in a healthy person should be between 2 – 8 cm.[2] The JVP is measured from the level of the right atrium, however as it is impractical to determine the level of the right atrium, the position of thesternal angle is used as a surrogate, which is assumed to be 4 cm above the level of the right atrium. Hence the filling level of the jugular vein should be no more than 4centimetres above the vertical height of thesternal angle.[3] This may not be accurate in individuals at extremes of body habitus. A pen-light can aid in discerning the jugular filling level by providing tangential light.[4]
The JVP is easiest to observe if one looksalong the surface of thesternocleidomastoid muscle, as it is easier to appreciate the subtle movement relative to the neck when looking from the side (as opposed to looking at the surface at a 90-degree angle).[citation needed] The internal jugular vein is typically not able to be visualised directly, rather the pulsations that are transmitted through to the sternocleidomastoid muscle are. Both the left and right jugular veins can be used to examine JVP, however the right side is preferably used due to having a more direct connection to the right atrium. It is helpful to turn the head gently to one side for better exposure, but avoid turning the neck excessively as it will lead to tension in the sternocleidomastoid muscle and skin making it difficult to visualise the pulsations.
If the JVP is not visible with the patient at 45°, the JVP may be either be severely elevated to beyond the level of the ear, in which case the patient should be sat up to 90° and re-examined. Alternatively, the JVP may be below the level of the clavicle, in which case the patient can be laid flat and re-examined. Finally, it may be difficult to appreciate the JVP in a small number of patients due to anatomy and body habitus.
Pulses in the JVP are rather hard to observe, but trained cardiologists do try to discern these as signs of the state of theright heart.
The JVP and carotid pulse can be differentiated several ways:[citation needed]

The jugular venous pulsation has a multiphasic waveform and will typically appear as biphasic on examination.
A classical method for quantifying the JVP was described by Borst & Molhuysen in 1952.[5] It has since been modified in various ways. Avenous arch may be used to measure the JVP more accurately.[citation needed]
This sign is used to determine which waveform you are viewing. Feel the radial pulse while simultaneously watching the JVP. The waveform that is seen immediately after the arterial pulsation is felt is the 'v wave' of the JVP[citation needed].
The termhepatojugular reflux was previously used, as it was thought that compression of the liver resulted in "reflux" of blood out of thehepatic sinusoids into theinferior vena cava, thereby elevating right atrial pressure and visualized as jugular venous distention. The exact physiologic mechanism of jugular venous distention with a positive test is much more complex and the commonly accepted term is nowabdominojugular test.[6]
The abdominojugular test was shown to correlate best with thepulmonary arterial wedge pressure. Furthermore, patients with a positive response had lower leftventricular ejection fractions and stroke volumes, higher left ventricular filling pressure, higher mean pulmonary arterial, and higher right atrial pressures.[7][better source needed]
The abdominojugular test, when done in a standardized fashion, correlates best with the pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, and therefore, is probably a reflection of an increased central blood volume. In the absence of isolated right ventricular failure, seen in some patients with right ventricular infarction, a positive abdominojugular test suggests a pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 15 mm Hg or greater.[7]
An elevated JVP is the classic sign of venous hypertension (e.g. right-sidedheart failure). JVP elevation can be visualized asjugular venous distension, whereby the JVP is visualized at a level of the neck that is higher than normal. The jugular venous pressure is often used to assess thecentral venous pressure in the absence of invasive measurements (e.g. with acentral venous catheter, which is a tube inserted in the neck veins). A 1996systematic review concluded that a high jugular venous pressure makes a high central venous pressure more likely, but does not significantly help confirm a low central venous pressure. The study also found that agreement between doctors on the jugular venous pressure can be poor, calling into question its reliability as a clinical decision-making tool.[8] Similarly, a 2016 study examined the use of JVP measurements by clinical examination in the evaluation of central venous pressure in patients with heart failure.[9] This study found that JVP examination was not consistent with actual central venous pressures, such that it was unreliable both for ruling in and ruling out heart failure. JVP measurement was especially unreliable in patients with high body fat. Additionally, it was noted that clinicians seemed to "extrapolate" JVP measurements from other, more easily examinable findings (like lung auscultation, body weight, heart rate, brachial blood pressure, and chest radiography findings).[citation needed]
The paradoxical increase of the JVP with inspiration (instead of the expected decrease) is referred to as theKussmaul sign, and indicates impaired filling of the right ventricle. The differential diagnosis of Kussmaul's sign includesconstrictive pericarditis,restrictive cardiomyopathy,pericardial effusion, and severe right-sided heart failure.[citation needed]
Certain wave form abnormalities, includecannon a-waves, or increased amplitude 'a' waves, are associated with AV dissociation (third degree heart block), when the atrium is contracting against a closed tricuspid valve, or even inventricular tachycardia. Another abnormality, "c-v waves", can be a sign oftricuspid regurgitation. The absence of 'a' waves may be seen inatrial fibrillation.[10]
An exaggerated "y" wave or diastolic collapse of the neck veins from constrictive pericarditis is referred to asFriedreich's sign.[11][12]
| Abnormality | Causes |
|---|---|
| Raised JVP, normal waveform |
|
| Raised JVP, absent pulsation | |
| Large 'a' wave (increased atrial contraction pressure) |
|
| Cannon 'a' wave (atria contracting against closed tricuspid valve) |
|
| Absent 'a' wave (no unifocal atrial depolarisation) |
|
| Large 'v' wave |
|
| Absent 'x' descent |
|
| Giant c–v wave |
|
| Prominent 'x' descent |
|
| Slow 'y' descent | |
| Prominent & deep 'y' descent |
|
| Parodoxical JVP (Kussmaul's sign: JVP rises with inspiration, drops with expiration) |
|