From 1869 onwards, theSuez Canal (depicted above) has offered a direct Indo-Mediterranean maritime route, and has become the main intermediate trade corridor in the region.[1]
From around 3000 BCE to 1000 CE, connectivity withinAfro-Eurasia was centered upon the Indo-Mediterranean region;[2]William Dalrymple has argued that connectivity in Eurasia centered on this region along with the West Pacific, which put together he refers to as a "Golden Road", until 1200 CE and the rise of theSilk Road.[3]Gamal Abdel Nasser, the second president of Egypt (which is at the heart of the Indo-Mediterranean) once described the country as "the crossroads of the world, the thoroughfare of its traders and passageway of its armies."[4]
Caravan traffic through the extended arid zone at the heart of much of Afro-Eurasia played a significant role in allowing for Indian Ocean and Mediterranean ports to thrive and trade with each other.[5] However, Southeast Asia was only loosely connected to the Indo-Mediterranean trade, primarily receiving a few Mediterranean objects through the filter of South Asia.[6]
In the second half of the first century BCE, theRoman Empire emerged with a unified realm and control over the Mediterranean, allowing for more investment and wealth generation; thisPax Romana allowed Rome to also become involved in the Indian Ocean trade.[9][10] Their 30 BCEconquest of Egypt better positioned them to be involved in the region, with Indian ambassadors coming to Rome in increasing numbers as theIndo-Roman trade began to greatly expand in volume;[11][12] Greek merchants settled on thewest coast of India to facilitate the trade,[13] with Romans celebrating the luxury products and wealth thusly acquired.[9][14] This connectivity between Europe and the Indian Ocean reduced the importance of theBlack Sea ports that the Greeks hadhelped establish in earlier centuries.[15]
The Indo-Mediterranean also facilitated interactions between India and the Mesopotamians, Anatolians and Greeks in different time periods;[16] many actors were involved in facilitating trade throughout this region, including Egyptians,Nabateans and Palmyrenes.[17] The Abrahamic religions began to have a more significantpresence in India in the early first millennium;[18] Christian commercial networks and their potential for enabling religion to spread in the Indian Ocean were to foreshadow, but not successfully parallel the later rise of Islam.[19]
Some evidence is present to suggest that Indo-Mediterranean trade may have also involved a "northern route" through theCaspian Sea andPontic–Caspian steppe.[20]
The expansion of the firstArab Muslim empires from the 7th century onward, which conquered much of the Mediterranean, played a role in bridging the Indo-Mediterranean together.[21] TheHajj pilgrimage, a fundamental element of Islam, also encouraged frequent convergence among Muslims who could make the maritime voyage towardMecca. Islam's success in connecting land and maritime spaces throughout Afro-Eurasia, contrasting with certain anti-maritime attitudes such askala pani that could be found in the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean from the pre-medieval era,[22] can be seen in the 14th century voyages of the famous travellerIbn Battuta.[23]
By the 14th century, buoyed by the emergence of overlapping trading networks from the western regions of Africa to the east coast, centralsub-Saharan Africa became more involved in Indo-Mediterranean trade, with the Indo-Mediterranean generally going on to become more economically unified by thespread of Islam.[24]
The Portuguese created new ties between Europe and the Indian Ocean in the 1490s bydiscovering a route through the Indo-Atlantic that circumnavigated Africa. The new route gave Europe the opportunity for greater parity with the commercial dominance of Muslims in the Indian Ocean even as they were facing the threat of the expanding Ottoman Empire from the southeast;[25] Ramachandra Byrappa has argued that the Ottomans may have intentionally destroyed an overland trade route between the Indian economic sphere and Europe seeking to make conquest easier around the Middle East, but that this inadvertently led toWestern colonialism, as the Europeans grew in influence because of their success indiscovering alternative routes into the world.[26]Wang Gungwu has similarly pointed out that it was the medieval "stalemate" between the "Christian West and core Islamic lands" in the Mediterranean that led toAtlantic Europe's integration into the world.[27] The resulting shifts in world dynamics saw the Indo-Mediterranean become less central until the 21st century.[26]
For the Ottomans, theirconquest of Constantinople in 1453 increased their reach in the Mediterranean, and in the next century, they also gained access to the western Indian Ocean by acquiringEgypt andBaghdad. This set the stage for theOttoman–Portuguese confrontations.[28] As for the Portuguese, their perception and persecution of Muslims as the primary enemy in the region fostered an anti-Portuguese sentiment among Indo-Mediterranean Muslims along with some calls for jihad.[29] This formed part of a broader Ibero-Islamic conflict ranging from Europe toMaritime Southeast Asia, involving major developments such as the IberianReconquista.[30] KingManuel I of Portugal even sought at the turn of the 16th century to strike atJerusalem, the target ofCrusades from Mediterranean Europe for centuries, from the Red Sea.[31][32] In general, the Western European presence in the Indian Ocean was based on precedents formed in the Mediterranean by Venice and Genoa, bringing gun-based "trading-post empires" to a previously peaceful region[33] (though contestation and piracy had been features of the region beforehand.)[34] By the 17th and 18th centuries, various Western European forces werecontesting the Persian Gulf, which had important, long-standing ties to trade in the Levant.[35]
British imperial dominance was achieved by the mid-20th century in much of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean
Rising Western dominance and changes in communication technologies in the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean began to reshape local dynamics by the 19th century.[36] After 1837, overland travel from Britain toBritish India was popularised;[37] from 1840, steam ships were used to facilitate this travel on both sides of Egypt, and from the 1850s, railways were constructed along the route. The usefulness of this new route was shown during theIndian Rebellion of 1857, with 5,000 British troops having arrived through Egypt.[38] The 1869 completion of theSuez Canal then helped togreatly expand European colonialism, as it enabled faster passage from Europe to Indian OceanAfro-Asia.[39] By the turn of the 20th century, British planners contemplated building an Indo-Mediterranean railway to shore up lines of communication with India in case the Suez Canal was blocked.[40][41]
In some cases, 21st century Arctic shipping routes are almost half as long as Suez Canal routes
British dominance in the region was ended with the 1956Suez Crisis, with the United States then going through a period ofCold War conflict with the Soviet Union before emerging as the new hegemon in the region.[43] In the early 21st century, the U.S. has had to compete with China in the Indian Ocean, and so it has furthered its ties with India.[44]
Italian foreign policy planners have recently been examining Italy's modern role in the "Enlarged Mediterranean", including its ties to the Indo-Mediterranean and theIndo-Pacific.[45][46] They see the Red Sea as particularly important due its bridging role in the Indo-Mediterranean.[47]
The 21st century melting of the Arctic is paving the way fornew shipping routes between the Atlantic and the Pacific that are shorter than and may challenge the dominance of the conventional route through the Suez Canal.[48] Geopolitical events also affect the relevance of the Indo-Mediterranean; for example, from December 2023 to mid-February 2024,Houthi attacks caused a 90% drop in Red Sea container traffic.[49]
The proposed India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor.
TheIndia–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) has been proposed to handle trade in the region. Indian External Affairs MinisterS. Jaishankar affirmed the initiative in 2024, citing the historical importance and rising trade taking place in the region.[50]
TheIndo-Mediterranean Initiative (IMI)[51] was launched on the 16th of June 2024 atAra Pacis under the leadership of SenatorGiulio Terzi di Sant'Agata, former foreign Minister ofItaly hosted[52] by theIndian Chamber of Commerce's Chief Representative for Italy, Vas Shenoy. The initiative aims to track IMEC, bring together decision makers, thinkers, policy experts in the IMEC countries to discuss the security, future and strategy of the Indo-Mediterranean.
This is a list of countries that are part of the Indo-Mediterranean, since they lie along theIndian Ocean or theMediterranean, or both. It is arranged from north to south, west to east in directional order.
^Truxillo, Charles A.By the Sword and the Cross: The Historical Evolution of the Catholic World Monarchy in Spain and the New World, 1492-1825.
^Portugal, RCAAP-Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de."RCAAP - D. Manuel, a Índia e o Brasil".RCAAP - Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (in Portuguese). Retrieved2025-03-12.
