Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Italian War of 1542–1546

Featured article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ninth phase of the Italian Wars
Italian War of 1542–1546
Part of theItalian Wars

Thesiege of Nice by aFranco-Ottoman fleet in 1543 (drawing by Toselli, after an engraving by Aeneas Vico)
Date12 July 1542 – 7 June 1546
Location
England, France, Italy, Spain, and theLow Countries
Result
Belligerents
Kingdom of France
Jülich-Cleves-Berg
Denmark–Norway
Holy Roman Empire
Electorate of Saxony
Brandenburg
Spain
England
Commanders and leaders
Francis I
Dauphin Henri
Duke of Orléans
Count of Enghien
Claude d'Annebault
Suleiman I
Hayreddin Barbarossa
Charles V
Alfonso d'Avalos
René of Nassau-Chalon
Ferrante Gonzaga
Maurice of Saxony
Maximiliaan van Egmond
Henry VIII of England
Duke of Norfolk
Duke of Suffolk
Viscount Lisle
1109–1120
First Hundred Years' War (1159–1259)
1294–1324
Hundred Years' War (1337–1453)
Italian Wars (1494–1559)
1562–1678
Second Hundred Years' War (1689–1815)
Franco-Spanish wars

TheItalian War of 1542–1546 was a conflict late in theItalian Wars, pittingFrancis I of France andSuleiman I of theOttoman Empire against theHoly Roman Emperor Charles V andHenry VIII of England. The course of the war saw extensive fighting in Italy, France, and theLow Countries, as well as attempted invasions of Spain and England. The conflict was inconclusive and ruinously expensive for the major participants.

The war arose from the failure of theTruce of Nice, which ended theItalian War of 1536–1538, to resolve the long-standing conflict between Charles and Francis—particularly their conflicting claims to theDuchy of Milan. Having found a suitable pretext, Francis once again declared war against his perpetual enemy in 1542. Fighting began at once throughout theLow Countries; the following year saw theFranco-Ottoman alliance's attack onNice, as well as a series of maneuvers inNorthern Italy which culminated in the bloodyBattle of Ceresole. Charles and Henry then proceeded to invade France, but the longsieges ofBoulogne-sur-Mer andSaint-Dizier prevented a decisive offensive against the French.

Charles came to terms with Francis by theTreaty of Crépy in late 1544, but the death of Francis's younger son, theDuke of Orléans—whose proposed marriage to a relative of the Emperor was the foundation of the treaty—made it moot less than a year afterwards. Henry, left alone but unwilling to return Boulogne to the French, continued to fight until 1546, when theTreaty of Ardres finally restored peace between France and England. The deaths of King Francis of France and King Henry VIII of England, in early 1547 left the resolution of the Italian Wars to their successors.

Prelude

[edit]

The Truce of Nice, which ended theItalian War of 1536–1538, provided little resolution to the long conflict between the Holy Roman Emperor and the King of France; although hostilities had ended, giving way to a cautious entente, neither monarch was satisfied with the war's outcome. Francis continued to harbor a desire for theDuchy of Milan, to which he held a dynastic claim; Charles, for his part, insisted that Francis comply at last with the terms of theTreaty of Madrid, which had been forced on the French king during his captivity in Spain after theItalian War of 1521–26.[1] Other conflicting claims to various territories—Charles's to Burgundy and Francis's to Naples and Flanders, among others—remained a matter of contention as well.

Negotiations between the two powers continued through 1538 and into 1539. In 1539, Francis invited Charles—who faceda rebellion in the Low Countries—to travel through France on his way north from Spain.[2] Charles accepted, and was richly received; but while he was willing to discuss religious matters with his host—theProtestant Reformation being underway—he delayed on the question of political differences, and nothing had been decided by the time he left French territory.[3]

In March 1540, Charles proposed to settle the matter by havingMaria of Spain marry Francis's younger son, theDuke of Orléans; the two would then inherit the Netherlands,Burgundy, andCharolais after the Emperor's death.[4] Francis, meanwhile, was to renounce his claims to the duchies ofMilan andSavoy, ratify the treaties ofMadrid andCambrai, and join an alliance with Charles.[5] Francis, considering the loss of Milan too large a price to pay for future possession of the Netherlands and unwilling to ratify the treaties in any case, made his own offer; on 24 April, he agreed to surrender the Milanese claim in exchange for immediate receipt of the Netherlands. The negotiations continued for weeks, but made no progress, and were abandoned in June 1540.[6]

William, Duke of Jülich-Cleves-Berg (engraving byHeinrich Aldegrever,c. 1540). William allied himself with Francis I, marryingJeanne d'Albret, but was defeated by Charles V.
Suleiman the Magnificent (painting by a member of theVenetian school, 16th century)

Francis soon began gathering new allies to his cause.William, Duke of Jülich-Cleves-Berg, who was engaged in theGuelders Wars, a dispute with Charles over the succession inGuelders, sealed his alliance with Francis by marrying Francis's niece,Jeanne d'Albret.[7] Francis sought an alliance with theSchmalkaldic League as well, but the League demurred; by 1542, the remaining potential French allies in northern Germany had reached their own understandings with the Emperor.[8] French efforts farther east were more fruitful, leading to a renewedFranco-Ottoman alliance;Suleiman the Magnificent of theOttoman Empire, seeking to distract Charles from Ottoman advances in Hungary, encouraged the Franco-Imperial rift.[9]

On 4 July 1541, however, the French ambassador to the Ottoman court,Antoine de Rincon, was killed by Imperial troops as he was travelling nearPavia. In response to Francis's protests, Charles denied all responsibility, promising to conduct an inquiry with the assistance of the Pope; he had by now formed plans for a campaign in North Africa, and wished to avoid further entanglements in Europe.[10]

By the end of September, Charles was inMallorca, preparingan attack on Algiers; Francis, considering it impolitic to attack a fellow Christian who was fighting the Muslims, promised not to declare war for as long as the Emperor was campaigning. The Imperial expedition, however, was entirely unsuccessful; storms scattered the invasion fleet soon after the initial landing, and Charles had returned to Spain with the remainder of his troops by November.[11][12] On 8 March 1542, the new French ambassador,Antoine Escalin des Eymars, returned fromConstantinople with promises of Ottoman aid in a war against Charles.[10] Francis declared war on 12 July, naming various injuries as the causes; among them was Rincon's murder, which he proclaimed "an injury so great, so detestable and so strange to those who bear the title and quality of prince that it cannot be in any way forgiven, suffered or endured".[13][14]

Initial moves and the Treaty of Venlo

[edit]

The French immediately launched a two-front offensive against Charles. In the north, the Duke of Orléans attackedLuxembourg, briefly capturing the city; in the south, a larger army underClaude d'Annebault and King Francis's eldest son,the Dauphin Henri,unsuccessfully besieged the city of Perpignan in northern Spain.[15] Francis himself was meanwhile inLa Rochelle, dealing with a revolt caused by popular discontent with a proposed reform of thegabelle tax.[16]

Battles and sieges in northern France and theLow Countries during the war

By this point, relations between Francis and Henry VIII were collapsing. Henry—already angered by the French refusal to pay the various pensions, which were owed to him under the terms of past treaties—was now faced with the potential of French interference in Scotland, where he was entangled in the midst of an attempt to marry his son toMary, Queen of Scots, that would develop into the open warfare of the "Rough Wooing".[17] He had intended to begin a war against Francis in the summer of 1543, but negotiating a treaty to that effect with the Emperor proved difficult; since Henry was, in Charles's eyes, aschismatic, the Emperor could not promise to defend him against attack, nor sign any treaty which referred to him as the head of the Church—both points upon which Henry insisted.[18] Negotiations continued for weeks; finally, on 11 February 1543, Henry and Charles signed a treaty of offensive alliance, pledging to invade France within two years.[19] In May, Henry sent Francis an ultimatum threatening war within twenty days; and, on 22 June, at last declared war.[20]

Hostilities now flared up across northern France. On Henry's orders, SirJohn Wallop crossed theChannel toCalais with an army of 5,000 men, to be used in the defense of the Low Countries.[21] The French, underAntoine de Bourbon, Duke of Vendôme, had capturedLillers in April; by June, d'Annebault had takenLandrecies as well.[22]Wilhelm of Cleves openly joined the war on Francis's side, invadingBrabant, and fighting began inArtois andHainaut.[23] Francis inexplicably halted with his army nearRheims; in the meantime, Charles attacked Wilhelm of Cleves, invading theDuchy of Jülich andcapturing Düren.[24]

Concerned about the fate of his ally, Francis ordered the Duke of Orléans and d'Annebault to attackLuxembourg, which they took on 10 September; but it was too late for Wilhelm, as he had already surrendered on 7 September, signing theTreaty of Venlo with Charles.[25] By the terms of this treaty, Wilhelm was to concede the overlordship of theDuchy of Guelders andCounty of Zutphen to Charles, and to assist him in suppressing theReformation.[26] Charles now advanced tobesiege Landrecies, seeking battle with Francis; the French defenders of the town, commanded byMartin du Bellay, repulsed the Imperial attack, but Francis withdrew toSaint-Quentin on 4 November, leaving the Emperor free to march north and seizeCambrai.[27]

Nice and Lombardy

[edit]
Ottoman depiction of thesiege of Nice (Matrakçı Nasuh, 16th century)

On the Mediterranean, meanwhile, other engagements were underway. In April 1543, the Sultan had placedHayreddin Barbarossa's fleet at the disposal of the French king. Barbarossa left theDardanelles with more than a hundredgalleys, raided his way up the Italian coast, and in July arrived inMarseille, where he was welcomed byFrançois de Bourbon, Count of Enghien, the commander of the French fleet.[28] On 6 August, the joint Franco-Ottoman fleet anchored off the Imperial city ofNice and landed troops atVillefranche; asiege of the city followed.[29] Nice fell on 22 August, although the citadel held out until the siege was lifted on 8 September.[30]

Barbarossa was by this point becoming a liability; on 6 September, he had threatened to depart if he were not given the means with which to resupply his fleet.[31] In response, Francis ordered that the population ofToulon—except for "heads of households"—be expelled, and that the city then be given to Barbarossa, who used it as a base for his army of 30,000 for the next eight months.[32] Yet Francis, increasingly embarrassed by the Ottoman presence, was unwilling to help Barbarossa recaptureTunis, which had beencaptured by Charles in 1535; so the Ottoman fleet—accompanied by five French galleys underAntoine Escalin des Aimars—sailed forIstanbul in May 1544, pillaging theNeapolitan coast along the way.[33]

Portrait of Alfonso d'Avalos, Marchese del Vasto, in Armor with a Page (oil on canvas byTitian,c. 1533). D'Avalos was defeated by the French at theBattle of Ceresole, but won a later victory at theBattle of Serravalle.

InPiedmont, meanwhile, a stalemate had developed between the French, under theSieur de Boutières, and the Imperial army, underAlfonso d'Avalos; d'Avalos had captured the fortress ofCarignano, and the French had besieged it, hoping to force the Imperial army into a decisive battle.[34] During the winter of 1543–44, Francis significantly reinforced his army, placing Enghien in command.[35] D'Avalos, also heavily reinforced, advanced to relieve Carignano; and, on 11 April 1544, Enghien and d'Avalos foughtone of the few pitched battles of the period at Ceresole.[36] Although the French were victorious, the impending invasion of France itself by Charles and Henry forced Francis to recall much of his army from Piedmont, leaving Enghien without the troops he needed to take Milan.[37] D'Avalos's victory over an Italian mercenary army in French service at theBattle of Serravalle in early June 1544 brought significant campaigning in Italy to an end.[38]

Danish-Norwegian participation

[edit]
Duke Christian of Holstein (later Christian III of Denmark), painted atGlücksburg
See also:Treaty of Fontainebleau (1541) andTreaty of Speyer (1544)

Emperor Charles V's refusal to recognizeChristian of Holstein asKing of Denmark and Norway, led to the Danish-French alliance in 1541. Denmark-Norway declared war on theNetherlands, at that time under Charles's rule. Denmark-Norway, were to blockadeThe Sound and the Belt to Dutch shipping,[39][40] and a Danish contingent joined the Franco-Cleves army, which invadedBrabant in July.[41] Additionally fleet of 26 Danish vessels patrolled theNorth Sea.[41] After a failed attempt byHamburg to mediate between the belligerents, a Danish fleet of 40 ships and 10.000 men, set sail for theWalcheren. Yet this fleet would be scattered by a storm. In the Holsteinian-Imperial border,Johann Rantzau prevented an invasion from Germany.[41]

