This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
In mathematics, aninfinite-dimensional Lebesgue measure is ameasure defined on infinite-dimensionalnormed vector spaces, such asBanach spaces, which resembles theLebesgue measure used in finite-dimensional spaces.
However, the traditional Lebesgue measure cannot be straightforwardly extended to all infinite-dimensional spaces due to a key limitation: any translation-invariantBorel measure on an infinite-dimensionalseparable Banach space must be either infinite for all sets or zero for all sets. Despite this, certain forms of infinite-dimensional Lebesgue-like measures can exist in specific contexts. These include locally compact spaces like theHilbert cube, which is compact, or scenarios where some typical properties of finite-dimensional Lebesgue measures are modified or omitted.
The Lebesgue measure on theEuclidean space islocally finite,strictly positive, andtranslation-invariant. That is:
Motivated by their geometrical significance, constructing measures satisfying the above set properties for infinite-dimensional spaces such as the spaces orpath spaces is still an open and active area of research.
Let be an infinite-dimensional,separable Banach space. Then, the only locally finite and translation invariantBorel measure on is atrivial measure. Equivalently, there is no locally finite, strictly positive, and translation invariant measure on.[1]
More generally: on a non locally compactPolish group, there cannot exist aσ-finite andleft-invariant Borel measure.[1]
This theorem implies that on an infinite dimensional separable Banach space (which cannot belocally compact) a measure that perfectly matches the properties of a finite dimensional Lebesgue measure does not exist.
Let be an infinite-dimensional, separable Banach space equipped with a locally finite translation-invariant measure. To prove that is the trivial measure, it is sufficient and necessary to show that
Like every separablemetric space, is aLindelöf space, which means that every open cover of has a countable subcover. It is, therefore, enough to show that there exists some open cover of by null sets because by choosing a countable subcover, theσ-subadditivity of will imply that
Using local finiteness of the measure, suppose that for some theopen ball of radius has a finite-measure. Since is infinite-dimensional, byRiesz's lemma there is an infinite sequence ofpairwise disjoint open balls, of radius with all the smaller balls contained within By translation invariance, all the cover's balls have the same-measure, and since the infinite sum of these finite-measures are finite, the cover's balls must all have-measure zero.
Since was arbitrary, every open ball in has zero-measure, and taking a cover of which is the set of all open balls that completes the proof that.
Here are some examples of infinite-dimensional Lebesgue measures that can exist if the conditions of the above theorem are relaxed.
One example for an entirely separable Banach space is theabstract Wiener space construction, similar to a product of Gaussian measures (which are not translation invariant). Another approach is to consider a Lebesgue measure of finite-dimensional subspaces within the larger space and look atprevalent and shy sets.[2]
TheHilbert cube carries theproduct Lebesgue measure[3] and the compacttopological group given by theTychonoff product of an infinite number of copies of thecircle group is infinite-dimensional and carries aHaar measure that is translation-invariant. These two spaces can be mapped onto each other in a measure-preserving way by unwrapping the circles into intervals. The infinite product of the additive real numbers has the analogous product Haar measure, which is precisely the infinite-dimensional analog of the Lebesgue measure.[citation needed]
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)