Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Company type	Public
Traded as	Nasdaq: ISRG Nasdaq-100 component S&P 100 component S&P 500 component
Industry	Medical Appliances & Equipment
Founded	1995; 30 years ago (1995)
Headquarters	Sunnyvale, California, U.S.
Key people	Gary S. Guthart (chairman) Dave Rosa (CEO) Craig Barratt (Board Member)
Products	da Vinci Surgical System
Revenue	US$8.35 billion (2024)
Operating income	US$2.35 billion (2024)
Net income	US$2.34 billion (2024)
Total assets	US$18.7 billion (2024)
Total equity	US$16.5 billion (2024)
Number of employees	15,638 (2024)
Website	intuitive.com
Footnotes / references [1]

Intuitive Surgical, Inc. is an American biotechnology company that develops, manufactures, and markets robotic products designed to improve clinical outcomes of patients through minimally invasive surgery, most notably with theda Vinci Surgical System. The company is part of theNasdaq-100,S&P 100 andS&P 500. As of 31 December 2021^[update], Intuitive Surgical had an installed base of 6,730 da Vinci Surgical Systems, including 4,139 in the U.S., 1,199 in Europe, 1,050 in Asia, and 342 in the rest of the world.^[2]

Intuitive Surgical made its debut on theFortune 500 list in 2024, ranking #497.^[3]

The research that eventually led to the development of theda Vinci Surgical System was performed in the late 1980s by Ajit Shah and Gary Guthart at research instituteSRI International.^[4][5] In 1990, SRI received funding from theNational Institutes of Health. SRI developed a prototype robotic surgical system that caught the interest of theDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which was interested in the system for its potential to allow surgeons to operate remotely on soldiers wounded on the battlefield.

In 1994, Dr.Frederic Moll became interested in the SRI System, as the device was known at the time. At the time, Moll was employed byGuidant. He tried to interest Guidant in backing it but to no avail. In 1995 Moll was introduced toJohn Freund who had recently leftAcuson Corporation. Freund negotiated an option to acquire SRI's intellectual property and incorporated a new company that he named Intuitive Surgical Devices, Inc.

At that point Freund, Moll, and Robert Younge (also from Acuson) wrote the business plan for the company and raised its initial venture capital. Early investors included theMayfield Fund, Sierra Ventures, and Morgan Stanley.^{[citation needed]}

The company refined the SRI System into a prototype known originally as "Lenny" (after Leonardo da Vinci), which was ready for testing in 1997. As the company's prototypes became more advanced, they were named using da Vinci themes. One was named "Leonardo", and another was "Mona". The final version of the prototype was nicknamed theda Vinci Surgical System, and the name stuck when the system was eventually commercialized. After further testing, Intuitive Surgical began marketing this system in Europe in 1999, while awaiting FDA approval in the United States.^{[citation needed][6]}

The company raised $46 million in an initial public offering in 2000. That same year, the FDA approved use of theda Vinci Surgical System for generallaparoscopic surgery, which can be used to address gallbladder disease and gastroesophageal disease. In 2001, the FDA approved use of the system for prostate surgery. The FDA has subsequently approved the system for thoracoscopic surgery, cardiac procedures performed with adjunctive incisions, and gynecologic procedures.^[7]

Shortly before going public, Intuitive Surgical was sued for patent infringement by Computer Motion, Inc, its chief rival. Computer Motion had actually gotten into the robotic surgery field earlier than Intuitive Surgical, with its own system, theZEUS Robotic Surgical System. Although the ZEUS system was approved in Europe, the U.S.Food and Drug Administration had not yet approved it for any procedure at the time that the FDA first approved theda Vinci system. The uncertainty created by the litigation between the companies was a drag on each company's growth. In 2003, Intuitive Surgical and Computer Motion agreed to merge, thus ending the litigation between them.^[8] The ZEUS system was ultimately phased out in favor of theda Vinci system. Computer Motion was led by ChairmanRobert Duggan from 1990 until 2003, when the two companies merged.^[9]

Before the buyout of Computer Motion, the stock of Intuitive was selling at around $14 per share, adjusted for stock splits. After the merger, the stock price rose significantly (and by 2015 it was at about $500),^[10] primarily because of the growth in systems sold (60 in 2002 compared with 431 in 2014) and the number of surgical procedures performed (less than 1,000 in 2002 compared with 540,000 in 2014).^{[citation needed]}

For the fiscal year 2017, Intuitive Surgical reported earnings of US$660 million, with an annual revenue of US$3.129 billion, an increase of 15.7% over the previous fiscal cycle. Intuitive Surgical's shares traded at over $307 per share, and its market capitalization was valued at over US$58 billion in November 2018.^[11]

Da Vinci Surgical System

Manufacturer	Intuitive Surgical
Type	Robotic surgery

The da Vinci Surgical System is arobotic surgical system. The system is controlled by a surgeon from a console. This minimally invasive surgical approach is commonly used forprostatectomies and increasingly forcardiac valve repair andgynaecologic surgical procedures.^[14][15]

A da Vinci Surgical System costs approximately $1.5 million.^[16] The da Vinci SI released in April 2009 cost about $1.75 million. In addition, there are maintenance contracts plus expenditures for instruments used during surgery. In 2008,The New York Times reported that most hospitals and clinics have a hard time recovering the cost of the robot.^[15]

In June 2018, Intuitive Surgical settled class action suits of its shareholders for a payment of $43 million.^[17][18] Originally filed in 2013, shareholders alleged Intuitive Surgical failed to report injuries related to their da Vinci robot, thus violating federal security laws.^[19]

In 2021, Intuitive was sued for alleged abuse of its monopolist position. Specifically, replacement part manufacturer Rebotix Repair accused Intuitive of anticompetitive behavior in the robots' aftermarket business and overcharging of hospitals for replacement parts.^{[citation needed]} The initiative was followed up by a wave of similar class-action lawsuits shortly afterwards, including those filed by Kaleida Health and Franciscan Health.^[20][21] In August of 2022,Rebotix v. Intuitive settled out of court shortly before trial was set to begin.^[22][23]

Sultzer v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. involved a claim against Intuitive that a defect in its da Vinci surgical robot allowed electricity to arc through a patient's spine, resulting in her death.^[24] Intuitive was represented byBradley Arant Boult Cummings.^[24] On July 12, 2024, the plaintiff agreed to drop the case.^[24]

• Official website
• Intuitive Surgical Product Recalls by FDA
• Business data for Intuitive Surgical, Inc.:
  • Google
  • SEC filings
  • Yahoo!

• Companies in the Nasdaq-100
• Companies listed on the Nasdaq
• Robotics companies of the United States
• Companies based in Sunnyvale, California
• Health care companies based in California
• Technology companies based in the San Francisco Bay Area
• Health care companies established in 1995
• Technology companies established in 1995
• American companies established in 1995
• Medical device manufacturers
• Medical technology companies of the United States
• 2000 initial public offerings

• Pages with non-numeric formatnum arguments
• CS1 errors: generic name
• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Articles containing potentially dated statements from December 2021
• All articles containing potentially dated statements
• All articles with unsourced statements
• Articles with unsourced statements from April 2014
• Articles with unsourced statements from August 2022