A peace treaty was signed, between Denmark-Norway and theHoly Roman Empire, in1544 at Speyer; Charles acknowledged Christian III as king of Denmark and Norway and free passage through the Sound (Øresund) was ensured.[39]

Invasion of France

[edit]

On 31 December 1543, Henry and Charles had signed a treaty pledging to invade France in person by 20 June 1544; each was to provide an army of no less than 35,000 infantry and 7,000 cavalry for the venture.[42] Against this Francis could muster about 70,000 men in his various armies.[43] The campaign could not begin, however, until Henry and Charles had resolved their personal conflicts with Scotland and the German princes, respectively.[44] On 15 May, Henry was informed byEdward Seymour, Earl of Hertford, that, after his raids, Scotland was no longer in a position to threaten him; he then began to make preparations for a personal campaign in France—against the advice of his council and the Emperor, who believed that his presence would be a hindrance.[45] Charles had meanwhile reached an understanding with the princes at theDiet of Speyer, and theElectors of Saxony and Brandenburg had agreed to join his invasion of France.[46]

By May 1544, two Imperial armies were poised to invade France: one, underFerrante Gonzaga, Viceroy of Sicily, north of Luxemburg; the other, under Charles himself, in thePalatinate.[44] Charles had gathered a combined force of more than 42,000 for the invasion, and had arranged for another 4,000 men to join the English army.[47] On 25 May, Gonzaga captured Luxembourg and moved towardsCommercy andLigny, issuing a proclamation that the Emperor had come to overthrow "a tyrant allied to the Turks".[48] On 8 July, Gonzagabesieged Saint-Dizier; Charles and the second Imperial army soon joined him.[49]

Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk (oil on wood byHans Holbein, 1539). Sent to France by Henry VIII, Norfolk commanded the English troops during the unsuccessfulsiege of Montreuil.

Henry, meanwhile, had sent an army of some 40,000 to Calais under the joint command ofThomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk, andCharles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk.[50] This force consisted of 36,000 infantry (including 8,000Landsknecht) and 6,000 cavalry (including another 2,000 German mercenaries). It was organized into three armies, one of 16,000 and two of 13,000 each. By western continental standards, the army was obsolescent; it had little heavy cavalry and a shortage of both pike and shot, the bulk of its troops being armed with longbows orbills. The fewcuirassiers andarquebusiers, the latter only accounting for single digit percentages of the host, were mostly foreign mercenaries.[51] Henry hired additional arquebusiers from Italy, but still only 2,000 of the 28,000 soldiers who besieged Boulogne that year were equipped with firearms.[52]

While Henry continued to squabble with the Emperor over the goals of the campaign and his own presence in France, this massive army moved slowly and aimlessly into French territory.[53] Finally, Henry decided that the army was to be split. Norfolk, ordered to besiegeArdres orMontreuil, advanced towards the latter; but he proved unable to mount an effective siege, complaining of inadequate supplies and poor organization.[54] Suffolk was ordered to attackBoulogne; on 14 July, Henry crossed to Calais and moved to join him.[55] Asiege of Boulogne began on 19 July—despite the protests of the Emperor, who insisted that Henry should advance towards Paris.[56]

Charles himself, on the other hand, was still delayed at Saint-Dizier; the city, fortified byGirolamo Marini and defended byLouis IV de Bueil, Count of Sancerre, continued to hold out against the massive Imperial army.[57] On 24 July, Charles capturedVitry-en-Perthois, from which French forces had harassed his supply lines; finally, on 8 August, the defenders of Saint-Dizier, running low on supplies, sought terms.[58] On 17 August, the French capitulated, and were permitted by the Emperor to leave the city with banners flying; their resistance for 41 days had broken the Imperial offensive.[59] Some of Charles's advisers suggested withdrawing, but he was unwilling to lose face and continued to move towardsChâlons, although the Imperial army was prevented from advancing across theMarne by a French force waiting atJâlons.[60] The Imperial troops marched rapidly throughChampagne, capturingÉpernay,Châtillon-sur-Marne,Château-Thierry, andSoissons.[61]

The French made no attempts to intercept Charles. Troops underJacques de Montgomery, Sieur de Lorges, sackedLagny-sur-Marne, whose citizens had allegedly rebelled; but no attempt was made to engage the advancing Imperial army.[62] Paris was gripped by panic, although Francis insisted that the population had nothing to fear.[63] Charles finally halted his advance and turned back on 11 September.[64] Henry, meanwhile, was personally directing the besiegers at Boulogne; the town fell in early September, and a breach was made into the castle on 11 September.[65] The defenders finally surrendered a few days later.[66]

Treaty of Crépy

[edit]

Charles, short on funds and needing to deal with increasing religious unrest in Germany, asked Henry to continue his invasion or to allow him to make a separate peace.[67] By the time Henry had received the Emperor's letter, however, Charles had already concluded a treaty with Francis—the Peace of Crépy—which was signed by representatives of the monarchs atCrépy inPicardy on 18 September 1544.[68] The treaty had been promoted at the French court by the Emperor's sister,Queen Eleanor, and by Francis's mistress, theDuchess of Étampes. By its terms, Francis and Charles would each abandon their various conflicting claims and restore thestatus quo of 1538; the Emperor would relinquish his claim to theDuchy of Burgundy and the King of France would do the same for theKingdom of Naples, as well as renouncing his claims as suzerain ofFlanders andArtois.[69] The Duke of Orléans would marry either Charles's daughter Mary orhis niece Anna; the choice was to be made by Charles. In the first case, the bride would receive the Netherlands andFranche-Comté as a dowry; in the second, Milan. Francis, meanwhile, was to grant the duchies ofBourbon,Châtellerault, andAngoulême to his son; he would also abandon his claims to the territories of theDuchy of Savoy, including Piedmont and Savoy itself. Finally, Francis would assist Charles against the Ottomans—but not, officially, against the heretics in his own domains.[70] A second, secret accord was also signed; by its terms, Francis would assist Charles with reforming the church, with calling aGeneral Council, and with suppressing Protestantism—by force if necessary.[71]

The treaty was poorly received bythe Dauphin, who felt that his brother was being favored over him, by Henry VIII, who believed that Charles had betrayed him, and also by the Sultan.[72] Francis would fulfill some of the terms; but the death of the Duke of Orléans in 1545 rendered the treaty moot.[73]

Portrait ofClaude d'Annebault (school ofJean Clouet,c. 1535). Despite having no experience in naval warfare, d'Annebault commanded the French invasion fleet during the expedition against England.

Boulogne and England

[edit]

The conflict between Francis and Henry continued. The Dauphin's army advanced on Montreuil, forcing Norfolk to raise the siege; Henry himself returned to England at the end of September 1544, ordering Norfolk and Suffolk to defend Boulogne.[74] The two dukes quickly disobeyed this order and withdrew the bulk of the English army to Calais, leaving some 4,000 men to defend the captured city.[75] The English army, outnumbered, was now trapped in Calais; the Dauphin, left unopposed, concentrated his efforts onbesieging Boulogne.[76] On 9 October, a French assault nearly captured the city, but was beaten back when the troops prematurely turned to looting.[77] Peace talks were attempted at Calais without result; Henry refused to consider returning Boulogne, and insisted that Francis abandon his support of the Scots.[78] Charles, who had been appointed as a mediator between Francis and Henry, was meanwhile drawn into his own disputes with the English king.[79]

Francis now embarked on a more dramatic attempt to force Henry's hand—an attack on England itself. For this venture, an army of more than 30,000 men was assembled in Normandy, and a fleet of some 400 vessels prepared atLe Havre, all under the command ofClaude d'Annebault.[80] On 31 May 1545, a French expeditionary force landed in Scotland. In early July, the English underJohn Dudley, Viscount Lisle, mounted an attack on the French fleet, but had little success due to poor weather; nevertheless, the French suffered from a string of accidents: d'Annebault's first flagship burned, and his second ran aground.[81] Finally leaving Le Havre on 16 July, the massive French fleet entered theSolent on 19 July and brieflyengaged the English fleet, to no apparent effect; the major casualty of the skirmish, theMary Rose, sank accidentally.[82] The Frenchlanded on the Isle of Wight on 21 July, and again atSeaford on 25 July, but these operations were abortive, and the French fleet soon returned to blockading Boulogne.[83] D'Annebault made a final sortie nearBeachy Head on 15 August, but retired to port after a brief skirmish.[84]

The French fleet attacks the Isle of Wight (unknown artist, 16th century)

Treaty of Ardres

[edit]
Ratification of the Treaty of Ardres by Henry VIII (1546)

By September 1545, the war was a virtual stalemate; both sides, running low on funds and troops, unsuccessfully sought help from the German Protestants.[85] Henry, Francis, and Charles attempted extensive diplomatic maneuvering to break the deadlock; but none of the three trusted the others, and this had little practical effect.[86] In January 1546, Henry sent the Earl of Hertford to Calais, apparently preparing for an offensive; but one failed to materialize.[87]

Francis could not afford to resume a large war, and Henry was concerned only for the disposition of Boulogne. Negotiations between the two resumed on 6 May.[88] On 7 June 1546, the Treaty ofArdres—also known as the Treaty of Camp—was signed by Claude d'Annebault, Pierre Ramon, andGuillaume Bochetel on behalf of Francis, andViscount Lisle,Baron Paget andNicholas Wotton on behalf of Henry.[89] By its terms, Henry would retain Boulogne until 1554, then return it in exchange for two millionécus; in the meantime, neither side would construct fortifications in the region, and Francis would resume payment of Henry's pensions. Upon hearing the price demanded for Boulogne, the Imperial ambassador told Henry that the city would remain in English hands permanently.[90]

During the treaty negotiations, two Protestant mediators—Han Bruno of Metz andJohannes Sturm—were concerned that Henry's war in Scotland was a stumbling block. The sixteenth article of the treaty made Scotland a party to the new peace, and Henry pledged not to attack the Scots again without cause.[91] This gave Scotland a respite from theWar of the Rough Wooing, but the fighting would recommence 18 months later.[92]

Aftermath

[edit]
Charles V enthroned over his defeated enemies (Giulio Clovio, mid-16th century). From left, the figures representSuleiman the Magnificent,Pope Clement VII,Francis I, theDuke of Cleves, theDuke of Saxony and theLandgrave of Hesse.

Exorbitantly expensive, the war was the costliest conflict of both Francis's and Henry's reigns.[93] In England, the need for funds led to what Elton terms "an unprecedented burden of taxation", as well as the systematicdebasement of coinage.[94] Francis also imposed a series of new taxes and instituted several financial reforms.[95] He was not, therefore, in a position to assist the German Protestants, who were now engaged in theSchmalkaldic War against the Emperor; by the time any French aid was to be forthcoming, Charles had already won his victory at theBattle of Mühlberg.[96] As for Suleiman, the conclusion of theTruce of Adrianople in 1547 brought his own struggle against theHabsburgs to a temporary halt.[97]

Henry VIII of England died on 28 January 1547 and was succeeded by his sonEdward VI; on 31 March, the death of King Francis followed and was succeeded by his son,Henry II of France.[98] Henry's successors continued his entanglements in Scotland; when, in 1548, friction with the Scots led to the resumption of hostilities around Boulogne, they decided to avoid atwo-front war by returning the city four years early, in 1550.[99] As successor to King Francis, kingHenry II of France had ambitions in Italy and hostility towards Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, which soon led to theItalian War of 1551–1559.[100]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 385–387.
  2. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 389–391.
  3. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 391–393, "the Emperor's itinerary from Loches northwards had evidently been devised to show him the principal artistic achievements of [Francis's] reign.... no expense had been spared to make his stay memorable".
  4. ^Knecht 1994, p. 394, The proposal specified, however, that the territories would revert to the Habsburg line if Mary died childless. Several other marriages between the Habsburg and Valois were also considered—notably one between Charles's son Phillip and Jeanne d'Albret..
  5. ^Knecht 1994, p. 394.
  6. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 394–395.
  7. ^Knecht 1994, p. 396.
  8. ^Knecht 1994, p. 478.
  9. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 478–479.
  10. ^abKnecht 1994, p. 479.
  11. ^Arnold & Keegan 2001, pp. 144–145.
  12. ^Knecht 1994, p. 479, The Imperial troops abandoned their horses—those they had not been forced to eat—and their guns as they evacuated..
  13. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 74.
  14. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 479–480.
  15. ^Knecht 1994, p. 480;Black 2002, p. 80;Blockmans 2002, p. 72
  16. ^Knecht 1994, p. 480 For more details of thegabelle revolt, seeKnecht 1994, pp. 480–483
  17. ^Knecht 1994, p. 486.
  18. ^Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 388–389 "The matter of royal style was finally resolved by referring to Henry as "Defender of the Faith, etc." in the final documents."
  19. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 72;Knecht 1994, p. 486;Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 388–389
  20. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 72;Knecht 1994, p. 486;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 389 Elton argues that the only explanation for this move is that Henry believed his Scottish entanglements to be concluded (Elton 1974, p. 194).
  21. ^Scarisbrick 1968, p. 389
  22. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 486–487
  23. ^Knecht 1994, p. 486
  24. ^Black 2002, p. 80;Knecht 1994, p. 487
  25. ^Knecht 1994, p. 487; "Wilhelm's surrender made his marriage to Jeanne d'Albret pointless, and it was annulled in 1545."
  26. ^Blockmans & Prevenier 1999, p. 232;Hughes 1992, p. 57
  27. ^Black 2002, p. 80;Blockmans 2002, p. 72;Knecht 1994, p. 487
  28. ^Knecht 1994, p. 487
  29. ^Arnold & Keegan 2001, p. 180;Knecht 1994, p. 487–488
  30. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 488–489
  31. ^Knecht 1994, p. 489
  32. ^Arnold & Keegan 2001, p. 180;Blockmans 2002, pp. 72–73;Knecht 1994, p. 489. The Ottomans opened amosque and aslave market in the city, shocking European observers—who were, however, favorably impressed by the strict discipline of the Ottoman troops.
  33. ^Crowley 2008, pp. 75–79;Knecht 1994, p. 489;Setton 1984, pp. 472–473. Knecht gives the date of the fleet's departure as 23 May, while Setton cites 26 May. Setton also notes that the Sultan, told by the French ambassador of the affair, "promised to pay for the supplies with which his fleet had been furnished" (Setton 1984, p. 473).
  34. ^Knecht 1994, p. 490;Oman 2019, pp. 229–230
  35. ^Oman 2019, pp. 229–230
  36. ^Hall 1997, pp. 187–190;Oman 2019, pp. 239–243
  37. ^Black 2006, p. 43;Oman 2019, p. 242
  38. ^Knecht 1994, p. 490;Oman 2019, pp. 242–243
  39. ^abSicking, Louis (2006). "Amphibious Warfare in the Baltic: The Hansa, Holland and the Habsburgs". In Fissel, Trim; Fissel, Mark C. (eds.).Amphibious Warfare, 1000–1700. Brill. p. 91.
  40. ^"The Dutch Economy in the Golden Age (16th – 17th Centuries) – EH.net". Retrieved2025-08-21.
  41. ^abcBain 2023, p. 71.
  42. ^Knecht 1994, p. 490;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 389.
  43. ^The number was a record high for the whole century; see John A. Lynn, "Recalculating French Army Growth during theGrand Siècle, 1610–1715", in Rogers,Military Revolution, 117–148.
  44. ^abKnecht 1994, p. 490.
  45. ^Knecht 1994, p. 490;Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 393–394
  46. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 73;Knecht 1994, p. 490 Francis attempted to dispatch an embassy to the Diet, but was denied a safe-conduct; Knecht writes that his herald "was sent home after being told that he deserved to be hanged" (Knecht 1994, p. 490).
  47. ^Tracy 2002, p. 196. Tracy cites a letter by Charles which gives the composition of the Imperial army as "16,000 High Germans, 10,000 Low Germans, 9,000 Spaniards, and 7,000 heavy cavalry" and the composition of the force sent to join the English as "2,000Landsknechte and 2,000 cavalry"
  48. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 73;Knecht 1994, pp. 490–491.
  49. ^Black 2002, p. 81;Blockmans 2002, p. 73;Knecht 1994, p. 491.
  50. ^Black 2002, p. 81;Knecht 1994, p. 491;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 394.
  51. ^Heath 1997, p. 32
  52. ^Heath 1997, p. 37
  53. ^Scarisbrick 1968, p. 394. Scarisbrick relates that Norfolk wrote to the Privy Council that "he had expected to know, before this, where he was supposed to be going"
  54. ^Black 2002, p. 81;Knecht 1994, p. 491;Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 394–395
  55. ^Elton 1974, p. 195;Knecht 1994, p. 491;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 395. Henry could not ride, and was carried in alitter; Elton notes that "at fifty-four Henry was in fact an old man" (Elton 1974, p. 195)
  56. ^Arnold & Keegan 2001, p. 180;Black 2002, p. 81;Knecht 1994, p. 194;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 395
  57. ^Knecht 1994, p. 491. Knecht notes that Marini was "one of the best military engineers of his day"
  58. ^Knecht 1994, p. 491
  59. ^Arnold & Keegan 2001, p. 180;Knecht 1994, p. 491
  60. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 73;Knecht 1994, p. 491–492
  61. ^Knecht 1994, p. 492
  62. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 73;Knecht 1994, p. 492
  63. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 492–493
  64. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 73;Knecht 1994, p. 493
  65. ^Scarisbrick 1968, p. 395. Henry apparently greatly enjoyed the proceedings of the siege.
  66. ^Knecht 1994, p. 493;Phillips 2007, p. 47;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 395
  67. ^Knecht 1994, p. 493
  68. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 74;Knecht 1994, p. 493. At the time of the treaty, "Crépy" was spelt "Crespy", so the treaty is also known as the "Treaty of Crespy" (See:"Crespy, Treaty of | Encyclopedia.com".www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved2025-08-22.)
  69. ^Armstrong 1902, p. 28
  70. ^Armstrong 1902, pp. 28–29;Blockmans 2002, p. 74;Knecht 1994, p. 493. Charles was to make the choice of bride within four months of the treaty.
  71. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 74;Knecht 1994, p. 493. Blockmans notes that Francis pledged to provide 10,000 infantry and 400 cavalry to Charles for a venture against the Protestants.
  72. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 493–494;Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 396. Knecht, citing Rozet, Lembey, and Charriere, writes that the Sultan "nearly had the French ambassador impaled" (Knecht 1994, p. 494)
  73. ^Knecht 1994, p. 494
  74. ^Scarisbrick 1968, p. 395
  75. ^Phillips 2007, p. 47;Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 396–397
  76. ^Elton 1974, p. 195;Phillips 2007, pp. 47, 51–52;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 397
  77. ^Arnold & Keegan 2001, p. 180;Phillips 2007, pp. 48–50
  78. ^Knecht 1994, p. 501;Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 397–398
  79. ^Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 398–399
  80. ^Knecht 1994, p. 502;Phillips 2007, pp. 50–51. Although d'Annebault bore the title of "Admiral", he had no experience in naval warfare.
  81. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 501–502
  82. ^Elton 1974, p. 195;Knecht 1994, p. 502;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 401
  83. ^Knecht 1994, p. 502;Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 401–402
  84. ^Knecht 1994, p. 502
  85. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 502–503;Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 399–400
  86. ^Scarisbrick 1968, pp. 404–407
  87. ^Scarisbrick 1968, p. 408
  88. ^Knecht 1994, p. 503;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 408
  89. ^Gairdner & Brodie 1965, pp. 507–509
  90. ^Scarisbrick 1968, p. 409
  91. ^Elton 1974, p. 195;Gairdner & Brodie 1965, p. 508;Knecht 1994, p. 503;Phillips 2007, p. 52;Scarisbrick 1968, p. 409
  92. ^Merriman 2000, pp. 163, 195–201
  93. ^Elton 1974, p. 195;Knecht 1994, p. 503. The English war effort cost nearly two million pounds. Francis had needed more than two million écus for his navy alone, and was spending almost 250,000 écus per year on new fortifications.
  94. ^Elton 1974, p. 195
  95. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 504–507
  96. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 517–518. Knecht writes that "in November [1546], Annebault declared that the imperial alliance needed to be preserved at all costs, regardless of the Protestants. By January 1547, however, the military situation had become so ominous for the Protestants that Francis saw the need to strengthen their hand"
  97. ^Kinross 1977, pp. 234–235
  98. ^Knecht 1994, pp. 541–542;Phillips 2007, p. 52
  99. ^Phillips 2007, p. 52
  100. ^Blockmans 2002, p. 75;Shaw & Mallett 2018, pp. 250–255.

References

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toItalian Wars.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Italian_War_of_1542–1546&oldid=1318572262"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp