| Itzam Kʼan Ahk II | |
|---|---|
| Ajaw | |
 Itzam Kʼan Ahk II's portrait on Stela 11 | |
| King ofPiedras Negras | |
| Reign | 9 November 729 - 26 November 757 |
| Predecessor | Kʼinich Yoʼnal Ahk II |
| Successor | Yoʼnal Ahk III |
| Born | 18 November 701 |
| Died | November 26, 757(757-11-26) (aged 56) Piedras Negras |
| Spouse | Lady Juntan Ahk (possibly) |
| Issue | Yoʼnal Ahk III Haʼ Kʼin Xook Kʼinich Yat Ahk II |
| Religion | Maya religion |
| Signature |  |
Itzam Kʼan Ahk II (Mayan pronunciation:[itsamkʼanahk], November 18, 701 – November 26, 757), also known asRuler 4, was anajaw ofPiedras Negras, anancient Maya settlement inGuatemala. He ruled during theLate Classic Period, from 729 to 757 AD. Itzam Kʼan Ahk II ascended to the throne following the death ofKʼinich Yoʼnal Ahk II. Itzam Kʼan Ahk II may have fathered the following three kings of Piedras Negras:Yoʼnal Ahk III,Haʼ Kʼin Xook, andKʼinich Yat Ahk II. Following Itzam Kʼan Ahk II's demise, he was succeeded by Yoʼnal Ahk III in 757 AD. Itzam Kʼan Ahk II left several monuments, includingstelae at Piedras Negras and a large mortuary temple now known as Pyramid O-13. In addition, the details of his life and hisKʼatun-jubilee were commemorated on Panel 3, raised by Kʼinich Yat Ahk II several years following Itzam Kʼan Ahk II's death.
Itzam Kʼan Ahk II, also known as Ruler 4, was born on November 18, 701 AD (9.13.9.14.15 7 Men 18 Kʼankʼin in theLong Count).[1] Of the three extant references to Itzam Kʼan Ahk's birth, not a single one mentions his line of descent, suggesting that Itzam Kʼan Ahk was notKʼinich Yoʼnal Ahk II's son. With this said,Simon Martin andNikolai Grube note that in one carving, theajaw is shown with a turtle ornament on his belt, suggesting that one of his ancestors had the wordahk ("turtle") in their name and was thus of royal blood.[2] Additionally, Stela 40 shows what could be Itzam Kʼan Ahk's mother inTeotihuacano garb, suggesting that Itzam Kʼan Ahk was emphasizing maternal connections to Teotihuacan.[1][3] Martin and Grube also note that this stela was erected exactly 83 Tzolkʼin, or about 59 years, following the death ofItzam Kʼan Ahk I (a formerajaw of Piedras Negras whose Itzam Kʼan Ahk II appropriated), which could suggest the existence of some "special link" between the two.[1]
Itzam Kʼan Ahk II ascended to power on November 9, 729 AD (9.14.18.3.13 7 Ben 16 Kʼankʼin).[1] In 749 AD, theajaw celebrated his oneKʼatun, an event that was attended by many dignitaries, including abʼaah sajal ("first ruler") named Kʼan Moʼ Teʼ who had served Kʼinich Yoʼnal Ahk II. The events of this banquet were later recorded by the finalajaw of Piedras Negras,Kʼinich Yat Ahk II on Panel 3; this artifact shows Itzam Kʼan Ahk II lecturing the interim ruler ofYaxchilan,Yopaat Bahlam II, about Piedras Negras's local dominance. (This panel has lent support to the argument that during Itzam Kʼan Ahk II's rule, Piedras Negras had eclipsed Yaxchilan in power.) The Kʼatun celebration was followed by another event a few days later, at which Itzam Kʼan Ahk II "performed a 'descendingmacaw' dance" and then had a drink made from fermentedcacao beans passed around to his guests.[4]
Itzam Kʼan Ahk II likely engaged in war, as apyrite disc found in his tomb depicts the severed head of a leader fromHix Witz.[3] Houston et al. argue that Hix Witz was under Piedras Negras's control, largely based on the disk and because the Maya center is identified on Panel 7, erected earlier byItzam Kʼan Ahk I, as a "tributary bearing plumes and textiles" to Piedras Negras.[5]
Itzam Kʼan Ahk II's reign was one marked by "hegemony over neighboring kingdoms".[6] The ruler died on November 26, 757 AD (9.16.6.11.17 7 Kaban 0 Pax) and was buried three days later.[1][7] According to Panel 3, the burial took place at the mythical "'mountain' ofho janaab witz", which in this context referred to Pyramid O-13.[7] Itzam Kʼan Ahk II was succeeded byYoʼnal Ahk III on March 10, 758 AD.[8] Itzam Kʼan Ahk II's burial site was venerated by the succeeding kings of Piedras Negras, which has led some to hypothesize that Itzam Kʼan Ahk II produced a new ruling dynasty, and that the following three kings—Yoʼnal Ahk III,Haʼ Kʼin Xook, and Kʼinich Yat Ahk II—were his sons.[7][8][9][10][11]
| This article is part ofa series on the |
| Maya civilization |
|---|
 |
| History |
| Spanish conquest of the Maya |
Itzam Kʼan Ahk II erected at least five stelae: 9, 10, 11, 22, and 40,[12] of which Stelae 9, 10, and 11 were raised in front of or near Structure J-3.[13] Stela 11, constructed in August of 731 AD, is of the niche variety (meaning it depicts the ruler seated in a small hollow, or niche) and commemorates Itzam Kʼan Ahk II's ascension to power.[14][15] This monument depicts theajaw flanked by witnesses to the ceremonies explored on the stela itself. The expanse in front of the stone slab "designates the space ... as one of offering and supplication", given the depiction ofhuman sacrifice near the monument's bottom.[14][16] The monument was discovered byTeoberto Maler in two pieces on the ground; the front was well-preserved (even retaining some of its pigment), although the glyphs on the upper right were weathered. Sometime in the 1960s,looters broke up the fallen monument so they would have an easier time smuggling it out of the site. The top portion is currently housed in theMuseum of Fine Arts, Houston (MFAH), whereas the bottom half is in a private collection inSwitzerland.[17]
Stela 9 had long been broken into thirds when it was discovered in 1899 by Maler. While these fragments had eroded slightly, the base was later foundin situ by theUniversity of Pennsylvania'sUniversity Museum. In the 1960s, looters carted off parts of the monument, namely a portion depicting a captive.[18] Stela 10 is highly eroded, resulting in a loss of detail.[13] In addition to this decay, the head ornament has presumably been lost.[19] Stela 22 was dedicated on the East Group Plaza, located in front of Structure O-12, thereby "initiat[ing]" the East Group Plaza as a locus for sculpture and stelae.[20] While previous stelae had faced other directions, Stela 22 faced northwest towards the site's acropolis, creating "a new axis of dialogue across the site."[20]
Stela 40 contains the depiction of the aforementioned woman dressed in Teotihuacano garb; it shows Itzam Kʼan Ahk II dispersing something—hypothesized to be either blood or incense—into a "psychoduct" (that is, "a vent leading into a subplaza tomb").[1] Simon and Grube argue that "the connection between the living and the dead is manifested [on this stela] as a 'knotted cord' or breath which travels down to enter the nose of the deceased".[1] The female on the stela, denoted only by an "upside down vase" glyph, is likely Itzam Kʼan Ahk II's mother; Pitts argues that the monument "offers an interesting vignette of Itzam Kʼan Ahk II and his loyalty to a female ancestor, probably his mother."[10][21]
.jpg)
Pyramid O-13 is the name given to the hypothesized mortuary temple of Kʼinich Yat Ahk II.[22] According to Stephen Houston et al., it was nearly "twice as large" as any of Piedras Negras's previous structures.[23] The pyramid was modified substantially following Itzam Kʼan Ahk II's demise: Kʼinich Yat Ahk II, for instance, reset the older Panel 2 and installed Panel 1 and the now-famous Panel 3. Megan O'Neil argues that these changes were made in order for the rulingajaw to "engag[e] with the past".[24] Given that the last known rulers of Piedras Negras erected their stelae on or near this pyramid[24] and all three of these leaders also revered the site as some sort of dynastic shrine, it is possible that they were Kʼinich Yat Ahk II's sons.[7]
In 1997, Héctor Escobedo discovered a tomb (Burial 13) containing the bodies of an adult and two adolescents underneath the plaza floor at the front of the pyramid's frontal stairs. While some believe this to have been the resting place for Itzam Kʼan Ahk II,[7]Stephen D. Houston cautions that this has not been conclusively proven.[25] Among the artifacts found within (including pieces of jade and ornaments), archaeologists uncovered evidence that the tomb had been reentered after it was sealed: many bones were missing from the three bodies, and it appeared that the skeletons had been charred by fire sometime after their initial entombment. Scholars eventually concluded that this apparent desecration was actually part of a ritual described on Panel 3 calledel naah umukil (the "house-burning at the burial"), and that it was carried out by Kʼinich Yat Ahk II.[7]
In terms of architecture, the O-13 Pyramid and the Late ClassicTemple of the Inscriptions atPalenque are very similar: both have the same number of substructure terraces, both pyramids' substructures have exactly five doors, and both were built into the sides of hills. Damien Marken and Kirk Straight, use this similarity—as well as inscriptions on stelae at Palenque—to argue that there existed some sort of relationship between Piedras Negras and Palenque.[26]
