James IV (17 March 1473 – 9 September 1513) wasKing of Scotland from 11 June 1488 until his death at theBattle of Flodden in 1513. He inherited the throne at the age of fifteen on the death of his father,James III, at theBattle of Sauchieburn, following a rebellion in which the younger James was the figurehead of the rebels. James IV is generally regarded as the most successful of theStewart monarchs of Scotland. He was responsible for a major expansion of theScottish royal navy, which included the founding of two royal dockyards and the acquisition or construction of 38 ships, including theGreat Michael, the largest warship of its time.
WhenHenry VIII of England invadedFrance in 1513 as part of theHoly League, James chose theAuld Alliance with the French over the "Perpetual Peace" with the English, and led a large army across the border into England. James and many of his nobles were killed at theBattle of Flodden on 9 September 1513, fighting against the English forces ofCatherine of Aragon, Henry VIII's wife and regent. James was the last monarch inGreat Britain to be killed in battle and was succeeded by his sonJames V.
Born on 17 March 1473 atStirling Castle, James was the eldest son ofKing James III andMargaret of Denmark.[2] Asheir apparent to the Scottish crown, he becameDuke of Rothesay at birth. James probably spent most of his infancy and youth at Stirling Castle in the care of his mother, along with his two younger brothers,James andJohn. In 1478, Queen Margaret was officially entrusted with the custody and education of the Duke of Rothesay.[3] Not much is known about James's early life, but it is known that he received a good education from Archibald Whitelaw, thehumanist scholar andsecretary of state, and thetheologianJohn Ireland, under the direction of his mother. In addition toScots, James became fluent inLatin andSpanish, also learnedFrench,German,Flemish andItalian, and was the last Scottish monarch known to have spokenGaelic.[4] The surviving exchequer records show that Prince James was taken from Stirling to visitEdinburgh in the summers of 1474 and 1479, and that his nurse in the 1470s was Agnes Turing, the wife of an Edinburgh burgess.[5]
In October 1474, James III agreed a peace treaty withEdward IV of England, the foundation of which was to be a marriage between Prince James and Edward's daughter,Cecily of York, when they both reached marriageable age.[6][7] The treaty marked the beginning of James III's pursuit of friendship with England, a policy which was unpopular in Scotland. This policy would see further prospective English brides proposed for his son:Anne de la Pole (niece ofRichard III of England) in 1484 and an unspecified daughter of Edward IV in 1487.[7] James III was an unpopular king: he faced two major rebellions during his reign, and alienated members of his close family, especially his younger brother,Alexander, Duke of Albany. James III's unpopular pro-English policy rebounded badly upon him when the peace with England broke down in 1480. This led to the invasion of Scotland andcapture of Berwick in 1482 byRichard, Duke of Gloucester, in the company of the Duke of Albany. When James III attempted to lead his army against the invasion, his army rebelled against him and he was briefly imprisoned by his own councillors. During James III's imprisonment, Albany visited Queen Margaret and the young Duke of Rothesay at Stirling Castle to discuss the crisis with them.[8]
For the nine-year-old heir to the throne, the crisis of 1482 had shattered the calm of his youthful existence at Stirling.[5] Following the death of Margaret of Denmark in July 1486, Prince James may have viewed the king's deliberate promotion of his second son — the 1486 and 1487 proposals to marry him to one of the younger daughters of Edward IV of England, and the conferring on him of thedukedom of Ross in January 1488 — with apprehension. There is no explanation of why James III seemed to be favouring his second son over his heir, although it has been suggested that James III's suspicion and distrust of his heir arose from the young Duke of Rothesay's meeting with the Duke of Albany during the 1482 crisis.[9]
On 2 February 1488, the Duke of Rothesay departed from Stirling Castle, without the king's knowledge. This defection saw the start of another major rebellion against James III, led by the earls ofAngus andArgyll, and theHome and Hepburn families.Pitscottie claimed that the prince defected as he had heard that his father was approaching Stirling with a large army to imprison him.[10] The prince became the figurehead of the rebels, who claimed that they had removed him from Stirling to protect him from his vindictive father, who had surrounded himself with wicked Anglophile counsellors.[11] Like Prince James, many of the rebels also feared for their safety if James III continued to rule.[12] Matters came to a head on 11 June 1488, when the royal and rebel armies fought outside Stirling at theBattle of Sauchieburn. The royal army was defeated and James III was killed during the battle, though several later sources claimed that the Duke of Rothesay had forbidden any man to harm his father.[13][14] James IV bore intense guilt for the indirect role which he had played in the death of his father. He decided to dopenance for his sin, constantly wearing an iron belt around his waist, next to the skin, to which he added weight every year throughout his life.[15][16]
Copy of contemporary portrait of James by Jacques Le BoucqArms of James IV
The victorious rebels moved swiftly to consolidate their power, and on 12 June, only a day after Sauchieburn, the new king issued his first charter. Edinburgh and Stirling castles were secured, as were the late king's money and jewels, and the rebel leaders were rewarded with offices of state and posts in the royal household.[17] James IV's coronation took place on 24 June 1488 atScone Abbey. TheArchbishop of St Andrews,William Scheves, a favourite of James III, did not officiate during the coronation ceremony, with the new king being instead crowned byRobert Blackadder,Bishop of Glasgow.[18] A few days later, James IV attended the burial of his father atCambuskenneth Abbey, a scene later portrayed in James IV'sbook of hours.[18] The new king also hosted his maternal great-uncle,Gerhard VI, Count of Oldenburg, who arrived atLeith with a Danish fleet in August, and remained in Scotland until the following year.[18]
James IV received Warbeck in Scotland in November 1495. The attraction of Warbeck to James lay in the recognition of Warbeck's claim to the English throne byMaximilian, King of the Romans,Ferdinand II andIsabella I of Spain (theCatholic monarchs),Philip, Duke of Burgundy, andMargaret of York. Embracing Warbeck's cause would give James IV international leverage to seek European alliances, and threatening Henry VII with Warbeck would surely produce a much more attractive offer of alliance from the English king.[22] As Ferdinand and Isabella were negotiating an alliance with Henry VII, James knew that Spain would help him in his struggles with England in order to prevent the situation escalating into war with France. Spanish ambassadors arrived in Edinburgh, and laterPedro de Ayala was established as a resident ambassador during the crisis.[23]
In September 1496, James IV invaded England alongside Warbeck, destroying Tillmouth, Duddo, Branxton and Howtel towers, andTwizell Castle andHeaton Castle. However, the army quickly retreated when resources were expended,[24] and hoped-for support for Perkin Warbeck inNorthumberland failed to materialise. The Scottish army left on 25 September 1496 when an English army commanded byLord Neville approached from Newcastle.[25] When news of this invasion reachedLudovico Sforza,Duke of Milan, on 21 October 1496, he wrote to his ambassador in Spain, to request the Spanish monarchs make peace between England and Scotland. The peace mission was entrusted to the Spanish ambassador in Scotland,Pedro de Ayala.[26] Later, wishing to be rid of Warbeck, James IV provided a ship called theCuckoo and a hired crew under a Breton captain,Guy Foulcart.[27] Horses were hired for 30 of Perkin's companions to ride to the ship atAyr on 5 July 1497, where Perkin sailed to Ireland.[28] In August 1497, James invaded England once more and laid siege toNorham Castle with a huge artillery train, includingMons Meg, a huge medieval bombard or cannon.[29]
James IV's use of war as a forceful extension of his diplomacy with England, andHenry VII's realisation of how vulnerable theAnglo-Scottish border was, saw Henry treat for peace with James. TheTreaty of Ayton was signed on 30 September 1497, agreeing to a seven-year truce between Scotland and England. Shipping and trade were to be conducted according to the 1464Treaty of York, and Border wardens on either side were given new powers to execute cross-border murderers after 20 days detention and punish thieves caught red-handed, and neither king should harbour the other's rebels.[30] The Spanish monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella were appointed to arbitrate future disputes and unresolved issues such as redress for damages caused by the recent invasions.[31] The possibility was also raised of strengthening the peace between both kingdoms with the marriage of James IV to Henry VII's eldest daughter,Margaret.[32]
Following several years in which the Treaty of Ayton held, Scottish and English commissioners met atRichmond Palace on 24 January 1502. They agreed the marriage between James IV and Margaret, with adowry of £35,000Scots, and a peace treaty between the two kingdoms.[32] Under the terms of theTreaty of Perpetual Peace, there was to be "good, real and sincere, true, sound, and firm peace, friendship, league and confederation, to last all time coming" between England and Scotland, neither king or their successors were to make war against the other, and if either king broke the treaty, thePope wouldexcommunicate him.[33] In a ceremony at the altar ofGlasgow Cathedral on 10 December 1502, James confirmed the Treaty of Perpetual Peace with Henry VII, the first peace treaty between Scotland and England since 1328.[34] The marriage was completed byproxy on 25 January 1503 atRichmond Palace in the presence of the king and queen of England, theEarl of Bothwell standing as proxy for the Scottish king.[35] Margaret left Richmond for Scotland on 27 June and, after crossing the border atBerwick upon Tweed on 1 August 1503, was received atLamberton by the Archbishop of Glasgow and the Bishop of Moray.[36] On 8 August 1503, the marriage of the 30-year-old Scottish king and his 13-year-old English bride was celebrated in person inHolyrood Abbey. The rites were performed byRobert Blackadder,Archbishop of Glasgow andThomas Savage,Archbishop of York.[37][38] Their wedding was commemorated by the gift of theHours of James IV of Scotland, and was portrayed as the marriage ofThe Thrissil and the Rois (the thistle and rose — the flowers of Scotland and England, respectively) by the poetWilliam Dunbar, who was then resident at James's court.[39]
Margaret did not bear her first child until 1507 when she was seventeen.[40] James IV's marriage to Margaret meant that only the future Henry VIII stood between the Scottish king and the English succession, as Henry's lack of an heir made it possible that either James or one of his successors might succeed if theTudors failed to produce heirs.[41] Margaret's first pregnancy resulted in the birth of James, Duke of Rothesay at thePalace of Holyroodhouse in February 1507.[42] However, this heir to the throne died a year later in February 1508.[40] At this point Margaret was already pregnant with a second child, a daughter whose name is unknown, and who was born and died in July 1508.[40] In October 1509, a second son was born and named Arthur, a name recalling Margaret's late brother,Arthur, Prince of Wales, and reminding the still heirless Henry VIII that, if he were unable to produce a legitimate son to succeed him, it might be a son of Margaret Tudor who would succeed.[43]
From the perspective of the new administration in the early 1490s, theWestern Highlands and theHebrides were regarded as a problem area and a threat to the rest of the kingdom.[44] By that period the Lordship of the Isles was fracturing as rivalries inClan Donald disrupted the authority ofJohn of Islay,Lord of the Isles.[44] John was a weak leader whose authority had been damaged in 1476 when he had forfeited theearldom of Ross and his lands inKnapdale andKintyre to James III due to the treasonousTreaty of Westminster he had agreed with Edward IV of England. After this,Ross-shire was continually invaded by the MacDonald islanders. In 1491, Alexander MacDonald ofLochalsh, heir to the lordship of the Isles, attempted to recover the earldom of Ross by raiding Ross-shire in alliance withClan Cameron andClan Chattan.[45] They marched toInverness, where they stormedInverness Castle, and clashed withClan Mackenzie before being routed.[45] In consequence of this insurrection, at a meeting of parliament in Edinburgh in May 1493, the title and possessions ofJohn MacDonald,Lord of the Isles were declared to be forfeited to the Crown.[46] In August 1493, King James made his first expedition to thewestern Highlands. Accompanied by Chancellor Angus,Bishop Elhinstone, theEarl of Bothwell,Lord Home, andSecretary of State Archibald Whitelaw, James IV sailed toDunstaffnage Castle, where the local chiefs, including John MacLean of Lochbuie and John MacIain of Ardnamurchan, made their submissions of loyalty to him.[46] John of Islay surrendered and was brought back to the royal court and given an annual pension of £133 6s 8d.[47][44]
The following year,Sir John MacDonald of Dunnyveg rebelled, and in July the king sailed with an army fromDumbarton toTarbert Castle, before sailing south toDunaverty Castle inKintyre. The royal forces repaired both castles and soon afterwards Sir John was summoned for treason committed in Kintyre.[48] Sir John ignored the summons and continued to reside atIslay, but was later captured by John MacIain of Ardnamurchan and brought to Edinburgh to be hanged for treason.[48] In 1495 King James sailed on his third and final expedition to the Isles to find and reward supporters of the Crown within the forfeited lordship, sailing toMingary Castle, whereLachlan Maclean of Duart, Alan Cameron, and MacNeil of Barra came in to Mingary to submit and offer their allegiance to the king in person, who confirmed them in their lands and offices.[49]
In October 1496, thePrivy Council ordered that the clan chiefs in the region would be held responsible by the king for crimes of the islanders. This act for the governance of the region was unworkable, and after theAct of Revocation of 1498 undermined the chiefs' titles to their lands, resistance to Edinburgh rule was strengthened. James waited atKilkerran Castle atCampbeltown Loch to regrant the chiefs' charters in the summer of 1498. Few of the chiefs turned up.[50] At first,Archibald Campbell, 2nd Earl of Argyll, was set to fill the power vacuum and enforce royal authority, but he met with limited success in a struggle with his brother-in-law,Torquil MacLeod ofLewis.[50]
After this defiance,Alexander Gordon, 3rd Earl of Huntly, was granted Torquil's lands. He raised an army inLochaber and also cleared the tenants of that area, replacing them with his supporters.[51] After the parliament of 1504, a royal fleet sailed north fromAyr to attack theCastle of Cairn-na-Burgh, west ofMull, where it is thought that Maclean of Duart had Domhnall Dubh in his keeping.[52] As progress at the siege was slow, James sent Hans the royal gunner inRobert Barton's ship and then theEarl of Arran with provisions and more artillery. Cairn-na-Burgh was captured by June 1504 but Domhnall Dubh remained at liberty.[53] In September 1507, Torquil MacLeod was besieged atStornoway Castle on Lewis. Domhnall Dubh was captured and imprisoned for 37 years until he was released in 1543 and died in 1545 in Ireland; Torquil MacLeod died in exile in 1511. The Earl of Huntly was richly rewarded for his troubles, a price that James was prepared to pay.[54]
James IV's reign saw a decline in the holding ofparliaments, which was a departure from the practice of previous reigns. While ten meetings of thethree estates were held between 1488 and 1496, there were only three during the remaining seventeen years of the reign, with no parliaments held in the eight years between 1496 and 1504.[55][56] There was also a substantial reduction in the numbers of those attending parliaments as the reign progressed. This development matched that of the English and European monarchies in the playing down of the role of their representative assemblies, and placing more reliance on conciliar government: Edward IV of England only held six parliaments during his twenty-three-year reign, and Henry VII held seven in his twenty-four years on the throne.[57] In France, theEstates General were not summoned again for seventy-six years after 1484.[57]
With the ending of the conflicts with England in 1497, the Crown no longer needed Parliament to grant extraordinary revenue in the form of taxation, with Parliament no longer being summoned with the same regularity as a result.[57] In the decade before 1496, successive parliaments had presided over, or sanctioned, regicide or rebellion, and failed foreign embassies to find the king a bride. With this experience of parliaments, perhaps James IV considered the frequent calling of parliaments inimical to good royal government.[58]
The absence of parliaments between 1496 and 1504 may also have been due to James's discovery of other methods of raising revenue, and his reluctance to summon meetings of the three estates due to their propensity for dissent. The last three parliaments of James IV's reign in 1504, 1506 and 1509 were all called to address the administration of justice and the forfeiture of rebels following further risings in the western Highlands.[59] James IV managed to govern effectively without regular parliaments from 1496 onwards due to his use ofgeneral councils (a sister institution to Parliament) in 1497, 1498, 1502, 1511 and 1512, and the use of greatly enlarged sessions of thePrivy Council in 1508, 1511 and 1513.[60]
Goldunicorns from the reigns of James III (top) and James IV (bottom)
From the beginning of his reign, one of James's objectives was to increase the relatively limited Crown income by extracting larger returns from all available sources of revenue. The king had to fund all government expenses out of his own income, which came from the revenue from Crown lands, and fromburgh customs, mails, tolls and duties. The annual revenues of the Crown from these sources remained constant throughout James's reign (around £5–6,000Scots).[61] However, the king only received a small amount of the income from burgh revenues, as the majority of that income wasalienated to provide annuities to reward numerous nobles and Crown servants.[61]
Taxation imposed by Parliament offered the king greater opportunities to raise income. Between 1488 and 1497, Parliament voted taxation almost annually to support diplomacy and war, including embassies to the continent, the king's naval expeditions to the western Highlands, and the 1496–97 conflicts with England. However, James soon learned that using taxation extensively as a means of generating revenue was likely to provoke resistance without bringing in the sums required. Following the failure to raise the huge sum of £12,000 Scots from the three estates (clergy, nobility and burghs) in 1502–1504 to fund the sending of a naval expedition and a small army to Denmark, no further taxation was imposed until 1512, and even then the tax which brought in almost £7,000 was only imposed on the clergy.[62]
James's annual income increased remarkably between 1497 and 1513, due to several sources of revenue. In 1497 he received a substantial windfall from the death of Archbishop William Scheves of St Andrews.[63] James appointed his younger brother, theDuke of Ross, to fill the vacant see ofSt Andrews, bringing the highest office of the Scottish church within the royal family, with the appointment generating an annual income of around £2,500 for the Crown from the revenues of the archbishopric.[64] Although Bishop Elphinstone protested against this scandalous appointment, it was a shrewd move by the king as it removed any potential dynastic threat which his legitimate younger brother might pose in the future.[65] James also appointed Ross asabbot ofHolyrood (1498),Dunfermline (1500) andArbroath (1503). These offices, in combination with his appointment to thechancellorship in 1501, gave the Duke of Ross the highest status after the king.[65] Following the death of the Duke of Ross in 1504, James IV appointed his eleven-year-old illegitimate son,Alexander, as archbishop, thereby ensuring that the Crown would continue to receive the revenues of St Andrews.[64]
In 1498, James IV reached the age of twenty-five and was entitled to make a formalact of revocation of all grants made by him during his minority. Although James could — in theory — cancel all grants of lands and offices which had been made since hisaccession, the purpose of the revocation was only to assert royal authority by re-granting lands and offices surrendered to the Crown, and raise thousands of pounds in revenue, as their holders paid compensation to theTreasurer to receive confirmation of their holdings.[63] The payment of Margaret Tudor's dowry between 1503 and 1505 also brought in a relatively meagre £10,000 sterling.[66] By the end of the reign the Treasurer's annual receipts had increased — due to feudal payments made to the Crown by the holders of land, and judicial fines for criminal offences — from around £4,500 in 1496–1497 to a huge £28,000 by 1512.[67] When these receipts are added to income from ecclesiastical properties and the rental income from Crown lands, James IV may have received a total income of around £44,500 by 1513, although by that time there was an annual deficit of around £7,000.[67]
James IV took a close interest in the development of theRoyal Scots Navy, viewing a strong fleet as a means of protecting Scottish shipping, gaining international prestige, and providing him with an outlet to pursue foreign policies in alliance with either England or France. In the course of his reign, James commissioned or acquired a total of at least thirty-eight ships. His naval building programme was large, especially so for the ruler of a small kingdom. Naval spending was by far the greatest single item of royal expenditure in the later years of his reign.[68] In the early years, the annual average spent on ships was about£140 Scots. By the early 1510s it was £8,710.[69]
In 1491, James determined to address the many attacks on Scottish shipping in the vicinity of theFirth of Forth from the English and other pirates. He erected fortresses atLargo andInchgarvie, and made extensive repairs toDunbar Castle, to defend the firth from hostile attacks.[70] In 1493 James ordered everyburgh to provide the Crown with a boat of 20 tons, and to conscript able men to crew them.[71] The forfeiture of the Lordship of the Isles was followed by James's naval expeditions toArgyll and theHebrides in 1492–1495 and 1498, and in May 1502 James sent a fleet of five ships and 2,000 troops under the command ofJames Hamilton, 1st Earl of Arran toDenmark to aid his uncle,John, King of Denmark, who had appealed to James for aid during theDano-Swedish War.[72] The expedition was a failure, arriving too late to helpQueen Christina holdStockholm.[73] The Danish expedition seems to have concentrated James IV's mind on naval expansion: shipwrights and craftsmen were recruited from across Scotland, and from France,Flanders, Denmark andSpain; timber for shipbuilding was felled inLanarkshire and theHighlands and imported from Norway and France. James was also responsible for the founding of newdockyards on the Forth atNewhaven in 1504, andPool of Airth in 1506. The king also wore the insignia of anAdmiral — awhistle and a chain of gold.[74]
TheMargaret, built atLeith and launched in 1506, weighed around 600–700 tons, was armed with fourfalconets, acannon and twenty-one other guns, and cost the king an estimated £8,000 — more than a quarter of his annual income.[75] ThecarrackGreat Michael was the largest warship of its time.[76][77] Built at Newhaven and launched in 1511, it measured between 150 feet (46 m) and 180 feet (55 m) in length, weighed around 1,000 tons, and was supposed to have cost around £30,000.[77] Armed with twenty-four bronzecannons and threebasilisks, it marked a shift in design as it was designed specifically to carry a main armament of heavy artillery.[76][78] The navy's core of four large ships (theTreasurer, theMargaret, theJames and theMichael) were supported by a number of smaller craft and privately ownedmerchant ships.[74]
Like his grandfather and father, James IV also took an enthusiastic interest inartillery, and from early in his reign he added to James III's French train of artillery.[79] In 1507 he shot some "great guns" at Holyrood Abbey with three of his gunners, and the following year it is recorded that he held shooting matches with handculverins in the great halls of Holyrood Palace and Stirling Castle. James also took a culverin to stalk deer in the park of Falkland Palace and shot at sea birds with one from a row boat off theIsle of May.[80] James IV imported guns, shot and powder from France, and in 1511 the royal gun foundry was moved from Stirling Castle to Edinburgh Castle, where Scots, Dutch, German, and French gunmakers worked under the master gunner, Robert Borthwick, in what was the earliest significant foundry for producing large bronze guns in theBritish Isles.[81][79] Their output included guns for theMichael, and theSeven Sisters, a set ofcannons captured by the English at Flodden.[82] James's artillery also included arquebus à croc (mounted heavyarquebuses),hand culverins andfalconets.[81][79]
James was both highly intelligent and well educated. In July 1498, Spanish ambassador,Pedro de Ayala, reported to Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile:
The King is 25 years and some months old. He is of noble stature, neither tall nor short, and as handsome in complexion and shape as a man can be. His address is very agreeable. He speaks the following foreign languages:Latin, very well;French,German,Flemish,Italian, andSpanish; Spanish as well as the Marquis, but he pronounces it more distinctly. He likes, very much, to receive Spanish letters. His own Scots language is as different from English as Aragonese from Castilian. The King speaks, besides, the language of the savages who live in some parts of Scotland and on the islands. It is as different from Scots as Biscayan is from Castilian. His knowledge of languages is wonderful. He is well read in the Bible and in some other devout books. He is a good historian. He has read many Latin and French histories, and profited by them, as he has a very good memory. He never cuts his hair or his beard. It becomes him very well.[85][4]
James also ensured that the very best education was given to his illegitimate son, Alexander, who was tutored byErasmus inPadua,Siena andRome.[86] James IV allegedly conducted alanguage deprivation experiment[87] in which two children were sent to be raised by a mute woman alone on the island ofInchkeith, to determine if language was learned or innate.[88][89]
James IV had a wide range of intellectual interests and took an interest in practical and scientific matters. He patronised the establishment of Scotland's firstprinting press,Chepman and Myllar Press, in 1507, and granted theIncorporation of Surgeons and Barbers of Edinburgh aroyal charter in 1506.[90] James was also interested indentistry, an interest which began in 1503 when the king summoned a"barbour" to extract one of his teeth for the sum of 14 shillings.[91][92] In 1504, he sought more practical experience of dentistry and purchased two goldtoothpicks suspended from a chain, and "ane turcase [pincer] to tak out teith".[93] It is recorded that James pulled two teeth from one of his own barber-surgeons, for which the king paid him 14 shillings, and also triedbloodletting on patients, and treating and dressing ulcer wounds.[94] He also took an interest in other sciences which are now less creditable, establishing analchemy workshop at Stirling Castle, where alchemistJohn Damian looked for ways to turn base metals into gold.[95] The project consumed quantities ofmercury,golden litharge, andtin. A goldsmith,Matthew Auchinleck, provided the alchemists with astill made ofsilver.[96] Damian also researched aviation and undertook a failed experiment to fly from the battlements of Stirling Castle, an event whichWilliam Dunbar satirised in two separate poems.[97]
James poured large amounts of money into the construction or remodelling of several royal residences.[98] He commissioned the construction between 1501 and 1505 of thePalace of Holyroodhouse.[98] The impetus for the work probably came from his marriage to Margaret Tudor, which took place inHolyrood Abbey in August 1503. James also commissioned the construction ofFalkland Palace inFife between 1501 and 1513, on a site to the south of Falkland Castle.[98] At Stirling Castle, James commissioned the construction of the great hall and a new royal lodging (the present-day King's Old Building), the remodelling of thechapel royal, and the reconstruction of the principal defences on the southern and eastern sides of the castle. He also commissioned the construction of the great hall atEdinburgh Castle, rebuilding atLinlithgow Palace,Rothesay Castle, andDunbar Castle, and furnished his palaces withtapestries.[98]
Entry in the Register of The Privy Seal of Scotland, 15 September 1507, which established Scotland's first printing press (National Records of Scotland)
The first evidence ofwhisky production in Scotland comes from an entry in theExchequer Rolls for 1494 where malt is sent "To Friar John Cor, by order of the king, to make aquavitae", enough to make about 500 bottles.[99] James IV reportedly had a great liking for whisky, and in 1506 the town ofDundee purchased a large amount of whisky from the Guild of Barber-Surgeons, which held the monopoly on production at the time.[99]
James IV's court and royal household were cosmopolitan, containing assorted foreign peoples including French, Italian and German minstrels, Flemish metalworkers, and Spanish dancers.[100] The court also hosteda number of Africans, some working as servants or (possibly) slaves, but others appearing to have been courtiers, invited guests or musicians.[101][102][103] In 1504, two African women, who were later christened as Margaret andHelen or Elen More, are mentioned in theAccounts of the Lord High Treasurer of Scotland.[104][105][106] The women were visible in court life and Helen More became the presumed subject of the poem "Of Ane Blak-Moir" byWilliam Dunbar describing an African woman offered as a prize in jousting tournaments.[107][108] The poem is critical of her appearance and status as a black woman in a predominantly white court and country.[109][110]
An African drummer referred to as the "More taubronar" travelled with James around Scotland.[105][111] "Peter theMoor" was an African man whose travel and expenses were paid for by royal funds.[112] He first appears in records in 1500 and some historians believe he and other Africans arrived in Scotland initially as "human booty" captured by Scottish privateers from Portuguese cargo ships.[113] Records show that Peter the Moor was a companion to King James in his various trips across the country, appearing in the records until August 1504, when he received a large and final payment.[113] Historian Imtiaz Habib argues that Peter was "clearly a favourite companion to the monarch" and was "well accepted" into the court culture.[113] The status of the Africans in James IV's court is contested, with some historians taking the view that the two women Elen and Margaret More were "enjoying in the royal service a benevolent form of ... black slavery".[114] Other historians emphasise that these individuals were treated as "court curiosities" rather than being in control of their own lives,[107] and were most likely enslaved to some extent.[108]
James was granted the titleProtector and Defender of the Christian Faith in 1507 byPope Julius II, and in April 1507 at Holyrood Abbey he received theBlessed sword and hat.[115][116][92] In 1508 James IV made plans to go on pilgrimage toJerusalem, after a journey toVenice, before sailing from there toJaffa in a Venetian ship.[116][117] James's uncle, King John of Denmark, protested against his projected pilgrimage to Jerusalem in a letter written to the Archbishop of Glasgow in July 1507, remarking that the Scottish king should think first of his young wife and his country.[118] Archbishop Blackadder left Scotland in February 1508 to set out on pilgrimage to theHoly Land, probably as a reconnaissance for the king's pilgrimage. Blackadder's death on 28 July 1508, presumably from an infectious illness, on board a ship from Venice to Jaffa appears to have convinced James IV of the inadvisability of sailing to Jerusalem.[118] In 1507–1508,Louis XII of France was endeavouring to have James renew the Franco-Scottish alliance, and James wrote to Louis raising the idea of a joint Franco-Scottish crusade to the Holy Land.[118][119] James's maintenance of Scotland's traditional good relations with France occasionally created diplomatic problems with England. In April 1508,Thomas Wolsey was sent to Scotland discuss Henry VII's concerns over rumours that James would renew theAuld Alliance with France. Wolsey found "there was never a man worse welcome into Scotland than I. ... They keep their matters so secret here that the wives in the market know every cause of my coming."[120] Wolsey was unable to persuade James to abandon the Auld Alliance, but Anglo-Scottish relations nonetheless remained stable until the death of Henry VII in 1509.[121]
Relations between Scotland and England deteriorated with the accession ofHenry VIII of England in April 1509. Unlike his father, Henry had no interest in appeasing James, because his focus was on France.[122] Henry VIII also believed that whatever the implications of the Treaty of Perpetual Peace, the King of Scotland owed him obedience.[123] At the core of the increasing hostility between James and Henry was James IV's position in relation to the English throne. From his accession in 1509 until the birth of his daughterMary in 1516 — apart from the short life of his sonHenry, Duke of Cornwall in 1511 — Henry was childless and had no recognised heir. Through his wife Margaret, James IV was an heir to the English throne. When Margaret gave birth to a son in October 1509, the baby was christened Arthur, not after Margaret and Henry's elder brother, but to advertise the Scottish claim to theArthurian legend and as a British name for a potential British king.[123] Then on 10 April 1512, Margaret gave birth to another boy, to be called James. This boy, the futureJames V, was still alive and well a year later, while his uncle continued to remain childless.[124]
As a result of theItalian Wars, in October 1511Pope Julius II created aHoly League againstFrance.[125] The new alliance included the Papacy, Venice, Spain and the Holy Roman Empire. In November 1511, England also joined the League, with Henry VIII deciding to use the occasion as an excuse to conclude the Treaty of Westminster — a pledge of mutual aid against the French — withFerdinand II.[126][127] Relations between the Scottish and English kings continued to deteriorate with the passing of the Subsidy Act by the English parliament in 1512, with the act preamble declaring that the King of Scotland was "the very homage and obedience of right to your Highness [Henry VIII]".[128] This assault on Scotland's independence was a reassertion of claims to English overlordship which had been implicitly revoked on a permanent basis by the 1502 Treaty of Perpetual Peace. The English justification of the claim was that James IV had broken the peace, and was preparing for war. This was completely specious as James had by then not even acceded toLouis XII's urgent requests to renew the Franco-Scottish alliance. In theory, there was a "court of appeal" which had the power to adjudicate such differences between the parties to the treaty: the Papacy. But Pope Julius II was now an ally of England, and far from being an honest broker.[128] James IV had so far refused the French king's requests to renew the Franco-Scottish alliance as Louis XII was not offering a sufficient benefit in return. However, Henry VIII's increasingly belligerent stance effectively ensured that the Auld Alliance would be renewed.[129] James gave formal agreement to the renewal of the alliance in July 1512, but this was a gesture rather than a commitment of active support against England, and it was still possible that Scotland would remain neutral in any Anglo-French war.[130]
Before his death in February 1513, Pope Julius II had been persuaded by the Archbishop of York,Christopher Bainbridge, to impose aninterdict as a general censure against the Scottish people. He also threatened toexcommunicate the Scottish king if he was judged to have broken the treaty with England, and granted Bainbridge the power to excommunicate James is such circumstances.[130] James IV sentAndrew Forman, theBishop of Moray, to Rome to try and persuade the new Pope,Leo X, to countermand the interdict, but without success. Leo sent a letter to James, threatening him with ecclesiastical censure for breaking peace treaties, and in the summer of 1513 the king was excommunicated by Bainbridge. On 30 June, Henry VIII invaded France, his troops defeating a French army at theBattle of the Spurs, before capturingThérouanne andTournai.[131] James IV summoned the Scottish army, and sent a naval fleet of twenty-two vessels, including theGreat Michael, to join the ships of Louis XII of France.[132] The fleet, commanded byJames Hamilton, 1st Earl of Arran, departed from theFirth of Forth on 25 July and sailed around the north of Scotland. It first created a diversion inIreland, where it attacked the English royal garrison atCarrickfergus and burnt the town, with support fromHugh Duff O'Donnell. The Scottish fleet then joined the French atBrest, from where it might cut the English army in France's line of communication across theEnglish Channel. However, the fleet was so badly delayed that it played no part in the war; James had sent most of his experienced artillerymen with the expedition, a decision which was to haveunforeseen consequences for his land campaign.[133]
The western side of the battlefield ofFlodden, looking south-south-east towards Branxton Hill. The Scottish army advanced down the ploughed field, the English down the grassy field in the foreground. The modern boundary between the two fields marks the position of the marsh encountered by the Scots.
Led by James IV, the Scottish army, numbering some 42,000 men, and including a large artillery train, crossed theRiver Tweed into England nearColdstream around 22 August.[134][135] The Scottish troops were unpaid and were only required byfeudal obligation to serve for forty days. Once across the border, a detachment turned south to attackWark on Tweed Castle, while the bulk of the army followed the course of the Tweed downstream to the northeast to invest the remaining border castles.[136]Norham Castle was taken and partly demolished, and the army then moved south, capturing the castles ofEtal andFord.[137] On 8 September the Scottish army took up position against an English army commanded byThomas Howard, Earl of Surrey onBranxton Hill inNorthumberland. James's army, somewhat reduced from the original 42,000 by sickness and desertion, still amounted to about 34,000, outnumbering the English force by 8,000. The Scottish infantry had been equipped with 18-foot-long (5.5 m)pikes by their French allies; a new weapon which had proved devastating in continental Europe, but required training, discipline and suitable terrain to use effectively.[138] The Scottish artillery, consisting mainly of heavysiege guns, included five great curtals and two greatculverins, together with foursakers and six great serpentines.[139] The English infantry were equipped with traditionalpolearms, mostlybills which were the favoured pole arm of the English infantry. There was also a large contingent of well-trainedarchers armed with theEnglish longbow.[140] The English artillery consisted of lightfield guns of rather old-fashioned design, typically firing a ball of only about 1 pound (0.45 kg), but easy to handle and capable of rapid fire.[141]
James IV began the battle with an artillery duel, but his heavy guns did not perform well, contemporary accounts putting this down to the difficulty for the Scots of shooting downhill, another factor being that their guns had been hastily sited instead of the careful emplacement which was usually required for such heavy weapons, slowing their rate of fire. This allowed the light English guns to turn a rapid fire on the massed ranks of Scottish infantry.[142] The Scottish left, underLord Home and theEarl of Huntly, then advanced downhill towards the English army. The Scots had placed their most heavily armoured men in the front rank so that the English archers had little impact. The outnumbered English formation was forced back and elements of it began to run off before Surrey ordered the intervention of Dacre's light horsemen. The eventual result was a stalemate in which both sides stood off from each other and played no further part in the battle.[143]
In the meantime, James had observed Home and Huntly's initial success and ordered the advance of the next formation in line, commanded by the earls ofErrol,Crawford andMontrose. At the foot of Branxton Hill, they encountered an unforeseen obstacle, an area of marshy ground, made worse by days of heavy rain.[144] As they struggled to cross the waterlogged ground, the Scots lost the cohesion and momentum on which pike formations depended for success. Once the line was disrupted, the long pikes became an unwieldy encumbrance, and the Scots began to drop them. Reaching for their side-arms ofswords andaxes, they found themselves outreached by the English bills in the close-quarter fighting that developed.[145] It is unclear whether James had seen the difficulty encountered by the earls formation, but he followed down the slope regardless, making for Surrey's formation. James has been criticised for placing himself in the front line, thereby putting himself in personal danger and losing his overview of the field. He was, however, well known for taking risks in battle, and it would have been out of character for him to stay back. Encountering the same difficulties as the previous attack, James's men nevertheless fought their way to Surrey's bodyguard. The fierce fighting continued, centred on the contest between Surrey and James. As other English formations overcame the Scottish forces they had initially engaged, they moved to reinforce the Earl of Surrey. An instruction to English troops that no prisoners were to be taken explains the exceptional mortality amongst the Scottish nobility.[146] James IV himself was killed in the final stage of the battle, having fought to within a spear length of the Earl of Surrey.[147]
The Battle of Flodden was one of Scotland's worst military defeats: the loss of not only a popular and capable king but also a large portion of the political community, was a major blow to the realm. James IV's son,James V, was crowned three weeks after the disaster at Flodden but was only one year old, and his minority was to be fraught with political upheaval.
The body of James IV was found the following day amongst the thousands of Scottish dead on the battlefield, having been identified by two Scottish soldiers captured by the English, and byThomas Dacre, 2nd Baron Dacre.[148][149] James's lower jaw had been pierced by an arrow, an injury which would have disabled him sufficiently for the attacking English soldiers to move in and slash him with theirbills, almost severing his left hand and slicing his throat open.[150] James's body was taken toBerwick-upon-Tweed, where it was embalmed, sealed in a lead-lined coffin, and transported toSheen Priory inSurrey, where it remained unburied. James's slashed and bloodstainedsurcoat was sent to Henry VIII (then on campaign in France) by his queen,Catherine of Aragon.[151]
As James had been excommunicated prior to his death, he could not be buried in consecrated ground until the Pope remitted the sentence. Although Henry VIII obtained a dispensation fromPope Leo X on 29 November 1513 to have the Scottish king buried inSt Paul's Cathedral inLondon, James IV remained unburied.[152] His coffin remained above ground atSheen Priory, as the decades passed and the priory was dissolved in 1539 during theEnglish Reformation, becoming the secularised estate ofHenry Grey, 1st Duke of Suffolk. During the reign ofEdward VI of England the antiquarianJohn Stow was shown the coffin, lying in a store room: "since the dissolution of the House I have been shewed the same body (as was affirmed) so lapped in lead throwne into an old wast roome, amongst old timber, stone, lead, and other rubble".[152] James IV's coffin was rediscovered during the reign ofElizabeth I of England when it was opened and his body became a plaything, John Stow writing that "Workmen there for their foolish pleasure hewed off his head."[152][153] The body disappeared, its last-known resting place at Sheen now lying under the fairway of the 14th hole of theRoyal Mid-Surrey Golf Course.[154] Elizabeth I's master glazier, Lancelot Young, is said to have kept James's "sweetly scented" head (still identifiable as James by its red hair and beard) as a curio at his home inWood Street in the City of London, before giving it to thesexton of the local church,St Michael's.[152][153] The head was then buried in a charnel pit in St Michael's churchyard.[152] The church was later demolished, and the site redeveloped many times.[154][155]
Rumours persisted that James IV had survived and was seen riding back across the Tweed; that he had gone on pilgrimage to Jerusalem; or that his body was buried in Scotland. Two castles in theBorders are claimed as his resting place. The legend ran that, before the Scottish charge at Flodden, James had ripped off his surcoat to show his nobles that he was prepared to fight as an ordinary man-at-arms. Border legend claimed that during the battle, fourHome horsemen or supernatural riders swept across the field snatching up the king's body, or that the king left the field alive and was killed soon afterwards. In the 19th century, when the medieval well ofHume Castle was being cleared, the skeleton of a man with a chain round his waist was discovered in a side cave; but this skeleton has since disappeared. Another version of this tale has the skeleton discovered at Hume a few years after the battle and re-interred at Holyrood Abbey. The same story was told forRoxburgh Castle, with the skeleton there discovered in the 17th century. Yet another tradition is the discovery of the royal body at Berry Moss, nearKelso. Fuelling these legends,Robert Lindsay of Pitscottie, writing in the 1570s, claimed that a convicted criminal offered to showJohn Stewart, 2nd Duke of Albany the king's grave ten years after the battle, but Albany refused.[156]
The Arrow of the North (1906) by R. H. Forster. The novel mainly depictsNorthumberland in the reigns of Henry VII and Henry VIII. It covers the Flodden campaign of theAnglo-Scottish Wars and the finale depicts the battle that ended James IV's life.[160]
The Crimson Field (1916) by Halliwell Sutcliffe, which also covers the Anglo-Scottish Wars. It features James IV and ends with a full account of the Battle of Flodden;[160]
King Heart (1926) byCarola Oman. The story depicts Scotland in the time of James IV. The king himself is depicted in an epilogue featuring the Battle of Flodden;[158]
Gentle Eagle (1937) by Christine Orr, an account of the king's life;
Sunset at Noon (1955) by Jane Oliver, an account of the king's life;
Chain of Destiny (1964) byNigel Tranter, an account of the king's life, from Sauchieburn to Flodden;
Falcon (1970) byA.J. Stewart, an unusual work by an author claiming to be a reincarnation of the king;
^Henry VIII owned a "picture of Jacobe kinge of Scottes with an hawke on his fist",Maria Hayward,The 1542 Inventory of Whitehall Palace, 2 (Illuminata Press, 2004), p. 96 no. 799.
^Accounts of the Lord High Treasurer of Scotland, vol. 1 (Edinburgh, 1877), pp. 299–300.
^Bain, Joseph, ed.,Calendar of Documents relating to Scotland, 1357–1509, vol. 4 (Edinburgh, 1888), pp. 418–419 no. 35 (there dated as if "1497"): David Dunlop (1991), 108–109 and fn., quotes another version, and cites four more, noting mistaken date in Bain (1888).
^Calendar State Papers Milan (London, 1912), no. 514.
^Accounts of the Lord High Treasurer of Scotland, vol. 3 (Edinburgh, 1901), pp. 99, 135, 202, 206, 209, 330, 340, 341, 353, 355, 365, 379, 382, 389, 409: vol. 2 (1900), p. 362.
^abcHabib, Imtiaz H.Black lives in the English archives, 1500–1677 imprints of the invisible. Aldershot, England. pp. 28–29.ISBN978-1-315-56946-8.OCLC1081357683.
^"Scotland",The Crusades – An Encyclopedia, p. 838
^Macdougall, Norman,James IV, (1997), p. 254;Letters James IV, SHS (1953) pp. xlii, 107–111; Pinkerton, John,History of Scotland from the Accession, vol. 2 (1797), p. 449, prints Wolsey's letter in full and attributes it to Nicolas West.
^Aikman, James,Buchanan's History of Scotland, vol. 2 (1827), 259 note, quoting Stow'sSurvey of London on St Michael, Cripplegate ward.
^Adam de Cardonnel,The Edinburgh Magazine, vol. 4, August (1786), p. 112, andNumismata Scotiae, (1786), p. 83, note both legends: Pitscottie,History of Scotland, Glasgow, (1749), p. 214;Spencer, Nathaniel,The Complete English Traveller, (1772), p. 575;Archaeologia Aeliana, vol. 3, (1859), p. 228.
^Alison Weir,Britain's royal families: the complete genealogy (London: Pimlico, 2002), pp. 241–242.
.jpg)
.jpg)
_by_Hugo_van_der_Goes.jpg)
_-_2004-Feb-06_-_Looking_SSE_from_the_monument.jpg)
