Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Indian feudalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
India's social structure till the 20th century
For the book by Ram Sharan Sharma, seeIndian Feudalism (book).
Mehtab Chand (1820–79), thezamindar of theBurdwan feudal estate in Bengal.

Indian feudalism refers to thefeudal society that made upIndia's social structureuntil the formation of the Republic of India in the 20th century.

AMarathaDurbar showing the King (Raja) and the nobles (Sardars,Jagirdars, Istamuradars &Mankaris) of theprincely state.

Terminology

[edit]

Use of the termfeudalism to describe India applies a concept of medieval European origin, according to which thelanded nobility held lands from the Crown in exchange for military service, and vassals were in turn tenants of the nobles, while the peasants (villeins orserfs) were obliged to live on their lord's land and give him homage, labor, and a share of the produce, notionally in exchange for military protection. The term Indian feudalism is used to describetaluqdars,zamindars, andjagirdars. Most of these systems were abolished after theindependence of India and the rest of the subcontinent.D. D. Kosambi andR. S. Sharma, together withDaniel Thorner, brought peasants into the study of Indian history for the first time.[1]

Bihar

[edit]
Main article:Zamindars of Bihar

TheBihar region (now a state) of India was a hotbed for feudalism. Feudal lords ruled the region for decades; semi-feudal conditions still exist. As a result, child malnourishment is common, in spite of modern Bihar's status as having the fastest growth in gross domestic product in India.[2]

Telangana

[edit]

The region implemented a feudal system known as the ‘Zamindari system’ and was largely controlled bydoras anddeshmukhs untilHyderabad's annexation. The landlords or feudal lords held large tracts of land in theirfief and were responsible for collecting taxes from the peasants who worked the land, a portion of which would be paid to theNizam of Hyderabad. The peasants were tenants under the feudal lords and cultivated this land, paying rent in the form of a share of their produce or money to the feudal lords. The peasants had very little security and were often subjected to high taxes, forced labor, and various forms of abuse and exploitation. The oppression experienced by the lower class in theTelangana region (now a state) ultimately led to theTelangana Rebellion against the feudal lords (known inTelugu asVetti Chakiri Udhyamam) which took place from 1946 to 1951.[3] The feudal lords used to reside in a high fortress called asGadi,[4] for entering it they leave their footwear at the threshold of the gadi. TheMadigas and otherlower castes were required to carry their footwear in their hands if they were passing in front of the gadi or dora.

The phrase"Banchen Dora née Kalmoktha“ became a popular saying during the rebellion, capturing the peasants’ deep-rooted resentment towards the feudal lords. The phrase literally means “I am your slave my lord, I bow to your feet" and reflected the severe exploitation of the peasants under the oppressive feudal system.[5]Shyam Benegal's filmsAnkur andNishant graphically depict feudalism in Telangana, while the Telugu filmMaa Bhoomi accurately portrays the lifestyle of peasants under feudal lords as well as the socio-economic struggles which led to the rebellion.

TheSrikrishna Committee on Telangana has stated in its findings that there is still gross injustice to the land tillers of the region, the villains, in this case, being the landlords of Telangana and not those of other regions.[6]

Kerala

[edit]
Main article:History of medieval Kerala

There were a number of feudal states in Kerala in the Middle Ages andEarly Modern Era between the rule ofChera dynasty and theBritish Raj (smaller feudal estates remained even during British rule). InKerala,Kshatriyas,Nairs, andSamantha Kshatriyas were prominent during feudalism. Nairs acted as both feudal lords as well aswarriors.

Mumbai

[edit]

Initially,Bombay was inhabited by numerous tribes who lived in densely forested regions with no semblance of authority. However, sometime after the fall of theYadavas of Devagiri, a feudal structure began emerging among these tribes.[7] Many petty chieftains belonging to tribes such as theGonds began ruling small areas inMadhya Pradesh which they sometimes fortified as a defensive measure againstIslamic kingdoms such as theMalwa Sultanate andBijapur Sultanate. Gond chieftains such as that ofLanji inBalaghat district ruled from strong forts calledgarhs. These tribalzamindars served their overlord kingdom in times of war but could also be a nuisance when they rebelled.[8]

These zamindars enjoyed privileges under the nativeGond kingdoms such asGarha-Mandla,Chanda andDeogarh. However, after theMaratha conquest of these regions by GeneralRaghuji Bhonsle, these zamindars were displaced from the plains and were forced to retreat into the forest areas. They had to pay tribute toRaghuji Bhonsle and his descendants from then on, and often rebelled against the later oppressive Maratha rule.[8]Many of thesezamindars rebelled in theRevolt of 1857 against the EnglishEast India Company, were defeated, their leaders executed and the feudal lands annexed to direct British territory as a result. However, some of them were still ruling after 1857 but their family lines died out and those who survived gave up their estates in exchange for pensions.

Madras Presidency

[edit]
Main article:List of zamindari estates in Madras Presidency

Several zamindaris were established in theMadras Presidency (present-dayTamil Nadu and adjoining areas) from 1799 onwards. The largest of these were Arni,Ramnad, Ganapur andSivaganga. The zamindari settlement was based on a similar settlement established inBengal. The Zamindari settlement ofMadras was largely unsuccessful and was wrapped up in 1852. However, a few zamindaris remained till India's independence in 1947.

North Arcot

[edit]

North Arcot region was under jagirdars until the Indian independence. The largest estate was that of Arni, aDeshastha family. Arni estate was larger thanSandur princely state.

Northern Andhra

[edit]

The Northern Andhra region was underTelaga doras until the Indian independence. The largest estate was that ofVizianagaram under the Poosapatikshatriya family.

Rayalaseema

[edit]

TheRayalaseema region was under Ayyagaru until the independence. The largest estate was that of Panyam; which was ruled by aDeshastha family of Vishvamitragotra (lineage).

Vidarbha

[edit]
This section has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)
Theneutrality of this article isdisputed. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please do not remove this message untilconditions to do so are met.(July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
icon
This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

The feudal lords inVidarbha region are notorious for their oppressive rule.

In literature

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Habib, Irfan (2007).Essays in Indian History. Tulika. p. 109.ISBN 978-81-85229-00-3.
  2. ^B Vijay Murty (2010-12-16)."Food that's not fit for humans".Hindustan Times. Archived fromthe original on 2011-01-19. Retrieved2011-10-14.
  3. ^I Thirumali.Dora and. Gadi: Manifestation of Landlord. Domination in Telangana.
  4. ^"Spat over portfolio".The Hindu. Archived fromthe original on 13 August 2004. Retrieved6 February 2012.
  5. ^"KCR's comments on Nizam's rule raise hackles NEWS ANALYSIS".The Hindu. Archived fromthe original on 8 December 2007. Retrieved6 February 2012.
  6. ^Panel finds no data to prove T backwardness,Deccan Chronicle
  7. ^"Gonds".Gonds' Rise to power- Chanda District Gazetteer. Gazetteers Department: Maharashtra. 1973.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  8. ^abPrasad, Archana (1999)."Military Conflict and Forests in Central Provinces, India: Gonds and the Gondwana Region in Pre-colonial History".Environment and History.5 (3):361–375.ISSN 0967-3407.
  9. ^"Saraswatichandra (1968)". January 21, 2010. RetrievedFeb 8, 2013.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • R.S. Sharma,Perspectives in Social and Economic History of Early India, paperback edn., (Munshiram Manoharlal, Delhi, 2003). Translated intoHindi, Russian andBengali.Gujarati,Kannada,Malayalam,Marathi,Tamil andTelugu translations projected.
  • R.S. Sharma,Material Culture and Social Formations in Ancient India, (Macmillan Publishers, Delhi, 1985). Translated into Hindi, Russian and Bengali. Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Tamil and Telugu translations projected.
  • R.S. Sharma,Urban Decay in India (c.300-1000), (Munshiram Manoharlal, Delhi, 1987). Translated into Hindi and Bengali
  • R.S. Sharma,Early Medieval Indian Society: A Study in Feudalisation (Orient Longman Publishers Pvt. Ltd., Delhi, 2003)
  • R.S. Sharma,India's Ancient Past, (Oxford University Press, 2005,ISBN 978-0-19-568785-9)
  • R.S. Sharma,Indian Feudalism (Macmillan Publishers India Ltd., 3rd Revised Edition, Delhi, 2005)
  • R.S. Sharma,The State and Varna Formations in the Mid-Ganga Plains: An Ethnoarchaeological View (New Delhi, Manohar, 1996)
  • R.S. Sharma,Origin of the State in India (Dept. of History, University of Bombay, 1989)
  • R.S. Sharma,Land Revenue in India: Historical Studies, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1971
  • Historiography of Indian Feudalism Towards a Model of Early Medieval Indian Economy, C. A.D. 600–1000, by Vijay Kumar Thakur. Commonwealth Publishers, 1989.ISBN 81-7169-032-7.
  • Dora and. Gadi: Manifestation of Landlord Domination in Telangana,I Thirumali, 1992
  • Against Dora and Nizam : People's Movement in Telangana 1939–1948, I Thirumali
  • "Chillarollu's Defiances in Telangana, 1900–1944"Indian Historical Review, XXII, 1995–1996
  • Origin and Growth of Feudalism in Early India: From the Mauryas to AD 650, by Gian Chand Chauhan. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, 2004.ISBN 81-215-1028-7.
Economy
Education
Environment
Family
Children
Women
Caste system
Communalism
Crime
Health
Media
Other issues
Feudalism in Asia
Sovereign states
States with
limited recognition
Dependencies and
other territories
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_feudalism&oldid=1313539954"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp