Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Indo-Aryan superstrate in Mitanni

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Aspect of Indo-Aryan language

This articlemay be too technical for most readers to understand. Pleasehelp improve it tomake it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details.(April 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Indo-Aryan superstrate in Mitanni
Mitanni-Aryan
Native toMitanni
RegionUpper Mesopotamia
EthnicityIndo-Aryan peoples of Mitanni
Extinctafter 1300s BC[1]
Indo-European
Cuneiform
Language codes
ISO 639-3None (mis)
GlottologNone
Map of the ancient Indo-Iranian languages, including Mittani-Aryan.

The ancient Middle Eastern state ofMitanni (modern-day NortheastSyria, SoutheasternTurkey,2nd millennium BCE) used a dialect ofHurrian as its main language. This dialect however contains some loanwords of evidentlyIndo-Aryan origin, i.e. related toSanskrit, the ancestor of many modern languages of the Indian subcontinent. The loaned vocabulary seems to be related to an elite group in Mitanni society, as they appear in the names of rulers and gods as well as in relation to horse-breeding and the military (thus forming a so-calledsuperstrate).[2]

It is thus generally believed thatIndo-Aryan peoples settled inUpper Mesopotamia and northernSyria, and established the kingdom ofMitanni following a period of political vacuum, while also adopting Hurrian. This is considered a part of theIndo-Aryan migrations.[3][4][5]

Linguistic context

Some theonyms, proper names, and other terminology of the LateBronze AgeMitanni civilisation ofUpper Mesopotamia exhibit an Indo-Aryan superstrate. While what few written records left by the Mittani are either inHurrian (which appears to have been the predominant language of their kingdom) orAkkadian (the maindiplomatic language of the Late Bronze Age Near East), these apparently Indo-Aryan names suggest that an Indo-Aryan elite imposed itself over theHurrians in the course of theIndo-Aryan expansion. If these traces are Indo-Aryan, they would be the earliest known direct evidence of Indo-Aryan, and would increase the precision in dating the split between the Indo-Aryan and Iranian languages (as the texts in which the apparent Indicisms occur can be dated with some accuracy).

Scholarship has reached a consensus that the linguistic data is most certainly affiliated to theIndo-Iranian language family, more specifically toIndo-Aryan.[2][6] Professor Eva von Dassow concurs with the presence of Indo-Aryan terms in Mitanni vocabulary, but cautiously advises against the notion of an "Indo-Aryan takeover".[7]Michael Witzel argues for the antiquity of the Indo-Aryan words attested in the Mitanni data, since they almost certainly predate linguistic developments attested in theRigveda.[8] In the same vein, German linguistMartin Joachim Kümmel [de] divides the Indo-Aryan elements into WIA (Western Indo-Aryan) and (E)IA ((Eastern) Indo-Aryan), the latter "being slightly less archaic than WIA".[2]

Historical context

In a treaty between theHittites and Mitanni (betweenSuppiluliuma I andShattiwaza, c. 1380 BC), the deitiesMitra,Varuna,Indra, andNasatya (Ashvins) are invoked.Kikkuli's horse training text (circa 1400 BC) includes technical terms such asaika (Vedic Sanskriteka, one),tera (tri, three),panza (pañca, five),satta (sapta, seven),na (nava, nine),vartana (vartana, round). The numeralaika "one" is of particular importance because it places the superstrate in the vicinity of Indo-Aryan proper (Vedic Sanskriteka, with regular contraction of /ai/ to [eː]) as opposed toIndo-Iranian or early Iranian (which has*aiva; compare Vediceva "only") in general.[9]

The Mitanni warriors were calledmarya (Hurrian:maria-nnu), the term for '(young) warrior' inSanskrit as well,[10] formed by adding the Hurrian suffix-nnu;[11] note 'mišta-nnu' (= miẓḍha,~ Sanskrit mīḍha) "payment (for catching a fugitive)".[12]

Attested words and comparisons

All of the following examples are from Witzel (2001).[13] For the pronunciation of the sounds transcribed from cuneiform asš andz, seeAkkadian language § Consonants andProto-Semitic language § Fricatives.

Names of people

Transcription of cuneiformInterpretationVedic equivalentComments
bi-ir-ya-ma-aš-daPriyamazdhaPriyamedha"whose wisdom is dear"; /azd(ʰ)/ to [eːd(ʰ)] is a regular development in Vedic and its descendants (Indo-Aryan in the narrow sense)
bi-ir-ya-aš-šu-wa, bi-ir-da-aš-šu-waPriyāśva ~ PrītāśvaPrītāśva"whose horse is dear"
ar-ta-aš-šu-ma-raArtasmaraṚtasmara"who thinks of Arta/Ṛta"
ar-ta-ta-a-maArtadhāma(n?)Ṛtadhāman"his abode is Ṛta"
tu-uš-rat-ta, tu-iš-e-rat-ta, tu-uš-e-rat-taTvaiša(?)rathaTveṣáratha"whose chariot is vehement"
in-tar-ú-da, en-dar-ú-taIndrautaIndrota"helped byIndra"; /au/ to [oː] is a regular development in Vedic;úspecifically indicates [u] as opposed to [o]

Sanskritic interpretations of Mitanni names render Artashumara (artaššumara) as Arta-smara "who thinks ofArta/Ṛta",[14] Biridashva (biridašṷa, biriiašṷa) as Prītāśva "whose horse is dear",[15] Priyamazda (priiamazda) as Priyamedha "whose wisdom is dear",[16][17] Citrarata as Citraratha "whose chariot is shining",[18] Indaruda/Endaruta as Indrota "helped by Indra",[19] Shativaza (šattiṷaza) as Sātivāja "winning the race prize",[20] Šubandu as Subandhu "having good relatives" (a name in Palestine[21]),Tushratta (tṷišeratta, tušratta, etc.) as *tṷaišaratha, Vedic Tveṣaratha "whose chariot is vehement".[22]

Names of deities

From treaties of Mitanni.

Transcription of cuneiformInterpretationVedic equivalentComments
a-ru-na, ú-ru-wa-naVarunaVaruna
mi-it-raMitraMitra
in-tar, in-da-raIndraIndra
na-ša-ti-ya-an-naNasatya(-nna)NasatyaHurrian grammatical ending-nna
a-ak-ni-išĀgnisAgnionly attested inHittite, which retains nominative -/s/ and lengthens stressed syllables

Horse training

FromKikkuli.

Transcription of cuneiformInterpretationVedic equivalentComments
a-aš-šu-uš-ša-an-niāśva-san-ni?aśva-sana-"master horse trainer" (Kikkuli himself)
-aš-šu-wa-aśvaaśva"horse"; in personal names
a-i-ka-aika-eka"1"
ti-e-ra-tera- ?tri"3"
pa-an-za-pańća- ?pañca"5"; Vedicc is not an affricate,[citation needed] but apparently its Mitanni equivalent was
ša-at-tasattasapta"7"; /pt/ to /tː/ is either an innovation in Mitanni or a misinterpretation by a scribe who had Hurrianšinti "7" in mind
na-a-[w]a-nāva-nava"9"
wa-ar-ta-an-navartan(n)avartanaround, turn

Other lexicon

A document fromNuzi hasbabru(-nnu) (babhru, brown),parita(-nnu) (palita, grey), andpinkara(-nnu) (pingala, red) for horse colours. Their chief festival was the celebration of thesolstice which was common in most cultures in the ancient world.

The following table includes the remaining lexicon, considered to attest horse colours.[23]

Transcription of cuneiformInterpretationVedic equivalentComments
ba-ab-ru-un-nu[24]papru-nnu orbabru-nnubabhrú-'brown'
pi2-in-ka4-ra-an-nu[25]pinkara-nnu orbingara-nnupiṅgalá-'reddish brown'
pa2-ri-it-ta-an-nu[26]paritta-nnu orbaritta-nnupalitá-'gray'

See also

References

  1. ^Sigfried J. de Laet 1996, p. 196.
  2. ^abcKümmel 2022, p. 246.
  3. ^Sigfried J. de Laet 1996, p. 562.
  4. ^Beckwith 2009, pp. 39–41.
  5. ^Bryce 2005, p. 55.
  6. ^Halfmann, Jakob Martin (2025).The Diversification of Indo-Iranian and the Position of the Nuristani Languages. Beiträge zur Iranistik. Vol. 54. Wiesbaden: DR. LUDWIG REICHERT VERLAG. p. 23.doi:10.29091/9783752003543.ISBN 9783752003543....a consensus appears to have emerged that this adstrate vocabulary [Mitanni-Aryan] is real (though its extent may have been overestimated in the past) and that it should furthermore be considered as specifically Indo-Aryan, though representing an earlier stage of development than that seen in the earliest attested Old Indo-Aryan texts.
  7. ^Dassow 2014, pp. 12–14.
  8. ^Witzel 2001, pp. 5 and footnote nr. 8, 36, 49, 53–55.
  9. ^Fournet 2010, pp. 26–40.
  10. ^Mayrhofer 1998, p. 293.
  11. ^Dassow 2014, p. 27.
  12. ^Mayrhofer 1998, Entry "mīḍha". p. 358.
  13. ^Witzel 2001, pp. 1–115.
  14. ^Mayrhofer 1998, Entry "SMAR". p. 780.
  15. ^Mayrhofer 1998, p. 182.
  16. ^Mayrhofer 1998, Entry "priyá-". p. 189.
  17. ^Mayrhofer 1998, Entry "medhắ-". p. 378.
  18. ^Mayrhofer 1992, p. 553.
  19. ^Mayrhofer 1992, pp. 134.
  20. ^Mayrhofer 1998, pp. 540, 696.
  21. ^Mayrhofer 1998, pp. 209, 735.
  22. ^Mayrhofer 1992, pp. 686, 736.
  23. ^Deshpande, Madhav M. (1995). "Vedic Aryans, non-Vedic Aryans, and non-Aryans: Judging the linguistic evidence of the Veda". In George Erdosy (ed.).The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia: Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 67-84 [71].doi:10.1515/9783110816433-008.
  24. ^Kogan, Leonid; Krebernik, Manfred (2020).Etymological Dictionary of Akkadian. Vol. 1: Roots beginning with p and b. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. p. 392.doi:10.1515/9781614512394.
  25. ^Kogan, Leonid; Krebernik, Manfred (2020).Etymological Dictionary of Akkadian. Vol. 1: Roots beginning with p and b. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. p. 372.doi:10.1515/9781614512394.
  26. ^Kogan, Leonid; Krebernik, Manfred (2020).Etymological Dictionary of Akkadian. Vol. 1: Roots beginning with p and b. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 348–349.doi:10.1515/9781614512394.

Sources

Further reading

Dardic?
Kashmiric
Shinaic
Kunar
Kohistani
Others
Northern
Eastern
Central
Western
Northwestern
Punjabi
Eastern
Lahnda
Sindhi
Western
Gujarati
Rajasthani
Bhil
Romani
Northern
Others
Others
Central
Western
Eastern
Others
Eastern
Bihari
Bhojpuric
Magahi
Maithili
Sadanic
Tharuic
Others
Gauda–
Kamarupa
Bengali
Kamarupic
Odia
Halbic
Southern
Marathi–
Konkani
Marathic
Konkanic
Insular
Old
Middle
Early
Middle (Prakrit)
Late (Apabhraṃśa)
Proto-
languages
Unclassified
Pidgins
and creoles
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Aryan_superstrate_in_Mitanni&oldid=1328839568"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp