Jan Swammerdam | |
|---|---|
 A 19th-century fantasy portrait, based on the face of Hartman Hartmanzoon from Rembrandt'sThe Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp. No genuine portrait is known. | |
| Born | (1637-02-12)February 12, 1637 |
| Died | February 17, 1680(1680-02-17) (aged 43) Amsterdam, Dutch Republic |
| Alma mater | University of Leiden |
| Known for | Describingerythrocytes, work onentomology |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Entomology |
Jan orJohannes Swammerdam (February 12, 1637 – February 17, 1680) was a Dutch biologist and microscopist. His work oninsects demonstrated that the various phases during the life of an insect—egg,larva,pupa, and adult—are different forms of the same animal. As part of his anatomical research, he carried out experiments onmuscle contraction. In 1658, he was the first to observe and describered blood cells. He was one of the first people to use themicroscope in dissections, and his techniques remained useful for hundreds of years.
%2c_Afb_010001000416.jpg)
Johannes Swammerdam was baptized on 15 February 1637 in theOude Kerk Amsterdam. His father Jan (or Johannes) Jacobsz (-1678) was anapothecary and an amateur collector ofminerals, coins,fossils, andinsects from around the world. In 1632 he married Baartje Jans (-1660) inWeesp.[1] The couple lived across theMontelbaanstoren, near the harbour, the headquarter and the warehouses of theDutch West India Company where an uncle worked. Some of their children were buried in theWalloon church, likewise Jan himself (who never married) and his father.[2]
As a youngster, Swammerdam had helped his father to take care of hiscuriosity collection. Despite his father's wish that he should studytheology Swammerdam started to study medicine in 1661 at theUniversity of Leiden. He studied under the guidance ofJohannes van Horne andFranciscus Sylvius. Among his fellow students wereFrederik Ruysch,Reinier de Graaf,Ole Borch,Theodor Kerckring,Steven Blankaart,Burchard de Volder,Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhaus andNiels Stensen. While studying medicine Swammerdam started his own collection of insects.[3]
In 1663 Swammerdam moved to France to continue his studies. It seems together with Steno.[4] He studied for one year at the ProtestantUniversity of Saumur, under the guidance ofTanaquil Faber. Subsequently, he studied in Paris at the scientific academy ofMelchisédech Thévenot. 1665 he returned to theDutch Republic and joined a group of physicians who performeddissections and published their findings. Between 1666 and 1667 Swammerdam concluded his study of medicine at the University of Leiden; he received his doctorate in medicine in 1667 under van Horne for his dissertation on the mechanism ofrespiration, published under the titleDe respiratione usuque pulmonum.[3]
Together with van Horne, he researched theanatomy of theuterus. The result of this research was published under the titleMiraculum naturae sive uteri muliebris fabrica in 1672. Swammerdam accused Reinier de Graaf of taking credit of discoveries he and Van Horne had made earlier regarding the importance of the ovary and its eggs.He used waxen injection techniques and a single-lensmicroscope made byJohannes Hudde.
While studying medicine Swammerdam had started to dissect insects and after qualifying as a doctor, he focused on them. His father pressured him to earn a living, but Swammerdam persevered and in late 1669 publishedHistoria insectorum generalis ofte Algemeene verhandeling van de bloedeloose dierkens (The General History of Insects, or General Treatise on little Bloodless Animals). The treatise summarised his study of insects he had collected in France and around Amsterdam. He countered the prevailingAristotelian notion that insects were imperfect animals that lacked internal anatomy.[3] Following the publication his father withdrew all financial support.[5] As a result, Swammerdam was forced, at least occasionally, to practice medicine in order to finance his own research. He obtained leave at Amsterdam to dissect the bodies of those who died in the hospital.[6]
At university Swammerdam engaged deeply in the religious and philosophical ideas of his time. He categorically opposed the ideas behindspontaneous generation, which held that God had created some creatures, but not insects. Swammerdam argued that this would blasphemously imply that parts of the universe were excluded from God's will. In his scientific study, Swammerdam tried to prove that God's creation happened time after time, and that it was uniform and stable. Swammerdam was much influenced byRené Descartes, whose natural philosophy had been widely adopted by Dutch intellectuals. InDiscours de la Methode Descartes had argued that nature was orderly and obeyed fixed laws, thus nature could be explained rationally.[7]
Swammerdam was convinced that the creation, or generation, of all creatures obeyed the same laws. Having studied the reproductive organs of men and women at university he set out to study the generation of insects. He had devoted himself to studying insects after discovering that thekingbee was indeed aqueen bee. Swammerdam knew this because he had found eggs inside the creature. But he did not publish this finding. Swammerdam corresponded withMatthew Slade andPaolo Boccone and was visited byWillem Piso,Nicolaas Tulp andNicolaas Witsen.[8] He showedCosimo III de' Medici, accompanied by Thévenot, another revolutionary discovery. Inside acaterpillar the limbs and wings of thebutterfly could be seen (now called theimaginal discs).
When Swammerdam publishedThe General History of Insects, or General Treatise on little Bloodless Animals later that year he not only did away with the idea that insects lacked internal anatomy but also attacked the Aristotelian notion that insects originated from spontaneous generation and that their life cycle was ametamorphosis.[9] Swammerdam maintained that all insects originated from eggs and their limbs grew and developed slowly. Thus there was no distinction between insects and so-calledhigher animals. Swammerdam declared war on "vulgar errors" and the symbolic interpretation of insects was, in his mind, incompatible with the power of God, the almighty architect.[10]Swammerdam, therefore, dispelled the seventeenth-century notion of metamorphosis —the idea that different life stages of an insect (e.g.caterpillar andbutterfly) represent different individuals[11] or a sudden change from one type of animal to another.[12]
Swammerdam suffered a crisis of conscience; his father repudiated the study of insects. Having believed that his scientific research was a tribute to the Creator, he started to fear that he may be worshipping theidol of curiosities. In 1673 Swammerdam briefly fell under the influence of theFlemishmysticAntoinette Bourignon. His 1675 treatise on themayfly, entitledEphemeri vita, included devout poetry and documented his religious experiences.[5] Swammerdam found comfort in the arms of Bourignon's sect inNordstrand, Germany. Swammerdam traveled to Copenhagen to visit the mother ofNicolaus Steno, but was back in Amsterdam in early 1676. In a letter toHenry Oldenburg, he explained "I was never at any time busier than in these days, and the chief of all architects has blessed my endeavors".[13]
His religious crisis only interrupted his scientific research briefly and until his premature death aged 43, he worked on what was to become his main work. It remained unpublished when he died in 1680 and was published asBybel der natuure posthumously in 1737 by the Leiden University professorHerman Boerhaave.[14][15] Convinced that all insects were worth studying, Swammerdam had compiled an epic treatise on as many insects as he could, using the microscope and dissection. Inspired byMarcello Malpighi, inDe Bombyce Swammerdam described the anatomy ofsilkworms,mayflies,ants,stag beetles,cheese mites,bees and many other insects. His scientific observations were infused by hisbelief in God, the almighty creator.[16] Swammerdam's praise of thelouse went on to become a classic:
Herewith I offer you the Omnipotent Finger of God in the anatomy of a louse: wherein you will find miracle heaped on miracle and see the wisdom of God clearly manifested in a minute point.[7]
Since ancient times it had been asserted that the queen bee was male, and ruled the hive. In 1586Luis Mendez de Torres had first published the finding that the hive was ruled by a female, but Torres had maintained that she produced all other bees in the colony through a "seed". In 1609Charles Butler had recorded the sex of drones as male, but he wrongly believed that they mated with worker bees. InBiblia naturae the first visual proof was published that his contemporaries had mistakenly identified thequeen bee as male.[17] Swammerdam also provided evidence that the queen bee is the sole mother of the colony.[18]
Swammerdam had engaged in five intense years ofbeekeeping. He had found thatdrones were masculine, and had nostinger. Swammerdam identified the worker bees as "naturaleunuchs" because he was unable to detectovaries in them, but described them as nearer to the nature of the female. Swammerdam had produced a drawing of the queen bee's reproductive organs, as observed through the microscope.[19] The drawing Swammerdam produced of the internal anatomy of the queen bee was only published in 1737.[18] His drawing of thehoneycomb geometry was first published inBiblia naturae, but had been referenced byGiacomo Filippo Maraldi in his 1712 book.[20] Details of Swammerdam's research on bees had already been published elsewhere because he had shared his findings with other scientists in correspondence. Among others, Swammerdam's research had been referenced byNicolas Malebranche in 1688.[13]
InBiblia naturae Swammerdam's research on muscles was published. Swammerdam played a key role in the debunking of theballoonist theory, the idea that 'moving spirits' are responsible for muscle contractions. The idea, supported by the Greek physicianGalen, held that nerves were hollow and the movement of spirits through them propelled muscle motion.[21]René Descartes furthered the idea by basing it on a model ofhydraulics, suggesting that the spirits were analogous to fluids or gasses and calling them 'animal spirits'.[21] In the model, which Descartes used to explainreflexes, the spirits would flow from theventricles of the brain, through the nerves, and to the muscles to animate the latter.[21] According to this hypothesis, muscles would grow larger when they contract because of the animal spirits flowing into them. To test this idea, Swammerdam placed severed frog thigh muscle in an airtight syringe with a small amount of water in the tip.[21] He could thus determine whether there was a change in the volume of the muscle when it contracted by observing a change in the level of the water (image at right).[21] When Swammerdam caused the muscle to contract by irritating the nerve, the water level did not rise but rather was lowered by a minute amount; this showed that no air or fluid could be flowing into the muscle.[21] The idea that nerve stimulation led to the movement had important implications forneuroscience by putting forward the idea that behavior is based on stimuli.[21]
Swammerdam's research had been referenced before its publication byNicolas Steno, who had visited Swammerdam in Amsterdam. Swammerdam's research concluded after Steno had published the second edition ofElements of Myology in 1669, which is referenced inBiblia naturae.[22] A letter from Steno to Malpighi from 1675 suggests that Swammerdam's findings on muscle contraction had caused his crisis of consciousness. Steno sent Malpighi the drawings Swammerdam had done of the experiments, saying "when he had written a treatise on this matter he destroyed it and he has only preserved these figures. He is seeking God, but not yet in the Church of God."[23]
Together with his father he collected 6,000 objects in 27 drawer cabinets. Swammerdam'sHistoria insectorum generalis was widely known and applauded before he died. Two years after his death in 1680 it was translated into French and in 1685 it was translated into Latin.John Ray, author of the 1705Historia insectorum, praised Swammerdam' methods, they were "the best of all".[13] Though Swammerdam's work on insects and anatomy was significant, many current histories remember him as much for his methods and skill with microscopes as for his discoveries. He developed new techniques for examining, preserving, and dissecting specimens, including wax injection to make viewing blood vessels easier. A method he invented for the preparation of hollow human organs was later much employed in anatomy.[6] He had corresponded with contemporaries across Europe and his friendsGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz andNicolas Malebranche used his microscopic research to substantiate their own natural and moral philosophy.[13] But Swammerdam has also been credited with heralding the natural theology of the 18th century, were God's grand design was detected in the mechanics of theSolar System, theseasons,snowflakes and the anatomy of the human eye.[13] An English translation of his entomological works by T. Floyd was published in 1758.[6]
No authentic portrait of Jan Swammerdam is extant nowadays.[24] The portrait shown in the header is derived from the paintingThe Anatomy Lesson of Dr Tulp byRembrandt and represents the leading Amsterdam physician Hartman Hartmanzoon (1591–1659).
| Aspects ofinsects in culture |
| ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pioneers | |||||||||||||||
| Concerns | |||||||||||||||
| Categories, templates | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
| Artists | |
| People | |
| Other | |
