Josef Pieper | |
|---|---|
| Born | (1904-05-04)4 May 1904 |
| Died | 6 November 1997(1997-11-06) (aged 93) |
| Education | |
| Education | University of Berlin University of Münster |
| Philosophical work | |
| Era | 20th-century philosophy |
| Region | Western philosophy |
| School | Thomism Christian philosophy |
| Main interests | Philosophy of religion |

Josef Pieper (German:[ˈpiːpɐ]; 4 May 1904 – 6 November 1997)[1] was a German Catholicphilosopher and an important figure in the resurgence of interest in the thought ofThomas Aquinas in early-to-mid20th-century philosophy. Among his most notable works areThe Four Cardinal Virtues: Prudence, Justice, Fortitude, Temperance;Leisure, the Basis of Culture; andGuide to Thomas Aquinas (published in England asIntroduction to Thomas Aquinas).
Pieper studiedphilosophy,law, andsociology at the universities of Berlin and Münster. After working as a sociologist and freelance writer, he became ordinaryprofessor ofphilosophical anthropology at theUniversity of Münster, and taught there from 1950 to 1976. As professor emeritus, he continued to provide lectures until 1996.[2] With his wife Hildegard, he translatedC.S. Lewis'sThe Problem of Pain into German (Über den Schmerz, 1954) with an afterword, "On Simplicity of Language in Philosophy". A symposium to celebrate his 90th birthday was held in Münster in May 1994, with the papers read there published asAufklärung durch Tradition ("Enlightenment through Tradition") in 1995. In 2010, a symposium was held in Paderborn on "Josef Pieper's and C. S. Lewis's View of Man", with papers published inWahrheit und Selbstüberschreitung ("Truth and Self-Transcendence").[3]
His views are rooted primarily in theScholasticism ofThomas Aquinas and in the teachings ofPlato. In 60 years of creative work as a philosopher and writer, Pieper explicated the wisdom tradition of the West in clear language, and identified its enduring relevance.
Recent champions of Pieper's philosophy in the English-speaking world includeJames V. Schall,S.J., professor of political philosophy atGeorgetown University, Joseph T. Lienhard, S.J., professor of theology atFordham University, Steven Cortright atSt. Mary's College of California, Francis Grabowski, professor of English atRogers State University, and from within the Muslim community,Hamza Yusuf ofZaytuna College, Berkeley, California.[4][citation needed]
In his autobiography, Pieper wrote:
"I was not in Germany when the Nazis took over. I had cast my vote against it early on the morning of 3 March 1933 in the polling of the Central Railway Station in Munich, before traveling south with my fiancée and her friend."[5]
The philosopherKurt Flasch sees Pieper's 1934 writing as support forNazi social policy; however, Flasch qualifies that Pieper's attempts to act as a "bridge builder" betweenCatholicism and the Nazi state are visible "only in his world of thought of the years 1933 and 1934".[6] In the early phase of theNazi regime, Pieper "[clarified] the ethically correct intention of National Socialism and ... explained to hesitant Catholics the parallel social teaching of the encyclicalQuadragesimo of 1929" and thus at his place of work inMünster in community with the aforementioned scholars served to "talk the Münster Catholics out of their distance from National Socialism". Pieper agreed withSchmaus andLortz that "Hitler and the Pope ... had the same main enemies", namely "liberalism on the right, this hereditary evil of modernity which underlies the current crisis, and Bolshevism on the left, before Hitler saved us". "He, Pieper, proves to the Catholic Christians that Hitler's and the Pope's goals are identical." Pieper's book,Das Arbeitsrecht des Neuen Reiches und die Enzyklika Quadragesimo anno ("The Labor Law of the New Reich and the Encyclical Quadragesimo Anno") (1934), says: "The very far-reaching, in individual points astonishing correspondences between the model of the encyclical and the socio-political goals and realizations of the National Socialist state should be clarified so emphatically, so that the Catholic Christians outside the bridge that connects the ideas of Christian social teaching with National Socialist social policy, the core of the domestic policy of the Third Reich."[7] Hans Maier wrote in a review that Flasch, in his writing on Pieper, refutes the assumption that Pieper was a "pioneer of National Socialism". Pieper gave the Third Reich "no impetus, no suggestions", but was initially deceived by Nazi attempts to hide the criminal character of that state.[8]
However, immediately after the publication of the bookDas Arbeitsrecht des Neuen Reiches und die Enzyklika Quadragesimo, Pieper recognized his mistake and asked the publisher on 21 July 1934 and again on 22 September 22, to refrain from a new edition.[9] According to Hans Maier, Pieper quickly distanced himself fromDas Arbeitsrecht and his positive assessment of Nazi social policy.[10] In his work on thecardinal virtue ofbravery, also published in 1934, Pieper, referring to the situation in Germany, was already warning of a "destructive counterattack of ... irrationalism" that "declares war on the primacy of ... the Spirit itself."[11] Pieper also criticized the "conversion of society into a community" operated by the Nazis. Because of the increasingly visible rejection of Nazism in his writings, Pieper was eventually banned from publishing. The philosopher Fernando Inciarte therefore classifies Pieper as an opponent of National Socialism, who, however, did not cross the line into open resistance and therefore "never claimed the honor of being considered an opposition member". However, Pieper's writings have been shown to have influenced members of the opposition such asDietrich Bonhoeffer.[12]
In 1981 Pieper received theBalzan Prize in Philosophy; in 1987 he was awarded the State Prize of the state of Nordrhein-Westfalen. In 1990, he received the Ehrenring of the Görres-Gesellschaft.