Internal medicine, also known asgeneral medicine inCommonwealth nations, is amedical specialty formedical doctors focused on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases in adults. Its namesake stems from "treatment of diseases of the internal organs".[1] Practitioners of internal medicine are referred to asinternists in North America andphysicians inBritain and most Commonwealth nations.[2] Internists possess specialized skills in managing patients with undifferentiated ormulti-system disease processes. They provide care to both hospitalized (inpatient) andambulatory (outpatient) patients and often contribute significantly to teaching and research. Internists are qualified doctors who have undergonepostgraduate training in internal medicine, and should not be confused with "interns",[3] a term commonly used for a medical doctor who has obtained amedical degree but does not yet have a license to practice medicine unsupervised.[4][5]
In the United States and Commonwealth nations, there is often confusion between internal medicine andfamily medicine, with people mistakenly considering them equivalent.
Internists primarily work in hospitals, as their patients are frequently seriously ill or require extensivemedical tests. Internists often havesubspecialty interests in diseases affecting particular organs or organ systems. The certification process and available subspecialties may vary across different countries.
Robert Koch, 19th century German physician and microbiologist[6]
The terminternal medicine in English has itsetymology in the 19th-century German termInnere Medizin. Originally,[7] internal medicine focused on determining the underlying "internal" orpathological causes ofsymptoms andsyndromes through a combination of medical tests and bedsideclinical examination of patients. It emphasized treatment of the diseases affecting the internal organs of the body.[1] This approach differed from earlier generations of physicians, such as the 17th-century English physicianThomas Sydenham, known as the father of English medicine or "the EnglishHippocrates." Sydenham developed the field ofnosology (the study of diseases) through a clinical approach that involved diagnosing and managing diseases based on careful bedside observation of thenatural history of disease and their treatment.[8] Sydenham emphasized understanding the internal mechanisms and causes of symptoms rather than dissectingcadavers and scrutinizing the internal workings of the body.[9]
In the 17th century, there was a shift towardsanatomical pathology and laboratory studies, andGiovanni Battista Morgagni, an Italian anatomist of the 18th century, is considered the father of anatomical pathology.[10]Laboratory investigations gained increasing significance, with contributions from physicians like German physician and bacteriologistRobert Koch in the 19th century.[6] During this time, internal medicine emerged as a field that integrated the clinical approach with the use of investigations.[11] Many American doctors of the early 20th century studied medicine in Germany and introduced this medical field to the United States, adopting the name "internal medicine" in imitation of the existing German term.[7]
Internal medicine specialists, also referred to as general internal medicine specialists or general medicine physicians in Commonwealth countries,[14] are specialized doctors trained to manage complex or multisystem disease conditions that single-organ specialists may not be equipped to handle.[15] They are often called upon to address undifferentiated presentations that do not fit neatly within the scope of a single-organ specialty,[16] such as shortness of breath, fatigue, weight loss, chest pain, confusion, or alterations in conscious state.[14] They may manage seriousacute illnesses that affect multiple organ systems concurrently within a single patient, as well as the management of multiplechronic diseases in a single patient.[15]
While many practitioners of internal medicine choose to subspecialize in specificorgan systems, general internal medicine specialists do not necessarily possess any lesser expertise than single-organ specialists. Rather, they are specifically trained to care for patients with multiple simultaneous problems or complex comorbidities.[16]
Due to the complexity involved in explaining the treatment of diseases that are not localized to a single organ, there has been some confusion surrounding the meaning of internal medicine and the role of an "internist".[17] Although internists may serve as providers ofprimary care, the term is not synonymous with "family doctor", "family practitioner" or "general practitioner" (GP). The training of internists is solely focused on adults and does not typically includesurgery,obstetrics, orpediatrics. According to theAmerican College of Physicians, internists are defined as doctors "who specialize in the prevention, detection, and treatment of illnesses in adults."[18] While there may be some overlap in the patient population served by both internal medicine and family medicine doctors, internists primarily focus on adult care with an emphasis on diagnosis, whereas family medicine incorporates a holistic approach to care for the entire family unit. Internists also receive substantial training in various recognized subspecialties within the field and are experienced in both inpatient and outpatient settings. On the other hand, family doctors receive education covering a wide range of conditions and typically train in an outpatient setting with less exposure to hospital settings.[19] The historical roots of internal medicine can be traced back to the incorporation of scientific principles into medical practice in the 1800s, while family medicine emerged as part of the primary care movement in the 1960s.[19][20][21]
The training and career pathways for internists vary considerably across different countries.
