![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
Part of a series of articles about | ||||||
Calculus | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
| ||||||
Specialized | ||||||
Inmathematics, anintegral transform is a type oftransform that maps afunction from its originalfunction space into another function space viaintegration, where some of the properties of the original function might be more easily characterized and manipulated than in the original function space. The transformed function can generally be mapped back to the original function space using theinverse transform.
An integral transform is anytransform of the following form:
The input of this transform is afunction, and the output is another function. An integral transform is a particular kind of mathematicaloperator.
There are numerous useful integral transforms. Each is specified by a choice of the function of twovariables, that is called thekernel ornucleus of the transform.
Some kernels have an associatedinverse kernel which (roughly speaking) yields an inverse transform:
Asymmetric kernel is one that is unchanged when the two variables are permuted; it is a kernel function such that. In the theory of integral equations, symmetric kernels correspond toself-adjoint operators.[1]
There are many classes of problems that are difficult to solve—or at least quite unwieldy algebraically—in their original representations. An integral transform "maps" an equation from its original "domain" into another domain, in which manipulating and solving the equation may be much easier than in the original domain. The solution can then be mapped back to the original domain with the inverse of the integral transform.
There are many applications of probability that rely on integral transforms, such as "pricing kernel" orstochastic discount factor, or the smoothing of data recovered from robust statistics; seekernel (statistics).
The precursor of the transforms were theFourier series to express functions in finite intervals. Later theFourier transform was developed to remove the requirement of finite intervals.
Using the Fourier series, just about any practical function of time (thevoltage across the terminals of anelectronic device for example) can be represented as a sum ofsines andcosines, each suitably scaled (multiplied by a constant factor), shifted (advanced or retarded in time) and "squeezed" or "stretched" (increasing or decreasing the frequency). The sines and cosines in the Fourier series are an example of anorthonormal basis.
As an example of an application of integral transforms, consider theLaplace transform. This is a technique that mapsdifferential orintegro-differential equations in the"time" domain into polynomial equations in what is termed the"complex frequency" domain. (Complex frequency is similar to actual, physical frequency but rather more general. Specifically, the imaginary componentω of the complex frequencys = −σ +iω corresponds to the usual concept of frequency,viz., the rate at which a sinusoid cycles, whereas the real componentσ of the complex frequency corresponds to the degree of "damping", i.e. an exponential decrease of the amplitude.) The equation cast in terms of complex frequency is readily solved in the complex frequency domain (roots of the polynomial equations in the complex frequency domain correspond toeigenvalues in the time domain), leading to a "solution" formulated in the frequency domain. Employing theinverse transform,i.e., the inverse procedure of the original Laplace transform, one obtains a time-domain solution. In this example, polynomials in the complex frequency domain (typically occurring in the denominator) correspond topower series in the time domain, while axial shifts in the complex frequency domain correspond to damping by decaying exponentials in the time domain.
The Laplace transform finds wide application in physics and particularly in electrical engineering, where thecharacteristic equations that describe the behavior of an electric circuit in the complex frequency domain correspond to linear combinations of exponentially scaled and time-shifteddamped sinusoids in the time domain. Other integral transforms find special applicability within other scientific and mathematical disciplines.
Another usage example is the kernel in thepath integral:
This states that the total amplitude to arrive at is the sum (the integral) over all possible values of the total amplitude to arrive at the point multiplied by the amplitude to go from to[i.e.].[2] It is often referred to as thepropagator for a given system. This (physics) kernel is the kernel of the integral transform. However, for each quantum system, there is a different kernel.[3]
Transform | Symbol | K | f(t) | t1 | t2 | K−1 | u1 | u2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abel transform | F, f | [4] | t | |||||
Associated Legendre transform | ||||||||
Fourier transform | ||||||||
Fourier sine transform | on, real-valued | |||||||
Fourier cosine transform | on, real-valued | |||||||
Hankel transform | ||||||||
Hartley transform | ||||||||
Hermite transform | ||||||||
Hilbert transform | ||||||||
Jacobi transform | ||||||||
Laguerre transform | ||||||||
Laplace transform | ||||||||
Legendre transform | ||||||||
Mellin transform | [5] | |||||||
Two-sided Laplace transform | ||||||||
Poisson kernel | ||||||||
Radon transform | Rƒ | |||||||
Weierstrass transform | ||||||||
X-ray transform | Xƒ |
In the limits of integration for the inverse transform,c is a constant which depends on the nature of the transform function. For example, for the one and two-sided Laplace transform,c must be greater than the largest real part of the zeroes of the transform function.
Note that there are alternative notations and conventions for the Fourier transform.
Here integral transforms are defined for functions on the real numbers, but they can be defined more generally for functions on a group.
Although the properties of integral transforms vary widely, they have some properties in common. For example, every integral transform is alinear operator, since the integral is a linear operator, and in fact if the kernel is allowed to be ageneralized function then all linear operators are integral transforms (a properly formulated version of this statement is theSchwartz kernel theorem).
The general theory of suchintegral equations is known asFredholm theory. In this theory, the kernel is understood to be acompact operator acting on aBanach space of functions. Depending on the situation, the kernel is then variously referred to as theFredholm operator, thenuclear operator or theFredholm kernel.