Jakobids are anorder of free-living,heterotrophic,flagellareukaryotes in the supergroupExcavata. They are small (less than 15 μm), and can be found in aerobic and anaerobic environments.[3][4][5] The order Jakobida, believed to bemonophyletic, consists of only twenty species at present, and was classified as a group in 1993.[3][5][6] There is ongoing research into themitochondrial genomes of Jakobids, which are unusually large and bacteria-like, evidence that Jakobids may be important to the evolutionary history of eukaryotes.[4][7]
Molecular phylogenetic evidence suggests strongly that Jakobids are most closely related toHeterolobosea (Percolozoa) andEuglenozoa.[8]
Jakobids have two flagella, inserted in the anterior end of the cell, and, like other members of orderExcavata, have a ventral feeding groove and associatedcytoskeleton support.[9] The posterior flagella has a dorsal vane and is aligned within the ventral groove, where it generates a current that the cell uses for food intake.[7][9] Thenucleus is generally in the anterior part of the cell and bears anucleolus. Most known Jakobids have onemitochondrion, again located anteriorly, and different genera have flattened, tubular, or absentcristae. Foodvacuoles are mostly located on the cell posterior, and in most Jakobids theendoplasmic reticulum is distributed throughout the cell.[6]
Jakobids are widely dispersed, having been found in soil, freshwater, and marine habitats, but generally not common.[4][7][6][10] However,environmental DNA surveys suggest that Stygiellidae are abundant in anoxic marine habitats.[6][11] Some are capable of surviving hypersaline and anoxic environments, though the Histionids have only been found in freshwater ecosystems, where they attach themselves to algae or zooplankton.[6] Outside of obligate sessile species, many species of jakobids can attach temporarily to surfaces, using either of the two flagella or the cell body itself.[11]
All known Jakobids are heterotrophic suspension feeders.[4][6] Their primary prey is generally considered to be bacteria, though one species has been observed eating extremely small (< 1 μm) eukaryotic cells.[5][12] Jakobids are generally slow swimmers, with low clearance rates relative to similar organisms.[6]
No study has suggested Jakobids might be pathogenic or toxic.[6]
Since Jakobids have no current commercial use, most research into Jakobids has focused on their evolutionary significance. Themitochondrial DNA of Jakobids is the most bacteria-like of all known eukaryotic mitochondrial DNA, suggesting that Jakobid mitochondrial genomes might approximate the ancestral mitochondrial genome.[6]
Jakobid mitochondrial DNA is substantially different from most other eukaryotes, especially in terms of the number of genes (nearly 100 in some species) and bacteria-like elements within their genomes.[5][6] Nine of the genes have never been found in eukaryotic mitochondrial DNA. Uniquely, Jakobid mitochondrial genomes code for bacteria-typeRNA polymerase, as opposed to typical eukaryotic mitochondrialRNA polymerase, referred to as “phage-type”, which appears to be viral in origin.[6] This does not necessarily mean that Jakobids are basal to the phylogeny of eukaryotes. While Jakobid mitochondria have genetic features that seem to have developed from bacteria, and apparently lack phage-type RNA, it is possible that other eukaryotic clades lost their bacterial features independently.[13]
Several proposed possibilities might explain the bacterial features of Jakobid mitochondrial DNA. One is that Jakobids diverged very early from the rest of the eukaryotes. This hypothesis depends on whether or not Jakobids are indeed basal to all living eukaryotes, but there is no evidence yet to support that suggestion.[6]
Another hypothesis is that the phage-type RNA polymerase moved from one eukaryote group to another vialateral gene transfer, replacing the bacteria-type enzyme, and simply did not reach the Jakobids. This would not depend on Jakobids being basal to eukaryotes as a whole, but has not been widely studied.[6]
A third possibility is the reverse of the others, suggesting that the phage-type RNA polymerase is the basal one. Under this scenario, Jakobids acquired their bacteria-type RNA polymerase much more recently and that then spread via lateral gene transfer.[6] However, the gene arrangement of Jakobid mitochondrial DNA suggests an ancestral origin of bacteria-type RNA polymerase over a more-recent divergence.[5][6]
One of the proposed scenarios suggests that the common ancestor of eukaryotes had two mitochondrial RNA polymerases, both phage-type and bacteria-type, and Jakobids lost their phage-type polymerase while the rest of the eukaryotes lost the bacteria-type, possibly several times.[6][14] Such a model eliminates the need for Jakobids to be truly basal. One study proposed that the phage-type and bacteria-type polymerases, when present in the same mitochondrion, served different functions, much in the way that the organelles of land plants have two different RNA polymerase enzymes that transcribe different genes.[6]
^Cavalier-Smith T (1997). "Amoeboflagellates and Mitochondrial Cristae in Eukaryote Evolution: Megasystematics of the New Protozoan Subkingdoms Eozoa and Neozoa".Archiv für Protistenkunde.147:237–258.
^abcO'Kelly, Charles J. (1993). "The Jakobid flagellates: structural features of Jakoba, Reclinomonas, and Histonia and implications for the early diversification of eukaryotes".Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.40 (5):627–636.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb06120.x.S2CID85938682.
^abcLara, Enrique; Chatzinotas, Antonis; Simpson, Alastair G. B. (2006). "Andalucia (n. gen.)—the Deepest Branch Within Jakobids (Jakobida; Excavata), Based on Morphological and Molecular Study of a New Flagellate from Soil".Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.53 (2):112–120.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00081.x.PMID16579813.S2CID19092265.
