Indigenismo (Spanish:[indixeˈnismo]) is a political ideology in severalLatin American countries which emphasizes the relationship between the nation state andindigenous nations and indigenous peoples.[1] In some contemporary uses, it refers to the pursuit of greater social and political inclusion forindigenous peoples in Latin America, whether through nation-wide reforms or region-wide alliances.[2] In either case, this type ofindigenismo seeks to vindicate indigenous cultural and linguistic difference, assert indigenous rights, and seek recognition and in some cases compensation for past wrongdoings of the colonial and republican states.[3] Nevertheless, some historical figures likeJosé Martí are classified as having been both indigenistas and hispanistas.[4]
Originally,indigenismo was a component of Mexican nationalism that consolidated after theMexican Revolution. Thisindigenismo lauded some aspects of indigenous cultural heritage, but primarily as a relic of the past. Within the larger national narrative of the Mexican nation as the product of European and Amerindianmestizaje,indigenismo was a component of Mexicannation-building, and an expression of freedom for an imagined, reclaimed identity that was stripped during theSpanish colonization of Mexico.
During the administration ofPlutarco Elías Calles (1924–28),Moisés Sáenz, who held a doctorate fromColumbia University and was a follower ofJohn Dewey's educational methods, implemented aspects ofindigenismo in the Department of Public Education. Sáenz had initially taken an assimilationist position on the "Indian problem," but after a period of residence in thePurépecha community of Carapan, he shifted his stance to one focusing on the material conditions affecting the indigenous. He influenced the administration ofLázaro Cárdenas (1934–40), which established the cabinet-level position of the Department of Indigenous Affairs in 1936.[5] The department's main efforts were in the economic and educational spheres.[6] Cárdenas valorized indigeneity, as indicated by the creation of the cabinet-level position and resources put into indigenous communities. In 1940, Mexico hosted a multinational meeting onindigenismo, The Congress of Inter-American Indigenism, held inPátzcuaro, where Cárdenas himself addressed the gathering.[7] PresidentMiguel Alemán reorganized the Mexican government's policies directed at the indigenous by creating theNational Indigenist Institute (Instituto Nacional Indigenista or INI). In theVicente Fox administration, the unit was reorganized and renamed.
The valorization of indigeneity was rarely carried over to contemporary indigenous people, who were targeted for assimilation into modern Mexican society. Though the authors of indigenist policies saw themselves as seeking to protect and relieve indigenous people, their efforts did not make a clean break fromforced assimilation practices of the pre-revolutionary past.[8]
InPeru, it was initially associated with theAPRA movement founded byVíctor Raúl Haya de la Torre (1924). The then left-wing APRA dominated Peruvian politics for decades as the singular well-organized political party in Peru not centered on one person. To some APRA or "Aprismo" in its initial form stood for the nationalization of foreign-owned enterprises and an end to the exploitation of the indigenous peoples. To others it was about the combining of modern economics and technology with the historical traditions of the countryside and indigenous populations to create a new and unique model for social and economic development.[9]
Ethnocacerism is anethnic nationalistindigenous political movement in Peru associated withAntauro Humala, brother of ex-presidentOllanta Humala with whom he carried out theAndahuaylazo, a failed coup d'état.