Many programs require previous undergraduate education prior to medical school admission. This "pre-medical" education is typically four or five years in length. Graduate medical education programs vary in length by country. Medical education programs aretertiary-levelcourses, undertaken at amedical school attached to auniversity. In the US, medical school consists of four years. Hence, gaining a basic medical education may typically take eight years, depending on jurisdiction and university.[22]
Following completion of entry-level training, newly graduated medical practitioners are often required to undertake a period of supervised practice before theirlicensure, orregistration, is granted, typically one or two years. This period may be referred to as "internship", "conditional registration", or "foundation programme". Then, doctors may follow specialty training in internal medicine if they wish, typically being selected to training programs through competition. In North America, this period of postgraduate training is referred to asresidency training, followed by an optionalfellowship if the internist decides to train in a subspecialty.[23]
In most countries, residency training for internal medicine lasts three years and centers on secondary and tertiary levels ofhealth care, as opposed toprimary health care. In Commonwealth countries, trainees are often calledsenior house officers for four years after the completion of their medical degree (foundation and core years). After this period, they are able to advance to registrar grade when they undergo a compulsory subspecialty training (including acute internal medicine or a dual subspecialty including internal medicine). This latter stage of training is achieved through competition rather than just by yearly progress as the first years of postgraduate training.[24][25]
Doctors who have completed medical school spend two years infoundation training completing a basic postgraduate curriculum. After two years ofCore Medical Training (CT1/CT2), or three years of Internal Medicine Training (IMT1/IMT2/IMT3) as of 2019, since and attaining theMembership of the Royal College of Physicians, physicians commit to one of the medical specialties:[32]
Many training programmes provide dual accreditation with general (internal) medicine and are involved in the general care to hospitalised patients. These are acute medicine, cardiology, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, endocrinology and diabetes mellitus, gastroenterology, infectious diseases, renal medicine, respiratory medicine and often, rheumatology. The role of general medicine, after a period of decline, was reemphasised by the Royal College of Physicians of London report from the Future Hospital Commission (2013).[33]
The European Board of Internal Medicine (EBIM) was formed as a collaborative effort between theEuropean Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) - Internal Medicine Section and the European Federation of Internal Medicine (EFIM) to provide guidance on standardizing training and practice of internal medicine throughout Europe.[34][35][36] The EBIM published training requirements in 2016 for postgraduate education in internal medicine, and efforts to create a European Certificate of Internal Medicine (ECIM) to facilitate the free movement of medical professionals with the EU are currently underway.[37][38]
The internal medicine specialist is recognized in every country in theEuropean Union and typically requires five years of multi-disciplinary post-graduate education.[35] The specialty of internal medicine is seen as providing care in a wide variety of conditions involving every organ system and is distinguished from family medicine in that the latter provides a broader model of care the includes both surgery and obstetrics in both adults and children.[35]
Accreditation for medical education and training programs in Australia is provided by theAustralian Medical Council (AMC) and theMedical Council of New Zealeand (MCNZ).[39][40] The Medical Board of Australia (MBA) is the registering body for Australian doctors and provides information to theAustralian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA).[41] Medical graduates apply for provisional registration in order to complete intern training. Those completing an accredited internship program are then eligible to apply for general registration.[42] Once the candidate completes the required basic and advanced post-graduate training and a written and clinical examination, theRoyal Australasian College of Physicians confers designation Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (FRACP). Basic training consists of three years of full-time equivalent (FTE) training (including intern year) and advanced training consists of 3–4 years, depending on specialty.[29] The fields of specialty practice are approved by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) and managed by the MBA. The following is a list of currently recognized specialist physicians.[43]
After completing medical school, internists in Canada require an additional four years of training. Internists desiring to subspecialize are required to complete two additional years of training that may begin after the third year of internist training.[44] TheRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) is a national non-profit agency that oversees and accredits medical education in Canada.[45] A full medical license in Internal Medicine in Canada requires a medical degree, a license from theMedical Council of Canada, completion of the required post-graduate education, and certification from the RCPSC.[30] Any additional requirements from separate medical regulatory authorities in each province or territory is also required.[30] Internists may practice in Canada as generalists in Internal Medicine or serve in one of seventeen subspecialty areas.[46] Internists may work in many settings including outpatient clinics, inpatient wards, critical care units, and emergency departments. The currently recognized subspecialties include the following:[44]
Medicine is mainly focused on the art of diagnosis and treatment withmedication. The diagnostic process involves gathering data, generating one or more diagnostic hypotheses, and iteratively testing these potential diagnoses against dynamic disease profiles to determine the best course of action for the patient.[47]
Data may be gathered directly from the patient in medical history-taking andphysical examination.[47][48] Previous medical records including laboratory findings, imaging, and clinical notes from other doctors is also an important source of information; however, it is vital to talk to and examine the patient to find out what the patient is currently experiencing to make an accurate diagnosis.[47]
History and physical examination are a vital part of the diagnostic process.[47]
Internists often can perform and interpret diagnostic tests likeEKGs andultrasound imaging (Point-of-care Ultrasound – PoCUS).[49][50]
Internists who pursue sub-specialties have additional diagnostic tools, including those listed below.
Other tests are ordered, and patients are also referred to specialists for further evaluation. The effectiveness and efficiency of the specialist referral process is an area of potential improvement.[51]
Determining which pieces of information are most important to the next phase of the diagnostic process is of vital importance.[47][52] It is during this stage that clinical bias like anchoring or premature closure may be introduced.[53] Once key findings are determined, they are compared to profiles of possible diseases. These profiles include findings that are typically associated with the disease and are based on the likelihood that someone with the disease has a particular symptom. A list of potential diagnoses is termed the "differential diagnosis" for the patient and is typically ordered from most likely to least likely, with special attention given to those conditions that have dire consequences for the patient if they were missed.[54][55] Epidemiology and endemic conditions are also considered in creating and evaluating the list of diagnoses.[56]
The list is dynamic and changes as the doctor obtains additional information that makes a condition more ("rule-in") or less ("rule-out") likely based on the disease profile.[57][58] The list is used to determine what information will be acquired next, including which diagnostic test or imaging modality to order. The selection of tests is also based on the doctor's knowledge of thespecificity and sensitivity of a particular test.[59][60][61]
An important part of this process is knowledge of the various ways that a disease can present in a patient. This knowledge is gathered and shared to add to the database of disease profiles used by doctors. This is especially important in rare diseases.[62]
Communication is a vital part of the diagnostic process. The Internist uses both synchronous and asynchronous communication with other members of the medical care team, including other internists, radiologists, specialists, and laboratory technicians.[63] Tools to evaluate teamwork exist and have been employed in multiple settings.[64]
Communication to the patient is also important to ensure there is informed consent and shared decision-making throughout the diagnostic process.[65]
Treatment modalities generally include both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, depending on the primary diagnosis.[66][67][68][69][70] Additional treatment options include referral to specialist care including physical therapy and rehabilitation.[71] Treatment recommendations differ in the acute inpatient and outpatient settings.[69][72] Continuity of care and long-term follow-up is crucial in successful patient outcomes.[73][74][75]
