Multiple iwans and tiled domes of the 16th-century Persian-styleMir-i-Arab madrasa,Bukhara, Uzbekistan
Aniwan (Persian:ایوان,eyvān, alsoromanized asivan orivān/īvān,Arabic:إيوان,’īwān)[1][2][3] is a rectangular hall or space, usually vaulted, walled on three sides, with one end entirely open. The formal gateway to the iwan is calledpishtaq, aPersian term for a portal projecting from the facade of a building, usually decorated withcalligraphy bands,glazed tilework, andgeometric designs.[4][5] Since the definition allows for some interpretation, the overall forms and characteristics can vary greatly in terms of scale, material, or decoration.
Iwans are most commonly associated withIslamic architecture; however, the form is pre-IslamicIranian in origin and was invented much earlier and fully developed inMesopotamia around the third century CE, during theParthian period.
Iwan is a Persian word that was subsequently borrowed into other languages such asArabic andTurkish.[6] TheNew Persian form iseyvān and its etymology is unclear.[7]
A theory by scholars likeErnst Herzfeld andWalter Bruno Henning proposed that the root of this term isOld Persianapadāna, but this is no longer taken for granted.[8][6] The wordapadāna appears in what modern scholars call theApadana palace atPersepolis, where kingDarius I declares in an inscription: "I, Darius, ... had thisapadāna constructed". In this case, the word denoted a type of structure, the iwan proper and not the palace.
The term in Old Persian means "unprotected",[citation needed] and the design allows the structure to be open to the elements on one side. At Persepolis, however, theapadāna takes the form of averanda (a flat roof held up by columns rather than a vault) but is still open to the elements on only one side.
By the time of theParthian and theSasanian Empires, the iwan had emerged as two types of structure: the old columned one and a newer vaulted structure; both, however, carrying the same native name of apadana/iwan, because both types are open on one side to the elements.[citation needed]
Ivan is an alternative form of the name, used in Iran, reflecting the Persian pronunciation.[9]
Many scholars, including Edward Keall, André Godard, Roman Ghirshman, and Mary Boyce, discuss the invention of the iwan in Mesopotamia, the area around today'sIraq. Although debate remains among scholars as to how the iwan developed, there is a general consensus that the iwan evolved locally, and was thus not imported from another area.[10][Note 1] Similar structures, known as "pesgams", were found in manyZoroastrian homes inYazd, where two or four halls would open onto a central court; however, it is not known whether these spaces were vaulted.[11]
The feature which most distinctly makes the iwan a landmark development in the history of Ancient Near Eastern architecture is the incorporation of avaulted ceiling. A vault is a ceiling made from arches, known asarcuated, usually constructed with stone, concrete, or bricks.[12][failed verification] Earlier buildings would normally be covered in atrabeated manner, withpost and lintel beams. However, vaulted ceilings did exist in the ancient world before the invention of the iwan, both within Mesopotamia and outside it. Mesopotamian examples includeSusa, where theElamites vaulted many of their buildings withbarrel vaults, andNineveh, where theAssyrians frequently vaulted their passages for fortification purposes.[13]
Outside Mesopotamia, a number of extant vaulted structures stand, including many examples fromAncient Egypt,Rome, and theMycenaeans. For example, the MycenaeanTreasury of Atreus, constructed around 1250 BCE, features a largecorbelled dome.Ancient Egyptian architecture began to use vaulting in its structures after the Third Dynasty, after around 2600 BCE, constructing very early barrel vaults using mud bricks.[14]
Iwans were a trademark of theParthian Empire (247 BC – AD 224) and later theSassanid architecture ofPersia (224–651), later finding their way throughout the Arab andIslamic architecture which started developing in 7th century AD, after the period ofMuhammad (c. 570–632).[15] This development reached its peak during theSeljuki era, when iwans became a fundamental unit in architecture, and later theMughal architecture.[16][17] The form is not confined to any particular function, and is found in buildings for either secular or religious uses, and in both public and residential architecture.
Although some scholars have asserted that the iwan form may have developed under theSeleucids, today most scholars agree that theParthians were the inventors of the iwan.[Note 2][citation needed] One of the earliest Parthian iwans was found at Seleucia (Seleucia-on-the-Tigris), located on theTigris River, where the shift from post-and-lintel construction to vaulting occurred around the 1st century CE.[13] Other early iwans have been suggested at Ashur, where two buildings containing iwan-like foundations were found. The first building, located near the ruins of aziggurat, featured a three-iwan façade.[18] The proximity of the building to a ziggurat suggests that it may have been used for religious preparations or rituals.[18] It could also indicate a palatial building, as it was common for the ziggurat and palace to be situated next to one another in the Ancient Near East. What seems to be a palace courtyard had iwans on each side, which remained a common features well into Islamic times.[19]
The second iwan building is located across a courtyard, and Walter Andrae, a German archaeologist, suggested that it served as an administrative building rather than as a religious center because there is no evidence of inscriptions or wall carvings.[20] Although the absence of inscriptions or carvings does not equate necessarily to a civic function, it was not uncommon for iwans to serve a secular use, as they were frequently incorporated into palaces and community spaces.[21] Other early sites including Parthian iwans includeHatra, the Parthian ruins atDura Europos, andUruk.[22]
TheSasanian Empire also favored the iwan form, and adopted it into much of their architecture; however, they transformed the function. The Parthian iwan led to other spaces, but its primary function served as a room itself. In contrast, the Sasanian iwan served as a grand entranceway to a larger, more elegant space which was usually domed.[23] Both the Parthian and Sasanian iwans were often elaborately decorated with inscriptions and sculpted reliefs including scenes of hunting, vegetal motifs, abstract, geometric patterns, and animal scenes.[24][25] The reliefs’ style shows a blend of influences including other Near Eastern cultures,Roman, andByzantine decorative traditions.[26] For instance, the rock-cut iwan atTaq-i Bustan features Roman style figures, Eastern-inspired vegetal patterns and crenellations, and wide-eyed, stylized Byzantine-esque angels and mosaic interiors.
The most famous example of a Sasanian iwan is theTaq-i Kisra ("Iwan of Khosrau"), part of a palace complex inMada'in, which is the only visible remaining structure of the ancient Sasanian capital ofCtesiphon. It is near the modern town ofSalman Pak,Iraq, on the Tigris River about twenty-five miles south of Baghdad. Construction began during the reign ofKhosrau I after a campaign against the Eastern Romans in 540 AD.[27] The arched iwan hall, open on the facade side, was about 37 meters high 26 meters across and 50 meters long, the largestvault ever constructed at the time.[28] Early photographs and 19th-century drawings show that the remaining part of the hall has reduced since then.
The dating for the Taq-i Kisra has been debated throughout history; however, a variety of documents detailing the arrival of Byzantine sculptors and architects sent by the Byzantine EmperorJustinian, suggest that the correct date for the construction is around 540 CE.[29] The 540 date suggests that the construction of the Taq-i Kisra, and perhaps Justinian's “help” was in response to the victory of Sasanian king Khosrau I overAntioch in 540, which is depicted in the mosaics decorating the interior of the Taq-i Kisra.[29] The Taq-i Kisra was finally demolished for the most part by al-Mansur, who reused the bricks to build his palace complex.[30]
TheTaj Mahal inAgra, India (17th century), uses iwans for both entrances and decorative features.
Islamic art and architecture was also heavily influenced inspired by Roman, Byzantine, and Sasanian designs, both due to the presence of extant examples and contact between cultures. For example, theGreat Mosque of Damascus was built in the early eighth century CE on the site of a Roman Christian church, and incorporates anave-like element with a tall arcade andclerestory. The Sasanian Empire also had a tremendous impact on the development of Islamic architecture; however, there was some overlap between the Sasanians and the Muslims making it difficult at times to determine who was influencing whom.[31] Islamic art and architecture borrowed many Sasanian decorative motifs and architectural forms, including the iwan.
Iwans were used frequently in Islamic non-religious architecture before the twelfth century, including houses, community spaces, and civic structures such as the bridge ofSi-o-Se Pol inIsfahan.[32] Furthermore, Islamic architecture incorporated the Sasanian placement for the iwan by making it a grand entrance to the prayer hall or to a mosque tomb, and often placing it before a domed space.[33] The iwan became common in Islamic religious architecture from the twelfth century onward.[34][35]
Within theIslamic world the iwan was especially important in the architecture ofCentral Asia andGreater Iran, but it was also adopted into the local architectural traditions of other regions. It was highly adaptable and it appears in a variety of contexts and in different configurations.[35] Iwans could be placed along the sides of the interior courtyards of buildings, as they were in manymadrasas, or on the exterior of buildings, as at theTaj Mahal and otherMughal mausoleums.[19][34] Under theAyyubids andMamluks, who ruled Egypt and theLevantine region, it became a common feature of madrasa architecture, although inCairo the vaulted iwans of earlier periods were replaced with flat-roofed iwans in the later Mamluk period.[36][37] Starting in the late 13th and 14th centuries, the wordiwan in Mamluk Egypt itself seems to have been become more restricted, on the one hand, to secular architecture while, on the other hand, it was used in this context to denote large domed structures in addition to vaulted halls.[38] The celebrated monumental throne hall of Sultanal-Nasir Muhammad was thus called theGreat Iwan (al-Iwan al-Kabir) even though its main element was a domed hall, not a vaulted hall.[38]
The courtyard of theGreat Mosque of Isfahan, one of the earliest and most prominent uses of the four-iwan plan in mosque architecture, introduced in the early 12th century[39]
Thefour-iwan plan (cruciform) is one of the most characteristic floor plans of Islamic architecture,[34][40] consisting of four iwans arranged around a central square or rectangular courtyard (durqāʿa orṣaḥn), with the iwans aligned with the central axes of the courtyard. For cruciform mosques andcruciform madrasas, one of the iwans could be oriented towards theqibla (direction of prayer) and include amihrab in order to serve as a prayer space.[41]
The history of the evolution of the standard four-iwan plan has been debated by scholars.[42][35] The four-iwan plan was already in use in palace and temple architecture during both the Parthian and Sasanian periods.[13][19] The earliest known appearance of the four-iwan plan in Islamic architecture is at thedār al-imāra (governor's palace) inKufa, as rebuilt by the Umayyad governor Ziyād ibn Abīh in the late 7th century.[34] It only became common in mosque design in the twelfth century, long after the iwan's invention in the first century CE.[43] The first patrons to incorporate this layout into mosques were the Seljuks, with the first example probably being the Seljuk modifications to theGreat Mosque of Isfahan in the early 12th century, though the layout also appears in other mosques in Iran built or renovated by the Seljuks around the same time.[44][39][35]André Godard attributes both the origin and spread of this design to the appearance of madrasas, which also began with the Seljuks, and he further argued that the layout was derived from the style of domestic architecture indigenous toKhorasan.[42][35] The details of Godard's origin theory have not all been accepted by other scholars,[45] but it is widely-attested that the four-iwan layout spread to other regions with the subsequent proliferation of madrasas across the Islamic world.[46][47][34] In some regions it also spread to other building types such ascaravanserais andbimaristans.[42][34][40]
In the Ayyubid and Mamluk periods of Egypt and Syria the four-iwan plan was prominently used in the architecture of madrasas, with the most monumental example being the massive 14th-centuryMadrasa-mosque of Sultan Hasan.[48][49][50] In some more distant regions, like theMaghreb, the four-iwan plan was not commonly adopted for mosque architecture,[34] but it most likely influenced the axial designs of local madrasas that began underMarinid andHafsid rule.[51][52][34] Inearly Ottoman architecture, particularly as it developed inBursa around the 14th century, the four-iwan plan was adapted in a pragmatic way for religious buildings. In these early Ottoman designs the central court is covered by a dome instead of being open to the sky and one of the four iwans is repurposed as the vestibule of the building.[34]
^Some scholars have claimed that the iwan developed not in Mesopotamia, but inNisaea (the ancient Parthian capital) where it was a result of Greek workers living and working in Parthia. For more information on the Nisaea theory, seeCuratola & Scarcia (2004), p. 57.
^Although the Parthians have been credited with the invention of the first fully developed iwan, there have been claims that some iwan-like forms existed during the Seleucid period in Mesopotamia, namely at Dura Europos. F. E. Brown claimed that an iwan-type hall may have existed in the Temple of Zeus Megistos; however it has been contested. Many scholars believe that any iwans built at the Temple were likely later Parthian additions. Brown argued that the Temple of Zeus Megistos could have been modeled after the triple-iwan terraces at Masjid-I Solaiman or Bard-è Néchandeh, both of which archaeologist Roman Ghirshman claimed to date from the Achaemenid Persians; however, in later excavations Ghirshman discovered that both terraces did not in fact support iwan structures. Susan Downey argues that both the date and the western location make any early iwans at Dura Europos unlikely. Every other iwan from before the Sasanian period is found further east, such as at Hatra, Ashur, or Seleucia-on-the-Tigris. For more information on the claimed Seleucid iwans, seeDowney (1988), pp. 78–85.
^abcdefghiTabbaa, Yasser (2007). "Architecture". In Fleet, Kate; Krämer, Gudrun; Matringe, Denis; Nawas, John; Rowson, Everett (eds.).Encyclopaedia of Islam, Three. Brill.ISBN9789004161658.
^abcdeM. Bloom, Jonathan; S. Blair, Sheila, eds. (2009). "Iwan".The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press. p. 337.ISBN9780195309911.
^abBlair, Sheila; Bloom, Jonathan (2011). "The Friday Mosque at Isfahan". In Hattstein, Markus; Delius, Peter (eds.).Islam: Art and Architecture. h.f.ullmann. pp. 368–369.ISBN9783848003808.
^abM. Bloom, Jonathan; S. Blair, Sheila, eds. (2009). "Architecture".The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press.ISBN9780195309911.
^M. Bloom, Jonathan; S. Blair, Sheila, eds. (2009). "Architecture; V. c. 900–c. 1250; A. Eastern Islamic lands; 2. Iran, c. 1050–c. 1250.".The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press.ISBN9780195309911.
^Bloom, Jonathan M.; Blair, Sheila S., eds. (2009). "Madrasa".The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press.
^Pedersen, J.; Makdisi, G.; Rahman, Munibur; Hillenbrand, R. (2012). "Madrasa".Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill.
^M. Bloom, Jonathan; S. Blair, Sheila, eds. (2009). "Architecture; VI. c. 1250–c. 1500; D. Western Islamic lands.".The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press.ISBN9780195309911.
Behrens-Abouseif, Doris (2007).Cairo of the Mamluks: A History of Architecture and its Culture. The American University in Cairo Press.ISBN9789774160776.
Bier, Lionel (1993). "The Sassanian Palaces and their influence in Early Islam".Ars Orientalis.23:57–66.
Boas, Adrian J. (2010).Domestic Settings: Sources on Domestic Architecture and Day-to-Day Activities in the Crusader States. Brill.ISBN978-90-04-18272-1.
Curatola, Giovanni; Scarcia, Gianroberto (2004).The Art and Architecture of Persia. Translated by Shore, Marguerite. London: Abbeville Press.
Downey, Susan B. (1988).Mesopotamian Religious Architecture: Alexander through the Parthians. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.ISBN9780691035895.
Farrokh, Kaveh (2007).Shadows in the desert: ancient Persia at war. Osprey Publishing.ISBN978-1-84603-108-3.
Gillispie, Charles Coulston; Dewachter, Michel (1987).Monuments of Egypt: the Napoleonic edition. The Complete Archaeological Plates fromLa Description de l'Egypte. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.ISBN9780910413213.
Godard, André (1951). "L'origine de la Madrasa, de la Mosquée et du Caravansérail Àquartre Iwans".Ars Islamica.15.
Keall, Edward J. (1974). "Some thoughts on the early iwan". In Dickran Kouymjian (ed.).Near Eastern Numismatics, Iconography, Epigraphy, and History, Studies in Honor of George C. Miles. Beirut: American University of Beirut. pp. 123–130.
Kurz, Otto (1941). "The Date of the Ṭāq i Kisrā".Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland.73 (1):37–41.doi:10.1017/S0035869X00093138.S2CID162160996.
Marçais, Georges (1954).L'architecture musulmane d'Occident. Paris: Arts et métiers graphiques.
Najm, Ra'ef (2001). "Islamic architectural character of Jerusalem: with special description of the al-Aqṣā and the Dome of the Rock".Islamic Studies.40 (3):721–734.doi:10.52541/isiri.v40i3-4.6110.JSTOR20837154.
Rabbat, Nasser O. (1989).The Citadel of Cairo: a New Interpretation of Royal Mamluk Architecture. Geneva: AKTC.
Sitwell, Sacheverell (1957).Arabesque and Honeycomb. Robert Hale.
Smith, W. Stevenson; Simpson, William Kelly (1998).The Art and Architecture of Ancient Egypt. Pelican history of art. Vol. 14. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.ISBN9780300077476.
Blair, Sheila, and Bloom, Jonathan M.,The Art and Architecture of Islam, 1250–1800, 1995, Yale University Press and Pelican History of Art.ISBN0300064659.
Henri Frankfort, Michael Roaf, Donald Matthews.The Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.ISBN9780300064704