Inappropriateness refers to standards orethics that are typically viewed as being negative in a society, often treated as objective bymoralists.[1] It differs from things that are illicit in that inappropriate behavior does not necessarily have any accompanying legal ramifications.[2]
Synonyms of inappropriate includeimproper,unfitting,unsuitable[3] andindecent. Although social ills are usually outlawed in wider society, there are many examples wherein various jurisdictions give their inhabitants full discretion over certain aspects of their lives so they can police themselves without anyintrusiveness.[4] For instance, although it's legal toflatulate in a crowded elevator, there are strong social pressures not to do so.[5] Other socially contentious behavior, such assmoking while pregnant, may procure a statement from a public health organization rather than from a law enforcement organization.[6] The term has also been used to negatively refer to the usage of recreational drugs.[7] Increasingly, the term is used in the context of sexual misconduct, especially touching of erogenous zones such as the genitalia or sending photos of said private parts.[8]
In theUnited States, theSupreme Court has ruled inFCC v. Pacifica Foundation (1978) that theFederal Communications Commission has the power to punish constitutionally protected but "indecent" expression on radio and broadcast television.[9] The FCC released guidelines on indecency in 2001.[10] The radio and television broadcast of indecent material is prohibited between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.[11]
Indecency and good morals laws became more common in 19th century San Francisco as the population of women increased. Very frequently, immigrant women were targeted for being indecent regardless of whether they were asex worker or not. European men criticized Chinese, Mexican, and South American women for being improper, immodest, and impure, articulating a stark boundary betweenracialized and gendered legality.[12]