| Iuput I | |
|---|---|
| Reign | uncertain; late 9th century BC |
| Predecessor | Takelot II |
| Successor | Osorkon III, perhaps not immediately |
| Father | possiblyTakelot II |
| Dynasty | Branch of22nd Dynasty |
Iuput I (sometimes renderedAuput,Egyptianjwpwtj mrj-jmn[2] orjȝpwty[3]) was anancient Egyptian king as a member of a branch of the22nd Dynasty in Upper Egypt, sometimes classified as the23rd Dynasty.
The first attestation of King Iuput I comes from a Nile Level Text (no. 26), in which Year 16 of KingPedubast-meryamun is explicitly equated to Year 2 of Iuput-meryamun.[4] This was originally interpreted to indicate that Iuput was the son and co-regent of Pedubast I.[5] Since then, it has been recognized that the apposition of Pedubast I's regnal count with that of another king (such asShoshenq III in Nile Level Text no. 24)[6] is insufficient grounds for positing a co-regency between the kings involved.[7] This, as well as the apparent coincidence between the end of the reign ofTakelot II and the beginning of the reign of Iuput, has led most scholars to reject the previously posited co-regency and relationship between Iuput and Pedubaste.[8] Instead, it now appears that Iuput I succeeded Takelot II and was the latter's son or kinsman, and had preempted Takelot's eldest son, the High Priest of Amun Osorkon B (the future KingOsorkon III-siese), in taking the throne.[9] A damaged passage in an inscription recording the flooding of theLuxor Temple in Year 5 of Osorkon III has been restored as naming his brother Iuput (the name is restored), but if so, the historical context of the reference remains unclear.[10] The damaged text of a graffito (no. 81) on the roof of theTemple of Khonsu at Thebes is dated to the reign of "Pharaoh Iu[put ...]-siese,"[11] which would likewise group Iuput with Takelot II and Osorkon III, whose names were compounded with the same epithet, meaning "son of Isis."
In addition to Year 2, discussed above, the regnal count of Iuput I is attested at Thebes in Year 9 (graffito no. 244 on the roof of the Temple of Khonsu)[12] and probably Year 12 (graffito no. 245 at the same location).[13] This indicates that, at least at these points in time, the local religious establishment recognized his authority as king. Although three more Nile Level Texts (nos. 28, 27, 29) date from Years 18, 19, and 23 of Pedubast I,[14] in them there is no mention of Iuput I and the latter's regnal count (Years 4, 5, and 9). Nevertheless, like Pedubast I and his apparent successorShoshenq VI, Iuput I does not appear to have cooperated with his presumably resentful brother, the High Priest Osorkon B.[15] The length of Iuput I's reign remains impossible to determine, but Karl Jansen-Winkeln posits that it could have reached a theoretical Year 18 and to have been immediately followed by the assumption of kingship by the displaced High Priest Osorkon B, as KingOsorkon III.[16] On the other hand, Frédéric Payraudeau thought the reign might have reached a theoretical Year 15, ending a few years before the triumph of High Priest Osorkon in Year 39 of Shoshenq III and Osorkon's subsequent assumption of kingship.[17]
The reign of Iuput I is dated generally to the end of the ninth century BC: Jürgen von Beckerath places it in circa 816–800 BC;[18] Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David Warburton in 820–809 BC;[19] Aidan Dodson in 810–799 BC;[20] Frédéric Payraudeau in 809–798 BC.[21] The dating of the reign can be established precisely in relation to those of Takelot II, Pedubast I, and Shoshenq III, but its absolute chronology depends on the choice of two alternatives for the accession of Takelot II—in 845 BC or 834 BC—and respectively of Shoshenq III—in 841 or 830 BC.[22] In terms of correlation, Year 1 of Iuput I followed immediately upon Year 25 (or possibly 26) of Takelot II and corresponded to Year 15 of Pedubast I, which in turn corresponded to Year 22 of Shoshenq III.[23]