Aside from diagnosing and treating acute conditions, the Internist may also assess disease risk and recommend preventive screening and intervention. Some of the tools available to the Internist include genetic evaluation.[76][77]
Internists also routinely provide pre-operative medical evaluations including individualized assessment and communication of operative risk.[78]
Training the next generation of internists is an important part of the profession. As mentioned above, post-graduate medical education is provided by licensed doctors as part of accredited education programs that are usually affiliated with teaching hospitals.[79] Studies show that there are no differences in patient outcomes in teaching versus non-teaching facilities.[80] Medical research is an important part of most post-graduate education programs, and many licensed doctors continue to be involved in research activities after completing post-graduate training.[81][82]
Inherent in any medical profession are legal and ethical considerations. Specific laws vary by jurisdiction and may or may not be congruent with ethical considerations.[83] Thus, a strong ethical foundation is paramount to any medical profession. Medical ethics guidelines in the Western world typically follow four principles includingbeneficence,non-maleficence, patient autonomy, andjustice.[83] These principles underlie the doctor–patient relationship and the obligation to put the welfare and interests of the patient above their own.[84]
The relationship is built upon the doctor's obligations of competency, respect for the patient, and appropriate referrals while the patient requirements include decision-making and provides or withdraws consent for any treatment plan. Good communication is key to a strong relationship but has ethical considerations as well, including proper use of electronic communication and clear documentation.[85][86]
Providing treatment including prescribing medications based on remote information gathering without a proper established relationship is not accepted as good practice with few exceptions.[87] These exceptions include cross-coverage within a practice and certain public health urgent or emergent issues.[83]
The ethics oftelemedicine including questions on its impact to diagnosis, doctor-patient relationship, and continuity of care have been raised.[83][88] However, with appropriate use and specific guidelines, risks may be minimized and the benefits including increased access to care may be realized.[83]
Ethical considerations in financial include accurate billing practices and clearly defined financial relationships. Doctors have both a professional duty and obligation under the justice principle to ensure that patients are provided the same care regardless of status or ability to pay. However, informal copayment forgiveness may have legal ramifications and the providing professional courtesy may have negatively impact care.[83]
Dotors must disclose all possibleconflicts of interest including financial relationships, investments, research and referral relationships, and any other instances that may subjugate or give the appearance of subjugating patient care to self-interest.[83][89]
Other foundational ethical considerations include privacy, confidentiality, accurate and complete medical records,electronic health records, disclosure, and informed decision-making and consent.[83]
Electronic health records have been shown to improve patient care but have risks including data breaches and inappropriate and/or unauthorized disclosure of protected health information.[90]
Withholding information from a patient is typically seen as unethical and in violation of a patient's right to make informed decisions. However, in situations where a patient has requested not to be informed or to have the information provided to a second party or in an emergency situation in which the patient does not have decision-making capacity, withholding information may be appropriate.[91][92]
^Arneson, J; McDonald, WJ (July 1998). "Can we educate the public about internal medicine? Initial results".The American Journal of Medicine.105 (1):1–5.doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00220-4.PMID9688013.
^Freeman, Brian S. (2012).The ultimate guide to choosing a medical specialty (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical. pp. 229–250.ISBN978-0-07-179027-7.
^Abyad, Abdulrazak; Al-Baho, Abeer Khaled; Unluoglu, Ilhami; Tarawneh, Mohammed; Al Hilfy, Thamer Kadum Yousif (November 2007). "Development of family medicine in the middle East".Family Medicine.39 (10):736–741.ISSN0742-3225.PMID17987417.
^Olgers, T. J.; Azizi, N.; Blans, M. J.; Bosch, F. H.; Gans, R. O. B.; Ter Maaten, J. C. (June 2019). "Point-of-care Ultrasound (PoCUS) for the internist in Acute Medicine: a uniform curriculum".The Netherlands Journal of Medicine.77 (5):168–176.ISSN1872-9061.PMID31264587.
^Kwok, Chun Shing; Bennett, Sadie; Azam, Ziyad; Welsh, Victoria; Potluri, Rahul; Loke, Yoon K.; Mallen, Christian D. (2021-09-01). "Misdiagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review of the Literature".Critical Pathways in Cardiology.20 (3):155–162.doi:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000256.ISSN1535-2811.PMID33606411.S2CID231961318.
^Knuuti, Juhani; Ballo, Haitham; Juarez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo; Saraste, Antti; Kolh, Philippe; Rutjes, Anne Wilhelmina Saskia; Jüni, Peter; Windecker, Stephan; Bax, Jeroen J.; Wijns, William (2018-09-14). "The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability".European Heart Journal.39 (35):3322–3330.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy267.hdl:11380/1286682.ISSN1522-9645.PMID29850808.
^Wacker, Christina; Prkno, Anna; Brunkhorst, Frank M.; Schlattmann, Peter (May 2013). "Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis".The Lancet. Infectious Diseases.13 (5):426–435.doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70323-7.ISSN1474-4457.PMID23375419.
^Kripalani, Sunil; LeFevre, Frank; Phillips, Christopher O.; Williams, Mark V.; Basaviah, Preetha; Baker, David W. (2007-02-28). "Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care".JAMA.297 (8):831–841.doi:10.1001/jama.297.8.831.ISSN1538-3598.PMID17327525.
^Neugut, Alfred I.; MacLean, Sarah A.; Dai, Wei F.; Jacobson, Judith S. (February 2019). "Physician Characteristics and Decisions Regarding Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review".Population Health Management.22 (1):48–62.doi:10.1089/pop.2017.0206.ISSN1942-7905.PMID29889616.S2CID48359458.
^Levi, M. (June 2010). "Abundance of research talent in internal medicine".The Netherlands Journal of Medicine.68 (6):234–235.ISSN1872-9061.PMID20558852.
^Ng, Ercan-Fang; Ma, Mahmoud; C, Cottrell; Jp, Campbell; Dm, MacDonald; T, Arayssi; Dc, Rockey (January 2021). "Best Practices in Resident Research- A National Survey of High Functioning Internal Medicine Residency Programs in Resident Research in USA".The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.361 (1):23–29.doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2020.08.004.ISSN1538-2990.PMID33288205.S2CID225377201.
^Farnan, Jeanne M.; Snyder Sulmasy, Lois; Worster, Brooke K.; Chaudhry, Humayun J.; Rhyne, Janelle A.; Arora, Vineet M.; American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee; American College of Physicians Council of Associates; Federation of State Medical Boards Special Committee on Ethics and Professionalism* (2013-04-16). "Online medical professionalism: patient and public relationships: policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards".Annals of Internal Medicine.158 (8):620–627.doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00100.ISSN1539-3704.PMID23579867.S2CID24921697.
^Snyder, Lois; Weiner, J (2005). "Ethics and Medicaid patients". In Snyder, L (ed.).Ethical choices: case studies for medical practice. American College of Physicians. pp. 130–5.ISBN1-930513-57-7.OCLC1034917748.
^Snyder, L; Hillman, AL (2005). "Financial incentives and physician decision making". In Snyder, L (ed.).Ethical choices: case studies for medical practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: American College of Physicians. pp. 169–75.ISBN1-930513-57-7.OCLC56531440.
Goldman, Lee (15 April 2001). "Key challenges confronting internal medicine in the early twenty-first century".The American Journal of Medicine.110 (6):463–470.doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00649-0.PMID11331058.
Meltzer, David; Manning, WG; Morrison, J; Shah, MN; Jin, L; Guth, T; Levinson, W (Dec 3, 2002). "Effects of Physician Experience on Costs and Outcomes on an Academic General Medicine Service: Results of a Trial of Hospitalists".Annals of Internal Medicine.137 (11):866–74.doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-11-200212030-00007.PMID12458986.S2CID31987327.
Sox, Harold C (Jun 15, 2001). "Supply, demand, and the workforce of internal medicine".The American Journal of Medicine.110 (9):745–749.doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00756-2.PMID11403763.
