Iwal | |
---|---|
Kaiwa | |
Native to | Papua New Guinea |
Region | Morobe Province |
Native speakers | 2,100 (2011)[1] |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | kbm |
Glottolog | iwal1237 |
Iwal (also calledKaiwa from JabêmKai Iwac "Iwac highlanders") is anAustronesian language spoken by about 1,900 people from nine villages inMorobe Province,Papua New Guinea (Cobb & Wroge 1990). Although it appears most closely related to theSouth Huon Gulf languages, it is the mostconservative member of its subgroup.
The termIwal is an endonym. Cognates in other related languages includeYabemIwac andNumbamiYuwala.
Iwal distinguishes 5 vowels and 16 consonants. Unlike most of its neighboring languages, it distinguishes the lateral /l/ from the trill /r/, the latter derived from earlier *s, as inaru from Proto-Oceanic (POc) *qasu 'smoke',ruru- from POc *susu 'breast', andur from POc *qusan 'rain'. Otherwise it appears to be the most phonologically conservative language in the South Huon Gulf chain (see Ross 1988:154–160). It has retained POc *t as /t/ (not /l/ or /y/) and POc *mw as /mw/ (not /my/ or /ny/), as inmwat 'snake' from POc *mwata.
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
High | i | u | |
Mid | e | o | |
Low | a |
Bilabial | Alveolar | Palatal | Dorsal | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Voiceless stop | p | t | k | |
Voiced stop | b | d | ɡ | |
Nasal | m | n | ŋ | |
Fricative | β | s | (χ) | |
Lateral | l | |||
Rhotic | r | |||
Approximant | w | j |
[χ] is only heard in word-medial position.
Person | Singular | Plural | Dual | Paucal |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st person inclusive | eitit | tutlu | totol | |
1st person exclusive | ayeu ~ au | amei | eilu | eitol |
2nd person | mie | yem | yemlu | yemtol |
3rd person | ei | eisir | sulu | sotol |
Person | Singular | Plural |
---|---|---|
1st person inclusive | a-nd | |
1st person exclusive | a-ngg | a-meimei |
2nd person | a-m | a-im |
3rd person | a-ne | a-s |
Person | Singular | Plural |
---|---|---|
1st person inclusive | -(a)nd | |
1st person exclusive | -(a)ngg | -(a)nggamei |
2nd person | -m (-am > -em) | -(a)nggaim |
3rd person | -Ø (-a > -e) | -s |
Iwaldeictics correlate with first, second, and third person, each of which has a long and a short form. The latter appear to beanaphoric in usage. Deictics also serve to bracketrelative clauses:ete/ebe ...ok/nok/nik. By far the most common brackets areebe ...ok, but if the information in the clause is associated with either speaker or addressee, the brackets are likely to beete ...nik orete ...nok. Deictics may occur either in place of nouns or postposed to nouns, as innalk etok 'that earth/soil'.
Traditional Iwal counting practices started with the digits of the left hand, then continued on the right hand, and then the feet to reach '20', which translates as 'one person'. Higher numbers are multiples of 'one person'. Nowadays, most counting above '5' is done in Tok Pisin; in the Iwal New Testament, all numbers above '5'—exceptbage isgabu '10'—are written with Arabic numerals and most likely read in Tok Pisin.
Numeral | Term | Gloss |
---|---|---|
1 | dongke/ti | 'one' |
2 | ailu | 'two' |
3 | aitol | 'three' |
4 | aivat | 'four' |
5 | bage tavlu | 'hands half/part' |
6 | bage tavlu ano dongke | 'hands half right one' |
7 | bage tavlu ano ailu | 'hands half right two' |
8 | bage tavlu ano aitol | 'hands half right three' |
9 | bage tavlu ano aivat | 'hands half right four' |
10 | bage isgabu | 'hands both/pair' |
15 | bage isgabu be va tavlu | 'hands both and feet half' |
20 | buni amol ti | '[?] person one' |
100 | buni amol bage tavlu | '[?] person hands half [= '5']' |
One unusual feature of Iwal is a small set of bioclassifying prefixes:ei- (POc *kayu) for trees,wer- for edible greens,man(k)- (POc *manuk) for birds,ih- (POc *ikan) for fish.
The basicword order in Iwal is SVO, with (mostly) prepositions, preposed genitives, postposed adjectives and relative clauses. Relative clauses are marked at both ends, and so are some prepositional phrases. Negatives come at the ends of the clauses they negate. There is also a class of deverbal resultatives that follow the main verb (and its object, if any).
ei
tle
chop
eivovo
canoe
butu
down
ei ni- tle eivovo butu
3SG FUT.3SG chop canoe down
'He'll chop down the canoe tree.'
wakas
root
gi-
sov
descend
nalk
earth
aplo
inside
gi-
le
go
ite
not
wakas gi- sov nalk aplo gi- le ite
root 3SG descend earth inside 3SG go not
'The roots did not go deep into the ground.'
in-
di
see
gen
thing
ete
ayeu
ga-
lgum
do
nik
in- di gen ete ayeu ga- lgum nik
3PL see thing DEM 1SG 1SG do DEM
'They'll see the things I have done.'
Verb serialization is very common in Iwal. Within a serial verb construction, all verbs must agree intense and theperfective marker is itself a serialized verb. Negatives come at the ends of the clauses they negate.
ei
tle
chop
butu
down
le
go
tak
stay
kwai
finish
ei ni- tle butu ni- le ni- tak ni- kwai
3SG FUT.3SG chop down FUT.3SG go FUT.3SG stay FUT.3SG finish
'He'll chop it down and it'll go and lie there.'
atob
then
ei
mbweg
stay
wei
be.on
nalk
earth
ite
not
atob ei ni- mbweg ni- wei nalk ite
then 3SG FUT.3SG stay FUT.3SG be.on earth not
'Then he won't sit on the ground.'
gi-
dugdug
roll
gi-
sov
descend
gi-
le
go
gi-
tak
stay
gi- dugdug gi- sov gi- le gi- tak
3SG roll 3SG descend 3SG go 3SG stay
'It rolled on down until it stopped.'
The primary source for this article is Bradshaw (2001), whose copyright holder is Joel Bradshaw, whose contributions here are licensed under theGFDL.